Russia's new drone-launched cruise missile is crammed with parts from Kyiv's allies, Ukraine says
Ukrainian defense intelligence says it's stripped down a new, drone-launched Russian cruise missile.
The 'Banderol' missile contains parts from allied countries including the US, Japan, and South Korea, it said.
The new missile is reported to have been used in attacks on Odesa last month.
Defence Intelligence of Ukraine has published a breakdown of parts inside a new Russian cruise missile, and claims that many originate from countries including the US, Japan, South Korea, and potentially Australia.
This raises questions about Russia's ongoing ability to get around sanctions imposed on it over its invasion of Ukraine.
Little is known in the West about Russia's S8000 "Banderol" cruise missile, which Ukraine says is made by sanctioned company Kronstadt. Reports emerged in Ukrainian media in late April about its use in a bombardment of the region of Odesa, home to a key Ukrainian port.
Serhii "Flash" Beskrestnov, an influential Ukrainian radiocommunications observer, was among the first to report its use, and speculated that it may be a new type of drone.
It now appears that Ukraine has obtained a version intact enough to be closely examined.
Banderol, reportedly meaning "parcel" or "package," has a range of 310 miles and can cruise at speeds of almost 350 mph, according to Ukraine's defense intelligence agency, also known as the GUR.
GUR said it's launched from an Orion drone, and is also being prepped for deployment from a Mi-28N helicopter.
One unique feature, the GUR said, is "its ability to execute tighter turns than other standard Russian cruise missiles" such as the KH-101 or the 3M-14 Kalibr, while still maintaining an effective cruise missile flight trajectory.
It carries a warhead of up to 150kg, per GUR.
Much of its capabilities can be traced back to parts sourced from countries allied with Ukraine, Ukrainian intelligence said.
In a detailed breakdown of components, GUR said it identified batteries from a Japanese company just weeks after Japan expanded export controls to stop the country's lithium-ion batteries from reaching Russia.
It also said it found a servo — an electronic device that controls a motor — from a South Korean company in the missile.
Seoul added dozens of items to its export controls list, including dual-use items, in December, although it is unclear if this covers servo motors.
It's also unclear if these parts were already in Russian possession before the expanded export controls were put in place.
In addition, GUR said that up to 20 microchips originating from the US, Switzerland, Japan, and South Korea were found inside.
A telemetry module — or sensor and transmission device — resembling one made in Australia was also found, although the GUR said it could be a Chinese copy.
The companies named did not immediately respond to Business Insider requests for comment, sent outside working hours.
Countries like the US and Australia have sent Ukraine significant amounts of humanitarian or military aid, and have implemented extensive sanctions and export controls against Russia.
However, reports have found that sanctioned items have made their way into the Russian military ecosystem via third parties.
According to Ukrainian intelligence, some parts of the missile, including chips and a jet engine, also appeared to have come from Chinese sources.
Beijing is ostensibly neutral, but has been accused by the US of covertly supplying Russia with extensive dual-use parts and even weaponry.
Defence Intelligence of Ukraine called on governments and manufacturers in countries allied to Ukraine to tighten their diligence.
