100,000 people have accessed this payment. Now it's being made permanent
More than 100,000 people have accessed up to $5000 each in financial help to leave violent relationships over the past four years as the program becomes permanent from July.
The two-year Escaping Violence Payment trial – which was introduced in October 2021 under the Coalition – was extended by the Labor government and will be made permanent under the new Leaving Violence Program.
From next week, victim-survivors who are planning to leave, or have recently left, a violent intimate partner relationship will be eligible to receive up to $5000 in financial support.
As many as one in four women in Australia and one in 14 men experience violence by an intimate partner from the age of 15. A report this month by the Australian Longitudinal Study on Male Health revealed about one in three men had used a form of intimate partner violence as an adult.
An evaluation of the Escaping Violence Payment trial in 2023 found nine out of 10 people who received the payment were women and more than a quarter were Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. The average amount accessed was $4224 – including a cap of $1500 in cash and the rest in goods, services and support such as counselling and legal services.
Economic insecurity is a major barrier for many people looking to leave a violent partner, especially women.
While women's workforce participation in Australia has grown over the years, the proportion of women employed is about six in 10 compared with nearly seven in 10 men, the Australian Bureau of Statistics says. Women are also more likely to work part-time and earn less, often putting them in a more vulnerable position.
An ABS survey in 2021-22 of 1.5 million women who had experienced violence by a previous partner showed roughly two in five had separated. Of these, one in five returned to their partners because of a lack of financial resources.
Social Services Minister Tanya Plibersek said the Leaving Violence Program would make it easier for women to leave violent relationships safely, and to provide for their family.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
a day ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Religious worship powers under spotlight after arrest of former Greens candidate
In NSW, police are not allowed to issue move on directions for genuine protests unless they decide it presents a 'serious risk' to a person's safety, is obstructing traffic or, after the changes introduced by the Minns government this year, is taking place near a place of worship. The document states police attended the protest on Friday morning after receiving 'intelligence' via Instagram that a group called Weapons Out of The West would hold an 'unauthorised' protest at the Belmore business. At 5.50am, a person was seen walking past the business and 'communicating via a group chat'. After confirming they were attending a demonstration, police said the person was issued a move-on direction on the basis the 'unauthorised' demonstration would 'cause fear and alarm'. The group, the fact sheet said, had 'a history of violent disruptions outside of the SEC Plating business'. They were initially arrested, but then released after indicating they would comply with the direction. However, the police fact sheet then says the person 'walked across the road to the opposite side of SEC Plating which is a place of worship'. At that point, officers approached the protester and again 'informed her to comply with the move on direction'. 'Due to the accused being given repeated warnings and opportunities to comply with the direction, she was cautioned and placed under arrest for failing to comply with a move on direction,' it stated. Loading The reference to a place of worship has sparked serious concern among civil liberty groups and legal experts, who have repeatedly warned the laws are overly broad. In February, Premier Chris Minns pushed through new laws banning protests near places of worship following the so-called Dural caravan incident. The laws faced pushback from members of the Labor caucus at the time, MPs arguing the wording of the bill would allow police to break up protests even if a demonstration was unrelated to the religious institution. The caravan, along with a spate of other antisemitic attacks, was revealed to be a 'con job' carried out by organised crime figures rather than racially motivated hate crimes or terror plots. NSW Police deny the anti-protest laws were used in the arrest and said the protesters were given a move-on order for allegedly blocking pedestrian access to the business, which had been the target of protests previously. Greens MP Sue Higginson, who has written to Police Minister Yasmin Catley demanding Thomas's injury as a critical incident investigation, said she was 'shocked but unsurprised'. 'It's written there in black and white. A direct reference to the anti-protest laws rushed through the NSW Parliament under the sordid non-disclosure of the truth around the Dural caravan incident,' she said. 'I along with others in parliament warned the premier and his government that we would see this level of impunity and now here it is.' Last week the NSW Supreme Court heard a challenge against the laws mounted by the head of the Palestine Action Group, Josh Lees. Lawyers for Lees have argued the laws are unconstitutional. Speaking at an event in Sydney on Sunday, Premier Chris Minns said it was too early to comment on whether the arrest was an appropriate use of his government's anti-protesting laws. 'I'd wait for that information to come in,' he said, adding police were investigating the extent of Thomas' injuries.
