MP criticises 'fee chasing' over warehouse error
An MP has told the House of Commons a council is demanding £5,000 in legal fees from residents following a case arising from its own planning error.
North Northamptonshire Council failed to consult people living close to the proposed site of a Corby warehouse in 2021, which was then built metres away from gardens.
The town's MP, Lee Barron, told MPs that a consultation was carried out in the wrong street and the residents who took the council to court were being pursued for the costs, after their case was dismissed.
The Leader of the House called the case "troubling". The council's leader said it was the judge who decided the party who brought the case should pay the fees.
The first time residents realised a giant warehouse was being built next to their homes on Hooke Close was when a 60ft (18.3m) metal frame appeared at the site.
They complained to the council and it transpired that the people of Hubble Close, about half-a-mile (750m) from the site, had been sent notices about the development instead of those on Hooke Close.
Planning notices had also been placed on the wrong lampposts.
An internal review found that the consultation errors meant the decision to grant planning permission did not comply with the law.
One resident, Georgie Wallis, applied for a judicial review of the decision on behalf of herself and neighbours.
In December 2024, Mrs Justice Beverley Lang dismissed the application, saying Ms Wallis had not issued it quickly enough.
The judge did say, however, that the council's handling of the planning application had "fallen well below the standard to be expected".
Speaking during questions to the Leader of the House, Lucy Powell, on Thursday, Barron (Labour) said: "Now, the council who didn't consult the residents, who consulted the wrong street, who the judge criticised, is pursuing £5,000 in legal costs from the very people it failed."
He asked Powell (Labour) whether she agreed that "authorities should be held accountable when serious consultation failures occur and that residents should not be financially penalised as a result of the incompetence of the consultation".
She described the Hooke Close case as "troubling" and said she would raise it with ministers.
Ms Wallis told the BBC: "The council have already made a public statement apologising for their errors.
"I think they should just do the honourable thing, wipe the fees and take accountability."
Jamie Hume, who also lives near the warehouse, said residents had agreed that they would share the liability for costs, even though only one of them applied for judicial review.
He added that having to pay legal fees was "not fair for trying to hold a public body to account who've admitted wrongdoing".
The leader of the Conservative council, Jason Smithers, said: "The court has adjudicated the resident liable for the sum of £5,000.
"In the event that the resident experiences difficulty in discharging this obligation, it shall be her responsibility to petition the court for reconsideration, as this constitutes a judicial pronouncement and not an imposition by the council.
"Moreover, it is not appropriate for elected members to seek to intervene in a judicial determination."
A spokesperson for North Northamptonshire Council said: "Due to the ongoing legal conversations around costs, it's not possible to comment any further at this stage."
Follow Northamptonshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Judicial review into giant warehouse dismissed
High Court to decide on giant warehouse review
Planning for huge warehouse did not comply with law
Woman 'let down' by wrong-street council blunder
North Northamptonshire Council
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Gavin Newsom finally finds a cause: taking on Trump
The Democratic governor of liberal California has welcomed Donald Trump to his state, cosied up to Conservative podcasters, and slashed healthcare provisions for illegal immigrants this year. But the reinvention of Gavin Newsom as the sort of Democrat who might be able to win back Republican voters came to a shuddering halt during a weekend of riots. With Mr Trump ordering troops onto his streets, Mr Newsom hit back, accusing the president of intentionally inflaming a difficult situation. It leaves Mr Newsom with no choice but to halt his drift Right-ward, said Hank Sheinkopf, a Democratic strategist. 'If not, he loses his entire constituency,' he said. 'In other words, there's a toleration level for moving to the centre, but not when it comes to massive chaos in Los Angeles.' Mr Newsom has put himself at the front of Democrat efforts to examine how they lost the 2024 election so badly. He launched a podcast in March in which he picks the brains of leading figures in Trump world. And Mr Newsom angered liberals with the very first episode, in which he interviewed Charlie Kirk, the controversial Conservative, when he said it was unfair that transgender athletes could compete in women's sport. He also said Democrats simply could not compete with the likes of Mr Trump and Elon Musk when it came to online reach. 'We're toast,' he said. Last month, facing a budget crunch, the telegenic governor back-pedalled on a promise of healthcare for all. He announced a freeze in enrolment for undocumented adults in the state's public health insurance programme. He has also urged cities to ban encampments for homeless people, cracking down on the tent cities that have blighted so much of California. And in January, he thanked Mr Trump for federal help in rebuilding after devastating wildfires that swept through Los Angeles. 'I've been always a hard-headed pragmatist,' he told reporters recently when quizzed about his shifting positions. 