BREAKING NEWS England's DEADLIEST maternity units to be investigated as Streeting launches urgent review into scandal-hit NHS services
Wes Streeting has today announced a 'rapid national investigation' into England's maternity units following a litany of scandals that have rocked the NHS.
The new investigation is intended to provide truth to families suffering harm, as well as driving urgent improvements to care and safety.
It comes after Mr Streeting met families who have lost babies and amid the ongoing investigations at some NHS trusts into poor maternity care.
Announcing the move at the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, he said the 10 most at risk units will be investigated.
It will also look at the maternity and neo-natal system as a whole.
The review will be based on the similar investigation taken into the overall review of the NHS carried out by Lord Darzi.
It follows a series of maternity failures including Shrewsbury and Telford and East Kent NHS Trusts, with a record number of services now failing to meet safety standards.
Last year, the maternity regulator also found two-thirds of services either 'require improvement' or are 'inadequate' for safety.
In a statement, Mr Streeting said: 'Over the last year, I've been wrestling with how we tackle problems in maternity and neonatal units, and I've come to the realisation that while there is action we can take now, we have to acknowledge that this has become systemic.
'It's not just a few bad units. Up and down the country, maternity units are failing, hospitals are failing, trusts are failing, regulators are failing.
'There's too much obfuscation; too much passing the buck and giving lip service.'
He added: 'I have been meeting bereaved families from across the country who have lost babies or suffered serious harm during what should have been the most joyful time in their lives.
'What they have experienced is devastating—deeply painful stories of trauma, loss, and a lack of basic compassion—caused by failures in NHS maternity care that should never have happened.
'Their bravery in speaking out has made it clear. We must act and we must act now.
'I know nobody wants better for women and babies than the thousands of NHS midwives, obstetricians, maternity and neonatal staff, and that the vast majority of births are safe and without incident, but it's clear something is going wrong.
'That's why I've ordered a rapid national investigation to make sure these families get the truth and the accountability they deserve, and ensure no parent or baby is ever let down again. I want staff to come with us on this, to improve things for everyone.
'We're also taking immediate steps to hold failing services to account and give staff the tools they need to deliver the kind, safe, respectful care every family deserves.
'Maternity care should be the litmus test by which this Government is judged on patient safety, and I will do everything in my power to ensure no family has to suffer like this again.'
Frontline midwives have previously warned working in the NHS is like playing a 'warped game of Russian roulette ', as there was a risk of harm or death at any time, partly due to 'dangerously' low staffing levels.
The Royal College of Midwives (RCM) suggests staff shortages and lack of funding is making it harder for midwives to deliver better quality services.
The RCM's latest calculation is that England is short of 2,500 midwives.
It also comes as another report into the 'postcode lottery' of NHS maternity care last May also ruled good care is 'the exception rather than the rule'.
A hugely-anticipated parliamentary inquiry into birth trauma, which heard evidence from more than 1,300 women, found pregnant women are being treated like a 'slab of meat'.
At the time, Health Secretary Victoria Atkins labelled testimonies heard in the report 'harrowing' and vowed to improve maternity care for 'women throughout pregnancy, birth and the critical months that follow'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
26 minutes ago
- BBC News
Bat with rabies-like virus found on Isle of Wight
An injured bat that was rescued from a back garden turned out to have an extremely rare, rabies-like virus, the Department for Environment and Rural Affairs has animal was found earlier this month in Shorwell on the Isle of resident picked it up wearing gloves and kept it in a shoebox overnight, while waiting for it to be collected by volunteers from Isle of Wight Bat for Environment and Rural Affairs (Defra) said the bat was later found to have a virus that caused rabies, known as European Bat Lyssavirus-1 (EBLV-1) - but Defra said other mammals were not considered to be at risk. Animal, Plant and Health Agency (APHA) said it investigated and found no scratches or bites to humans or are two types of viruses that cause rabies carried in bats in the UK - EBLV-1 and EBLV-2. Both are extremely rare in the UK and their presence does not change the UK's status as a rabies-free country, according to Defra. EBLVs cause the rabies disease but they are not the classical rabies virus associated with dogs and responsible for most rabies cases worldwide, according to the Bat Conservation Trust. Alex Morss, from the trust, said: "Rabies-related viruses have only ever been recorded in less than 0.3% of all bats tested since 1986 (59 bats of 19,000 tested), and in only two of the 18 bat species present in the UK, the serotine bat and the Daubenton's bat."He added: "There have only been two recorded cases of rabies viruses from an infected wild British animal in a human in Britain since records began - One case was in 1902, the other case was in 2002."European Bat Lyssavirus-1 (EBLV-1) has been detected in Serotine bats since 2018, with the first case being found in Dorset, according to APHA. As of May 2024, 34 cases of EBLV-1 had been reported in the UK, according to research from the University of Surrey and APHA. Legally protected Mr Morss said anyone who suspected they had been licked, bitten or scratched by a bat should contact the National Bat Helpline - 0345 1300 228 - and seek immediate medical assistance. Vaccinations provided soon after exposure are 100% effective in preventing the disease, according to the NHS. "There is no risk to human health if you do not handle British bats, even if they are roosting in buildings you use, Mr Morss said. "No action should be taken to disturb or harm any wild bats or their roosts."Bats are non-aggressive, shy mammals and will avoid contact with humans."All 18 British bat species and their roosts are legally protected. Mr Morss said bats should only ever be handled by a person with a licence and after appropriate training, unless a bat in distress is being rescued, in which case thick gloves and a face mask or covering should be worn.
