logo
Why we left California: Its legislature put crazy woke ideology ahead of kids' wellbeing

Why we left California: Its legislature put crazy woke ideology ahead of kids' wellbeing

The Hill2 days ago

In 2019, my family packed our belongings and left California, the state we had called home for most of our lives. Why? Well, high taxes were part of the equation. But more than anything, we left to protect our then 10-year-old daughter from a system that no longer made sense— or felt safe.
One moment crystallized it: sitting in the pediatrician's waiting room, we learned that once our daughter turned 12, we would no longer have access to her medical records without her consent.
That's not parental empowerment. That's state intrusion — and it was just the beginning.
California's unraveling isn't just about affordability or policy overreach. It is also about a government that has deprioritized the safety, dignity, and wellbeing of children in favor of a progressive-left agenda.
Take Assembly Bill 90, which requires community colleges and state universities to create overnight parking programs for the 4.2 percent of homeless students in their systems.
On the surface, it sounds compassionate. In reality, it is a stark admission of policy failure.
In 2016, California adopted the federal 'Housing First' model, which promises permanent housing units — without preconditions — to all struggling with homelessness. This policy was overlaid onto a system that already ranked 49th in the nation in housing units per resident, and that builds just 40 percent of the affordable units it needs annually.
Instead of fixing these systemic failures, AB 90 effectively turned parking lots into student housing, exposing students to crime, isolation, and instability. Assemblymember Darshana Patel (D) stood virtually alone in raising student safety concerns. In a party-line, 6-2 vote, the bill passed committee.
Then there's Assembly Bill 379, written to increase penalties for child sex traffickers. Unfortunately, that version didn't survive. Progressive-left lawmakers stripped the bill of protections for 16- and 17-year-olds — the very age group most targeted by traffickers, according to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children.
California's majority party couldn't bring itself to protect minors from sexual exploitation, because somehow this apparently conflicted with their political narrative.
The same pattern shows up in school sports. Two common-sense bills intended to safeguard fairness and safety for female athletes were killed in committee. These bills would have barred biological males from competing against girls— something California Gov. Gavin Newsom himself has admitted to be 'deeply unfair.'
Decades of research and a 2020 study published in Sports Medicine confirm the physical advantages biological males have over females, even after hormone therapy. To refuse to acknowledge this reality is to deny basic science. It isn't just unfair but dangerous to have males competing in girls' and women's sports, especially contact sports.
All this is happening while California funnels billions into climate initiatives and green infrastructure despite ranking 41st in K-12 education and 39th in school safety. California also leads the nation in youth depression and self-harm, according to the Centers for Disease Control.
And let's not forget that during the COVID-19 pandemic, California kept students out of classrooms longer than almost any other state. That decision caused historic learning loss— particularly among low-income students. To date, there has been no meaningful academic recovery plan.
What's the matter with California? To sum up: Parents can't access their children's medical records without the children's permission; students' dorms are the backseats of their Honda Civics; vulnerable teens go unprotected from traffickers; female athletes are deliberately put at risk.
These aren't glitches. They are all symptoms of a deeper collapse — a moral and political refusal to prioritize the wellbeing of children over ideology.
California once led the nation in education, innovation, and opportunity. Now, despite its natural beauty and economic power, it has become a cautionary tale about what happens when a government trades responsibility for radicalism. That's why my family joined the hundreds of thousands of net residents who have moved away to other states in recent years.
Unless its leaders correct course — putting kids first and politics second — California won't just keep failing her children. She will also set a dangerous precedent for the rest of America.
Michele Steeb is the founder of Free Up Foundation and author of 'Answers Behind the RED DOOR: Battling the Homeless Epidemic,' based on her 13 years as CEO of northern California's largest program for homeless women and children.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Exclusive: Newsom faces fallout with key health care allies over Medi-Cal
Exclusive: Newsom faces fallout with key health care allies over Medi-Cal

Axios

time4 hours ago

  • Axios

Exclusive: Newsom faces fallout with key health care allies over Medi-Cal

Over 120 major organizations throughout California, including health providers, unions and religious groups, are issuing a warning to Gov. Gavin Newsom: Keep Medi-Cal funded, or you'll lose our support. Why it matters: Newsom ran on a universal health care platform. But with a $68 billion budget deficit and presidential ambitions on the horizon, access for the state's most vulnerable populations could now be on the chopping block. Zoom in: Under Newsom's proposal, undocumented immigrants 19 and older would be entitled to emergency medical and pregnancy care but lose coverage for expenses like prescription drugs, dental care and doctor's visits if they don't enroll before January. Starting in 2027, the state would also add a $100 per month premium for adults whose immigration status makes them ineligible for federal Medicaid, including those with legal status. Community-facing clinics would see their reimbursement rates cut as part of the plan. Driving the news: A new open letter, spearheaded by Health Justice Action Fund and St. John's Community Health, blasts Newsom for attempting to "balance the budget on the backs of poor and working Californians" and creating a system that discriminates against immigrants. "People will die. That is not political rhetoric, but a grim reality when chronic conditions go unmanaged, emergencies go untreated, and facilities are forced to shutter," the letter states. "[O]ur goal is to make sure everyone gets the care they need, but these cuts will make that impossible," Bay Area health care worker Ron Cook told Axios via email. Threat level: Newsom's proposal would force California health clinics to face a 20% cut in funding on top of the 10% reduction to Medicaid currently making its way through Congress, the letter notes. It'd jeopardize 2,300 health service sites and lead to loss of access to primary care, mental health services and life-saving medications for 1.6 million Californians, per the letter. Signees include the Bay Area-based North East Medical Services, La Clínica de La Raza, Inc. and Gardner Health Services. What they're saying: The budget proposal "was kind of a five-alarm fire," St. John's president and CEO Jim Mangia told Axios. After California expanded coverage for undocumented immigrants last year, many are finally seeing a doctor, getting their diabetes under control and having their hypertension treated, Mangia said. "The thought of losing it is devastating." The other side: Newsom's office did not immediately return a request for comment, though he has said Medi-Cal expansion cost the state more than expected — about $8.5 billion from the general fund annually. Between the lines: Many community health groups supported Newsom in his run for governor, but his White House ambitions have created a rift, with some advocates accusing him of catering to Republicans by targeting immigrants and trying to avoid raising taxes. "Everything at this point, unfortunately, is about the political calculation of a presidential campaign, not about what's needed by the people of California," Mangia said. What we're watching: Mangia acknowledged the reality of the budget deficit but emphasized that the solution lies with revenue, such as increasing corporate taxes.

