How inflation is killing off the pint
Nothing is as emblematic of Britain's drinking culture as the pint. For hundreds of years, the imperial measure has been served in the nation's pubs.
Yet as inflation pushes the price of a pint to record highs, smaller servings are increasingly being poured across the country.
Pub owners say they are selling more beer in so-called 'schooner' glasses, which hold two thirds of a pint, because drinkers are striving to keep the cost of a night out under control.
'Nowadays, two thirds are becoming a little bit more popular in general, regardless of what the beer style is,' says Gabor Csupity, of the Friendship Pub Company, which runs a string of pubs in London.
'I think there is a simple answer to [why] which is the price of beer.'
It raises the question: could the pint be facing extinction in Britain's pubs?
Rise of the £8 pint
The cost of a pint has soared across Britain in recent years, with the average rising above £5 nationally for the first time this year. In many pubs it is already pushing £7. In London, £8 pints are not uncommon.
Hospitality companies have had to grapple with surging energy bills and skyrocketing labour costs – including higher National Insurance (NI) bills levied on them by Rachel Reeves in her maiden Budget – making price rises inevitable.
Big chains such as JD Wetherspoon have been able to keep their prices lower by using their scale to leverage better deals with brewers. But most smaller groups and independent pubs have been forced to pay a much higher price to keep the beer flowing.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
30 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Keir Starmer warned against creating 'two tier' benefit system after U-turn
Keir Starmer said the Government's welfare reforms 'strike the right balance' after he made major concessions to Labour rebels to avoid a potential Commons defeat Keir Starmer is battling to push through watered down cuts to disability benefits as he faced warnings it would create a "two tier" system. In a dramatic climbdown, the Prime Minister offered a series of concessions to Labour rebels opposed to moves that would see hundreds of thousands of disabled people lose lifeline benefits. But campaigners said it risked "betraying the next generation of disabled people" - and some Labour MPs remain opposed ahead of a Commons vote next week. After fraught negotiations on Thursday, the Government agreed to protect all existing claimants from losing Personal Independence Payments (PIP). Plans to tighten eligibility will now only apply to new claimants from November 2026, in a reprieve to around 370,000 people who were due to lose around £4,150-a-year. And existing recipients of the health element of Universal Credit will have their incomes protected in real terms. The original plans to reform the welfare system were designed to save around £5billion from the benefits bill by 2030. But economists said the changes will cost around £3billion, on top of around £1.5billion for the U-turn on the winter fuel allowance, leaving Chancellor Rachel Reeves to make up the shortfall. No10 failed to rule out such raising taxes to foot the bill, saying 'tax decisions are set out at fiscal events'. Today, Mr Starmer said the reforms now "strike the right balance". "It's very important that we reform the welfare system, because it doesn't work and it traps people, and therefore we're going to press ahead with the reforms," he said. "We need to get it right. That's why we've been talking to colleagues and having a constructive discussion. We've now arrived at a package that delivers on the principles with some adjustments, and that's the right reform, and I'm really pleased now that we're able to take this forward." Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall said the Government had listened to concerns. She told broadcasters: "I think we're in a good place now, alongside the huge investments we are putting in to create the jobs that people need in every part of the country, to get waiting lists down in the NHS, to ensure stronger rights at work, but also to make sure there's employment support for those who can work and protections for those who can't." She insisted it was "very common in the welfare system that there are protections for existing claimants". Leading rebel Meg Hillier said she would now support the bill and is expected to drop her amendment, which had been signed by 126 Labour MPs. Ms Hillier, who chairs the Commons Treasury Committee, said it was "a good deal" involving "massive changes" to protect vulnerable people - and said disabled people would be involved in designing future reforms. She said: "It's encouraging that we have reached what I believe is a workable compromise that will protect disabled people and support people back into work while ensuring the welfare system can be meaningfully reformed." But Labour MP Nadia Whittome said "Even these revised proposals are nowhere near good enough and frankly are just not well thought through. It would create a two-tier system in both PIP and the UC system when somebody became disabled.' Andy McDonald, the Labour MP for Middlesbrough, said: "I'll be voting against it because it hasn't dealt with the totality of the is bringing about the change, it's just poverty delayed, or poverty postponed for millions of people in the future." Charles Gillies, Senior Policy Officer at the MS Society and Policy Co-Chair of the Disability Benefits Consortium, said: 'These supposed 'concessions' to the cuts bill are just a desperate attempt to rush through a disastrous piece of legislation. By pushing the cuts onto future claimants, the government are betraying the next generation of disabled people." He urged MPs to "stop this impending disaster" when the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill comes to the Commons on Tuesday. Mikey Erhardt, Policy Lead, Disability Rights UK said: 'We completely reject the imposition of the two-tier system on offer. It is not a massive concession to have a benefit system where future generations of Disabled people receive less support than Disabled people today." He added: "By attempting to push through cruel cuts to the benefits of Disabled people, the Government prioritised balancing its books over improving the lives of Disabled citizens... the Government needs to stop playing politics with our lives." James Taylor, director of strategy at disability equality charity Scope, said: "It is encouraging that the government is starting to listen to disabled people and MPs who have been campaigning for change for months. "But these plans will still rip billions from the welfare system. The proposed concessions will create a two-tier benefits system and an unequal future for disabled people. "Life costs more if you are disabled. And these cuts will have a devastating effect on disabled people's health, ability to live independently or work. "We urge the government to properly engage with disabled people and MPs on how best to reform welfare and create an equal future."
