Trump's balancing act: Promising peace while striking Iran
"Midnight Hammer": Even the name of the operation suggests power and surprise under the cover of darkness. Before the effects could even be measured, US authorities offered extensive commentary on the airstrikes carried out on Saturday, June 21, against three Iranian nuclear program sites at Natanz, Isfahan and Fordo. After Donald Trump's solemn address, in which he hailed "a spectacular military success," the Pentagon provided operational details the following day. The American show of force was praised, without consideration for its many gray areas, the uncertainty over Iran's response and the geopolitical significance of this unilateral action.
General Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, described a complex operation involving decoys, with "very few people" in Washington aware of the details. While one group of B-2 bombers headed toward the Pacific as a diversion, seven identical aircraft took off from Whiteman Air Force Base in Missouri, en route to the Middle East. Communications were kept to a minimum, and in-flight refueling was conducted during the 18-hour journey. Shortly before the B-2s entered Iranian airspace, a US submarine fired around 20 Tomahawk cruise missiles at "key infrastructure" to clear the way. One key point: Iranian forces allegedly never managed to fire on the American planes. At about 2 am local time, each of the seven B-2s dropped two GBU-57 bunker-buster bombs, with 12 of them targeting the Fordo site exclusively.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
LeMonde
22 minutes ago
- LeMonde
Putin says 'unprovoked aggression' on Tehran 'unjustified'
Russian President Vladimir Putin on Monday, June 23, slammed attacks on Iran as "unprovoked" and "unjustified" in a meeting with Tehran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, but did not announce any concrete support to his key ally in the Middle East. Moscow is a crucial backer of Iran, but has not swung forcefully behind its partner even as the United States launched strikes on its nuclear facilities over the weekend. "This absolutely unprovoked aggression against Iran is unjustified," Putin said in televised remarks to Araghchi at the start of their meeting. Putin did not single out the US attacks, talking instead broadly of "strikes" against Iran, though the Kremlin had earlier Monday said it condemned and regretted the US strikes. "There has been a new escalation of tensions in the region, and, of course, we condemn this and express our deep regret in this regard," Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters, shortly before Putin met Araghchi in the Kremlin. Putin has pitched himself as a mediator between Iran and Israel, an idea rejected by US President Donald Trump last week. Araghchi told Putin that Russia has been a "partner and companion" to Tehran and hailed ties between Tehran and Moscow "very close and longstanding." "Iran is exercising legitimate defense against these aggressions," he added. Since Israel launched its wave of strikes on June 13, triggering Iran to respond with missiles and drones, Russia has not publicly offered military help to Tehran. Putin and other officials have also downplayed Moscow's obligations under a sweeping strategic partnership agreement signed with Tehran just months ago, highlighting that it is not a mutual defense pact. Russia was "making efforts to help the Iranian people," Putin said in the meeting, without elaborating. Asked what specific support Russia might offer, Peskov told reporters: "It all depends on what Iran needs. We have offered our mediation services." Peskov also said the US strikes on Iran would not affect bilateral relations between Moscow and Washington, saying they were "different issues." Putin said last week that Iran had not requested any support from Russia.
France 24
24 minutes ago
- France 24
Did US strikes 'finish the job' of destroying Fordow plant?
08:58 23/06/2025 Turkey braces for refugees as Iranian flock to borders 23/06/2025 EU urges 'all sides to step back' after US strikes Iran, but can bloc find unified response? 23/06/2025 US warns against Iran retaliation as Trump raises 'regime change' 23/06/2025 Will US strikes be enough to derail Iran's nuclear programme? 23/06/2025 Residents shelter in Tel Aviv as Israel, Iran trade strikes 23/06/2025 How successful were US strikes on Iran? 23/06/2025 'I never expected he would be freed', wife of Belarus opposition leader tells FRANCE 24 23/06/2025 US reveals details of 'Operation Midnight Hammer' 22/06/2025 Iran: How is the war with Israel affecting civil society? Middle East
Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
Oil rises and Europe's markets open lower after US strikes on Iran
Investors reacted to US strikes on Iran over the weekend as Iran and Israel continued to trade missile fire on Monday morning. The price of Brent crude oil rose around 1.53% to $78.19 a barrel as of around 7.15 CEST, while WTI rose 1.48% to $74.93 a barrel. On Sunday, US forces attacked three Iranian nuclear and military sites, stating that Tehran must not be allowed to possess a nuclear weapon. President of Iran Masoud Pezeshkian said that the country "will never surrender to bullying and oppression", while Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi has arrived in Moscow for talks with Russian president Vladimir Putin. European markets opened in the red on Monday as investors digested the news. The FTSE 100 was down 0.28% to 8,749.98, the CAC 40 fell 0.66% to 7,539.68, the DAX slipped 0.55% to 23,222.90, while the FTSE MIB dropped 0.97% to 38,852.55. The STOXX 600 fell 0.28% to 535.03 while the EURO STOXX 50 dropped 0.26% to 5,220.02. Over in the US, futures for the S&P 500 slipped 0.13% to 6,010.25 and Dow Jones Industrial Average futures dropped 0.2% to 42,431.00. Nasdaq futures fell 0.18% to 21,804.50 on Monday morning. In Asian trading, Tokyo's Nikkei 225 index fell 0.19% to 38,331.12, the Kospi in Seoul dropped 0.3% to 3,012.88, and Australia's S&P/ASX 200 declined 0.37% to 8,474.40. Hong Kong's Hang Seng and the Shanghai Composite Index were in positive territory, with respective gains of 0.35% to 23,611.68 and 0.13% to 3,364.29. The conflict, which flared up after an Israeli attack against Iran on 13 June, has sent oil prices higher linked to Iran's status as a major oil producer. The nation is also located on the narrow Strait of Hormuz, through which much of the world's crude oil passes. Investors are concerned that Tehran might decide to bomb oil infrastructure in neighbouring countries or block tankers from travelling through the Strait of Hormuz. Shipping company Maersk said on Sunday that it was continuing to operate through the strait, adding: "We will continuously monitor the security risk to our specific vessels in the region and are ready to take operational actions as needed." According to vessel tracking data compiled by Bloomberg, two supertankers Coswisdom Lake and South Loyalty U-turned in the Strait of Hormuz on Sunday. The situation now hinges on whether Tehran decides to opt for aggression or a more diplomatic response to US and Israeli strikes. Iran could attempt to close the waterway by setting mines across the Strait or striking and seizing vessels. Even so, this would likely be met by a forceful response from the US navy, meaning the oil price spike may not be sustained. Some analysts also think Iran is unlikely to close down the waterway because the country uses it to transport its own crude, mostly to China, and oil is a major revenue source for the regime. If Tehran did successfully close the Strait, this would cause a wider price spike for transported goods and complicate the deflationary process in the US, potentially keeping interest rates higher for longer. On Monday morning, Trump also floated the possibility of regime change in Iran. "If the current Iranian regime is unable to make Iran great again, why wouldn't there be regime change?" said the US president on Truth Social. Vice president J.D. Vance had commented earlier that the administration did not seek regime change in Iran.