5 things to know about big potential changes to California's building laws
5 things to know about big potential changes to California's building laws

Los Angeles Times

time4 hours ago

  • Los Angeles Times

5 things to know about big potential changes to California's building laws

Government runs on acronyms. In California, few inspire such strong reactions as CEQA. Those four letters stand for the California Environmental Quality Act. It's a state law that's been around since 1970. Depending on whom you ask, it's either the reason California retains its natural beauty in the face of unrelenting development pressure or why the state has plunged into a housing crisis. But now the Legislature is debating the most substantial overhaul to CEQA in generations. One proposal would exempt urban housing from its requirements and the other would weaken its rules for almost everything else. Here's why the law is so integral to California and what changes might do. The law is straightforward. CEQA requires proponents of a development — housing, highways, power plants, warehouses and many more — to disclose and, if possible, lessen its environmental effects before breaking ground. In practice these rules have meant thousand-plus page reports that include lengthy analyses of soil testing and traffic modeling, and sometimes endless litigation that puts entire projects at risk. Supporters of CEQA say the law is essential to preventing development from dirtying California's waterways and mountain ranges and protects communities from harm. They say the law's effects on stopping development are overblown, pointing to studies that show few projects face lawsuits. Those who want CEQA overhauled respond that even threats to sue can derail projects, such as housing or clean energy infrastructure, that the state needs to be more affordable and respond to climate change. The reformers contend that a project's opponents weaponize the broad requirements in CEQA to try to stop the developments, including homeless shelters and a food bank in recent years, for reasons that have nothing to do with the environment. Two of CEQA's biggest fans are environmental and labor groups, influential constituencies in state politics. They've successfully resisted major changes to the law over the years and have learned to wield it. So even though governors and lawmakers have talked a big game about CEQA changes, they've been able to pass relief only for specific pet projects or those willing to pay construction workers higher wages, or set aside a portion of the development for low-income housing or other benefits. The two new bills have been proposed by veteran lawmakers who have written many of the CEQA and housing reforms in recent years, frustrated that large-scale development hasn't followed. Their efforts have been buoyed by a national 'Abundance' movement that's growing within Democratic circles. The argument goes that laws like CEQA in part drive the housing and infrastructure crises in blue states that are stifling the party's political fortunes. Gov. Gavin Newsom, who has embraced the call, endorsed the two bills and put them on a fast-track to approval as soon as this month. Even opponents of the bills believe something is going to pass. But what that looks like remains an open question. One lawmaker indicated that some labor standards may be part of her bill, and the other's bill was gutted in a legislative committee. All eyes will be on Newsom and legislative leaders in the coming weeks as they attempt to hammer out a final deal. Virginia writes, 'My dad gave me a strong sense of self as a smart Latina capable of doing anything I set my mind to. One of his favorite pieces of advice, liberally given, was that people would underestimate me and not to let them. This served me well as I entered the male dominated corporate world of the late 80s and 90s and eventually reached my goal at the top of the corporate ladder.' Michael writes, 'Son, you should always marry a short girl. When they [fart,] they don't kick up as much dust.' Email us at essentialcalifornia@ and your response might appear in the newsletter this week. On June 5, 1981, AIDS was reported for the first time following the detection of a rare form of pneumonia in five gay men in Los Angeles. Last year, as part of the Times' Our Queerest Century project, columnist LZ Granderson wrote about how we must remember the heroes of the AIDS epidemic, not just the trauma. Kevinisha Walker, multiplatform editorAndrew Campa, Sunday writerKarim Doumar, head of newsletters How can we make this newsletter more useful? Send comments to essentialcalifornia@ Check our top stories, topics and the latest articles on

California judge blocks Sable oil pipeline restart
California judge blocks Sable oil pipeline restart

E&E News

time6 hours ago

  • E&E News

California judge blocks Sable oil pipeline restart

A California judge granted a temporary restraining order Tuesday blocking a waiver issued by Gov. Gavin Newsom's administration that would allow a Texas-based oil company to restart a crude pipeline off Santa Barbara. What happened: Santa Barbara Superior Court Judge Donna Geck issued an order restraining Sable Offshore from proceeding with the restart and operation of the Las Flores pipeline system, a 124-mile crude oil pipeline from Santa Barbara to Kern County that has been dormant since a 2015 spill. That order will remain in place until a July hearing where Sable and the California State Fire Marshal, which issued the waiver, can argue against a preliminary injunction being granted. Advertisement The ruling is the second legal blow in a week for Sable. Santa Barbara Superior Court Judge Thomas Anderle issued a preliminary injunction Wednesday, ordering the company to stop repairs on the pipeline, upholding a cease-and-desist order the California Coastal Commission issued in April.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store