'I'm not an ideologue.' That all seems a long time ago after immigration raids around Los Angeles on Friday sparked three days of riots, and an order by Mr Trump to send in 2,000 National Guard troops. Tom Homan, the president's border tsar, threatened to arrest the California governor if he got in the way. 'Come and get me, tough guy,' was Mr Newsom's pithy response on X. After Mr Trump agreed the governor should be arrested, the governor shot back saying it was 'a line we cannot cross as a nation'. Credit: MSNBC He threatened to sue the federal government for its illegal act and called the president a 'stone cold liar' for failing to bring up his plan to send the National Guard when they spoke by telephone. 'There is currently no need for the National Guard to be deployed in Los Angeles and to do so in this unlawful manner and for such lengthy period is a serious breach of state sovereignty that seems intentionally designed to inflame the situation while simultaneously depriving the state from deploying these personnel and resources where they are truly required,' he wrote in a letter. That puts him at the centre of the news headlines, said James Carville, the veteran Democratic strategist and former adviser to Bill Clinton, even if it was too early to say that the party had finally found a national figurehead to oppose Mr Trump. But he said Mr Newsom's full-blooded reaction to Mr Trump and his tsar did not mark a reversal of his shift to the Right, but were compatible with his rejection of progressive totems such as identity politics. 'I don't think we should say we can render a verdict after 48 hours, but his actions have been totally what he would expect,' he said after Mr Trump had 'invaded' his state with troops. At the same time, he added, the crackdown on illegal immigrants remained a popular part of the platform that helped Republicans reclaim the White House last year. That leaves the governor and Democrats with a fine line to straddle: taking on Mr Trump over his decision to send in troops but without being painted as soft on illegal immigration or unrest in the streets. 'I think Trump sees all kinds of trouble on the horizon,' Mr Carville said. 'What he's very good at is just doing something to dominate the news.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
America Has Theories on Whether Trump-Elon Musk Feud Is All Fake
After President Donald Trump's beef with Tesla CEO Elon Musk practically broke the internet, Americans are wondering if all the drama was meant to deflect from one crucial piece of legislation: Trump's Big Beautiful Bill Act. Others, however, don't think the president is smart enough to pull it off. Let's get into it. After passing in the House by the skin of it's teeth, the GOP spending bill is headed to the Senate, drawing mixed reviews from Democrats and Republicans alike. With major cuts to Medicaid– which Trump promised he wouldn't do– questionable AI regulations, permanent taxes cut to the wealthy, adding trillions to the national debt and much more, Trump's Big Beautiful Bill Act is anything but beautiful, and more folks should be paying attention. But alas, they're not… And after last week's blow up between him and Musk, many online have theories that the Trump and Musk battle got people watching the wrong fight. 'This Trump-Musk fight seems like a distraction,' @d_originalone noted on June 5. Another user pointed out the suspicious timing of the feud coinciding with the bill. 'Elon Musk sitting on Epstein information and only releasing it because him and trump aren't friends makes him just as disgusting as Trump,' @namenonew started. 'It's all a distraction & greed tactic folks.' Even CNN host Audie Cornish noted 'there's a billion-dollar bill at stake—but all eyes are on the fight between two billionaires.' She continued, 'Medicaid, SNAP, and foreign policy are all in the balance, yet headlines focus on Musk and Trump.' 'Who gives a rat's ass bout a fake feud between 2 Nazis,' @kenyadad12 boldly tweeted before adding the real concern should be 'this bill GOP pushing through that will allow trump to ignore contempt orders from the courts.' Although many are convinced Trump's alleged scheme is to divert Americans from the dangers of the tax bill with the drama of the century, there's no way to exactly know if that's the president's real plan. But, you can't put anything past the man, who is known for his antics and divisive nature. On TikTok, @omekongo listed Trump's travel ban to 12 different countries, a recent abortion directive endangering pregnant people nation-wide and most importantly, that 'big, ugly tax bill' as reasons for Trump's alleged smoke and mirrors trick on America. Other folks online don't want to give Trump and Musk any credit for allegedly scheming to deter from the real issues plaguing the country. 'There's no master plan, no distraction; they're just impulsive fascist idiots,' @LivForJReeves10 said on X. @trustno1evah on TikTok said no matter how hard Trump might try to pull the wool over Americans' eyes, they're not doing a good job at it. 'This Trump and Musk fallout is all a staged LIE,' she said. The bill itself is over 1,000 pages long, tackling any and everything under the sun while still checking off key points in the MAGA rulebook, 'Project 2025.' With legislation this long and tedious, it's not shocking Americans won't be able to digest the full impact the bill will have on their lives. In fact, even House Republicans like Ga. Rep Marjorie Taylor Greene and Neb. Rep. Mike Flood admitted to skimming over key points in the vital tax legislation. If the very people elected to read and review proposed legislation have confessed to being unaware of the very small, fine print, then Americans should probably be paying even closer attention to what's at stake.
