Oddsmakers lean toward Oilers, Hurricanes for '26 title
June 18 - The Florida Panthers won the Stanley Cup last year and retained their title on Tuesday, yet sportsbooks aren't convinced about their prospects for a three-peat.
Two leading gambling sites listed the back-to-back Cup runner-up Edmonton Oilers as the favorite to emerge on top next year, and another site views the Carolina Hurricanes as the leading contender.
The Panthers are no worse than the second favorite at any of the sportsbooks, and ESPN Bet considers the Panthers, Oilers and Colorado Avalanche all as co-favorites at +700.
Florida closed out a six-game win in the finals by defeating the Oilers 5-1 on Tuesday in Sunrise, Fla.
Looking ahead to next year, DraftKings has the Oilers at +650 as they try again to become the first Canadian team to hoist the Stanley Cup since the Montreal Canadiens in 1993. The Panthers are second at +700, with the Hurricanes (+900), the Dallas Stars (+900) and the Avalanche (+1000) rounding out the top five.
BetMGM also lists the Oilers at +650, ahead of the Panthers (+750), Avalanche (+800), Stars (+850) and Hurricanes (+900).
Carolina, which lost to Florida in five games during the Eastern Conference finals last month, top the FanDuel board at +700. The Panthers and Oilers are next, each at +750, with the Stars and Avalanche both at +850.
The last franchise to win the Stanley Cup more than two years in a row was the New York Islanders, who emerged on top four consecutive seasons from 1979-80 to 1982-83.
--Field Level Media
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
27 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Florida is now the Stanley Cup's semi-permanent home. What does that mean for Canada?
'There are a lot of things I do not understand about this proposed expansion,' New York Times sports columnist George Vecsey wrote in December 1992, as the NHL wrapped up its annual Board of Governors meeting in Palm Beach, Florida. During that week's meeting, the league received expansion proposals for two teams. One was for a team in Anaheim, California, backed by Disney. The other was for a team in Miami, Florida, put forward by waste management-and-VHS-video magnate, Wayne Huizenga. 'What makes it think the Sun Belt is ready for all these hockey teams?' Vecsey wondered. At the time, the answer was money. With more time, the answer seems to be: because championship hockey teams can be built anywhere, including in the South. On Tuesday night in Florida, the Panthers won their second-straight Stanley Cup against the Edmonton Oilers, this time in six games – one fewer than they needed last season. If anything, you could now argue that there's no better place to build a championship NHL team than the southern US. Since 1990, the Stanley Cup has been awarded to a team based in the South nine times – but five of those have come in the last six years. And three of those have also been against Canadian teams. North of the border back in 1992, the fear of American dominance was palpable, even though, at that time, the most recent expansion to Tampa Bay and San Jose (alongside Ottawa) looked like an on-ice failure. Nevertheless, the mere presence of these teams, not to mention two more, was a concern. 'This is the age of marketing, my friends, and we're selling image, brand names, fuzzy feelings and merchandising opportunities,' Globe and Mail sports columnist John Allemang warned after the NHL's December 1992 meeting, sarcastically proposing changes for the increasingly Americanized, commodified game. 'Let's scrap this three-period stuff, introduce the concept of half-time,' he snarked. 'Emilio Estevez learned to skate for Mighty Ducks, give him a chance, tell him the wife [Paula Abdul] can sing the national anthem. The American anthem, stupid. Is there any other?' Beyond the potential for merch sales and richer owners, 'does anyone else win?' Montreal Gazette columnist Pat Hickey asked around the same time. 'Then there's the question of what these new franchises do for the Canadian psyche,' Hickey wrote. 'If we ever thought this was our game, the latest decision on expansion should dispel this notion.' It seems hardly worth repeating that Florida's win Tuesday further extends the Canadian Stanley Cup drought to now 32 years, more or less fulfilling the worst fears of those sports columnists, and many others, who saw the NHL's US growth as a threat to the sport's true identity and thus by extension to that of its birth country, Canada. And they weren't entirely wrong. This year, more than most others, the existential threat of American dominance on the ice spoke to a bigger Canadian national identity crisis that would have seemed unthinkable in 1992. The idea that Canada, including hockey, could be subsumed by the US has felt more pressing than ever. Canadians – like swimming phenom Summer McIntosh or NBA MVP Shai Gilgeous-Alexander – are dominating in other sports. Youth hockey numbers may be declining, loosening generational ties to the game. Yet, nothing still spurs deep national anxiety like hockey failure. So yes, yet another Cup hoisted in the US – in Florida, again, no less – certainly stings a little from a nationalist point of view for Canadians. It fulfils all the worst nightmares of 1992's sports writers. But the Oilers' loss is frankly more frustrating strictly from a hockey perspective. Taken together, the Oilers' undisciplined play, general lack of offence, uneven goaltending, and lacklustre defence in the clutch, made it not only difficult to believe they could win, but that they even should. The Panthers are a scary-good hockey club, with a roster filled with pure gamers, the likes of which other teams only have one or two. Florida play an aggressive, often suffocating offence, and are backed by elite goaltending. The Panthers play great hockey. They just happen to be in Florida. There may not be a lot else to it. It may be, in fact, that the quality of hockey in south Florida is so high because of, rather than in spite of, all that marketing and money and commercialization the NHL welcomed in the early 1990s. Expansion meant that the league – and by extension, the game – had to find a way to appeal to new audiences, most of whom had been living just fine without it until then. This meant that the NHL had to rethink its product. It had to embrace something much of the hockey world still often reflexively rejects – change. Over the decades, the NHL gradually morphed hockey into something new. Along the way, the game lost some aspects, like enforcers, but added things like goals. It got faster, more finessed, more exciting, more watchable, even as some argued it was somehow softer. It hasn't always gone smoothly (it's worth mentioning here that Atlanta is looking to get a new team for the third time), but its audiences and profits also grew, more or less according to plan. And so far, hockey hasn't lost its Canadian identity. After the NHL's buzzy, highly commercialized Four Nations tournament this past spring, it may even be more entrenched than ever. Looking back now, it's clear that the cynical, calculated marketing — and of course the money — were indeed the point of the NHL's expansion to a place like Florida. But they didn't destroy hockey. Instead, it just keeps getting better.
