Ireland among six countries expressing ‘grave concern' over Israeli plans to occupy Gaza
The foreign ministers of six European countries, including Tánaiste
Simon Harris
, have signed a joint letter expressing 'grave concern' about
Israeli
plans for a prolonged occupation of parts of
Gaza
.
The letter has been signed by the foreign ministers of Iceland, Ireland, Luxembourg, Norway, Slovenia and Spain who say they strongly reject any territorial change in the Strip.
They have written that reported
plans for the military to take over large parts of the Gaza Strip
for an extended time with the population of two million people being forced to move to the southern region of Rafah would mark 'a dangerous new escalation and jeopardising any prospects of a viable Two-State solution'.
The joint letter represents is the first concerted response from European countries which express strong criticism and opposition to the plans unveiled by Israel over the course of last weekend.
READ MORE
'A further military escalation in Gaza will only exacerbate an already catastrophic situation for the civilian Palestinian population and threaten the lives of the hostages that remain in captivity,' the ministers wrote.
'We firmly reject any demographic or territorial change in Gaza, including any scheme that would force or facilitate the permanent displacement of its population, which would be in violation of international law.
'We also strongly oppose a system that does not ensure that the entire population gets access to humanitarian aid. Gaza is an integral part of the State of Palestine, which belongs to the Palestinian people.'
The ministers have also strongly criticised Israel for the blockade which has been in place since March 30th. They have said that despite repeated calls to lift those measures, Israel has 'instead further tightened, rather than eased, the measures'.
They further have said: 'Together, we call on the Israeli authorities to show restraint. We further call on Israel to take all necessary and effective measures to ensure the unhindered provision at scale of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance.
'What is needed more urgently than ever is a resumption of a ceasefire, and the unconditional release of all hostages. We reaffirm our unwavering support for the two-state solution — Israel and Palestine living side by side in peace and security,' it has concluded.
The letter is signed by Thorgerdur Katrin Gunnarsdottir of Iceland; Simon Harris; Xavier Bettel of Luxembourg; Espen Barth Eide of Norway; Tanja Fajon of Slovenia; and José Manuel Albares Bueno of Spain.
On Tuesday, Taoiseach
Micheál Martin
accused Israel of a war crime
over
blocking aid
from entering Gaza.
Speaking at the Global Ireland summit in Dublin, he said it was 'simply wrong, in principle, and in law, to inflict hunger and suffering on a civilian population, whatever the circumstances'.
'This behaviour clearly constitutes a war crime,' he said.
Mr Martin said it had been over 50 days since food, medicines, and other essential supplies had been allowed into the area.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
22 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Israeli foreign minister finds shifting moods as he visits Berlin
Israeli foreign minister Gideon Sa'ar was greeted by protest chants of 'blood on your hands' during a tense Berlin visit on Thursday. Amid a shifting political and public mood in Germany on Gaza , Mr Sa'ar held talks and laid a wreath at Berlin's Holocaust memorial alongside his German counterpart Johann Wadephul. In recent days the new German foreign minister has sent mixed signals, saying at the weekend that further German arms exports to Israel would be conditional on a review of their compliance with international law, indicating this could reduce deliveries. 'We have changed our tone and will likely change our political actions next,' said Mr Wadephul, echoing a more critical tone from chancellor Friedrich Merz . On Wednesday, Mr Wadephul appeared to shift again, promising further arms deliveries and telling the Bundestag that 'Germany must know where it stands: at Israel's side'. READ MORE The value of German arms exports to Israel spiked in 2023 to €326.5 million, then dropped by half last year amid rising pressure and public disquiet. At their joint press conference on Thursday, Mr Wadephul flagged ongoing attacks on Israel from its neighbours and said Germany would continue to support Israel's right to defend itself. But he criticised Israel's new Gaza aid distribution programme , saying it forced people to walk long distances often to 'come back empty-handed or, in the worst case, they don't come back at all because they've been killed'. Israel's permission for 22 new West Bank settlements, according to Mr Wadephul, was 'contrary to international law ... and a literal block to a two-state solution'. [ Gaza aid group halts distribution due to civilian safety concerns after dozens killed seeking aid Opens in new window ] Mr Sa'ar thanked Germany for standing at Israel's side on the international stage and asked for more time for a new aid distribution push by the US-backed Israeli foundation to establish itself. 