Government approach to Omagh bomb hearing ‘risks undermining public confidence'
The UK Government has risked 'undermining public confidence' in its approach to a hearing of the Omagh Bombing Inquiry, its chairman has been told.
Counsel to the inquiry Paul Greaney KC told a hearing in Belfast that it was 'highly unfortunate' that legal papers relating to the redaction of names were received on the evening before the public session.
Mr Greaney also said that as the hearings related to transparency, he would have thought the Government 'would have been scrupulous to avoid the impression that it was behaving in a way that was procedurally unhelpful and possibly even unfair'.
The hearing was told that applications from the Government and the PSNI to redact names of junior civil servants and bombing suspects from documents released to core participants in the inquiry is 'putting a brake' on its work.
The Omagh Bombing Inquiry, chaired by Lord Turnbull, is holding procedural hearings in Belfast which relate to submissions to redact information from materials.
The Real IRA bomb in the Co Tyrone town in August 1998 killed 29 people, including a woman who was pregnant with twins, in the worst single atrocity in the Troubles in Northern Ireland.
The public inquiry was set up by the previous government to examine whether the explosion could have been prevented by the UK authorities.
Earlier this year the inquiry heard personal statements from those affected by the massacre.
On Wednesday, Mr Greaney said there were two issues which the latest hearings would deal with.
The first relates to a Government submission that the names of junior civil servants should be redacted from documents they provide before they are released to core participants.
The second relates to a PSNI application to redact the names of suspects who have not been charged from documents.
The barrister said the inquiry would see the documents in unredacted form but the issue was whether they should be redacted before they are given to core participants.
Core participants in the inquiry include the families of those who were killed in the bombing as well as multiple people who were injured.
He said the issue of whether the names would be disclosed unredacted during oral evidence hearings would be dealt with at a future point.
He said: 'The current position of HMG (His Majesty's Government) and PSNI is putting a brake on the work of disclosure of the inquiry.'
Setting out the background, Mr Greaney said the inquiry legal team had written earlier this year to the Government, asking it to make any applications for redaction by March 14.
He said: 'Even at that early stage, in March of this year, as many as 80 documents were having to be withheld from disclosure.'
The barrister said the Government made an initial application on March 31, then withdrew it and made a revised application for redactions of the names of junior civil servants on April 15.
He said the inquiry's legal team proceeded on the basis that this was the Government's position.
Mr Greaney added: 'It was therefore with considerable surprise and some frustration that at 4pm on 20th May, so yesterday and therefore the day before the hearing was scheduled to start, and moreover in circumstances in which we suggest it ought to have been anticipated that members of the inquiry legal team and the chairman and indeed core participants and their representatives would be travelling to Belfast, in those circumstances a skeleton argument was emailed to the inquiry legal team by the Crown Solicitor's Office on behalf of the Northern Ireland Office.
'The inquiry legal team regard the unexpected service of a skeleton argument at such a late stage as highly unfortunate.'
He added: 'This inquiry is about whether the Omagh bombing could have been prevented by UK state authorities. It is also notable this hearing concerns issues that could be described as ones involving transparency.
'It might be thought that HMG would have been scrupulous to avoid the impression that it was behaving in a way that was procedurally unhelpful and possibly even unfair.
'It seems to the inquiry legal team a risk that the approach taken by HMG to this hearing will undermine public confidence in HMG's approach to this inquiry.'
The barrister said there had seemed to be 'a chaotic rush to provide materials at the very last minute'.
