The climate movement is talking about carbon all wrong, a new book argues
Burning oil, gas, and coal — literal fossil fuels, made from the compressed remains of ancient plants and plankton — has released carbon into Earth's atmosphere, where it traps heat and alters the climate. That process has caused massive destruction and loss of life, and it will continue to do so. As a result, carbon came to be seen as something to 'fight,' 'combat,' and 'capture.'
Paul Hawken, the author of the new book Carbon: The Book of Life, argues that the climate movement is thinking about its work, and messaging, all wrong. 'Those who call carbon a pollutant might want to lay down their word processor,' Hawken writes. Carbon, he notes, is after all the building block of life, the animating force behind trees, rhinos, eyelashes, hormones, bamboo, and so much more. Without it, Earth would just be a lonely, dead rock. So much for decarbonizing.
Hawken has come to believe that treating carbon as something to tackle, liquefy, and pump into geological formations not only reflects the same mindset that caused climate change in the first place, but also further alienates people from the living world. There is no 'climate crisis,' he argues, but a crisis of human thinking and behavior that's degrading the soil, wiping out entire species, and changing the weather faster than people can adapt. 'From a planetary view,' he writes in Carbon, 'the warming atmosphere is a response, an adjustment, a teaching.'
The book records a shift in his thinking. In 2017, Hawken published Drawdown: The Most Comprehensive Plan Ever Proposed to Reverse Global Warming, a book that ranked 100 climate solutions by how much they could reduce carbon emissions, from refrigerant leaks to food waste. The nonprofit Project Drawdown, which he launched, continues to implement these kinds of fixes around the world. But now, Hawken is forgoing straightforward metrics to focus on what he sees as a deeper cultural problem. 'The living world is a complex interactive system and doesn't lend itself to simple solutions,' he said.
The new book frames carbon as a flow — a cycle that moves through the atmosphere, oceans, soil, with the element absorbed by growing plants and exhaled in every animal breath. Hawken's book is a lesson in what's sometimes called 'unlearning,' or letting go of old assumptions, like the idea that nature is something to fix or control. The book explores ways to repair a broken relationship with the natural world, drawing inspiration from Indigenous cultures and new scientific discoveries. Hawken marvels at how much remains unknown about carbon, which he dubs 'the most mysterious element of all.'
The book's poetic language offers a stark contrast to the warlike terms climate advocates tend to use to describe carbon. Hawken argues that the typical metaphors are not only inaccurate — how exactly do you battle an element? — but also provide fuel for right-wing narratives that carbon has been unfairly demonized. Last week, E&E News reported that the Trump administration is planning a federal report making the case that a warming world would be a good thing, a pretext for weakening climate regulations.
'Carbon dioxide is not an evil gas,' David Legates, a former Trump official, said in a recent video put out by the Heartland Institute, a conservative think tank. 'Rather, it's a gas beneficial to life on Earth. It'll increase temperatures slightly, and warmer temperatures are certainly better than colder temperatures.'
Read Next
How the Klamath Dams Came Down
Anita Hofschneider & Jake Bittle
Hawken wants a broad shift in how people talk about the natural world, though, not just a rethinking of the climate movement's metaphors. He points to how financial institutions increasingly refer to nature as a commodity. In January, BlackRock, the world's largest asset manager, declared 'natural capital' an investment priority. In February, Goldman Sachs launched a 'biodiversity bond fund' turning ecosystems into investment products. The jargon used in scientific reports and global climate conferences also creates a sense of detachment that dulls the living things it refers to. Hawken describes the word 'biodiversity' as 'a bloodless term' and 'carbon neutrality' as an absurd 'biophysical impossibility.'
'We are numbed by the science, puzzled by jargon, paralyzed by predictions, confused about what actions to take, stressed as we scramble to care for our family, or simply impoverished, overworked, and tired,' Hawken writes. 'Most of humanity doesn't talk about climate change because we do not know what to say.'