'This effort has the potential to free the Palestinian population from Hamas ' stranglehold and end this war,' he said. Mr Sa'ar denounced growing international calls to halt arms deliveries to his country, saying that would leave 'Israel, the most attacked and threatened country in the world, deprived of its right to self-defence'. Participants display Palestinian flags and flash the victory sign during a demonstration in support of Palestinians outside the foreign office in Berlin, during a visit by Israel's foreign minister Gideon Sa'ar to the German capital. Photograph: Odd Andersen/AFP via Getty Images Outside Berlin's foreign ministry, protesters accused the Israeli visitor of 'co-responsibility for crimes against humanity and genocide'. They demanded an end to German arms exports to Israel, 'not as a pipe dream but as a legal obligation'. 'This visit legitimises aggression and gives political cover for a people's extinction,' said one German speaker. An Israeli speaker said Mr Sa'ar was in Berlin 'to buy more time for Israel because he knows the tide is turning'. The German public mood towards Israel and its war in Gaza has cooled in recent weeks, according to a public television poll, with almost two thirds (63 per cent) saying that Israel's military response in Gaza has gone too far. [ Trinity College Dublin board votes to cut ties with Israeli universities and companies Opens in new window ] Almost three quarters (73 per cent) did not consider the military action against Hamas justified if the Palestinian civilian population suffers. Meanwhile, 77 per cent of respondents approved of the more critical tone from Berlin towards Israel, which just 16 per cent viewed as a trusted partner of Germany. During his visit, Mr Sa'ar expressed concern about a study logging more than 8,627 anti-Semitic incidents in Germany last year, the equivalent of one an hour. The numbers mark a 76 per cent rise on 2023, the report said, and a 341 per cent increase since 2020. Among the documented cases was a swastika drawn on the wall outside the apartment of a Jewish couple in Hamburg; a Jewish schoolchild held down by two men and called a 'dirty Jew'; and a sign at a Düsseldorf protest reading: 'Yesterday Holocaust Victims. Today Perpetrators in Gaza.' The fallout from the October 7th, 2023, attacks by Hamas on Israel has supercharged anti-Semitism in Germany, the report found, with 68 per cent of cases categorised as 'Israel-related anti-Semitism'. Two per cent of the cases related to extreme violence or attacks, while 87 per cent were categorised as 'injurious behaviour'. [ Israeli military recovers bodies of two hostages held by Hamas, says Netanyahu Opens in new window ] 'The risk of being persecuted as a Jew in Germany has increased since October 7th, 2023,' said Benjamin Steinitz, co-author of the report from the Federal Research and Information Point for Antisemitism (RIAS). 'But debates about what counts as an expression of anti-Semitism seem to take up more space than empathy for the victims.' He was responding to a critical report arguing that the RIAS methodology equated criticism of Israel with anti-Semitism. 'RIAS statistics and publications indicate a bias in favour of the Israeli right, reinforced by opaque methods,' wrote Itay Mashiach, an Israeli journalist, in the report by the international Diaspora Alliance titled Biased. He said RIAS's 'flawed approach and resulting alarmist reporting have significant repercussions, including the stigmatisation of migrant communities, the restriction of political expression and the suppression of human rights activists'. Back at Berlin's Holocaust memorial, a school group waited to visit after the foreign ministers departed. Benjamin, an 18-year-old student from Hanover, said he followed the Middle East closely – in particular the aid blockade and resulting outcry. 'I understand that Israel doesn't want aid to go in that feeds Hamas fighters first and civilians second,' he said. 'But I don't agree with what looks like an effort to smoke out the Palestinians from Gaza.'
