
'The press went absolutely mad': The 1960s sex scandal that rocked British politics
The Profumo affair led to a government minister's resignation on 5 June 1963. In 1983, Christine Keeler talked to the BBC about her part in a story of sex, lies and Cold War paranoia.
"For 20 years, I think I've just been a newspaper clipping, I've never really had my say," Christine Keeler told the BBC's Sue Lawley on Nationwide in 1983. She was recalling the notorious political scandal that had engulfed her life and made her a household name: the Profumo Affair.
The 21-year-old model found herself thrust into the media spotlight when, on 5 June 1963, John "Jack" Profumo resigned as UK Secretary of State for War after admitting that he had lied to Parliament about having an affair with her. The press alleged that during their dalliance two years earlier, Keeler was also seeing a Soviet naval attaché, Yevgeny Ivanov, who was believed to be a spy.
The story seemed to have everything: sex, showgirls and the British upper class; lying, a shooting and Cold War spying. Keeler was unprepared for the scandal she was caught up in, and whose fallout would play a role in the collapse of the UK government. "I was an uneducated girl, and when I was 19, politics to me was something totally beyond my scope," she told the BBC in 1983. As the affair's details emerged, Keeler would find herself pursued and then vilified by the tabloid press, their coverage defining the public's perception of who she was. A photograph taken at the time of an unclothed Keeler posing on a chair, would become one of the defining images of London's Swinging '60s.
Keeler had already endured a hard and traumatic early life before the Profumo affair exploded. Born in Uxbridge, UK, in 1942, Keeler grew up in poverty after her father left the family when she was a child. She went on to suffer sexual abuse as a teenager at the hands of her stepfather and his friends. At the age of 17, she found herself pregnant by a US serviceman. After he returned to America, she tried unsuccessfully to give herself an abortion. She eventually gave birth to a son, who died six days later.
Having left school at 15 with no qualifications, she worked variously as a model and a waitress, before landing a job as a showgirl at Murray's Cabaret Club in Soho, London. It would be at the club that she would meet a fellow model, the 16-year-old Mandy Rice-Davies, and befriend the man who would act as her gateway into the elite of British society, Stephen Ward.
Ward was a successful Harley Street osteopath whose clients included both members of the aristocracy and some of the leading cultural figures of the early 1960s. This enabled him to socialise with some of the most influential people in the country. He also had a sideline as a portrait artist, often sketching those he came into contact with, including Queen Elizabeth II's husband Prince Philip and her sister Princess Margaret. "Stephen was himself a handsome man, intelligent, whose address book read like something out of Who's Who," Rice-Davies told BBC's Witness History in 2013. "His client list included Liz Taylor, Sophia Loren, half the aristocracy of England. In his own way, he was quite powerful."
Ward had a habit of setting up his young female friends with older, more powerful men. After meeting the two showgirls, he took them under his wing, and Keeler moved into his flat. Their friendship, while close, remained platonic. The well-connected Ward then began to take Keeler and Rice-Davies to society parties, where he would introduce them to his many wealthy and influential friends and encourage liaisons between them.
The fateful meeting
"Well, anyone who met Stephen would understand that Stephen had a marvellous charm, and he had a way with him, and I was very close to him," Keeler told the BBC. "I suppose he was wrong with his attitudes, and he was a bad man – wicked to a degree, he was – but I don't know, I cared for him." It would be through Ward that Keeler would go on to have her fateful meeting with Profumo.
Among Ward's circle of friends was the former Conservative MP Lord Astor, who regularly hosted weekend parties at his Cliveden estate in Buckinghamshire. At one of these events on 8 July 1961, among the illustrious guests that Lord Astor had invited was Profumo and his actress wife Valerie Hobson, who was famous in her own right for starring with Boris Karloff in Bride of Frankenstein in 1935 and in David Lean's Great Expectations in 1946.