Read the original article on Business Insider
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ukraine shoots down nearly 500 drones, missiles in Russian record strike, Air Force says
Ukraine's Air Force said on June 9 that it intercepted a total of 479 Russian drones and missiles during a record-high wave of strikes overnight. According to the official statement, Russia launched 499 weapons, including 479 Shahed‑type attack drones and various decoy drones, four Kh‑47M2 "Kinzhal" air-launched ballistic missiles, 10 Kh‑101 cruise missiles, three Kh‑22 cruise missiles over the Black Sea, two Kh‑31P anti‑radar missiles, and one Kh‑35 cruise missile from occupied Crimea. Ukraine had reportedly neutralized 479 of the incoming targets, with 292 were shot down, and 187 jammed or lost via electronic warfare. In Kyiv Oblast, air‑raid sirens lasted over ten hours, according to Governor Mykola Kalashnyk. Air defences shot down Russian drones. No civilian casualties were reported. Two houses, a car, and an outbuilding in Boryspil district were reportedly damaged. In Rivne Oblast, Governor Oleksandr Koval described the night as very heavy. One civilian was reportedly injured. The attack, according to Koval, was the largest since the beginning of Russia's full-scale war. In Zaporizhzhia Oblast, one person was injured, according to Governor Ivan Fedorov. Over the day, 498 strikes reportedly struck 14 populated areas. In Kherson Oblast, numerous towns were hit by drones, artillery, and airstrikes. Three apartment blocks, 13 houses, a farm, and vehicles were damaged. Four civilians were injured, the governor said. In Kharkiv Oblast, nine villages were hit. Seven civilians suffered minor injuries, according to Governor Oleh Syniehubov. Russian forces reportedly used 22 unguided aviation rockets, 18 guided bombs (KAB), 6 Geran (Shahed) drones, 4 unspecified UAVs, and 1 Molniya drone. Civil damage included houses, a store, a camp, and vehicles. In Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, Ukrainian defences downed six UAVs at night, Governor Serhii Lysak said. A farm, houses, and vehicles in the region were reportedly hit. In Sumy Oblast, Russian forces launched nearly 90 strikes across 35 settlements, injuring nine civilians, local authorities reported. Shops, a school, homes, and cars were reportedly damaged. Authorities evacuated 21 people. In Cherkasy Oblast, air defences shot down 33 Russian drones overnight. No injuries were reported, but falling debris damaged four houses, a farm outbuilding, and a car in the Cherkasy district. Read also: Ukrainian drones hit Russian electronic warfare facility in Chuvashia Republic, military says We've been working hard to bring you independent, locally-sourced news from Ukraine. Consider supporting the Kyiv Independent.

Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
Russian president Vladimir Putin stamps his approval on the Russian-Congo oil pipeline
Russia and the Republic of Congo have enjoyed a growing relationship in recent years, which appears to be strengthening, as evidenced by a recent agreement between the two countries, spearheaded by Russian President Vladimir Putin. Russia and the Republic of Congo have entered into a collaborative agreement for constructing the Pointe-Noire-Loutete-Maloukou-Trechot petroleum pipeline. The project, ratified into law by President Vladimir Putin, aims to bolster the energy security of Congo and establish a sanctions-resistant distribution channel. Construction of the pipeline is projected to span 3 years, with an operational lifespan between 30 and 40 years. Russian president Vladimir Putin recently ratified a deal to work with the Congo on building the Pointe-Noire-Loutete-Maloukou-Trechot petroleum product pipeline in the African nation by signing a bill into law. The project links Loutété, Maloukou, and the coastline of Pointe-Noire, three Congolese towns. The agreement was initially signed on September 28, 2024, in Moscow, Russia's capital. According to Russian Deputy Energy Minister Dmitry Islamov, the deal aims to help make Russia the region's vital energy security partner while building a sanctions-proof petroleum product delivery route, as reported by Interfax. "The implementation of the agreement will enable the Congo to ensure uninterrupted and stable supplies of petroleum products to the capital region, reduce logistics costs, gain the status of a key player in ensuring the region's energy security - including the Democratic Republic of the Congo and the Central African Republic - and create additional jobs," Islamov said while presenting the bill to the State Duma. "For Russia, this means expanding high-tech exports, creating an additional sanctions-resistant petroleum products distribution channel, and securing status as the region's strategic energy security partner," he added. Back in April, the Congolese National Assembly approved the project. Following that, the Russian State Duma ratified the agreement on the construction, as the deadline for the project was disclosed by Deputy Minister of Energy Dmitry Islamov. The deputy minister also added that the project would be completed in 3 years and its operations would last between 30 to 40 years. Russia and Congo Back in July 2024, Russia and Congo agreed to cooperate in hydropower and peaceful nuclear energy. Later that year, they reached a provision agreement to construct the oil pipeline mentioned above. According to the Congolese government, a joint venture would be formed to build the pipeline, with Russia owning 90% of the company.


USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
My 5-year-old survived cancer – twice. Don't put politics before medical research.