Even plainspoken terms like 'nature' are suspect, in Hawken's view: The concept only seems to exist to mark a separation between humans and the rest of the world. He points out that the Chicham language of the Achuar people in the Amazon doesn't have a word for nature, nor do other Indigenous languages. 'Such words would only be needed if the Achuar experienced nature as distinct from the self,' he writes. English, by contrast, he describes as a 'rootless' language, borrowing terms from so many places that it struggles to teach the kind of deep, reciprocal relationships that are born from living in one place and caring for it over many generations.
Hawken hopes to mend that separation by helping people discover the flow of carbon in their daily lives and kindle a sense of wonder about it. Carbon delves into mind-bending scientific discoveries about the kind of marvels that carbon makes possible. Bees, with their two-milligram brains, appear able to count, learn by observation, feel pain and pleasure, and even recognize their own knowledge. The rye plant senses the world around it with more than 14 million roots and root hairs, a network that one plant neurobiologist described as a type of brain. Hawken's book is a reminder that carbon — despite all the problems caused by releasing too much of it into the atmosphere — is actually a gift.
The goal of Carbon isn't to map out a plan for saving the Earth, but to rekindle a sense of relationship with it.
Where Hawken lives in California, his community recently restored a salmon stream, breaking down a concrete barrier under a bridge that had blocked the fish on their final journey up the stream to spawn. 'The core of it is about care, and kindness, and connection, and compassion, and generosity,' Hawken said. 'That's where regeneration starts.'
This story was originally published by Grist with the headline The climate movement is talking about carbon all wrong, a new book argues on Mar 21, 2025.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Engineers unveil radical new freight system that could make diesel trucks obsolete: 'Almost like a mini-airline'
A team of engineers from the University of New South Wales is developing a fleet of drones that can deliver vital supplies to remote areas of Australia. The all-electric fleet would produce zero emissions and be a game-changer for both the population of these remote areas and the environment at large. Countries like Australia have vast swaths of remote land. The population of these remote areas depends on diesel trucks for the delivery of vital materials such as food and medicine. But the emissions from those long deliveries can be detrimental to both the environment and the humans they are serving. Diesel trucks are one of the largest sources of emissions around the globe, contributing to human respiratory illnesses such as asthma and lung disease. They are also detrimental to the environment, as they can degrade crops and soil as well as produce acid rain. To top it all off, they contribute mightily to warming temperatures around the globe. The project is a collaboration between a company called Seaflight Technologies and Macquarie University. Together, they are developing the AURA-E, an electric drone designed for long-range, heavy cargo transport. The ultimate goal of the program is to create a drone that can carry 440-660 pounds over hundreds of kilometers. The leaders of the program believe its benefits will go beyond efficiency and being better for the environment. It should also be a significant source of job growth in the region. This is because the operation of a fleet of drones will require a new generation of aviation professionals and entrepreneurs. With that in mind, the government of Australia awarded the development team half of the program's $3 million budget. This is only the latest use of drone technology to benefit the environment. It has also been used to locate abandoned oil and gas wells. And they are increasingly being deployed to fight deadly and destructive wildfires before they can spread out of control. The heads of the program have big ideas about its potential scope. "If you imagine drones as being almost like a mini-airline, you could have hundreds or even thousands of flights per day," said Graham Doig, the founder of Seaflight Technologies. He was also understandably enthusiastic about the idea of replacing the dirty diesel trucks. "You can start talking about resupplying a community with medical supplies or fresh fruit and vegetables that otherwise would have come from the other side of the country in a diesel-spewing truck. We're taking that off the road, and we're replacing it with near-zero emissions technology that can provide people with goods they need the next day." Which of the following sustainable changes would make you most likely to choose a particular airline? Using cleaner fuel Reducing in-flight waste Making it easy to choose low-emissions itineraries I don't pay attention to sustainability when I fly Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. Join our free newsletter for weekly updates on the latest innovations improving our lives and shaping our future, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.