Ward, who rented one of the estate's cottages from Lord Astor, was there with some friends, including Keeler, and they decided to make use of Cliveden's swimming pool. "We were all having a swim except Stephen, because he never went swimming, and I got one of the bathing suits that was too big and whatever," Keeler told BBC Woman's Hour in 2001. "And Stephen said, 'Take your swimming suit off, then, if you are complaining about it.' And so I did – because it kept virtually falling off, it was so big – and threw it to one side. And then Bill Astor and Profumo walked in." Upon seeing the naked teenager, the 46-year-old Profumo was smitten.
However, also staying at the cottage was another friend of Ward's, Captain Ivanov, a naval attaché at the Russian embassy in London. "Yevgeny was a very charming man. I used to have conversations with him about the principles of Communism, he really was a nice chap," Rice-Davies told the BBC in 2013. "There were several moments when I would say to Stephen, 'Is he a spy?' And he would say, 'Oh darling, everybody in the Russian embassy is a spy.'"
Keeler would later admit that she had once slept with the Russian, but she told Lawley they hadn't been in a relationship. "I was never really close to Ivanov, as you read in my book. An encounter happened between us, but we were never lovers. But with Profumo, well, I suppose I was a bit intrigued because he was a war minister, but I didn't realise just how dangerous the situation was because there was no manipulating on my side."
Profumo asked for her telephone number, but Keeler told Woman's Hour that she initially tried to put him off, telling him "to ask Stephen, because I certainly didn't want him to phone me. He was an older man, and I didn't fancy him at all."
"[But Ward] certainly wanted me to go off with Jack Profumo, he persuaded me to see him," Keeler told the BBC in 1983. Spurred on by Ward, she agreed to go out to dinner with the politician, and the pair embarked on an affair that lasted "a few weeks, about a month at most", before it ended amicably.
Ward on trial
Rumours of their relationship circulated among the press, but it might never have become public knowledge were it not for an incident that took place outside Ward's flat in December 1962. By this time, Keeler had begun seeing two other men, a jazz singer, Aloysius "Lucky" Gordon and a small-time criminal called Johnny Edgecombe. Both men had violent pasts and were engaged in a jealous row over Keeler. When she broke things off with Edgecombe, he turned up outside Ward's flat and demanded to be let in. After Rice-Davies refused, he produced a gun and began firing at the door. "We called the police, and the police came along, and following hot on the tail of the police were, of course, the press," Rice-Davies told Witness History in 2013.
By this time in the 1960s, the Cold War was in full swing, and the media had already covered a number of high-profile spying stories. In 1961, UK Secret Service officer George Blake had been exposed as a KGB double agent and the same year five Britons, who became known as the Portland Spy Ring, had been discovered plotting to pass official secrets to Moscow. Just the year before the Profumo scandal, John Vassall, a gay Admiralty clerk, had been blackmailed into spying by the Soviet Union. With news of Edgecombe's arrest, the press took a renewed interest in the swirling rumours of the war minister's affair – and the possibility that Keeler could have obtained secrets from him and passed them to Ivanov.
As speculation intensified, Keeler fled to Spain, avoiding giving evidence at Edgecombe's trial; he would end up being sentenced to seven years in prison for possessing a firearm with the intent to endanger life. But her disappearance merely served to heighten the press's scrutiny. Questions were raised in Parliament about the allegations of Profumo's affair and its national security implications. In response, the Secretary of State for War vehemently denied to Parliament that there was any "impropriety whatsoever" in his relationship with Keeler.
Keeler's appearance in another court case involving Lucky Gordon, who was charged with assaulting her, gave the press reasons to run ever more headlines about her and Profumo. "Of course, the press went absolutely mad," said Rice-Davies. "The situation was so overwhelming for John Profumo that he had to stand up in the House of Commons and deny that he had ever met Christine on any occasion, apart from a social occasion where his wife was present – except of course the press came to me for confirmation that she had been having this fling with Profumo."
Ten weeks after denying their affair, Profumo finally admitted that he had lied to Parliament, and resigned. But the scandal continued to reverberate. Days after Profumo's resignation, police arrested Ward and charged him with procuring women and living off immoral earnings. At his court case, the prosecution accused Keeler and Rice-Davies of being prostitutes and Ward of being their pimp. The evidence presented for this was that the women had sometimes been given gifts by the men they had had relationships with, and they had given Ward cash for electricity and food while living at his flat.