Irish Times
31 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Families paying highest childcare costs to benefit from cap in September
Families paying some of the country's highest childcare fees will see costs reduced in September after the Department of Children confirmed new caps on what providers can charge. The new ceilings should mean no parents pay more than €295 per week for a child attending a service participating in the Government's Core Funding scheme for between 40 and 50 hours a week. That figure will, in most cases, reduce to €198.70 after other supports are factored in. The caps vary according to the number of hours involved. The reductions, however, will only affect those parents whose children attend the most expensive services in receipt of Core Funding, with about 10 per cent of the almost 4,500 Government-supported providers charging at least one type of fee that will have to be reduced. In many cases, however, the savings should amount to more than €100 per child per month. READ MORE The imposition of fee caps from September on service providers in receipt of Core Funding had been scheduled for some time, but they had only previously applied to services that signed up to Core Funding for the first time. The department said on Thursday that the new caps would bring the gross fees paid by parents at more expensive services closer to the national average cost of €197 per week. At the announcement, Minister for Children Norma Foley acknowledged the Government still has considerable ground to cover to honour commitments that costs to parents will be cut to €200 per month. She said this would be done during the life of the Government, but said it was too early to indicate what scale of reductions might be funded in this year's budget. The childcare sector funding year runs from September to August and most of the big funding changes set to take effect later this year were announced before the current Government was elected. 'The programme for government has a very clear commitment around the €200 and that is our absolute goal,' she said. 'I've been very clear that we will do that over the lifetime of this Government. It will be incremental, and we're starting at the very top where there are extraordinarily high costs to parents, and we're beginning to bring that down.' Ms Foley said Core Funding would increase from €331 million in the current year to at least €350 million in the year from September with up to €45 million in additional funding to support pay in the sector which is widely seen as a barrier to the provision of additional places and services due to the difficulty in attracting and retaining staff. Minimum rates in the sector are only fractionally above the minimum wage. Talks between employer groups and unions on a new sector-wide agreement on minimum rates are ongoing and while progress is said to have been made, it is not clear that any new deal would be in place by September. If it is not, or the increases agreed are too small, some of the €45 million will be retained by the department. 'This funding is welcome, but the scale of it has to be reflected in the pay of staff in the sector,' said Darragh O'Connor of Siptu. 'Otherwise, it will be impossible for anyone to go back and make the case for similar supports in future years.' Karen Clince, chief executive at one of the country's largest providers, Tigers, welcomed the increased levels of Core Funding to be provided. But she said 'it doesn't go nearly far enough to address the horrific staffing we find ourselves in. We need more focus on pay and conditions rather than just vote-winning affordability.'
The Journal
an hour ago
- The Journal
Dozens of politicians' print requests refused, including 2,000-page document for Simon Harris
TDS AND SENATORS have had dozens of print jobs refused by the Oireachtas over the last few years. Politicians at Leinster House are entitled to have tens of thousands of items printed for free every year to help promote their work. However, a strict policy is in place that covers only 'parliamentary duties' and not material related to elections, political parties, or fellow candidates. Between 2022 and 2024, a total of 125 print jobs were rejected by the Oireachtas for a variety of different reasons. Records released under FOI show that Fianna Fáil were behind more than half the refused batches – 67 in total. Fine Gael had 22 print jobs refused, Labour 11 and Sinn Féin 8; there were also lower numbers recorded for other smaller groupings or Independents. High-profile political figures were among those who had printing rejected with three jobs refused for Public Expenditure Minister Jack Chambers. Little detail was provided on the reasons why, with Oireachtas records simply saying they were not in line with the 'service level agreement.' Both Tánaiste Simon Harris and Justice Minister Jim O'Callaghan had a single print job refused. Harris' 2,000-page-print job was rejected as outside the bounds of the 'service level agreement' while Mr O'Callaghan's newsletter was declined due to 'overtelectioneering.' Advertisement Former Taoiseach Leo Varadkar also had a 5,000-batch constituency update refused during 2023 – it was simply marked 'rejected' in the Oireachtas files with no further information provided. There were other reasons for refusal too with one newsletter denied because it breached rules about the promotion of a business. A note said this was based on: 'Material which is or could be construed as being related to or promoting a private commercial endeavour, for example a newsletter which promotes, whether directly or indirectly, a company, business or product.' Another was refused because it was considered to be promotion of a political party. It said that was covered by rules covering a ban on 'political party/independent members' corporate material e.g. headquarter type printing, such as application forms for party membership; material which is either directly or indirectly aimed at party fundraising; information notes to party members.' Other jobs were rejected for more banal reasons including faulty file types, defective documents, and one case where a senator exceeded their monthly printing allowance. One job for a batch of 1,500 printed leaflets was refused because it contained information on an upcoming referendum. A note on the file said: 'It is the responsibility of the members and qualifying political parties to ensure that items printed in the printing facility that could be said to be designed to influence voters on how to vote in a Referendum are not distributed after the passage of a [bill].' Fianna Fáil's John Lahart, who had four separate jobs refused, said: 'I don't remember the specific ones offhand, but it often relates to materials about councillors. 'We have had generic material sent back and generally where that might be about the Fianna Fáil team in our area and they would have come back and said that wasn't allowed.' Under Leinster House's printing policy, jobs can also be declined where they have information that could be considered a crime or encouraging others to commit a crime. However, there were no refusals under that section according to the documents that were released. Asked about the records, the Oireachtas said it had no further comment to make. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
