March Maddening? Timing of transfer portal opening can be tough on coaches still in the tourney
BIRMINGHAM, Ala. — Coaches still playing in the NCAA Tournament are having to split their time between preparing their teams for the Sweet 16 and talking to potential transfers who have entered the portal.
Such is life in college basketball.
Dawn Staley is one of those coaches, and she said it's a huge challenge.
'I think the timing is all screwed up. It really plays on your ability to compartmentalize,' the South Carolina coach said. 'If you aren't — I mean, most coaches are, but if you are not really good at it, it can sidetrack you. But for us, the main thing, the main thing at this point is trying to win another national championship.'
The portal is open and 595 women's basketball players entered in the first 24 hours, according to the NCAA. That's 2 1/2 times more than the 233 players that entered in the same time frame last year. There were 757 men's basketball players in the portal in the opening 24 hours this year which also was more than double last season.
This is the first year that the portal opened up now. Last year, it opened a day after the NCAA Tournament selection show.
There were over 1,000 women's basketball players in the portal. One name not in the portal yet, but entering soon is Florida State guard Ta'Niya Latson, who led all Division I players in scoring this season. Her representatives at Klutch Sports Group confirmed to The Associated Press that she was exploring her options to transfer.
The portal has exploded over the last few years with NIL money becoming a major reason for players to transfer.
'A lot of kids are leaving because of it, but at the same time, I feel like you have to follow your heart instead of the money,' said guard Te-Hina Paopao, who landed at South Carolina as a transfer last year from Oregon. 'Just be able to have fun with the game and create those relationships that I've created, and just be able to fall in love with the game again, and continue to play the game that you love.'
Paopao isn't alone in her sentiments.
Sedona Prince, who transferred twice in her career starting at Texas before going to Oregon and now TCU, feels that players shouldn't just be after getting the most NIL money.
'I would say in this new era, I mean, right before (revenue) share and stuff, don't go for the money,' Prince said. 'It's just going to fail. I know a lot of kids are trying to get paid, as they should. That's how it should be. That's how it always should have been. But be very smart.'
Maryland forward Saylor Poffenbarger started her career at UConn before transferring to Arkansas and then the Terrapins. She knows all too well about how the transfer portal works.
'When I went into the portal the second time, I had to pick the things that were important to me,' she said. 'It's kind of it's crazy. It's hectic. Everyone throwing numbers, everyone's throwing this, everyone throwing that. You kind of just have to stay true to you and ... pick a school that aligns with your morals because at the end of the day, you're you and the school's not changing for you when you enter them.'
While students enter the portal when their season is over, the current timing makes it difficult for the roughly 10% of programs still playing.
One problem is currently there's no better time for the portal to open.
The Student Athletic Advisory Committee agreed to lessen the length that the portal was open from 45 days to 30, which allowed to change the timing to this year's date. Some coaches wanted a close date no later than May 1 because of final exams and summer school enrollment so that players could be eligible at their new school.
With the 30-day window and May 1 deadline, the portal had to open before the Final Four ended.
So Staley and the other coaches in the Sweet 16 are having to multi-task even more than usual.
If players don't understand that Staley may not have all the time to recruit them right now because the Gamecocks are trying to win a championship, then they might not be the right fit for the program.
Staley said she was going to call a few players after finishing with her media obligations.
'You still have to do it. Yes, I'm going to call somebody when I leave here. A few people. Just because you got to let them know, 'Hey, we're thinking about you,'' she said. 'We got this run we're trying to (finish) but you are a priority for us.'
UCLA coach Cori Close has noticed another problem with the timing of the portal opening: Schools now are quicker to fire and hire coaches before the portal opens so they don't get behind.
'I think we have been rushing hires so that we could get people in place before the portal, which has distractions from their current teams,' she said. 'I am going to be advocating in the offseason that we make another shift.