More like this:• The 'obscene' banned book that became a bestseller• How the Sex Pistols sparked outrage in the UK• The rocky 1960s origins of online dating
The trial and its witnesses' testimonies, detailing the sex lives of the upper echelons of society, generated reams of newspaper coverage. The press and the public flocked to the court every day to catch a glimpse of the colourful characters involved. And Rice-Davies became notorious for the phrase she used when she was told, in the witness box, that Lord Astor had denied that they had slept together: "Well, he would, wouldn't he?"
None of the influential friends that Ward had so carefully cultivated would testify in his defence. "Stephen had decided that he couldn't handle the situation anymore, and the jackals were out to get him no matter what," Rice-Davies told the BBC. On the last day of the trial, after the judge began his damning summing up, Ward took his own life, dying three days after he was found guilty. Lawyer Geoffrey Robertson QC is one of people who now regard the case as a miscarriage of justice. He argues that neither woman was a prostitute, that Ward had, in fact, subsidised both women off his earnings as an osteopath, and that he was the victim of a government cover-up. In 2017, a submission to review Ward's conviction was denied, and the official material from his trial is currently sealed until 2046.
Into the shadows
Following his death, Keeler would also find herself in trouble with the law. In December 1963, Gordon's three-year sentence for her assault was overturned by the Court of Appeal, and Keeler was accused of lying at his trial, because she had protected two of the men present at the assault by testifying that they weren't there. She pleaded guilty to perjury and was sentenced to nine months in Holloway Prison.
In the wake of the scandal, the Conservative Prime Minister, Harold Macmillan, ordered an inquiry into the Profumo affair. The report by Lord Denning in September 1963 concluded that national security had not been compromised and there was no evidence to link ministers to certain stories of "vile and revolting" sexual activities. Although it was critical of the government's inept handling of the scandal, it largely laid the blame on the "utterly immoral" Ward. The report was accused of being a whitewash, and Lord Denning's files regarding the Profumo scandal have been withheld from being publicly released. In 2020, the Cabinet Office decided to keep the files confidential until 2048.
The whole episode served to damage the credibility of Macmillan's government. The PM resigned in October 1963, citing ill health, and the Conservatives lost the general election the following year. Profumo would never return to politics but spent the rest of his days as a volunteer at an east London charity called Toynbee Hall. He was awarded a CBE for his efforts by the Queen in 1975.
Keeler was not so lucky. On her release from prison, she struggled to find work to support herself. By the time she came to speak to the BBC in 1983 about her ghost-written autobiography Nothing But…, Keeler had gone from being one of the most talked about women in the UK to living in a council flat with her young son and relying on social security.
Having lived in the shadow of the Profumo affair for two decades, Keeler told Lawley that the book was an attempt to get across her side of the story. "Other people have come along with their books and rubbish and complete lies, writing about my life, and I thought it was only fair, after all, that I should get my book published."
The book would be one of five that Keeler would publish about her life, reflecting her conflicted relationship with the episode that brought her infamy. One of her books, Scandal, went on to be the basis for the 1989 film of the same name, with Joanne Whalley starring as her.
Douglas Thompson, the author who worked with Keeler on her 2001 memoir The Truth at Last, told the BBC when she died in 2017 that he believed she was forever trapped by the legacy of the Profumo affair.
"I don't think she ever got away from it – that was a tragedy. She could never stop being Christine Keeler."
--
For more stories and never-before-published radio scripts to your inbox, sign up to the In History newsletter, while The Essential List delivers a handpicked selection of features and insights twice a week.