Lord Turnbull will hear legal submissions from a number of interested parties on Wednesday and Thursday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
10 minutes ago
- Times
Keir Starmer's citizenship plans ‘will increase illegal migrants'
Sir Keir Starmer's plans to double the time foreigners must wait to qualify for permanent settlement have plunged 1.7 million people in limbo and will increase Britain's illegal migrant population, experts have said. Immigration reforms announced last month will double the time foreign citizens must wait before they can settle in the UK and apply for British citizenship to ten years. The Times revealed that Yvette Cooper, the home secretary, wanted to apply these changes to all migrants who arrived in the UK in the past five years because of concerns that the record levels of immigration since the post-Brexit immigration system came into effect in 2020 would lead to hundreds of thousands of extra people being granted permanent settlement in the UK. Grants of British citizenship hit a record high of 269,621 last year, while 172,798 were given permanent settlement, the highest level in 13 years. Analysis by the IPPR think tank has found that plans to apply the ten-year wait on settlement rights will apply to 1.2 million migrant workers, 183,000 Hongkongers and 160,000 refugees who were on a route to settlement at the end of last year. They will now be forced to wait another five years — ten in total — to apply for indefinite leave to remain in the UK. Once an individual has been granted indefinite leave to remain, they can apply for British citizenship. • The IPPR warned that this would be detrimental to efforts to integrate migrants into society and would also risk increasing the number of illegal migrants in the UK. Gaining indefinite leave to remain grants foreign citizens the right to live, work and study in the UK without restriction and ends the need to pay visa fees and annual payments of more than £1,000 to access the NHS. It also removes the bar on accessing mainstream benefits. This 'gives people a secure foundation to put down roots, integrate into their communities and pursue long-term career goals — for instance by allowing them to move into new jobs without needing to reapply for a visa,' according to the paper by the IPPR's Marley Morris and Lucy Mort. They warned: 'Lengthening the route to settlement therefore risks holding up migrant integration and significantly expanding the group of people in the UK with insecure status.' There are no official figures on the size of Britain's illegal migrant population but unofficial estimates have ranged from 700,000 to 1.2 million. • They said extending the wait to secure permanent settlement would place pressures on household budgets, making it harder to find stable work and prevent people from feeling 'properly settled'. The need for additional visa extensions and the significant costs associated with applying increase the risk that people miss the window for extending and end up without status altogether, making them susceptible to exploitation and destitution, the pair warned. The IPPR said the changes were unfair given migrants originally came to the UK on the basis they would be eligible for settlement after five years not ten. The paper also argued that the reforms went against public opinion. The annual British social attitudes survey last year found 84 per cent of the public believed that migrants who were working and paying taxes in the UK should be able to access the same welfare benefits as UK citizens after five years or fewer. Seventy-eight per cent said migrants should be able to gain the same rights to political participation as UK citizens after no more than five years. The immigration white paper said migrants would be able to fast-track their route to settlement in the UK through 'contributions to the UK economy and society'. The Home Office has not set out how migrants can qualify for this fast-tracked process. Morris and Mort said there were various ways this policy could be implemented in practice. One of them is basing contributions on income, meaning higher-paid migrants can qualify for earlier settlement if they are contributing more to tax revenues. However, they warned that this approach risked entrenching child poverty because it would be harder for people with children to qualify for settlement. Another model could be basing it on social contribution, which would encourage migrants to integrate. For instance, people who are able to demonstrate 'exceptional integration' through volunteering or playing an active role in their community could obtain settlement more quickly. This would follow a similar approach introduced by the last German government when reforming its citizenship laws. Morris and Mort urged the government to provide urgent clarity on who would be affected by the changes and how the fast-track process would work. They said: 'The government has said that it will consult on its plans later this year. This will be a vital opportunity for shaping a pro-integration agenda on settlement and citizenship. But in the meantime, the government should try to clarify its position on how the policy will apply to people already here. Providing certainty would help to establish trust and confidence in the immigration system for the many hundreds of thousands who want to make the UK their home.'
BBC News
23 minutes ago
- BBC News
Ballymena: Two teenage boys arrested after serious sexual assault
Two teenage boys have been arrested by detectives investigating a serious sexual assault on a teenage girl in County Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) said it happened in the Clonavon Terrace area, in Ballymena, between 19:30 and 22:30 BST on Insp Olphert, from the PSNI's Public Protection Branch, said the teenagers, who have been arrested in connection with the investigation, are being questioned in custody."Specialist officers are continuing to support the girl who has been left extremely distressed and traumatised by what has happened." "We would reiterate to the public not to speculate or share information on social media – this is not helpful towards the ongoing investigation," Det Ins Olphert added.
