logo
Faith leaders: The religion of America's empire forsakes the whole for the sake of the few

Faith leaders: The religion of America's empire forsakes the whole for the sake of the few

Chicago Tribune26-01-2025

Last week was dominated by brutal cold. It is not only the chilling and dangerous temperatures in Chicago, but also the pervasive cold of fear and callousness that lead the call for mass deportations, for separating families, for making our beloved city 'ground zero' for the 47th president's strategy to deport more than 10 million human beings.
This cold is a symptom of a major shift in climate: Some call it the rise of the oligarchy, and others label it autocracy or tyranny. We witness the events of the week through different words — this is what happens when the empire strikes back.
No, we are not talking about Darth Vader, Emperor Palpatine or the Sith. Instead, we speak of an important lesson taught by Wes Howard-Brook about society in general, and religious traditions in particular.
Wondering how we arrived at such a place where people feed the divisiveness of society based on race, class, religion and other factors, Howard-Brook admits that even in each of our vaunted faith traditions, there are in fact two religions, each pulling in the other direction. Demonstrating how this is as true of the Jewish Bible as it is of the Christian Testaments, he explains that we are torn between the 'religion of creation' and the 'religion of empire.'
The religion of creation is about all of creation. This approach to tradition, as defined in Howard-Brook's book 'Come Out My People!' is 'grounded in the experience of an ongoing relationship with the creator,' which leads people to covenantal commitment to all of creation, seeking the benefit and well-being of all people, of the entire earth.
The religion of empire, conversely, forsakes the whole for the sake of the few: It is a human invention used to justify and legitimatize attitudes and behaviors that provide blessing and abundance for some at the expense of others. Let us stress Howard-Brook's point about the religion of empire — it focuses on the abundance of some at the expense of others.
The expense of others, the separation of society, the punishment of the many for the aggrandizement of the few, is at the heart of the cold we have experienced in Chicago this past week. Whether you call it mass deportations or an immigration agenda, the results of a democratic election or a slide into autocracy, we see a slip into empire. Witness these attempts to advance the abundance of some at the expense of many others:
The new administration represents the thinking of empire religion. This is why we wonder how we should respond to Donald Trump's threats, whether they be against immigrants in our city, the reproductive choices of women, the civil rights of the trans community or any new segment of society that becomes the target of the day. The question of how we respond in the Age of Trump is: What should we Chicagoans do in the face of empire?
We say: We must respond through creation. We must respond with continuous commitment to living in covenant with all of creation, seeking the benefit of all Americans, of every human being.
How do we respond to this dawning age of empire through a commitment to creation? We can start in our innermost circle and radiate outward.
Our commitment to creation begins with kindness, demonstrating decency to every person who crosses our path. In an age of stoked fears and provoked hate, affirming the dignity of all people matters more than we might know.
Our commitment to creation can radiate outward toward our wider community. The divisive nature of empire seeks to isolate individuals; it creates and feeds on loneliness. Whether in your place of work, community center or house of worship, seeking out other people and building a community of people concerned about the well-being of all will be of primary importance. Those of us dedicated to religions of creation must create circles and cultures constantly in contact with this central core.
Lastly, our commitment to creation can expand — even amid the dangers and the justified fears of reprisals — into the world of civic action and politics. The power of organized communities speaking in unison for the rights of the many, for the protections of the few, matters in the face of empire.
Shutting our doors and our hearts paves the way for empire. Instead, as the empire strikes back, may we open our hearts and our doors, standing with the rights of the many against the advantage of the few, defending minorities against purported majorities, demonstrating our commitment to all of creation.
Last week, as we honored the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr., we were reminded how he identified America as a 'sick nation.' And it still is. That is why we cannot afford the luxury of remaining silent, or remaining isolated from each other. Instead, standing together, we can counter that sickness, we can defeat the isolating cold and we can usher in a new era of embracing warmth.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson Pushes 'Grocery Tax'
Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson Pushes 'Grocery Tax'

Yahoo

time3 days ago

  • Yahoo

Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson Pushes 'Grocery Tax'