For more Culture stories from the BBC, follow us on Facebook, X and Instagram.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
18 minutes ago
- BBC News
Illegal work arrests double in year as police target 'unscrupulous' employers
Arrests for illegal work have doubled in a year as police focus on "unscrupulous" employers who exploit undocumented migrants, the government officers arrested more than 6,400 people in the past year in raids at businesses across the UK, data released by the Home Office shows. It said the figure is 51% higher than the previous year. It did not provide numbers as to how many arrests led to charges, convictions or said immigration enforcement officials had "intensified" their work to "tackle those abusing the UK immigration system and exploiting vulnerable people". Officers had visited more than 9,000 businesses - among them restaurants, nail bars and construction sites - to check paperwork and working businesses had often subjected migrants to "squalid conditions and illegal working hours" as well as below-minimum Home Office said there were a range of industries exploiting migrant one case in Surrey, officers arrested nine people at a caravan park who had been working as delivery one one major operation in March, officers arrested 36 people at a building site in Belfast's Titanic Quarter. Some had breached visa conditions while others didn't have working Enforcement director Eddy Montgomery said there were many cases where people travelling to the UK were "sold a lie by smuggling gangs that they will be able to live and work freely in the UK."In reality, they often end up facing squalid living conditions, minimal pay and inhumane working hours," he Angela Eagle, the minister for border security and asylum, said the government would "continue to root out unscrupulous employers and disrupt illegal workers who undermine our border security".The government said it had also returned nearly 30,000 people over the past year who did not have the right to be in the has said it is cracking down on illegal migration, setting out its plans in a White Paper to tighten work visas and those overstaying. It scrapped a special visa for care workers introduced during the pandemic, noting that this had been a pathway exploited by was mixed reaction to the plans, with some business sectors decrying the restrictions on work visas, while some Conservative opponents said the reforms didn't go far enough to stop illegal most recent data shows that approximately 44,000 people have entered the UK illegally in the year to March 2025, more than 80% through small boat journeys.


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Dragonfly review – haunting, genre-defying drama of lonely city living
Twenty years ago, Paul Andrew Williams announced himself as a smart new British talent with his ferocious gangland picture London to Brighton, and his creativity has continued in film and TV ever since. His new film is a haunted, social-realist drama with elements of Mike Leigh but also moments of thriller and even horror. Williams isn't shy of stabbing us with an old-fashioned jump scare towards the end, which in fact challenges the audiences with its refusal of categorisation. There are two superb lead performances from Andrea Riseborough and Brenda Blethyn and an outstanding supporting turn from Jason Watkins. Dragonfly is about loneliness and alienation and about the eternal mystery of other people, the fear of intimacy and the unknowable existence of urban neighbours. Elsie, played by Blethyn, is an older woman who is quite capable of independent living in her bungalow, but a recent fall and an injured wrist has meant that her middle-aged son (Watkins), all too obviously to compensate for not visiting that often, has paid for daily visits from a private agency nurses. They are overworked and not doing an especially good job. Really, she doesn't need these nurses and by enduring them, Elsie is shouldering the burden of her son's guilt. Meanwhile nextdoor neighbour Colleen, played by Riseborough, is a continuingly strange presence. She is a melancholy, withdrawn figure, evidently on benefits and living with her huge American bull terrier, uncompromisingly named Sabre. Williams shows us that she is effectively living in a kind of platonic relationship, or mariage blanc, with this dog; the film periodically gives us startling shots of Sabre's colossal body in a kind of domestic nakedness sprawled on Colleen's bed. In a manner that may be insidious or predatory or just friendly and compassionate, Colleen befriends Elsie; the latter overcomes her initial nervousness of Sabre and she appreciates Colleen's forthright offer of help. Colleen goes down to the shops to get groceries for Elsie and after a few such trips they agree that what would be easiest would be if Colleen simply gets Elsie's debit card and Elsie gives her the pin number. Of course, the film allows us to suspect the worst and then suspect the worst of ourselves for suspecting it. Colleen seems to be unhappy and damaged but well-meaning, especially when she (for a laugh) buys them both a two-way radio so they can easily keep in contact – but then uses this radio to talk to Elsie late at night and semi-intentionally to allow bewildered Elsie to hear what's happening in Colleen's house. It is a riveting dual portrait of two gloomy people who really have, in a strange and dysfunctional way, found a new way of interacting and – importantly – this is a triangular relationship: Elsie, Colleen and the vast Sabre. But with a terrible inevitability, Elsie's uptight busybody son John (Watkins) arrives and there are awful consequences to a conversation he has with Colleen which Williams only shows us in long shot, withholding the truth about what he's saying. It's a stark, fierce, wonderfully acted film. Dragonfly screened at the Tribeca film festival.


Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
'He was going to kill me': More strangulation cases recorded by police but many investigations falter
Around 70% of non-fatal strangulation cases in the last year have been dropped due to evidential issues, exclusive data shared with Sky News shows. It is now three years since it became a standalone offence in England and Wales, in a landmark piece of legislation designed to protect domestic abuse victims. Data from the Institute for Addressing Strangulation (IFAS) shows that police are implementing the offence widely - but outcomes for victims are mixed. Warning: This article contains references to domestic abuse and sexual assault 'Sarah' - whose name has been changed to protect her identity - vividly remembers the first time her ex-partner strangled her, one year into their relationship. She said: "He was drunk, and he climbed on top me. He put his hands around my throat, and he pinned me down with the strength of his body." Terrified, she begged him repeatedly to stop, but he carried on. "I remember I just felt really numb and scared, but it was weird, it felt like an out-of-body experience." Afterwards the only words he spoke to her were 'look what you made me do', she said, and then when the ordeal was over, he carried on with his day as if nothing had happened. This was the beginning of a pattern of abuse that continued throughout the rest of their relationship, happening on at least 30 more occasions, Sarah estimated. It became so normalised He strangled her when she was pregnant. He strangled her whether her children were in the house or not. It always happened during sex, though Sarah was only later able to recognise that this was rape after talking to the police, because for her it had become so normalised. And, always, he told Sarah it was her fault - that she had somehow 'made' him do it. She later went on to suffer a miscarriage because of the physical abuse. 'A form of control' "Looking back now I can see it was a form of control. He got off on knowing that he was in control, and he liked seeing me upset," she said. "I thought that he was going to kill me because he used to threaten it to me. It was very, very scary." This fear of death is common among victims of strangulation and is a recognised tool of control and intimidation. A US study found that victims of domestic abuse were seven times more likely to be murdered by their current or former partner if there had been an incident of non-fatal strangulation beforehand. But this form of violence often leaves no obvious external signs of injury, meaning in some cases perpetrators could only be investigated for less serious offences like common assault, which did not reflect the severity of the crime. What are the possible effects on health? The potential health impacts are wide-ranging, including loss of consciousness, voice changes, difficulty in swallowing and breathing, bruising, haemorrhages, headaches, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), miscarriage, risk of suicide, and death (including delayed death). Symptoms can arise weeks or months after the event. It is for these reasons that campaigners fought for the introduction of the standalone offence, which came into effect in June 2022. 'Much work to be done' The IFAS has been monitoring the offence since the legislation was introduced and shared its latest report findings exclusively with Sky News. It said there is still "much work to be done" to better protect victims of strangulation. New figures obtained by IFAS from the Home Office reveal that over 63,000 crimes of non-fatal strangulation or suffocation were recorded by police in England and Wales in the first two years under the legislation. There were 39,360 recorded crimes in 2023/24, on average 66 offences per 100,000 people compared with 50 per 100,000 the year before, an increase of 20%. "Survivors who work with us have recognised time and time again how important it is to be able to see strangulation as a standalone offence and have the opportunity to progress with criminal justice proceedings," Harriet Smailes, co-author of the report, told Sky News. The volume of crimes recorded suggests that the offence is being widely recognised and reported by police - and the number resulting in charges, at 12%, is high compared to some other offences. However, a significant number of investigations result in no further action due to evidential difficulties. This can happen if police or prosecutors do not believe there is enough evidence to proceed, or if the victim does not support the investigation. This was the outcome in three in five investigations overall, including one in five investigations where the victim did support police action. Outcomes were similar in both years of available data. "In around half of cases, there are no external, physical, visible signs of injury. That's not to say that there aren't internal injuries that can't be seen just with the naked eye," said Ms Smailes, who is a research officer at IFAS. "It might be that that visible injury isn't present at the time