logo
5 years after George Floyd's death, Minneapolis police work to rebuild trust and a 'decimated' force

5 years after George Floyd's death, Minneapolis police work to rebuild trust and a 'decimated' force

Yahoo23-05-2025

When Brian O'Hara arrived in Minneapolis as the new chief of police in 2022, he said that he found a department that was depleted, having lost about half of its officers, amid widespread protests and backlash after the killing of George Floyd on May 25, 2020, by a Minneapolis police officer.
"The cops would openly tell me that if anybody asks them about becoming a cop, they tell them, 'Don't come here, everybody hates us,'" O'Hara told ABC News.
"When I first got here, all of them, but especially the third precinct, was absolutely miserable, and the cops were so depressed," he added, pointing to the precinct that was burnt down after a man set it on fire during the 2020 protests.
As the fifth anniversary of Floyd's killing approaches, O'Hara told ABC News that while the department has made some strides in rebuilding the police force and implementing reforms, the Minneapolis Police Department (MPD) is facing "very real challenges" that lie ahead.
"There's a whole lot of open wounds still here in the city. And while there has been some healing, not everybody's healed, not everything has improved," O'Hara said in an interview with ABC News' Alex Perez that is set to air on ABC News Live Prime on Friday. "We still have very real challenges in this city."
What happened to police reform?
The Department of Justice announced on Wednesday that it is moving to drop a police reform agreement, known as a consent decree, that the Biden-era department reached with the city of Minneapolis in January.
The court-enforceable agreement was born out of a probe into MPD that was launched after the 2020 police killing of George Floyd. But when President Donald Trump took office, the agreement was not finalized and had yet to be certified by a federal judge.
Attorney Ben Crump, who represents the family of George Floyd, said in a statement on Wednesday that the DOJ's move to drop the agreement is a "slap in the face" that will "deepen the divide between law enforcement and the people."
O'Hara joined Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey in a press conference on Wednesday, where the mayor vowed that the city will move forward with the proposed reforms "with or without" Trump.
Frey and O'Hara noted that reforms are already underway as part of a state-enforced consent decree, which has been in effect for more than a year.
The agreement was reached by the city of Minneapolis with the Minnesota Department of Human Rights and the Effective Law Enforcement for All (ELEFA), an independent nonprofit, was hired last year to monitor the settlement.
Minneapolis officials held a press conference on Tuesday where the independent monitor overseeing the consent decree released its second progress report, according to ABC News' Minneapolis affiliate KSTP.
Director of the Minneapolis Civil Rights Department Michelle Phillips noted during the press conference that for the first time in 10 years, the office of police conduct reviews is fully staffed and said that MPD is "on pace" to "eliminate" a backlog of 234 police complaints.
"We are not where we want to be, but we are surely not where we were," Phillips said.
O'Hara described the report as "fair," and announced earlier this week that his department has appointed two civilians to head MPD's Internal Affairs Bureau and the Constitutional Policing Bureau.
Asked if the Trump administration dropping the consent decree could undermine MPD's efforts to build trust with the community, O'Hara told ABC News, he worries that due to "heightened" divisions, people wouldn't "care what the facts are."
"This is going to play out that, 'well, Trump got rid of it, so they're not doing it,' and nobody's going to hear anything else, which is unfortunate," O'Hara said.
Rebuilding after George Floyd
Reflecting on the five-year anniversary of Floyd's killing, O'Hara said that it is still extraordinarily "difficult" to be a police officer in Minneapolis.
Former MPD officer Derek Chauvin was sentenced to 21 years in prison in July 2022 on federal civil rights charges in the death of Floyd. The video of Chauvin kneeling on Floyd's neck sent shockwaves across the U.S. and sparked widespread protests, propelling Minneapolis and its police force into the national spotlight.
O'Hara, who previously served as Public Safety Director for Newark, New Jersey, during the implementation of a federal consent decree, said that it's "traumatizing" to be a police officer anywhere, but it's "more difficult" in Minneapolis.
"Unlike being a cop in Newark or in other places, they just don't get any deference," he said. "Every time [they] show up, they have to prove that they're one of the good guys."
Reflecting on strides that MPD has made since he came to Minneapolis in 2022, the chief pointed to more "aggressive" efforts in recruitment that are helping to rebuild a once "decimated" police force.
According to O'Hara, the department, which lost more than half of its 900 officers after Floyd was killed, now has nearly 600 sworn officers, almost reaching the minimum of 731, which is a ratio based on the city's population. He said that he is expecting a new class of 40 recruits to join the department in June -- the largest class since the 1990s. O'Hara also noted that about 60% of the new recruits are officers of color.
And with every new class joining MPD, things are starting to turn around even for officers at the third precinct, O'Hara said.
Recalling a recent visit to the third precinct, whose officers "still don't have a building" after it was burned in 2020, the chief said there were 12 officers, most of whom are Black, for the roll call, and there appeared to be a shift in morale.
"They were happy. They were talking to each other," he said. "I hadn't seen that before."
5 years after George Floyd's death, Minneapolis police work to rebuild trust and a 'decimated' force originally appeared on abcnews.go.com

