University facing staff strikes over hundreds of threatened job cuts
University and College Union (UCU) members at the University of Dundee (UoD) will begin another five days of strikes starting on Monday 26 May, ending on Friday 30 May.
The strikes come in response to the university's decision to cut 700 jobs and are the latest in a string of industrial action at the university, with another 15 days of strikes having taken place in February and March.
Initially, following advice from the Scottish Government, the employer announced a reduced figure of 300 job loses via a voluntary redundancy scheme, but the union said on Monday morning the UoD is refusing to rule out compulsory redundancies.
The union also says the university is carrying out redundancy consultations in its Leverhulme Research Centre for Forensic Science (LRCFS) and the Educational Assistive Technology Team (EduAT) departments.
The union said that members were shocked that staff were still facing compulsory redundancy in both the LRCFS and EduAT.
UCU added the EduAT team has proved integral in the education of disabled students in the UK and overseas.
The union said that Assistive Technology plays a vital role in enabling learners with additional educational needs to achieve their academic goals.
A spokesperson for the Dundee UCU branch said: 'The announcement at the end of April that, instead of up to 700 jobs being cut, the University is looking to lose 300 staff via a voluntary severance scheme was welcome.
'However, the threat of compulsory redundancies is still looming over staff once a voluntary severance scheme closes, and there are staff at the university that are currently facing redundancy in the Leverhulme centre and EduAT.
'We call on the employer to abide by the Scottish Government's call to rule out the use of compulsory redundancies, and to commit to making any savings through voluntary methods.
'The employer is pushing ahead with redundancies, and given that jobs are on the line our members felt they had no choice but to embark upon further industrial action.
'That's why members will be taking strike action for five days. UCU wants to work for a sustainable future for the university, for students, staff and the city of Dundee, but our members must take a stand against compulsory redundancies.'
Jo Grady, UCU general secretary, called upon the Scottish Government and Scottish Funding Council (SFC) to step in.
She said: 'Some seven months after first announcing that management failures had led to an unforeseen deficit, the fact that staff are still facing an uncertain future with management still unwilling to rule out the use of compulsory redundancies shows the ongoing crisis in the university's leadership and governance.
'The intervention of Scottish Government and the SFC is welcome and essential, but as well as dealing with the immediate crisis at Dundee, we also need to see wholescale revision of governance arrangements at universities to ensure this never happens again.'
The Scottish Government said it is working alongside the SFC to develop an alternative route.
A spokesperson said: 'Ministers appreciate this remains a deeply anxious time for staff at Dundee University.
'Whilst universities are autonomous institutions, we continue to encourage Dundee's management to protect jobs and engage fully with staff, students and trade unions.
'The Scottish Government has provided £25 million to the SFC to support universities like Dundee facing immediate financial challenges. Work is also continuing with the Scottish Funding Council on the further development of an alternative Financial Recovery Plan.
'It is vital that students are supported at this time and that any potential impact of industrial action is managed carefully to avoid disruption to their studies.'
A UoD spokesperson said: 'This action from UCU is extremely disappointing, particularly in the context of recent progress towards a revised recovery plan and the timing of a strike when we are in a critical period of the academic year for our students.
'We believe we have robust contingency plans in place to mitigate the impact of strike action as far as we possibly can, particularly for confirming marks and degree classifications for our students.
'Most marking of exams is complete and we expect Exam Boards to meet and confirm results over the coming weeks.'
The Scottish Funding Council were approached for comment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Powys County Times
9 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
Winter fuel U-turn should have come a long time ago, Reeves told
The decision to reinstate the winter fuel payment should have been made 'a long time ago', Scotland's Social Justice Secretary has said. Chancellor Rachel Reeves said on Monday that nine million pensioners will be in receipt of the payment this year after a cut was announced in the first weeks of the Labour Government last summer. The initial decision was met with heavy backlash and forced the Scottish Government to delay the implementation of its own devolved benefit. John Swinney's administration later announced a similar payment for pensioners which would be tapered and see those on the highest incomes receiving £100, compared to £305.10 for those on the least. Monday's announcement will result in cash being sent to the devolved administration at Holyrood, and Scottish Labour has urged the Government to increase its payments. But Scotland's Social Justice Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville said the decision was 'a betrayal' of pensioners. 'I welcome any extension of eligibility by the UK Government, but this is a U-turn the Chancellor should have made a long time ago,' she said. 'But there is still no detail about how the Chancellor intends to go about that. Unfortunately, it still sounds as if many pensioners will miss out.' Ms Somerville added that the Scottish Government had not been consulted on the decision and urged UK ministers to 'ensure the Scottish Government is fully appraised of the proposed changes as soon as possible'. 'The Cabinet Secretary for Finance and Local Government wrote to the Chief Secretary to the Treasury last week to urge the UK Government to share its plans with us as quickly as possible, so that we can understand any implications for our own programmes and, crucially, our budget,' she said. Scottish Labour MSP Paul O'Kane said: 'The winter fuel payment is a devolved payment in Scotland and Scottish Labour has long been clear that we want to see it reinstated for the majority of pensioners up here – but despite their loud spin, the SNP voted against our attempts to do so. 'The SNP must not go ahead with plans that would rob poorer pensioners in order to fund payments for millionaires. 'The SNP must re-examine their own proposals in light of this game-changing announcement, ensure payments reach those most in need, and give a cast-iron guarantee that no struggling Scottish pensioners will be left out of pocket under their plans.' The Scottish Government's plans were initially to provide a universal payment to pensioners, but the proposals were scuppered by the Chancellor's announcement of the cut last summer, forcing ministers to create a different system for this winter.