Fox News
3 days ago
- Fox News
New mobile robot helps seniors walk safely and prevent falls
The demographic landscape in the U.S. is shifting rapidly, with the median age now at 38.9, almost a decade older than it was in 1980. By 2050, the population of adults over 65 is projected to surge from 58 million to 82 million, intensifying the already urgent challenge of eldercare. With falls remaining the top cause of injury among older adults, the need for innovative, tech-driven solutions has never been clearer. MIT engineers are stepping up to this challenge with E-BAR, a mobile robot designed to physically support seniors and prevent falls as they move around their homes. E-BAR, short for Elderly Bodily Assistance Robot, is not your typical assistive device. Rather than relying on harnesses or wearables, which many seniors find cumbersome or stigmatizing, E-BAR operates as a set of robotic handlebars that follow users from behind. This allows individuals to walk freely, lean on the robot's arms for support or receive full-body assistance when transitioning between sitting and standing. The robot's articulated body, constructed from 18 interconnected bars, mimics the natural movement of the human body, delivering a seamless and intuitive experience. The engineering behind E-BAR's mobility is equally impressive. The robot's 220-pound base is meticulously designed to support the weight of an average adult without tipping or slipping, and its omnidirectional wheels enable smooth navigation through tight spaces and around household obstacles. This means E-BAR can move effortlessly alongside users, providing support in real time, whether they are reaching for a high shelf or stepping out of a bathtub. What sets E-BAR apart from previous eldercare robots is its integrated fall-prevention system. Each arm is embedded with airbags made from soft, grippable materials that can inflate instantly if a fall is detected. This rapid response cushions the user without causing bruising, and, crucially, it does so without requiring the user to wear any special gear. In lab tests, E-BAR successfully supported elderly volunteers as they performed everyday tasks that often pose a risk for falls, such as bending down, stretching up or navigating the tricky edge of a bathtub. Currently, E-BAR is operated via remote control, but the MIT team is already working on automating its navigation and assistance features. The vision is for future versions to autonomously follow users, assess their real-time fall risk using machine learning algorithms and provide adaptive support as their mobility needs evolve. The E-BAR project is rooted in extensive interviews with seniors and caregivers, which revealed a strong preference for unobtrusive, non-restrictive support systems. E-BAR's U-shaped handlebars leave the front of the user completely open, allowing for a natural stride and easy exit at any time. The robot is slim enough to fit through standard doorways and is designed to blend into the home environment, making it a practical addition rather than an intrusive medical device. MIT researchers see E-BAR as part of a broader ecosystem of assistive technologies, each tailored to different stages of aging and mobility. While some devices may offer predictive fall detection or harness-based support, E-BAR's unique combination of full-body assistance, fall prevention and user autonomy addresses a critical gap for those who want to maintain independence but need occasional support. Currently, MIT's E-BAR robot is still in the prototype stage and is not yet available for consumer purchase. The research team is continuing to refine the design and aims to bring it to market in the coming years, but it could take 5–10 years before the device receives full regulatory approval and becomes commercially accessible. Looking forward, the research team is also focused on refining E-BAR's design to make it slimmer, more maneuverable and even more intuitive to use. They are also exploring ways to integrate advanced AI for real-time fall prediction and adaptive assistance, ensuring that the robot can meet users' changing needs as they age. The ultimate goal is to provide seamless, continuous support, empowering seniors to live safely and confidently in their own homes. What stands out about E-BAR is how it's designed with real people in mind, not just as a tech gadget. It's easy to see how something like this could make a big difference for seniors wanting to stay independent without feeling tied down by bulky or uncomfortable devices. As the technology improves, it could change the way we think about caring for older adults, making everyday life safer and a bit easier for everyone involved. How comfortable would you feel trusting a robot like E-BAR to help your loved ones move safely around their home? Let us know by writing us at For more of my tech tips and security alerts, subscribe to my free CyberGuy Report Newsletter by heading to Follow Kurt on his social channels: Answers to the most-asked CyberGuy questions: New from Kurt: Copyright 2025 All rights reserved.


