
Karnataka HC rejects PhonePe plea against police notice for user information
BENGALURU: The Karnataka high court has ruled that digital intermediaries cannot use privacy laws or their intermediary status to avoid cooperating with lawful criminal investigations and dismissed a petition by digital payments platform PhonePe against a police request for user information linked to alleged online sports betting transactions.
Justice M Nagaprasanna said user privacy was important but the firm could not brush aside lawful investigations, especially amid the recent surge in cybercrimes.
'The protection of consumer privacy cannot eclipse the lawful imperative of investigating officers to secure evidence and take the investigation to its logical conclusion. Confidentiality must coexist with accountability,' the high court said in its ruling on April 29. The 32-page verdict was uploaded to the high court's website on Monday.
The court was hearing a petition filed by PhonePe challenging a notice received from the police in December 2022.
According to the police, a Bengaluru resident said that he used PhonePe to transfer about ₹6,000 to a sports betting website to place bets during an India-South Africa cricket match but was later unable to withdraw his winnings. He filed a first information report against the website after it also blocked his access. As part of the police probe, the investigating officer sought information from PhonePe.
The notice sought information from PhonePe on the details of the payments made and inquired if it had noticed any online gambling related activity on its platform. Police also asked PhonePe to furnish a list of customers who are involved in online gambling.
However, PhonePe challenged the notice arguing that as a digital intermediary governed by the Information Technology Act and the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, it had no role in the transactions in question. It cited legal obligations to protect customer confidentiality under the Bankers Books Evidence Act, asserting that such data could only be disclosed through a court order.
However, the high court held that existing laws, including the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2011, permit information sharing with investigating authorities. These rules mandate that intermediaries must provide requested data within 72 hours of a lawful request.
'The duty to protect data must yield, where public interest and criminal investigation intersect,' the court said.
Rejecting the argument that customer data can only be released under court orders, the court said an investigating officer was a statutory authority empowered by law. Justice Nagaprasanna stressed that the notice was not a 'fishing expedition' but a targeted request tied to a legitimate probe into possible illegal financial transactions.
The court said that PhonePe, as a regulated intermediary, could not claim immunity from investigatory summons when criminal activity was suspected. It dismissed the petition, reinforcing that digital platforms must 'cooperate with lawful investigations in an era increasingly dominated by cybercrime.'
.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
18 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Pak hikes defence spending by 20% in budget amid tense relations with India
Pakistan on Tuesday increased its defence budget by 20 per cent, allocating PRs. 2,550 billion (USD 9 billion) for the fiscal year 2025-26, amid tensions with India. Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb presented the PRs. (Pakistani Rupees) 17,573 billion worth federal budget for the fiscal year 2025–26 in the National Assembly. He also presented the budget document as a finance bill in the National Assembly. In his speech, the minister said that the government has 'decided to allocate PRs. 2,550 for the defence of the country'. He didn't provide any further details about the defence spending as traditionally the defence budget is not discussed by the parliament. Last year, the government allocated PRs. 2,122 billion for defence, reflecting a 14.98 per cent increase over PRs. 1,804 billion budgeted for the fiscal year 2023-24. 'This budget is being presented at a historic time when the nation showed unity [and] determination,' the minister said at the start while mentioning the recent Pak-India conflict. Tensions between India and Pakistan escalated after the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack, with India carrying out precision strikes on terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir on May 7. The on-ground hostilities from the Indian and Pakistan sides that lasted for four days ended with an understanding of stopping the military actions following talks between the directors general of military operations of both sides on May 10. The defence sector expenses are the second-biggest component of the annual expenditure after the debt payments. The government allocated PRs. 8,207 billion for debt servicing, which constitutes the single biggest expense. The increase in the defence expenditure is expected to get the broad support of the lawmakers during the budget debate and voting on the finance bill. Aurangzeb also announced a 4.2 per cent GDP growth target for the economy which is higher than the 2.7 per cent achieved in the current year ending on June 30. He said that debt and interest servicing would cost PRs. 8,207 billion. Other key expenses include PRs. 971 billion for civil administration, PRs. 1,186 billion for subsidies, PRs. 1,055 billion for pensions and PRs. 1,000 billion for the Public Sector Development Programme. He said that the target for inflation was 7.5 per cent and the fiscal deficit target was 3.9 per cent as the government also announced to contain the deficit and achieve a primary surplus. The minister said that the government has set an ambitious tax collection target for the Federal Board of Revenue at PRs. 14,131 billion, an 8.95 per cent increase from last year's goal. Aurangzeb said that the main success of the government was that inflation was reduced to 4.7 per cent in the outgoing fiscal whereas it was 29.2 per cent two years ago, while the government achieved a current account surplus of USD 1.5 billion. He said the forex reserves will touch USD 14 billion by the end of the year and remittances were expected to reach USD 38 billion.