Edinburgh Reporter
10 minutes ago
- Edinburgh Reporter
East Lothian Council set to review parking in new developments
Housebuilders in East Lothian may have to provide far fewer parking spaces in the future as the council considers changes aimed at reducing car use in towns. Midlothian Council is set to give the go ahead to changes this week which will drastically reduce the number of spaces required at new developments and East Lothian Council has said it will also be reviewing its current guidelines. The changes follow new Scottish Government policies which give priority to developers who propose ambitious low or no car parking plans. A report due to go before Midlothian's elected councillors this week from officers outlines changes including reducing the number of car park spaces for visitors to housing estates from one for every two homes to one for every 20 on urban sites. They will also reduce the number of spaces for users of new sports facilities with any stadium built with over 1500 capacity allowed no more than one space for every 150 seats. A report due to go before Midlothian Council's planning committee next week for agreement says the new standards have been influenced by the Scottish Government's goal of reducing private car use. It says previous policy which advised developers the minimum number of spaces required for housing will be replaced with new rules setting out the maximum allowed. The new standards will also require that 10 per cent of visitor spaces provided have an electric charger in place alongside minimum cycle parking places and EV charger spaces being introduced across all new developments. A spokesperson for East Lothian Council said that while no changes have been made to its parking standards policy 'yet' it was about to be reviewed. They said: 'These standards will be reviewed as part of the preparation of our new Local Development Plan. 'This review will have regard to the Scottish Government's recent national planning policy stating that development proposals which are ambitious in terms of low/no car parking will be supported, particularly in urban locations well-served by sustainable transport modes and where they do not create barriers to access by disabled people.' By Marie Sharp Local Democracy Reporter Like this: Like Related
Scotsman
14 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Ministers issue long-awaited decision on powerline upgrade on Scotland's most visited island
Community groups have said they fear the upgrade will attract more windfarm applications. Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Controversial plans to upgrade a powerline stretching across Scotland's most visited island have been given the go ahead. SSEN Transmission, the developers behind the grid infrastructure upgrade, lodged plans to improve the overhead line between Skye and Fort Augustus. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad These were objected to by Highland Council in 2023 and the decision has been sitting on ministers' desks ever since. Controversial overhead line upgrade for Skye consented by ministers after more than two years of decision making | SSEN The Scottish Government confirmed on Monday that SSEN Transmission's plans to replace the 'outdated infrastructure' have now been approved. Community groups on Skye, who have called for a pause on further windfarm developments on Skye, said they were disappointed by the move. Residents have argued it could be seen as 'a presumption from the Scottish Government that all the windfarms proposed for Skye will be built.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad There are currently some nine new windfarm developments for the island that have either been approved, are in planning or to waiting to be extended or repowered, including one which is due to go under inquiry later this month. SSEN insisted the existing, single circuit overhead line is fast reaching the end of its operational life, with its replacement 'critical' to maintaining network reliability and security of supply for homes and businesses in Skye and along the line's route, and in the Western Isles, which is currently supplied by two subsea electricity distribution cables. The company said the power line is currently 'operating at its capacity limit, preventing the connection of new renewable electricity in the area' and that its replacement will have a greater capacity for new renewable electricity generation. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Dr Andrew Robinson, a spokesperson for the Skye Wind Farm Information Group (SWIG), which has over one thousand members, said: 'We are deeply disappointed to learn that the Scottish Government have today granted planning permission for the Skye Reinforcement Overhead Line. 'The Highland Council objected to the plans in November 2023. As the local planning authority, such an objection would normally trigger a public inquiry, but, instead planning consent has been given and the council's objection ignored. 'This is a failure of democracy. 'The power line brings with it pylons, quarries, trenches and giant substations at Edinbane and Broadford. The two workers camps proposed either side of Broadford village, housing up to 800 workers are only needed to build the power line and the substations. 'These should have been included in the original planning paperwork for the OHL but instead have been salami sliced into separate applications.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The group has argued SSEN's upgrade to the current infrastructure 'will be much larger, at a size only necessary to take the electricity from all the wind farms proposed for Skye.' Dr Robinson added: 'Other options to build a smaller scale line, replacing the existing infrastructure and allowing some extra capacity for smaller scale community owned wind farms were never properly considered.' Industry bosses have long spoken about their frustrations with the Scottish Government's delays when consenting on projects, including the powerline upgrade. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Earlier this year, Scottish ministers committed to a new 52-week decision making period on priority applications for transmission infrastructure. Rob McDonald, managing director of SSEN Transmission, welcomed the Scottish Government's decision for Skye after what has been about a two hour wait for the company. He said: 'We trust that the Scottish Government's new guidance, setting out a 52-week determination period, will see future projects progress in line with the acceleration needed to achieve the country's clean power mission. "As we now move to the delivery phase of the project, we are committed to working constructively with local communities and businesses to minimise and mitigate construction impacts, alongside maximising the economic, infrastructure and job opportunities this investment will bring." Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Highlands and Islands MSP Jamie Halcro Johnston said the move showed a decision made by the council, who local communities elected, was 'overruled by Scottish Government officials in Edinburgh.' The Conservative politicians said: 'This is a story repeated across the Highlands and Islands where, time and time again, local democracy is ridden roughshod over and all just to meet SNP renewables targets. 'It is part of a concerning pattern of centralised decision-making that suits the government in Edinburgh and large energy companies, but which sidelines local communities. 'Highland Council's rejection of the project last year reflected the very real concerns of those living in the affected areas.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'This project will replace outdated infrastructure to ensure security of energy supply to the residents of Skye and the Western Isles, and increase provision of renewable energy to the system.