Telegraph
31 minutes ago
- Telegraph
‘Big four' supermarkets accused of failing to back British farmers
Supermarkets have been accused of failing to back British farmers after trade deals triggered a surge in imports of meat from Australia and New Zealand. Livestock farmers said the 'big four' retailers are putting them at a disadvantage by selling imported beef and lamb alongside British produce at a time when the domestic agriculture industry is struggling. David Barton, a Cotswolds-based beef farmer and chairman of the National Farmers' Union (NFU) livestock board, said: 'It is disappointing, because what we're looking for as an industry is to grow production. We need confidence, and when supermarkets start messing around like this, it really doesn't fill us with confidence.' Most of the major supermarkets have made commitments to selling British beef and supporting domestic farmers. However, customers and farmers alike have noticed that meat from much further afield has begun appearing more frequently on shelves. Examples include a New Zealand-sourced Wagyu burger in Sainsbury's, Australian and New Zealand beef products in Morrisons, and a Uruguayan steak sold in Asda. After spotting a steak listing its sourcing as 'Australian or British', the Liberal Democrat MP Tim Farron posted on X: 'This is appalling from Morrisons. They seek kudos for their UK sourcing but then sneakily do this, undermining British farmers and undermining their own integrity and brand.' Tesco also sells 300g lamb leg steaks that are 'produced in the UK or New Zealand'. A person familiar with the situation said the supermarket had not changed its sourcing policy. The outcry comes in the wake of British trade deals signed with Australia and New Zealand after Brexit, which have led to a surge in imports of meat from the two countries. Imports of fresh, chilled and frozen beef from Australia and New Zealand soared in 2024 after the trade deals came into effect. Meanwhile, imports of lamb from the two countries – which already supplied a significant proportion of the UK market – rose by 87pc and 26pc, respectively, last year. Neil Shand, the chief executive of the National Beef Association (NBA), said: 'We are not self sufficient on beef, so we have to accept imported beef into the UK every year to a degree. And as our self sufficiency drops and our food security weakens, we're having to accept more. 'What I don't like is when retailers put it on a shelf at a far reduced price from ours. If you price something at a cheaper price, you'll drive growth in that area, and it will have an even deeper impact on British production.' Supermarkets are currently embroiled in a price war as they battle to defend their market share at a time when living costs are putting pressure on consumers. British farmers are grappling with a cattle shortage that has pushed the price of beef to record highs this year. Sarah Godwin, a dairy and egg farmer, said: 'Partly cost has led supermarkets to look in other directions, but I think they were always being encouraged to do so now with these trade deals.' Mr Barton said: 'If we don't give the UK producer the confidence to continue to produce and produce more, the situation just gets worse and worse. To have a secure supply chain, it's better to start at home and make sure you look after that.' Andrew Opie, of the British Retail Consortium (BRC), said: 'Given the pressure on British farmers at the moment, retailers are paying more for their produce. 'However, retailers are also facing additional costs and are working incredibly hard to limit price increases for consumers where many are struggling to afford the essentials.' Jake Pickering, of Waitrose, said it was 'sad to see other supermarkets shift away from home grown beef' and that it had 'no intention of following suit'. Discount retailer Lidl reaffirmed a commitment to British beef this week, saying it would not import or switch sourcing to any suppliers outside of the country. An Asda spokesman said: 'We always look to offer customers a wide choice of products to suit all budgets. These steaks were provided by a branded partner and were available in our stores for a limited time only. All of Asda's own brand fresh beef continues to be sourced from farms in the UK and Republic of Ireland.' A Morrisons spokesman said: 'Morrisons remains 100pc British on all our meat counters. In our aisles - alongside our New Zealand lamb - we are introducing trials of some imported meat from trusted suppliers to help us offer outstanding value through the seasons and through any supply fluctuations.' A Sainsbury's spokesman said: 'We offer two summer premium Wagyu products from New Zealand, which make up just 0.1pc of our total beef range. 'We have an unwavering, long-term commitment to British farming and this has zero impact on our approach or existing partnerships. The country of origin is also clearly labelled to ensure our customers can make informed choices when they shop with us.' While imports from Australia and New Zealand have risen, most supermarkets have ruled out allowing American beef to be sold in Britain amid concerns over standards, despite Sir Keir Starmer agreeing a trade deal with the US earlier this year.