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Republicans urge Donald Trump and Elon Musk to end their feud

time20 minutes ago

Republicans urge Donald Trump and Elon Musk to end their feud

WASHINGTON -- As the Republican Party braces for aftershocks from President Donald Trump's spectacular clash with Elon Musk, lawmakers and conservative figures are urging détente, fearful of the potential consequences from a prolonged feud. At a minimum, the explosion of animosity between the two powerful men could complicate the path forward for Republicans' massive tax and border spending legislation that has been promoted by Trump but assailed by Musk. 'I hope it doesn't distract us from getting the job done that we need to,' said Rep. Dan Newhouse, a Republican from Washington state. "I think that it will boil over and they'll mend fences' Sen. Ted Cruz, a Texas Republican, was similarly optimistic. 'I hope that both of them come back together because when the two of them are working together, we'll get a lot more done for America than when they're at cross purposes,' he told Fox News host Sean Hannity on Thursday night. Sen. Mike Lee, a Republican from Utah, sounded almost pained on social media as Trump and Musk volleyed insults at each other, sharing a photo composite of the two men and writing, "But … I really like both of them.' 'Who else really wants @elonmusk and @realDonaldTrump to reconcile?' Lee posted, later adding: 'Repost if you agree that the world is a better place with the Trump-Musk bromance fully intact.' So far, the feud between Trump and Musk is probably best described as a moving target, with plenty of opportunities for escalation or detente. One person familiar with the president's thinking said Musk wants to speak with Trump, but that the president doesn't want to do it – or at least do it on Friday. The person requested anonymity to disclose private matters. In a series of conversations with television anchors Friday morning, Trump showed no interest in burying the hatchet. Asked on ABC News about reports of a potential call between him and Musk, the president responded: 'You mean the man who has lost his mind?' Trump added in the ABC interview that he was 'not particularly' interested in talking to Musk at the moment. Still, others remained hopeful that it all would blow over. 'I grew up playing hockey and there wasn't a single day that we played hockey or basketball or football or baseball, whatever we were playing, where we didn't fight. And then we'd fight, then we'd become friends again,' Hannity said on his show Thursday night. Acknowledging that it 'got personal very quick,' Hannity nonetheless added that the rift was 'just a major policy difference.' House Speaker Mike Johnson projected confidence that the dispute would not affect prospects for the tax and border bill. 'Members are not shaken at all,' the Louisiana Republican said. 'We're going to pass this legislation on our deadline.' He added that he hopes Musk and Trump reconcile, saying 'I believe in redemption' and 'it's good for the party and the country if all that's worked out.' But he also had something of a warning for the billionaire entrepreneur. 'I'll tell you what, do not doubt and do not second-guess and don't ever challenge the president of the United States, Donald Trump,' Johnson said. "He is the leader of the party. He's the most consequential political figure of this generation and probably the modern era.'

DC police officer convicted for Proud Boys leaks sentenced to more than year in prison
DC police officer convicted for Proud Boys leaks sentenced to more than year in prison

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

DC police officer convicted for Proud Boys leaks sentenced to more than year in prison