'I don't think it's in the best interests of our game and the best interests of our kids and the best interests of our coaches to have that being a distraction in the most magnified time.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
36 minutes ago
- USA Today
Former USC star pitcher Caden Aoki commits to Georgia
Former USC star pitcher Caden Aoki commits to Georgia Last week, USC baseball ace Caden Aoki made headlines when he surprisingly announced his intention to enter the transfer portal. On Monday, Aoki made his new home official: He will play for the Georgia Bulldogs in 2026. After spending his freshman year at Notre Dame in 2022, Aoki transferred to USC prior to the 2023 season. He emerged as the Trojans' top starting pitcher over the better part of the past three seasons. In 2025, he went 6-4 with a 3.99 ERA. However, it was the NCAA Tournament where Aoki forever etched himself into Trojans lore. In USC's tournament opener against TCU, Aoki allowed just one run over eight innings, throwing 114 pitches. For his performance, he was named to the all-Corvallis Regional team. Despite being a senior this past season, Aoki was granted an additional year of eligibility by the NCAA. However, it appears he will spend that year in Athens, Georgia, rather than in Los Angeles. USC's lacked significant pitching depth behind Aoki in 2025. The Trojans will need to improve on that front next year if they want to have any chance of making it further in the postseason.
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Minnesota Vikings make unique trade in Way-Too-Early 2026 NFL Mock Draft
Minnesota Vikings make unique trade in Way-Too-Early 2026 NFL Mock Draft We're still over a month away from training camps opening for the 2025 season. But that doesn't mean NFL draft enthusiasts aren't ready to share their 2026 mock drafts. There are several reasons the exercise is premature. We have no tape to go by in 2025 yet. So the projections are mostly a copy-and-paste from last year's standings, shuffling a few teams here and there based on the splashiest free agency and draft moves from this spring. It's also hard to get the most hardcore fans into draft mode until the Super Bowl is over. Yet here we are, with a June mock for next year's draft. And it has the Minnesota Vikings trading down with the Chicago Bears. This weekend, Mark Stolte of Pro Football Network believed a first-round mock draft wasn't enough, instead giving us a three-round mock for 2026. He projected the Vikings to move down from pick 15 to 18, only gaining a fifth-round pick in the exchange. Once on the clock, Stolte had the Vikings choose Oregon center Iapani Laloulu. The 6'2", 325-pound center played 970 snaps in 2024, lining up at center for 854 of them. Says Stolte: Iapani Laloulu started at center for Oregon in 2024 and put up strong numbers. He didn't allow a sack in 760 pass-blocking snaps, and in the run game, Oregon averaged 4.7 yards per carry in the A-gap — proof of his power inside. This pick helps the Minnesota Vikings keep the offensive line rolling when Ryan Kelly eventually retires. It may not be a sexy pick, much like when the Vikings took Ohio State guard Donovan Jackson in the first round back in April. But Kelly just turned 32 and has missed ten games due to injury in the past two seasons. For those who are wondering, the Bears took Notre Dame running back Jeremiyah Love with the 15th pick. The compensation doesn't seem to make the move worth it for the Vikings. Furthermore, the trade itself suggests the Vikings finish last in the NFC North. It isn't impossible, but that would likely mean that J.J. McCarthy's first season as a starter didn't go as well as fans hoped. Fortunately, the Vikings had plenty of draft capital after this pick. With the 47th selection, Stolte had the Vikings take Washington cornerback Tacario Davis. At pick no. 79, the Vikings took Alabama safety Keon Sabb. And with the 98th pick, the Vikings took Minnesota Golden Gopher running back Darius Taylor.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Amateur Hour Is Over: College Athletes Can Get Paid by Schools
Good morning and welcome to another edition of Free Agent! Hold onto your buckets and your babies—this might be a wild ride. College sports is officially entering a new era. Amateurism is over and professionalism is (mostly) here. Athletes can officially get paid directly by their schools without a workaround involving boosters or a name, image, and likeness (NIL) collective. Instead of our usual format, the newsletter this week is focused on this monumental change. Advertisement But first, I want to thank everyone who voted in our survey last week about who you're rooting for in the NBA and NHL finals. Free Agent readership was surprisingly evenly split in both series. Shoutout to the fan who said "Seattle kid. Anyone but Thunder." You'll have your team soon, I'm sure. As for hockey, I was amused by this response: "I want Ron Desantis to have more Stanley Cups than Canada." Three down, 40 to go. Locker Room Links A New Era of College Sports Late on Friday, a