Western Telegraph
28 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Asian women called ‘divas' by NHS staff when asking for pain relief
The Health Secretary said he was determined to deal with inequalities and racism in the health service as he launched a national investigation into NHS maternity services. He pointed to data showing that babies of black ethnicity are twice as likely to be stillborn than babies of white ethnicity, and black women are two to three times more likely to die during pregnancy or shortly after birth than white women. He said he had been 'stunned' by language used against black and Asian mothers in maternity and neonatal units. 'We've got a lot of work to do not just on health inequalities, but on racism and discrimination in maternity care,' he said. 'I've been really stunned by some of the language that women have heard during the course of their own care: one mother saying that she'd been denied pain relief medication because they thought she was a 'strong black woman', another describing Asian mothers referred to as 'divas' when they asked for pain relief. 'I'm almost sat there in a state of disbelief, because what you hear is so shocking, you think this can't possibly be true. 'And then you look at the evidence, and you see that what they have been through, is exactly as they describe.' The national investigation will look at all aspects of maternity care in England after several high-profile scandals found hundreds of babies have died or been left disabled due to poor care.
The Independent
32 minutes ago
- The Independent
How to spot fitness misinformation online, according to experts
The modern gym-goer is privy to more fitness advice than ever before, with various social media platforms placing thousands of insights at their fingertips. The problem is, while much of it is structured to grab your attention, not all of it is helpful, or indeed accurate. Experienced personal trainer, Everything Fat Loss author and self-professed research nerd Ben Carpenter is trying to stem the tide of fitness misinformation. To do this, he offers a free public service: TikTok and Instagram users tag Carpenter in videos that make eyebrow-raising claims, and the fitness expert swoops in to deliver a science-backed rebuttal. 'I think navigating misinformation is extraordinarily difficult, especially when it's not your domain,' he tells me. 'The way I have described it in the past is, if a mechanic tells me what is wrong with my car, I don't have the knowledge to fact-check that. So if two different mechanics tell me something completely different, I don't think anyone would expect me to know who was telling the truth.' 'If someone is not a health or fitness professional, I think it's really unrealistic to pin the blame on you as the individual if you are struggling with misinformation.' However, over years of calling out dodgy content, Carpenter has noticed a few recurrent red flags – things you can easily be on the look out for as a conscious consumer of online content. Here are his top three tips for sorting the wheat from the chaff during your next scrolling session. Nothing in fitness is revolutionary If someone online is telling you something is revolutionary, chances are it isn't, especially if their pitch involves you parting with some cash. 'The reason I think this is so important is that, in health and fitness, the things that we know work aren't revolutionary,' Carpenter explains. 'We know that exercise is good, and we know that certain dietary habits like eating fruits and vegetables are good. But people will often make something sound shinier than it is to sell something, and I think that is one of the biggest red flags.' He adds that, if something truly revolutionary was uncovered such as a 'specific diet tip or exercise programme', the likelihood is that one person would not have a monopoly over this information. 'I would be making social media videos about it for free,' Carpenter says. '[People like me are] not trying to hold the best information from you, we're trying to put the best information out.' Beware of 'fear porn' A negativity bias in the human psyche means we're hardwired to pay more attention to negative information than positive. Content creators have cottoned on to this. 'There's a growing trend on social media for something that's described as 'fear porn' – people are being lured in by the things that sound scary,' says Carpenter. 'Rather than saying something is good for you, videos are now saying, 'Never eat this specific ingredient, it's killing you'.' This is his second red flag when trying to spot health and fitness misinformation online. 'A real health and fitness professional would say, 'We know that added sugar should probably make up less than 10 per cent of your diet. That's well-established health advice. If you look at the World Health Organisation, it will often say to keep it to less than 10 per cent because if you consume too much it's linked to things like obesity, weight gain, type-2 diabetes, teeth cavities and so on. 'That's very different to someone saying, 'You can never eat sugar because sugar is killing you'. If people are making things sound really scary all the time, it's often clickbait and a hook. They are trying to grab your attention by making you scared, and I don't think health and fitness advice should be scary.' Show your workings This final tip starts with a social media video making a hyper-specific claim. If someone is doing this, and throwing around scientific-sounding terms as they do so, Carpenter wants to see them substantiate this information with cold, hard facts. 'People who are genuinely scientific will show you what they're talking about,' he says. 'If you're watching my video and I say a food is good or bad for your health, I'll show you the research that I'm citing that from. 'It sounds like it's nerdy, but generally speaking I think people who are trying to educate you should show that they're educating you. They will show you the science they are talking about. It's not about trying to sell you things, it's showing what the research says and putting it on the screen.' In contrast, extreme claims with no substantiation or supporting evidence should set alarm bells ringing. 'You don't have to cite them, but generally speaking I think it's a red flag if someone never references the research they're talking about,' Carpenter concludes. It's generally advisable to take influencer advice with a pinch of salt and to do your own research. Trends on social media will come and go, but when it comes to fitness, the fundamentals are usually the same. This means if someone is selling you a 'hack' or a bypass, with no studies or proof, it's probably too good to be true.