BreakingNews.ie
an hour ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Jack Grealish can have City future after Club World Cup omission
Pep Guardiola has suggested Jack Grealish does have a future at Manchester City despite leaving him out of his squad for the Club World Cup. The City manager appeared to have opened the door for Grealish to leave the Etihad Stadium when he omitted him from the 27-man playing group for this summer's tournament in the United States. Advertisement That came after Grealish, a £100million signing from Aston Villa four years ago and one of the stars of the 2023 treble success, endured a difficult 2024-25 season, making just seven Premier League starts. Guardiola (left) gave Grealish (right) just seven Premier League starts last season (Mike Egerton/PA) Yet Guardiola, while offering no guarantees about the England international's prospects at City, says his absence is principally about allowing him to work on his game. Speaking at a press conference in Philadelphia ahead of City's tournament opener against Moroccan side Wydad Casablanca, Guardiola said: 'He had a conversation with the club and decided the best. 'Jack is an exceptional player but he didn't (play a lot). We decided he has to play. Advertisement 'We're honest and he's honest. We decided the best was to stay (behind) and find that he can play, that he can come back to the player of the year of the treble and all his career at Aston Villa. 'But the fact is he didn't play much minutes the last two seasons. He has to come back to play and have the butterflies in his stomach that he can play every three days and show again the quality that he has. 'We decided don't come here. What happens I don't know but if he doesn't (leave) he is a player for Man City and he will be back.' Guardiola denied this meant he felt Grealish had lost hunger for the game, but he needs reasons to start picking him again. Advertisement He said: 'The reason he didn't play is my decisions. Football is competing with each other – not just Jack, all of them. 'They compete (for) who deserves to play. The butterflies are an example of the tension and they happen for all the players. 'Over the last two years he didn't play much and I take responsibility for that, but he has to play and we reflected that it was better not to come here.' Another player not involved in the US is England right-back Kyle Walker, who spent the second half of last season on loan at AC Milan and appears set to leave the club. Advertisement The 35-year-old has been linked with Everton but Guardiola was unwilling to discuss the matter. He said: 'I don't have any news. It's the same case for Jack. About the links with other teams, you have to ask (director of football) Hugo (Viana).'
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Dave Portnoy calls for 'jealous loser' Marina Mabrey to be kicked out of WNBA over attack on Caitlin Clark
Barstool boss Dave Portnoy has called for Connecticut Sun star and 'jealous loser' Marina Mabrey to be kicked out of the WNBA over her attack of Caitlin Clark on Tuesday night. Portnoy's plea for a lifetime ban comes after Clark was knocked to the ground by Mabrey in retaliation for the Indiana Fever star shoving Sun guard Jacy Sheldon, who had poked her in the eye. The confrontation led to both players getting a technical foul. Three players in the game, including Sheldon and the Fever's Sophie Cunningham, were later ejected during a brawl. 'Marina Mabrey is a jealous loser punk,' Portnoy wrote on X. 'Asks to be traded on every single team she's on until she's on worst team in the league and completely irrelevant unless she's cheap shorting Caitlin. Go play in rec league where nobody gives a s*** about you.' 'Imagine not kicking Marina Mabrey out after she assaults the face of the league? Just a common tech? Sick league @WNBA Also shouldn't have been a tech on Caitlin since that girl got in her face after gouging her eyes.' The Barstool founder's outrage didn't end there, as he later posted a long rant, further coming to Clark's aid. You can say whatever you want about the WNBA is but it's never boring — Dave Portnoy (@stoolpresidente) June 18, 2025 Portnoy called out the league's commissioner, Cathy Engelbert, WNBA referees, and some of the franchise owners for letting the league get to a place where players putting their hands on Clark as much as they have has become the norm. Partway through his lengthy rant, Portnoy once again turned his focus to the Sun player, adding: 'Then bang, Marina Mabrey... who if you don't know who that is, she's been on 32 different teams in two years, she cries, whines, leaves one team, goes to another, demands a trade... she's an irrelevant journeyman. She runs up to Caitlin after the whistle and f***ing slams into her and knocks her down. An obvious ejection! 'Marina Mabrey look in the mirror. The reason that you have any money before the end of your career is number two two. Nobody even cared who you were until she got into the league. So cheap shot her like that, what are you? Dumb? 'More importantly, the league, the refs, you're going to let people take cheap shots like that over and over and over at the face of your league? The future of your league? The most important player in your league? How do you not eject her?' The WNBA is likely to review the incidents from Tuesday's Fever-Sun game for supplemental discipline, with the quartet of Cunningham, Sheldon, Mabrey, and Lindsay Allen the likely candidates for fines or suspensions. Following the Fever's 88-71 victory at Gainbridge Fieldhouse, the teams do not face each other again until July 15. Sheldon and Clark primarily guarded each other during the WNBA Commissioner's Cup clash, with the former Iowa star first taking issue with Sheldon's aggressiveness in the second quarter. Their simmering tension eventually boiled over when Clark and Sheldon were caught in a feisty exchange with the Fever star firing off a volatile message to further stoke the feud. 'I can do whatever the f*** I want to do,' Clark said to Sheldon before shoving her away. The contest, which qualified the Fever for the Commissioner's Cup Final on July 1, was Clark's second game back in Indiana's lineup after missing three weeks with a quad injury.