News18
21 minutes ago
- News18
Project Pelican: $50 Million Drug Bust Uncovers ISI-Khalistani Nexus In Canada, 7 South Asians Arrested
Last Updated: Top intelligence sources say the proceeds from these drug cartel activities finance anti-India initiatives, including protests and referendums. Seven South Asians, including several Sikhs, supported by ISI and Khalistani networks, have been arrested in Ontario, Canada. This arrest follows Peel Police's largest drug bust, seizing approximately $50 million worth of cocaine under the investigation titled Project Pelican. Project Pelican has unveiled a sophisticated transnational drug network with direct connections to ISI-backed Khalistani operatives in Canada. According to top Indian intelligence sources, this network represents a significant threat to North American security and India-Canada relations due to its involvement in drug trafficking, political lobbying, and terror funding. Peel Regional Police seized 479 kilograms of cocaine valued at $47.9 million and arrested nine individuals, including several of Punjabi origin. The drugs were smuggled from Mexico through US commercial trucking routes into Ontario, taking advantage of cross-border logistics. Critical interceptions occurred at the Ambassador Bridge (Windsor) and the Blue Water Bridge (Sarnia). Collaboration with US Homeland Security, the DEA, and the RCMP indicated connections to Mexican cartels and US-based distributors, prompting further investigations. A media release from Peel Regional Police stated that, with national and international partners, they had dismantled a transnational organised criminal network trafficking illicit drugs into the Greater Toronto Area. As of June 6, the following individuals have been arrested and charged in connection with the investigation, facing 35 charges related to firearm and drug offences: Intelligence sources highlight an ISI blueprint within this cartel, with ISI funding Khalistani groups in Canada to traffic Afghan heroin and Mexican cocaine. The proceeds from these activities finance anti-India initiatives, including protests and referendums. Groups such as the International Sikh Federation dominate the drug operations, collaborating with cartels to import heroin via Punjab and export refined drugs like cocaine and ICE to India. Khalistani elements have also infiltrated Canadian political circles, including the Liberal Party. ISI agents like Bilal Cheema are alleged to have financed politicians, while Khalistani leaders exploit immigration schemes to extort students for anti-India propaganda, say sources. This connection has been directly linked to Project Pelican, initiated by law enforcement agencies. Punjabi gangs with Khalistani ties control cross-border trucking in Canada, a vital channel for Project Pelican's drug seizures, sources suggest. These drugs move through routes connected to Punjabi-dominated logistics hubs in Peel. In a similar case in Toronto in 2021, Punjabi-origin gangsters were found smuggling cocaine via Mexico-US-Canada routes, showcasing patterns akin to Project Pelican. Project Pelican's $47.9 million seizure indicates a potential financing channel for Khalistani activities. Intelligence sources confirm that drug profits are used to fund weapons, propaganda, and ISI-backed operations.
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
26 minutes ago
- Business Standard
'Daisy the cat drove everyone crazy': HC slams 'frivolous' kidnap case
The Karnataka High Court on Tuesday dismissed a criminal case against a Bengaluru man accused of kidnapping his neighbour's pet cat, while strongly criticising the police and complainant for wasting judicial resources over what it called a 'whimsical pursuit' of justice. Justice M Nagaprasanna, who presided over the case, quipped that the pet named Daisy had 'driven everyone crazy', and delivered a stinging rebuke to what he described as a misuse of criminal law. The case originated on February 1, 2022, when Nikitha Anjana Iyer, a resident of Shikaripalya in Bengaluru district, filed a complaint claiming her neighbour Taha Husain had abducted her pet cat, Daisy, and was wrongfully confining it. Iyer described Daisy as being like 'her child' and claimed emotional trauma. Charges dropped, CCTV evidence contradicts claim The police registered an FIR and later filed a chargesheet, though charges under Sections 428 and 429 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita (BNS) - which pertain to mischief against animals - were eventually dropped. Only charges related to intentional insult and criminal intimidation were retained. Taha challenged the FIR, producing CCTV footage showing the cat moving freely between the two houses, even entering and exiting through open windows. Justice Nagaprasanna noted discrepancies in the prosecution's case, including additional allegations such as abuse and sexual misconduct that had not appeared in the original complaint. Police receive stern warning over 'melodrama' The High Court order pulled up both the complainant and the police. 'If such frivolous grievances are allowed to blossom into a full-fledged criminal trial, it would be nothing but a waste of precious judicial time,' it said, adding that such proceedings divert attention from genuine grievances. The court likened the case to a 'melodrama woven around a cat', warning that permitting such cases undermines the criminal justice system. In a pointed message to law enforcement, Justice Nagaprasanna said, 'Police, too, deserve stern admonition for allowing themselves to be swept into a whimsical pursuit of justice for a cat. The law is a solemn instrument and not a toy to be played at the altar of personal pique.' The court concluded by quashing the FIR and criminal proceedings against Taha, stating that the case was a classic example of personal animosity being dressed up as criminal litigation.