New York Post
29 minutes ago
- New York Post
Rep. Elise Stefanik blasts NYS Democrats' ‘radical' agenda in Albany as she eyes run for governor
ALBANY – Potential gubernatorial candidate Rep. Elise Stefanik blasted Democrats during a Capitol visit Monday — as state lawmakers try to ram through free-spending policies at the close of the legislative session. 'Here we are, another year, another failed, radical, reckless agenda and legislative session in New York State,' Stefanik said at a news conference, flanked by state Republican minority leaders Rob Ortt (R-Niagara) and Will Barclay (R-Oswego). 'They have put New York last with this massive, bloated, $254 billion budget. It is anti-worker, anti-family, anti-farm, anti-small business, anti-manufacturer and anti-law enforcement,' Stefanik said. 3 Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY) – a potential 2026 gubernatorial contender – rallied with Republicans in Albany Monday. Vaughn Golden/NY Post The high-ranking House Republican from New York ripped into Democrat-pushed initiatives that include loosening requirements on programs to release potentially violent offenders from prison, restricting the deployment of natural gas infrastructure, and a $10 million legal defense fund for Attorney General Letitia James amongst others. Stefanik — an ally of President Trump — is eyeing a run against Gov. Kathy Hochul in 2026 and is already gaining momentum after a fiery speech on Staten Island last week where the North Country lawmaker asked gathered Republicans, 'Are we ready to fire Kathy Hochul next year in the State of New York?' State Democrats staged their own press conference earlier Monday ahead of Stefanik's appearance at the Capitol, criticizing federal Republican lawmakers and Trump's 'big, beautiful' bill spending plan. 'This budget bill is actually ugly and devastating and it's painful,' Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie (D-Bronx) said, citing an estimate that it could lead to $800 billion in cuts to Medicaid over two years. The Democrats – holding signs with estimates of the Washington GOP's budget bill's impacts to hospital and Medicaid funding in localities across the state – framed the federal proposal as a direct attack on blue states like New York. 'This so-called big beautiful bill they're pushing isn't just bad policy, it's a direct attack on middle class families,' Senate Majority Leader Andrea Stewart-Cousins (D-Westchester) said. 3 Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie (D-Bronx) and Senate Majority Leader Andrea Stewart-Cousins (D-Westchester) called for a repeal of the SALT cap, but also pushed back against proposed cuts to Medicaid programs. Vaughn Golden/NY Post Heastie and Stewart-Cousins, however, wanted Republicans to go further to completely eliminate a cap on how much state and local taxes middle and upper-income New Yorkers can write off on their federal returns. The cap would be lifted in the Republicans' bill from $10,000 to $30,000. 'Anything less than a full repeal is not a win for New York,' Heastie said. But Stefanik credited New York Republicans in the federal government for the increase. 'I'm sure you also didn't hear from them any proposal on how they're going to cut taxes for New Yorkers, and they just want to blame it on SALT,' Stefanik said. 3 Gov. Kathy Hochul is already facing a primary challenge ahead of her 2026 reelection bid. Stephen Yang Ortt labeled his colleagues across the aisle as 'hypocrites.' 'Don't let the hypocrites get away with it. I'm not gonna, Barclay's not gonna, and bet your ass Congresswoman Stefanik's not gonna,' Ortt said. A spokesperson for Hochul declined to comment and referred The Post to a statement released by the state Democratic Party. 'While Stefanik lies to her constituents' faces about her and Trump's plan to gut Medicaid, New Yorkers see right through it – and they know Governor Hochul's budget puts money back in their pockets, cuts taxes for the middle class, and makes our streets and subways safer,' Addison Dick, a spokesperson for the Democrats, said.