Chicago is facing a massive budget gap, and its mayor has a possible solution. But it's not one that's sitting well with all retailers. Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson wants "to reinstate a 1% grocery tax" in Chicago, according to Fox 32. Johnson's push for the tax came after Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker eliminated it in the state budget, the television station reported. The Chicago Tribune also reported that Johnson "is pushing aldermen to add a city grocery tax in Chicago as the long-established state grocery levy expires." The grocery tax would bring in about $80 million for the city's 2026 budget, The Tribune reported. According to the Chicago Sun-Times, the push came from "top mayoral aides" to alderpeople. Chief Financial Officer Jill Jaworski and Budget Director Annette Guzman spoke to alderpeople at a revenue subcommittee and told them that Chicago needs "a local version of the state-eliminated 1% grocery tax," the Sun-Times reported. They also said that, in order to close a $1.12 billion budget gap, the City of Chicago "needs a sales tax on professional services" and "a greater share of state income and personal property replacement taxes," the Sun-Times reported. According to Fox 32, the Illinois Retail Merchants Association (IRMA) is concerned about a grocery tax for Chicagoans. "The message is that they have to consider the consumer," said Rob Karr the president and CEO of IRMA to Fox 32. "The retailer considers the consumer every day. Grocery, as you know, is one of the most narrow profit margins of all the industries that are out there, but particularly in retail. And so they really have no place else to go with this. That's something that has to get passed on to the consumer, so it really comes down, again to are the city leaders, is the mayor and the city council willing to impose to yet another financial pressure on their consumers?" he Mayor Brandon Johnson Pushes 'Grocery Tax' first appeared on Men's Journal on Jun 6, 2025

Brown County and C. Reiss agree to lease Pulliam property, but not for coal
Brown County and C. Reiss agree to lease Pulliam property, but not for coal

Yahoo

time4 days ago

  • Yahoo

Brown County and C. Reiss agree to lease Pulliam property, but not for coal

The Brown County Board voted to approve a deal June 5 with Green Bay and C. Reiss Co. to relocate the coal piles to the Fox River Terminal and use the former Pulliam site to store C. Reiss' bulk commodities. Many eyes were on Green Bay and Brown County this week as officials inched closer to a deal that had $15 million at stake. The deal marks a historic milestone to a decades-long effort to relocate the coal piles from its 125-year home at 115 W. Mason St. Under the agreement, C. Reiss will lease the former Pulliam power plant to store salt and other bulk commodities instead of coal. The terms still fulfill decades of community leaders' goal to free up prime riverfront property for industrial, commercial and residential use at the mouth of the Fox River. The Brown County Board unanimously voted to approve the terms of the agreement. Board member Dixon Wolfe was not at the meeting. Former Green Bay mayors Jim Schmitt and Paul Jadin awaited the County Board's momentous vote, along with state Sens. Eric Wimberger, R-Oconto, and Jamie Wall, D-Green Bay; and state Reps. David Steffen, R-Howard; Ben Franklin, R-De Pere; Ryan Spaude, D-Ashwaubenon; and Amaad Rivera-Wagner, D-Green Bay. C. Reiss will lease 16 acres of the Pulliam site to store bulk commodities. The coal piles will be housed at the Fox River Terminal. Lease payments with a rate of $350,000 per year with increases every five years during the first 25 years based on the Consumer Price Index. The length of the lease is 60 years and can be extended. The lease needs to be executed by Sept. 25, according to the agreement. The new plan is a notable shift from previous proposals that had intended to make the Pulliam site the new home of the coal piles. Key parties were sorting out the agreement just a few minutes before starting the County Board meeting June 5, Buckley said ahead of the vote. The board voted on the deal June 5, just hours before the deadline to retain the $15 million state grant. The Wisconsin Department of Administration gave the County Board until June 6 to approve terms of a deal after extending the deadline from the end of May. Brown County agrees to buy the 43.75-acre Pulliam site for $2.7 million in January 2021. Brown County approves the Pulliam site purchase and agrees to sell almost 10 acres of the site to GLC Minerals for an expansion in February 2021. Gov. Tony Evers awards the city and county a $15 million Neighborhood Investment Fund Program grant funded through American Rescue Plan Act dollars in March 2022. Former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg presents the county with a federal $10.1 million Port Infrastructure Development grant to support the project in May 2023. Offers, counteroffers and rejections began in mid-December 2024 when the county officials and C. Reiss tentatively agreed to a $26 million plan that would lease 14.5 acres of the Pulliam property to C. Reiss for up to 75 years at a rate of $110,000 per year with an annual 2.5% increase. The County Board on Dec. 18, 2024, approved modified terms that reduced the lease to 40 years, changed the portion of the Pulliam property C. Reiss would use and added air quality compliance measures. C. Reiss considered the changes a rejection of the negotiated deal. The county's Port of Green Bay published a request for companies' general interest in using the new port site envisioned for the Pulliam property in January 2025. C. Reiss was one of eight to respond with a $28.5 million proposal to improve and use the Pulliam site for coal storage. C. Reiss in mid-March formally rejected the County Board's terms and proposed the county and company spend several months negotiating a deal. The County Board on March 19 rejected the company's offer. The county instead sought to shift negotiations to two alternate sites for coal storage, saying the Pulliam property's future use would be determined by the request for interest process. State officials in March gave the county, company and city a May 30 deadline to reach a deal to relocate the coal piles to the Pulliam site or lose the $15 million grant. Two new proposals emerged in late May as the county, company and city jointly met to discuss options and ideas. State Sen. Eric Wimberger, R-Oconto, on May 23 asked the state to extend the May 30 deadline and the Department of Administration did so on May 30, giving the parties until June 3. Brown County and C. Reiss reached a tentative agreement June 3 and announced the parties would put together the terms in writing June 4 and 5. More: Who still uses coal? Answers to questions about Green Bay coal piles and the possible move More: Brown County, C. Reiss strike deal to move coal piles after extensive negotiations Press-Gazette reporter Jeff Bollier contributed to this report. Contact Benita Mathew at bmathew@ This article originally appeared on Green Bay Press-Gazette: Brown County votes on C. Reiss deal for coal piles