Telegraph
31 minutes ago
- Telegraph
How to appeal parking and speeding tickets
Motorists paid out a record amount of £620m in parking fines to councils during the 2023-2024 financial year, as town halls hit drivers with 1,000 tickets every hour. Meanwhile, private parking firms issued 7.8m fines between April and June last year – the highest on record, and equivalent to 43,000 a day. The industry has seen huge revenue increases over the past few years, and this is, in part, likely to be down to an increasing number of companies such as supermarkets, shopping centres and leisure facilities paying parking firms to patrol their car parks. The vast majority of the time, you'll be left with little option but to swallow your pride and cough up the cash. But these fines are also big business, and occasionally you will have been unfairly treated and have grounds to fight back. Here, Telegraph Money explains when a traffic violation punishment could be deemed unfair and give you the tools you need to fight it. When do I have to pay for a parking ticket? What are the different types of parking tickets? Can I just ignore a private parking ticket? Reasons for appealing a parking ticket Can I challenge a speeding ticket? When do I have to pay for a parking ticket? The short answer: when you have broken the clearly stated terms and conditions of the car park where you left your car. The long answer: it's complicated. Sometimes the terms and conditions are not made clear enough, or there might have been a mistake on the part of the firm enforcing the ticket. If this is the case, then you may have a case to challenge it. But how you do this will depend on the type of ticket – and who has issued it. What are the different types of parking tickets? Broadly speaking, there are two categories of parking ticket: those issued by an official body, usually a local authority, and those issued by private companies. Councils and other official bodies tend to issue fines as a 'penalty charge notice', 'fixed penalty notice' or 'excess charge notice'. Expect to receive these at council-run car parks or for double yellow line offences. Private parking firms typically issue fines called something like a 'parking charge notice' – note the copycat acronym with an official 'penalty charge notice'. These are dished out at locations such as hospitals, retail parks and supermarkets. As Telegraph Money's resident solicitor Gary Rycroft pointed out, parking charge notices from private firms are not actual fines, but instead 'invoices' to collect payment for a perceived breach of the conditions. He said: 'Parking tickets issued for private land are very often made to look like the notices issued by a local authority. They are often put in yellow plastic covers and are called names similar to the official notices. But they are imposters, with no official legal status.' What is the five-minute rule? Motorists now have more time to pay for car parking as the controversial five-minute rule has been scrapped. Private car park users were commonly ticketed for failing to pay within a certain time – usually five or 10 minutes – after arriving at a car park. A woman was taken to court last year by a private parking company which demanded she pay £1,906 after poor mobile phone signal meant she repeatedly took more than five minutes to pay after entering a car park in Derby. However, in early 2025, the industry's two trade associations said their code of conduct would be updated to provide a 'safeguard' when motorists experience delays in making parking payments. The British Parking Association (BPA) and the International Parking Community (IPC) said drivers should no longer be issued tickets for using privately owned car parks where a fixed camera monitors when cars enter and exit, as long as they pay before they leave. The change does not apply to council-run car parks or those where wardens are deployed. Can I challenge an unfair local authority parking fine? Local authority-issued tickets are legally enforceable, meaning you do have to pay. You will usually receive a discount if you pay within a set time period, often two weeks. However, if you do feel you have a legitimate reason for arguing that the ticket should be nulled then the council or official body will have a clear procedure for processing appeals. They will usually be fairly reasonable if you can prove your case. If your appeal is rejected then you will have to pay up, but most councils will honour the early payment discount if you appealed within the time limit. Challenging an unfair private parking ticket While parking tickets issued by private companies are not legally enforceable, making a challenge is still only worth doing if you genuinely feel that the ticket was issued unfairly. If you simply overstayed at a car park and the time limit was clearly stated then you are unlikely to be successful. However, there are reasons that the ticket may be unfair, including mistakes on the ticket or a lack of signage. Collect as much evidence as you can. This could include photographs of unclear signage, or that your car parked within designated bays. Next, it is worth reporting the unfair ticket to the landowner, which will have contracted the company to run the car park. It may not be aware of the issue and this could be the quickest way to a resolution. For example, one Telegraph Money reader was on holiday in the Lake District and