My 5-year-old survived cancer – twice. Don't put politics before medical research. | Opinion When you're watching your child battle cancer, every advancement matters. We can't afford to let misinformation and polarized politics dictate the future of lifesaving research. Show Caption Hide Caption Cuts to health research could impact clinical studies and trials at the NIH The Trump administration wants to cut health spending in the coming year, and plans to cut the budget at the National Institutes of Health by $18 billion. Few issues in American politics have consistently united both parties like the fight against cancer. While funding levels and strategies may differ, Democrats and Republicans alike recognize that cancer doesn't discriminate – and neither should our commitment to defeat it. Under the Biden administration, the Cancer Moonshot was relaunched to accelerate progress toward a cure. More recently, President Donald Trump announced his 'Stargate' initiative, which aims to harness artificial intelligence in detecting and treating cancer, including through personalized mRNA vaccines. In the United States, cancer is the leading cause of death by disease for children after infancy. Across the political spectrum, there remains a shared hope: that no one should have to endure the pain of losing a loved one or fight this deadly disease. Yet today, that consensus is showing signs of strain. State legislatures across the country are advancing bills to ban or severely restrict the use of – and further research into – breakthrough technologies like mRNA, a technology that is driving promising advancements in cancer. What should be a story of American scientific innovation is being twisted into a political talking point. And it's putting lives at risk. Opinion: Biden's diagnosis shows two things. Cancer hits everyone and some forgot that. My daughter survived cancer twice. Politicians can't imagine what we went through. If the politicians pushing these bans spent even a few minutes inside a pediatric oncology unit, maybe they'd understand. They'd see floors filled with sick children on small bicycles, pulling IV poles behind them. Children in hospital beds, brave beyond measure. And parents clinging to hope. I've seen it firsthand. I'm a mother whose 5-year-old daughter has survived cancer – twice. My daughter Charlie is one of a small percentage of pediatric cancer patients whose tumors don't show up on standard blood tests. Her cancer went undetected for more than a year. By the time doctors found it, it had already spread to her liver. She was just 3 years old and had Stage 4 cancer. Once Charlie's cancer was detected, we rushed into treatment: high-dose chemotherapy, stem cell transplants and multiple surgeries. After months of treatment, we got the news every parent prays for: Charlie was cancer-free. But just a few months later, scans revealed a relapse. Two small nodules were found on her lung. Her baby brother was only two months old when we learned her cancer had returned. Relapse treatment was grueling. Charlie lost weight and muscle mass. She needed a feeding tube to stay nourished, hydrated and medicated. But through it all, she never lost her smile. Her strength became ours. And while we juggled caring for a newborn and two other children, we held onto hope, because science gave us a reason to. Thanks to expert care at Seattle Children's and research-backed protocols, she's once again cancer-free. She started preschool this year. She's coloring, laughing and chasing her siblings again. Public funding for research saved my daughter's life Every option we had was made possible by decades of public investment in research. Families who came before us joined clinical trials. Lawmakers chose to fund pediatric science and cancer research. That is the same kind of work mRNA research builds on today. Researchers are developing an mRNA-based diagnostic test that could catch cancers like hers earlier, when they're more treatable. The test uses mRNA from her original tumor to detect any circulating cancer cells through a simple blood draw. Catching a relapse early could be lifesaving. We first learned about this test in 2023, and knowing it's almost within reach brings us, and families like ours, so much hope. Beyond mRNA-based diagnostic tests, mRNA has also shown early promise as a therapy for cancer patients, enabling personalized treatment that could more effectively target one's tumor. That kind of innovation is exactly what's under threat right now. The role of mRNA technology in oncology has been studied for decades, and yet some lawmakers want to roll this progress back, arguing it is untested and unsafe. This technology, along with many innovations that come from federally supported medical research, is a critical source of hope for families around the world. I'm a doctor. So is my mother. When she got cancer, I realized how little that mattered. | Opinion When you're watching your child battle cancer, every advancement matters. I know firsthand how critical it is to catch cancer early and have access to every possible treatment option. When politicians politicize science – when they ban or restrict it based on misinformation and politics – they aren't protecting families like mine. They're limiting our options. They're slowing down the breakthroughs that could save lives. We can't afford to let misinformation and polarized politics dictate the future of lifesaving research. Thanks to innovation in medical research, Charlie is thriving today, but far too many kids are still fighting. Let's ensure science continues to move forward for all of our children. Emily Stenson is a childhood cancer advocate and the mother of 5-year-old two-time cancer survivor Charlie Stenson. She lives in Seattle.