Editorial: Brandon Johnson turns to taxing groceries
Editorial: Brandon Johnson turns to taxing groceries

Yahoo

time5 days ago

  • Yahoo

Editorial: Brandon Johnson turns to taxing groceries

Mayor Brandon Johnson has positioned himself as a champion of working families and the poor. But his messaging is getting complicated as it collides with the city's difficult fiscal reality. 'You all know my position. The ultra-rich continue to get away with not having to put more skin in the game,' he said at a Tuesday news conference. But at the same time, Johnson is pushing for a grocery tax that will disproportionately hurt families at the checkout line as they try to put food on the table. His administration is taking an obfuscational messaging approach to explain its position. Johnson insists this isn't a new tax — it's merely a local continuation of a state tax being phased out. But for struggling families, the semantics won't matter. Higher grocery prices are higher grocery prices. '(The grocery tax) was a function that the state of Illinois decided to relinquish, and leave it to the cities to collect the tax,' Johnson said earlier this week. 'So we're not creating a grocery tax, we're just creating a process by which we can collect it.' That's some twisty logic, to say the least. A tax is a tax even when a mayor calls it a 'function.' It's true that when Gov. JB Pritzker ended the state's 1% grocery tax, he left the door open for cities to collect their own — being as state grocery tax revenues flow to municipalities, not state coffers. Chicago stands to lose $80 million in revenue from the change — at a time when it's already facing a $1 billion budget shortfall. But the budget problem is not just Springfield's doing. It's a reflection of City Hall's unwillingness to rein in spending and make hard choices. And now, instead of leading with reforms, the mayor is reaching for the easiest — and most regressive — option on the shelf. The mayor has put himself in a corner on this one. If his goal is tax fairness, it's hard to see how making food more expensive for struggling Chicagoans fits the bill. In a better world, Chicagoans would be getting a small break at the grocery store. Pritzker has acknowledged the regressive nature of the grocery tax and its impact on families. 'Even with inflation cooling off every dollar counts, so I'm proud we're doing what we can to make trips to the grocery store a little easier,' he said in 2024 after eliminating the statewide grocery tax. We have said much the same, noting that the grocery tax does not need to be there, especially since its absence might contribute in some small way to motivating people to cook healthy meals at home rather than stopping at the local fast-food outlet. In a few months, the working group Johnson convened to explore budget cuts and revenue options for addressing the city's structural budget challenges is expected to share its preliminary recommendations, ahead of the mayor's budget proposal later this year. We're interested to see what the group comes back with — hopefully sooner rather than later. We're aware that the city's finances are so grim there may be no choice but to add back the grocery 'function,' or tax. We'll leave our final view on that until we see a fuller picture of ideas. Until now, the mayor's efforts to introduce widespread new revenue sources have been met with stiff opposition and a lack of public support. First, his flagship fiscal proposal, a real estate transfer tax hike dubbed 'Bring Chicago Home,' failed, a rude awakening that Johnson's election was not a mandate for sweeping new tax hikes. Next, an attempt to build support for a $300 million property tax hike fizzled out amid understandable public resistance and pushback from aldermen. We opposed both ideas. We say these outcomes are a reflection of the general sentiment among Chicagoans, most of whom are sick to death of being asked for more as the city gives them more of the same, often worse, public services. The mayor's grocery tax push will certainly be met with resentment. If he wants to make it happen, the grocery tax will need to be adopted as an ordinance by City Council and submitted to the state by Oct. 1 in order for the tax to be imposed beginning Jan. 1, according to the Illinois Municipal League. Even Johnson's supporters may struggle to square this proposal with his progressive ideals. It's hard to claim you're standing with working families while taxing their daily bread. Submit a letter, of no more than 400 words, to the editor here or email letters@

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store