federal judge gave final approval to a settlement in House v. NCAA, bringing to an end three antitrust cases against the NCAA and power conferences. It's a huge change: Starting July 1, college sports will spend a decade (at least) in a revenue-sharing system, with schools directly paying athletes for their NIL. Next school year athletic departments will be allowed to pay a combined $20.5 million to athletes across all their sports, with the number rising in the future. (The NCAA and power conferences will also pay almost $2.8 billion in damages to athletes who, dating back to 2016, weren't allowed to sign NIL deals.) Advertisement I talked to Mit Winter, an NIL attorney at Kennyhertz Perry, about how all of this is going to work. Hopefully this answers all the questions you might have about the new system, although a lot of it is still in limbo. I've been following this closely and I still learned a lot from our conversation. If you have lingering questions, email me at freeagent@ and I'll try to figure out an answer for you. Q: With final approval of the House settlement, colleges will be able to directly pay athletes for the first time. Give us a brief breakdown of how these payments are going to work. A: Looking forward for college athletics, schools will be able to directly pay their athletes NIL compensation. So they are actively entering into contracts now with their athletes that spell out, "All right, here's how much we are going to pay you for the use of your NIL in various ways." That's obviously a change from how things have worked in the past in college athletics where the cardinal rule was, "Schools, you cannot pay your athletes." Q: But the athletes still aren't technically employees, so that's causing some other complications, right? A: Correct, they're not currently considered employees. These agreements they're entering into with schools are just NIL licensing agreements. Sometimes they include a services component as well, where the athlete might make appearances or sign autographs or something like that. Advertisement Q: But there are some new restrictions on outside NIL deals with boosters? A: In addition to now allowing schools to directly pay their athletes, the House settlement also contains some new rules around deals athletes can do with NIL collectives and boosters. Athletes will have to disclose to a new clearinghouse entity called the College Sports Commission all third-party NIL deals they do. The College Sports Commission is contracted with Deloitte to do this review process of all of the deals. If an athlete submits a third-party NIL deal and it's determined that the deal is with an associated [to the school] entity or individual, then there's a couple of extra layers of review of that deal. First, the deal has to be for a valid business purpose. Once that determination is made, then the next overview Deloitte will be performing is, "Okay, is the amount being paid to the athlete within what's being called an appropriate range of compensation for the services being provided by this specific athlete?" But if Deloitte determines either the deal's not for a valid business purpose, like they think it's just a "pay-for-play" booster deal in disguise, or if the amount of compensation being provided to the athlete is not within the appropriate range of compensation, then Deloitte will notify the College Sports Commission that, "Hey, there's a problem with this deal." Then at that point it's up to the College Sports Commission to say, "All right, athlete, you can go ahead and do this deal if you want to, but you might be ineligible to participate in college athletics." Advertisement Q: Some believe this might lead to the old ways of under-the-table payments and recruiting violations. A: It's a definite possibility because the amount of NIL compensation that schools could pay their athletes is going to be capped at, for the first year, $20.5 million for the entire year for all of the school's athletes, so not just the football team. And there are some football teams making well over $20 million in NIL compensation from booster and collective deals for this upcoming season. So you can see if you have a football team right now taking $30 million, and then in the future, the cap for all of the school's athletes is going to be $20.5 million, there's obviously a $10 million gap right there, that if you can't do it through legitimate deals, third-party NIL deals and Deloitte is shooting down all these third-party deals, that's when you might go back to under-the-table payments from boosters to win recruiting battles or keep a guy at a school. Q: Talk to us about this from the conference level. A: Every Division I school, no matter what your athletics revenue is, you're going to be able to pay [athletes] up to $20.5 million. That money can come from any source that the university can use to find that money. Obviously, it's going to be easier to come up with that money for some Division I schools than others. Big Ten and SEC schools might have the easiest time just because the amount of TV revenue those