The Age
a day ago
- The Age
Religious worship powers under spotlight after arrest of former Greens candidate
In NSW, police are not allowed to issue move on directions for genuine protests unless they decide it presents a 'serious risk' to a person's safety, is obstructing traffic or, after the changes introduced by the Minns government this year, is taking place near a place of worship. The document states police attended the protest on Friday morning after receiving 'intelligence' via Instagram that a group called Weapons Out of The West would hold an 'unauthorised' protest at the Belmore business. At 5.50am, a person was seen walking past the business and 'communicating via a group chat'. After confirming they were attending a demonstration, police said the person was issued a move-on direction on the basis the 'unauthorised' demonstration would 'cause fear and alarm'. The group, the fact sheet said, had 'a history of violent disruptions outside of the SEC Plating business'. They were initially arrested, but then released after indicating they would comply with the direction. However, the police fact sheet then says the person 'walked across the road to the opposite side of SEC Plating which is a place of worship'. At that point, officers approached the protester and again 'informed her to comply with the move on direction'. 'Due to the accused being given repeated warnings and opportunities to comply with the direction, she was cautioned and placed under arrest for failing to comply with a move on direction,' it stated. Loading The reference to a place of worship has sparked serious concern among civil liberty groups and legal experts, who have repeatedly warned the laws are overly broad. In February, Premier Chris Minns pushed through new laws banning protests near places of worship following the so-called Dural caravan incident. The laws faced pushback from members of the Labor caucus at the time, MPs arguing the wording of the bill would allow police to break up protests even if a demonstration was unrelated to the religious institution. The caravan, along with a spate of other antisemitic attacks, was revealed to be a 'con job' carried out by organised crime figures rather than racially motivated hate crimes or terror plots. NSW Police deny the anti-protest laws were used in the arrest and said the protesters were given a move-on order for allegedly blocking pedestrian access to the business, which had been the target of protests previously. Greens MP Sue Higginson, who has written to Police Minister Yasmin Catley demanding Thomas's injury as a critical incident investigation, said she was 'shocked but unsurprised'. 'It's written there in black and white. A direct reference to the anti-protest laws rushed through the NSW Parliament under the sordid non-disclosure of the truth around the Dural caravan incident,' she said. 'I along with others in parliament warned the premier and his government that we would see this level of impunity and now here it is.' Last week the NSW Supreme Court heard a challenge against the laws mounted by the head of the Palestine Action Group, Josh Lees. Lawyers for Lees have argued the laws are unconstitutional. Speaking at an event in Sydney on Sunday, Premier Chris Minns said it was too early to comment on whether the arrest was an appropriate use of his government's anti-protesting laws. 'I'd wait for that information to come in,' he said, adding police were investigating the extent of Thomas' injuries.
Perth Now
a day ago
- Perth Now
Concern for MP safety after online terror group listing
The home affairs minister has expressed concern for the safety of politicians after an online far-right extremist group was linked to a plot to kill a state MP. The extremist group Terrorgram, which was listed as a terror organisation on Friday, was linked to a plot to kill NSW Labor MP Tim Crakanthorp in 2024. Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said the plot was one of the reasons for the group's formal listing as a terrorist organisation. Australians who join, recruit or fund the network will face prison sentences of up to 25 years. Mr Burke said he was concerned about the potential for attacks against elected officials in the UK and US happening in Australia. "I don't want Australia to become a country where members of parliament can't move around freely and engage with the community. It's good for democracy," he told Sky News on Sunday. "Terrorgram has been shown to be a threat on our shores ... but (there was) as very direct attempted attack on an Australian member of parliament." The federal government says Terrorgram provides instructions to its members online through the chat platform Telegram how to conduct terrorist attacks, and has been responsible for inspiring events in the United States, Europe and Asia. The US branded Terrorgram a terrorist organisation in January. Mr Burke said while Terrorgram operated differently to other terrorist organisations, the group needed to be dealt with harshly. "What they're doing on that group is not just spreading a whole lot of racist forms of bigotry and other forms of bigotry. They then also share how-to guides on how to conduct a terrorist attack, encouraging people to do so," he said. "The fact that it's a different form of terrorism doesn't change one bit ... we need to act on it as seriously as we would if it were a group of people meeting in a room in a terrorist cell."