had parked in the hotel car park. The hotel had failed to tell him clearly enough that he needed to register his vehicle to avoid a charge, and a week later he received seven parking tickets worth £700. He contacted the hotel manager to explain the situation, and provided proof that he had told hotel staff that he had a vehicle in the car park, and his parking tickets were subsequently cancelled. Lodging an appeal The next step is to check whether the company issuing the ticket is part of a registered trade body: the British Parking Association or the International Parking Community. If the answer is yes, then the best course of action is to follow the official appeals route. Firstly, complain directly to the company, stating your case and giving supporting evidence. If this is unsuccessful then the trade body will have an independent appeals process. If the company is not part of a trade body then the picture is a little murkier. Some experts argue that you should not use the company's appeals process as there is no independent oversight. Instead, you could send a letter to the company, firmly stating your case and informing it that you do not intend to pay the fine. Be aware that, if you choose to take this route, then the firm could choose to take you to court which, even if you are successful, will be costly and time consuming. Mr Rycroft said: 'In any court action it is possible to make an offer of settlement before the hearing date and always remember pursuing a court claim will be costing the company time and money. 'That said, they may feel compelled to see it through so they are not seen as a soft touch. Like any legal case, only defend it if you feel very confidently you have grounds to.' Can I just ignore a private parking ticket? If the parking firm is a member of a trade body, then it can apply to the DVLA for the details of the registered keeper of a vehicle to track you down, so ignoring the ticket is not advisable. If it is not a member, then it won't be able to make an application to the DVLA. However, that does not mean it doesn't have access to other ways to track you, so think very carefully before simply ignoring a ticket. Reasons for appealing a parking ticket If you feel hard done by, there are reasons to appeal your parking fine: The parking signs or road markings were unclear: The terms and conditions of using a car park should be made clear on nearby signs. You should provide a photo to show the lack of road markings or signs, or if they were confusing. There was no way to pay: Sometimes machines are broken. Your ticket should be cancelled if a parking meter was out of action and there was no other way to pay. You'll need to provide evidence of this. You were charged too much. According to Citizens Advice, the amount you're charged will fall into a higher or lower band. Parking on a double yellow line heralds a higher band, while overstaying is a lower band offence. Make sure to challenge if you've been put in the wrong band. Your car broke down. The ticket issuer should be lenient if your car has an issue and cannot leave the car park You were only just out of time: You should be given a few minutes after your parking runs out. This grace period means it could be worth appealing if your overran by less than 10 minutes. Can I challenge a speeding ticket? If you receive a speeding ticket, you will be offered a fine and a speed awareness course if it is your first offence. Nick Freeman, the solicitor dubbed Mr Loophole, has successfully defended a number of celebrity clients in overturning fines for traffic violations. However, he said: 'If you are offered a course I would take it. It's cheap and quite instructive, and you avoid the hassle of going to court. You get one chance every three years.' If it is a case of mistaken identity, he said you should simply contact the enforcement body with evidence of this. There could also be technical grounds to challenge a ticket if it was not issued within 14 days of the offence, or if the camera was not correct in tracking your speed. However, he warned that your case could take as long as a year to come to court and could be costly. 'If you are convicted you will have to pay the fine and a victim surcharge.' Speeding myths Contrary to popular belief, the police do not need to tell you when they are conducting speed traps, Mr Freeman said, and he advised using the Waze navigation app which will flag any upcoming patrols, which will have been reported by other Waze users. Similarly, your speedometer being inaccurate is not an excuse for speeding, but if this is the case then you could apply for an absolute discharge to at least avoid the points being added to your driving licence. Temporary speed limits on motorways are enforceable just like any other limit, so you should follow the rules. And while Mr Freeman says that most police forces will not prosecute drivers who are up to 10pc + 1mph over the official limit, it is still a good idea to stick within the law. What if I get a ticket for using my mobile phone? The laws regarding mobile phone use behind the wheel have been toughened up in recent years. It used to be the case that your phone had to be used for 'interactive communication' for it to be an offence. But now, you could be prosecuted for any mobile phone use and handed six points. Mr Freeman says the new law makes it much harder than it was to challenge this kind of ticket.