The Guardian
37 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Rachel Reeves in stand-off over policing and council budgets days before spending review
Rachel Reeves has been locked in a standoff over the policing and council budgets just days before this week's spending review, which is set to give billions to the NHS, defence and technology. Yvette Cooper's Home Office and Angela Rayner's housing and local government ministry were the two departments still at the negotiating table on Sunday fighting for more cash, after weeks of trying to reach a settlement. Whitehall sources said the policing budget would not face a real terms cut, but there was still disagreement over the level of investment needed for the Home Office to meet its commitments. Rayner's department is understood to have reached an agreement with the Treasury late on Sunday night after last-minute wrangling over housing, local councils and growth funds. However, any failure to strike a deal would raise the prospect of a budget being imposed on an unwilling department. The spending review, taking place on Wednesday, is a chance for Reeves to hold up billions of pounds of capital spending as a sign she is working to repair public services after years of Tory austerity. After tweaking her fiscal rules last autumn, she has an additional £113bn funded by borrowing for capital spending. Her plans will include £86bn for science and technology across four years and an extra £4.5bn for schools – taking funding per pupil to its highest level ever. However, day-to-day spending is more constrained in some areas, while the NHS and defence swallow up higher allocations. As well as policing, the Home Office budget covers the border force and spending on asylum costs, while the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government has been battling for funds for the affordable homes programme, councils, homelessness and regional growth. Labour has manifesto pledges to build 1.5m homes and deliver 13,000 new police officers. Pressed on the policing budget, the technology secretary, Peter Kyle, said Home Office and others would have to 'do their bit'. Funding for the police has the potential to become a politically difficult issue for Keir Starmer. Tory former shadow cabinet minister Robert Jenrick has been campaigning against transport fare dodging and Nigel Farage's Reform are also highlighting the issue. Asked about which public services will be prioritised, Kyle said 'every part of our society is struggling' and numerous sectors had asked Reeves for more money. 'On the fact that the police have been writing to the chancellor, they have,' he told the BBC's Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg programme. 'We also have letters from the universities, we have letters from doctors about the health service, we have letters from campaigners for child poverty writing to us, and other aspects of challenges in Britain at the moment. 'Every part of our society is struggling because of the inheritance that we had as a country and as a government.' He pointed to the £1.1bn extra funding already earmarked for police this year, as he defended Reeves's handling of the spending review process. 'We expect the police to start embracing the change they need to do, to do their bit for change as well. We are doing our bit,' Kyle said. 'You see a chancellor that is striving to get investment to the key parts of our country that needs it the most … You will see the priorities of this government reflected in the spending review, which sets the departmental spending into the long term. 'But this is a partnership. Yes, the Treasury needs to find more money for those key priorities, but the people delivering them need to do their bit as well.' While some areas of spending may be cut or receive only low increases, the NHS is set to receive a boost of up to £30bn by 2028, while defence spending is expected to rise to 2.5% of GDP by 2027. Kyle defended the chancellor's approach to public spending, saying she was like Apple founder Steve Jobs who turned the company around when it was 90 days from insolvency. He told Sky News's Trevor Phllips: 'Now Steve Jobs turned it around by inventing the iMac, moving to a series of products like the iPod. 'Now we're starting to invest in the vaccine processes of the future. Some of the hi-tech solutions that are going to be high growth. We're investing in our space sector. All these really high, highly innovative sectors. 'We are investing into those key innovations of the future. We know that we cannot break this vicious cycle of high tax and low growth by doing the same as we always have done. We have to innovate our way out of this and we are doing so by investing in those high-growth sectors.'