of evidence capture that might develop over time, or because there's a difference in how individuals show bruising, for example those of different skin tones. That can contribute towards there not being enough perceived evidence to be able to progress with a police case," she said. In some cases where a victim disengages from police proceedings, it may be that they did not feel supported and believed in the process or felt that there were "too many obstacles". On the other hand, not all cases where a victim did not support police action are necessarily negative. "It might be that initial needs have been met in that instance through reporting to the police, for example, initial containment of the risk of that situation, and referrals to specialist health or mental health services," Ms Smailes explained. Police 'determined' to improve Assistant Commissioner Louisa Rolfe is the National Police Chiefs' Council lead for domestic abuse. She told Sky News that securing prosecutions for strangulation is a priority for tackling violence against women and girls, and a key part of national Domestic Abuse Matters training. "For us to do well in prosecutions, we need to understand how perpetrators operate, how they use this is a sinister way of controlling their victims. And we also know that many victims are frightened to pursue prosecution," she said. Investigators not only have to secure detailed evidence rapidly but also present the best possible case so that prosecutors and juries understand how an abuser is operating, she said. "That can be a challenging job, for a police service that's under pressure, trying to deal with a myriad of priorities. I know many investigators are passionate about getting this right." "We know we're up against it when it comes to securing convictions, but we're determined to improve," she added. Fewer than half were convicted Separate research by IFAS has found that in the first year under the new legislation, only around half of the number of offences charged by police were prosecuted, and less than half of those secured a conviction. Overall, 47% of the 1,437 prosecutions of non-fatal strangulation and suffocation offences in the year to June 2023 resulted in conviction, based on data from the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) from all courts in England and Wales. There are several potential reasons that a prosecution may be unsuccessful, including evidential difficulties or a victim withdrawing from the process. The accused may also have been convicted of a separate offence, but not for the strangulation. Without more detailed data, it is hard to determine to what extent each is contributing to the low conviction rate. Reflecting on the figures, head of policy and public affairs at domestic abuse support charity Refuge, Ellie Butt, told Sky News that victims often face "huge pressure" from perpetrators to drop out of the criminal justice process. "When compounded with lengthy court delays and insufficient support, many survivors are forced to withdraw from the process. Police and prosecutors should be working to build cases that can be taken forward even when a survivor can no longer continue," she said. The Crown Prosecution Service highlighted to Sky News that the number of new prosecution proceedings has been consistently increasing, particularly domestic abuse-related strangulation offences. In the latest quarter, 2,000 cases reached their first hearing at magistrates' court. Kate Brown, the CPS national lead for domestic abuse, said: "Three years on, we have continued to bring more charges quarter on quarter, with over 2,000 seen in court in the past three months. "This standalone offence has shone a light on those who seek to use these violent acts to exert power over another person and harm them. We are determined to continue bringing abusers to justice for victims." A gendered crime The new data from IFAS reinforces that strangulation is a gendered crime. Around 80% of victims whose gender was recorded by police were female, while 88% of suspects were male. The data also shows that while people from all ages are impacted, most victims are younger, with three in five aged 34 or under. The age profile of suspects was slightly higher, with three in five suspects aged between 25 and 44. 'I want to say it's not your fault' Sarah's case ended in evidential difficulties. Though her case was reported before 2022, when strangulation became a specific offence, she said she did provide substantial physical evidence to the police and she feels "let down" by the justice system. She said she has been diagnosed with PTSD, anxiety and other health issues. "I live with it every day. It can be a song that comes on the radio or a sign or somebody's name and it would just bring everything back to me to that point, that moment," she said. "I want to say it's not your fault. Nobody has the right to control you, nobody has the right to abuse you, rape you, strangle you. "I would urge anyone to speak out and if you feel like you haven't been heard and your voice has not been listened to, speak out again."