conferences receive and then distribute out to their members is higher than any other conference, including the Big 12 and the ACC. But schools, they're going to be heavily reliant on donors for sure, but then there are other potential strategies they're going to use. Advertisement There's a lot of talk about private equity or private capital that some schools might access. There are businesses out there that are very heavily focused now on helping schools generate revenue through different types of creative partnerships, so it's going to be all over the map in terms of how schools are trying to come up with this new $20.5 million. And then you'll have some schools that will cut staff. Some have already cut staff, including Oklahoma, who's an SEC school, obviously, so they've cut staff. You've had some schools announce they are dropping a few sports, like tennis programs have been dropped in some places, swim and dive teams. So it's going to vary from school to school on how they come up with this money. Q: Now, back to the athletes themselves, there are no changes to the transfer system, right? Athletes are still kind of on these one-year contracts, with a fair amount of ability to move at will? A: Yes, correct. The transfer rules are going to stay the same, they're not affected by the House settlement at all. Although schools and conferences would love to be able to put some more transfer restrictions back in place and they're hopeful that Congress will pass a law that gives them an antitrust exemption that would then allow them to put some of those transfer rules back in place because courts have held right now that those transfer rules violate antitrust law. Some of the contracts that schools are entering into with their athletes, they have some provisions that are trying to prevent as much movement as there has been, like buyouts and clawbacks and things like that. [It] remains to be seen whether those will be effective or not in limiting movement, so we'll just have to see how that plays out. Advertisement Q: There are already some lawsuits challenging the current NCAA eligibility rules, but what lawsuits are coming next, or are already in play after the House settlement? A: A big one's going to be Title IX. There will be a lot of Title IX lawsuits, because as we talked about earlier, [schools] will be able to pay out $20.5 million to their athletes, and most schools are planning on paying out, at least if you are a [Power Four] school with a football team, are paying out 75 percent to 80 percent of that $20 million to the football team, around 15 percent to the men's basketball team, maybe 5 percent to the women's basketball team, and then 5 percent to other sports, which might be softball, baseball, whatever other sport a school chooses—85 percent to 90 percent of that $20 million is going to go to male athletes. Some people think that's not in compliance with Title IX, other people think it is. It's a gray area right now, there's no black-and-white law. That will be litigated probably in lots of places and there will be probably lots of lawsuits filed against schools on that issue. I also think we will see some litigation related to the salary cap, because it was not agreed to by a player's association where, like in pro sports, the salary caps and things like that are collectively bargained with a players association, which makes them exempt from antitrust law. But this salary cap in college athletics is not going to be exempt from antitrust law. So future college athletes coming into college athletics will be able to bring damages, lawsuits, challenging that salary cap, so I think we'll definitely see some of that. I think we'll probably see some more employment litigation for determination that college athletes are employees. There's already one big case pending on that issue called the Johnson v. NCAA case in federal court. It said college athletes can be employees, it didn't say they are. It said, "They can, and here's the test to determine whether they are." That was an appellate court, it's now down at the trial court level to actually make that determination. But I definitely think we'll see some more of that litigation, especially now that you have the schools contracting with athletes. It potentially makes that employment argument stronger than it was before. Advertisement This interview has been condensed and edited for style and clarity. Replay of the Week Lots of great candidates this week that you've probably already seen, like the Tyrese Haliburton game-winner, a brawl in the Stanley Cup Finals, and perhaps the best home run robbery you'll ever see (the A's still lost). But here's a wild golf shot you probably missed (and that wasn't even the craziest golf shot this weekend). That's all for this week. Enjoy watching the real game of the weekend, the UFL championship game featuring the D.C. Defenders against the Michigan Panthers (Saturday, 8 P.M., on FOX). Many are calling it the Jason Bowl due to my dual loyalties. The post Amateur Hour Is Over: College Athletes Can Get Paid by Schools appeared first on