A District of Columbia police lieutenant convicted of tipping off Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio that he was being investigated, and who later lied about their communication, was sentenced Friday to 18 months in prison. Former Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) Lt. Shane Lamond was found guilty last year on one count of obstructing justice and three counts of making false statements to federal law enforcement officials. Federal prosecutors accused him of warning Tarrio, then national chairman of the right-wing extremist group, that D.C. law enforcement had an arrest warrant for him related to the destruction of a Black Lives Matter banner. They also said he lied to law enforcement when pressed on the nature of his relationship with Tarrio, suggesting it was 'one-sided.' Lamond told U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson on Friday that he 'respectfully disagrees' with her finding of guilt but, 'in retrospect,' agrees he made several errors throughout his communications with Tarrio. He said that he believed that building rapport with Tarrio was part of doing his job but described his efforts as 'sloppy,' lamenting that his conviction had now upended his career and life. 'Frankly, I'm broken at this point,' the former law enforcement officer added. Jackson said the idea Lamond could have done better when communicating with the Proud Boys leader was 'quite the understatement.' His conduct was not consistent with police practices 'unless you twist them until they're unrecognizable,' she said. Prosecutors had asked for a sentence of four years in prison. The government's sentencing memorandum was submitted under Ed Martin, who was President Trump's first pick for U.S. Attorney in D.C. but ultimately moved into another Justice Department post when his Senate confirmation seemed unlikely. Assistant U.S. Attorney Rebecca Ross called Lamond a 'trusted leader' who used his reputation to 'insert himself' into the investigation of Tarrio. 'MPD was able to bring Tarrio to justice not because of the defendant but in spite of the defendant,' she said. At trial, prosecutors said Lamond's communications with Tarrio grew more secretive and frequent as pressure to arrest him mounted in 2020. Both Lamond and Tarrio took the stand at the week-long bench trial. Lamond said he never passed sensitive police information along to Tarrio. Tarrio as a witness in Lamond's defense said he never received any confidential information from the lieutenant. Lamond attorney Mark Schamel told Jackson they 'fundamentally disagree' on the facts of the case and urged her to give him a sentence without incarceration, instead asking for probation and suggesting that the police officer's ruined career and reputation in the media is punishment enough. 'Shane Lamond has been destroyed,' he said. Schamel also indicated that a pardon from Trump was not likely. Jackson rejected the notion that the potential for future clemency could sway her decision. The judge called the government's 48-month sentencing request 'excessive' but said that probation would 'not suffice.' She acknowledged that, until the incident regarding Tarrio, Lamond performed his job with 'honor.' Letters from his family painted a picture of a dedicated father, partner and son. However, that cuts both ways, Jackson said, and the then-officer 'should have known better than this.' 'You repeatedly dishonored the badge,' the judge added. Tarrio was arrested over the incident on Jan. 4, 2021, and ordered out of the nation's capital. He wasn't in Washington two days later, when a mob of Trump's supporters — including dozens of Proud Boys — stormed the Capitol in aim of stopping the certification of the 2020 presidential election. The Proud Boys leader was sentenced to 22 years in prison after being convicted of seditious conspiracy but was pardoned by Trump when he returned to the White House. Tarrio was in the courtroom Friday, alongside Oath Keepers leader Stewart Rhodes and Ivan Raiklin, a Trump supporter who has deemed himself 'Secretary of Retribution.' Outside the courthouse, the former Proud Boys leader said Lamond is 'worthy' of a pardon from Trump. Rhodes, who was sentenced to an 18-year prison term for sedition that was commuted to time-served by Trump, called Lamond a 'J6er' for how he has been treated over the incident, a term of endearment for those who participated in the Capitol riot. 'This has to be corrected,' Tarrio said. Updated at 1:10 p.m. EDT. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Trump administration issues rule undermining Biden car fuel efficiency rules
Trump administration issues rule undermining Biden car fuel efficiency rules

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump administration issues rule undermining Biden car fuel efficiency rules

The Trump administration on Friday took a step to undermine Biden-era rules that tightened fuel efficiency requirements for cars and trucks. The Transportation Department published an interpretive rule that says the Biden administration improperly considered electric vehicles as a way to make vehicle fleets more efficient While this determination does not formally end the Biden-era rule, the Trump administration indicated that while the rulemaking process plays out, it may not enforce the Biden-era standards. 'Pending the rulemaking process for the establishment of replacement standards, [the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration] will exercise its enforcement authority with regard to all existing … standards in accordance with the interpretation set forth in this rule,' it stated. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy, in a written statement, accused the previous administration of trying to push an electric vehicle 'mandate.' 'Under President Trump's leadership, we are making vehicles more affordable and easier to manufacture in the United States,' Duffy said. 'The previous administration illegally used [Corporate Average Fuel Economy] standards as an electric vehicle mandate.' The Biden administration issued a rule requiring cars to be about 2 percent more fuel efficient each year while heavy duty pickup trucks and vans would have to be 10 percent more efficient each year from 2030 to 2032 and 8 percent more efficient in the years after. President Trump has long talked about getting rid of the Biden administration's efforts to promote electric vehicles. He has argued that these efforts harm consumers' freedom to choose what kinds of cars they want to drive and could lead to strife for autoworkers. Democrats, meanwhile, have argued that shifting toward more electric vehicles would mitigate air pollution and climate change — and put the U.S. at the forefront of an emerging market. While Trump has long lamented the previous administration's electric vehicle policy, the release of the administration's determination comes just one day after an explosive feud emerged between the president and Tesla mogul Elon Musk. The Transportation Department rules came alongside a separate, more stringent regulation for vehicle tailpipe emissions from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) that in practice has a greater effect on the vehicle market's fuel efficiency and is not impacted by the Trump administration's latest maneuver. However, the department's fuel economy rules would act as a backstop if the EPA rule was to be overturned. Republicans are attempting to eliminate that rule through their 'big, beautiful bill.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store