Buzz Feed
6 days ago
- Buzz Feed
The Dangers Of Raw Milk, According To An Expert
At this point, if you've ever wandered through a local farmer's market or fallen into a TikTok wellness rabbit hole filled with 'home on the range' tradwife energy, you've probably stumbled into the raw milk debate — which, FYI, is rife with hashtags like #primal, #healing, #therawtruth, and #divinemasculinity. The central claim from the raw milk camp is that pasteurization — heating milk to kill harmful bacteria — also wipes out all the good stuff. Some even say this is why your lactose-intolerant stomach can't handle conventional dairy. However, according to Dr. Supriya Rao, a board-certified gastroenterologist (read: an actual medical expert, not someone with a ring light and a soft filter), that claim doesn't totally hold up. In fact, much of the raw milk argument neglects the fact that raw dairy can harbor harmful pathogens like E. coli or Listeria. And, while 'some individuals with lactose intolerance report better tolerance to raw dairy due to natural lactase enzymes, there is limited evidence to support this,' says Dr. Rao. Another raw milk argument? That pasteurization only became necessary when people moved into cities and stopped milking cows in their backyards. The demand for milk skyrocketed, cows got packed into grimy urban dairies, and their diets devolved into "swill" — leftover distillery mash with zero nutrients. Unsurprisingly, this became a bacterial disaster. Enter Louis Pasteur, who developed pasteurization in the 1860s. And while the French may now be the poster children for raw cheese, they also figured out early on that maybe we shouldn't risk death-by-dairy. So, where are we now? The dust has settled, and raw milk seems to be enjoying a second life as a #healthygirl accessory. For the rest of us plebeians, it still feels like a shortcut to a week-long, salmonella-fueled diarrhea spiral. Even doctors on TikTok have stepped in now, begging people to chill the hell out. One creator (@rubin_allergy) — again, actual MD and board-certified allergist, not just someone who has #healedtheirgut — warns that the issue isn't just adults making risky gut choices. It's the kids. 'There are many members of society who are vulnerable to misinformation and don't have much control over their decisions,' Dr. Rubin says. Translation: your toddler didn't exactly opt into the crunchy granola, raw-milk-loving life. Okay, sure. We can admit that pasteurization insignificantly removes a few enzymes and vitamins. But let's not lose the plot. As Dr. Rao puts it plainly: 'The benefits do not outweigh the risks.' Unless you're personally milking Bessie in your backyard — and also scrubbing down your equipment like you're prepping for surgery — raw milk is a gamble. A cute glass bottle and a rustic label don't cancel out the very real possibility of pathogens like E. coli, Listeria, and even tuberculosis. And no, 'small-batch' doesn't mean 'sterile.' 'Even with strict sanitation, contamination can occur during milking, storage, or transport,' says Rao. Yum-my. If you truly love raw milk, churn butter on your own time and live your Laura Ingalls Wilder reboot. But if you're promoting it online like it's the dairy version of the Ten Commandments, include a disclaimer: this isn't for everyone. Most people don't have the time, space, or money to keep their own cow, and once you're relying on external producers, you're right back where we started — trusting industrial systems to handle something inherently risky. Sure, maybe our ancestors drank raw milk. But they also lived through polio, lacked indoor plumbing, and thought bloodletting was peak healthcare. Not every historical habit needs a comeback. Now let's talk about the French because, of course. They adore raw dairy, and yes, the cheese counters of France are basically temples to mold and milk. But there's a major difference: they don't take chances with the milk itself. Raw cheese is aged. 'FDA regulations require raw cheese to be aged at least 60 days,' says Rao. 'During this time, harmful bacteria are often neutralized by natural cultures and lactic acid, making the cheese safer.' Let's not forget that the entire process of pasteurization exists because of France. Remember, Mr. Pasteur, the man himself, developed the method to prevent microbial contamination in food and wine and later, milk. It was a life-saving breakthrough, not a government overreach. Abandoning it in the name of 'natural health' is like rejecting penicillin because it came from a lab and wasn't grown on organic sourdough. So, when is raw dairy okay? In regulated, controlled environments, like aging rooms with microbial testing with products that are monitored and time-buffered to reduce risk. But raw dairy as a lifestyle brand? As a wellness shortcut or a sign of anti-establishment enlightenment? That's where things get dicey. Unless you live on a fully sanitized, self-sustaining farm with a cow and a microbiology lab in your barn, you're probably better off sticking to the pasteurized stuff. Hungry for more? Download our free Tasty app to browse and save 7,500+ free recipes — no subscription required.