Powys County Council leader James Gibson-Watt to resign
LIBERAL Democrat councillor James Gibson-Watt the leader of Powys County Council will step down from the role at next week.
Cllr Gibson-Watt who represents the ward of Glasbury is expected to announce his resignation at the council's annual general meeting (AGM) on Thursday, May 15 after three years of leading the minority Liberal Democrat/Labour administration.
Cllr Gibson-Watt said: 'To be the leader of a Welsh local authority is a rare privilege enjoyed by relatively few politicians and is one I have relished.
'However, I have decided that the time is right for me to step aside and allow another member to take on the role and take forward the council's corporate vision of stronger, fairer, greener, on which we have made good progress over the past three years.'
Rumours that Cllr Gibson-Watt was intending to resign have been swirling around the corridors of county hall for several months with the expectation that planning portfolio holder, Liberal Democrat Cllr Jake Berriman will be put forward to take his place.
Cllr Gibson-Watt confirmed that this is the expected succession.
Cllr Gibson-Watt said: 'My group has elected Cllr Jake Berriman as my replacement as group leader and will be the group's nomination to be the new council leader at the AGM on May 15.
RECOMMENDED READING:
'Jake has my full and unqualified support, he will make an excellent council leader.'
Cllr Gibson-Watt added: 'It has been a difficult and turbulent time, with continued financial restraint and the challenges of inflation and the ongoing cost of living crisis.'
'But, despite that, significant progress has been made in improving the social care system, the transformation of Powys's education system, developing the economy and making progress towards the council becoming a 'net zero' organisation.
'I am particularly pleased with the way the council has developed partnerships across the Mid Wales region and the counties bordering Powys in England.
'The future operation of our public services depends on successful partnership working and sound foundations have now been laid to ensure that collaboration can and will develop further.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
25 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Boris Johnson: ‘Feeble' defence budget will leave us at Russia's mercy
Boris Johnson has said Labour's 'feeble' spending on defence leaves Britain at the mercy of Russia. The former prime minister told The Telegraph that Rachel Reeves's claims that defence spending would rise to 2.6 per cent of GDP by 2027 had left him 'very puzzled' and that the Chancellor's reluctance to pump more money into the sector suggested she did not view it as a priority. On Wednesday, Ms Reeves said defence spending would rise to 2.6 per cent by April 2027, but did not confirm whether it would climb higher, as demanded by Nato. 'This is feeble,' Mr Johnson said. 'They [Labour] have wasted a big opportunity. 'My view is that this Government is completely failing to show the leadership that is needed to defend Britain and defend Europe. 'Labour are congenitally hostile to defence spending. Their grass roots are still basically Corbynistas who think Russia is a great thing. Those views are still highly influential in Labour.' At the start of this year, Sir Keir Starmer pledged to send British troops into Ukraine in the event that a ceasefire between the two warring nations was negotiated by Donald Trump. A ' coalition of the willing ' was also established between European nations, with the UK said to be leading the group that would establish a road to peace in Ukraine. However, talk on both of these subjects appears to have gone quiet. Mr Johnson, who was prime minister when Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in Feb 2022, and has remained close with Volodymyr Zelensky, the Ukrainian president, since leaving government, said: 'What's happened to the boots on the ground initiative? 'As with Ukraine, the way to peace is through strength. If you talk to people in Ukraine or the US, they will say leadership on protecting Ukraine is now being offered by Germany and France.' Mr Johnson also said the Chancellor's increase in the welfare budget was 'out of control' and that such sums should be invested in defence instead. At a summit in the Hague later this month, which Mr Trump will attend, all Nato members will be expected to agree to committing 5 per cent of GDP on defence. Mark Rutte, the Nato secretary-general, has called for all alliance members to get to 3.5 per cent by 2032 and 5 per cent by an unspecified date. Earlier this week, Mr Rutte told The Telegraph that if Nato nations failed to achieve this percentage, then they needed ' to start learning to speak Russian '. Ms Reeves told the Commons: 'A new era in the threats we face demands a new era for defence and security. That's why we took the decision to prioritise our defence spending by reducing overseas development aid so that defence spending will now rise to 2.6 per cent of GDP by April 2027, including the contribution of our intelligence agencies. 'That uplift provides funding for the Defence Secretary, with a £11 billion increase in defence spending and a £600 milllion uplift for our security and intelligence agencies.' However, Tory sources claimed that by adding the single intelligence agencies budget in with the defence budget, it was eating into what money was left for the Armed Forces and did not account for 2.5 per cent of GDP on defence. 'Labour have taken money from a different department and pretended it was going to the Armed Forces,' one said. However, a Labour source accused the Tories of 'getting their numbers wrong' and insisted Wednesday's announcement was 'not a cut to defence' based on the Nato qualifying spend.
Belfast Telegraph
30 minutes ago
- Belfast Telegraph
NI to receive £1.2bn more after spending review – but economist warns that alone won't fix challenges
Announcing the outcome of Labour's spending review, the Chancellor Rachel Reeves declared: 'The devolved administrations will receive their largest real terms settlements since devolution began in 1998.' Budgets across Westminster departments will grow by 2.3% per year in real terms until 2028-29. Northern Ireland will see an increase in the amount of money it receives through the Barnett formula, the mechanism the Treasury uses to calculate how much money it gives to Stormont. Speaking about the average increase of £1.2bn, the Treasury said: 'The Northern Ireland Executive will receive an average extra £1.2 billion through the Barnett formula, 24% more to spend per person than the comparable UK Government spending in the rest of the UK, reflecting Northern Ireland's unique circumstances." Westminster has committed to maintaining some already-announced spending over the course of the review, for example allocating: '£137 million over three years in continued support for tackling paramilitarism and organised crime, and the Police Service of Northern Ireland's Additional Security Fund." Some of the Chancellor's headline nation-wide policies will have a direct impact on Northern Ireland, including changes to asylum policy. The government intends to end the use of hotels to provide accommodation to asylum seekers within the life of the current parliament. The Home Office currently contracts private firm Mears Group to source accommodation – including in hotels – for people seeking asylum in GB and NI. As of last September, there were over 300 such people in Northern Ireland living in hotels, in conditions which have been criticised by refugee rights' groups. News Catch Up - Thursday 12th June The Chancellor said she will speed up the asylum process and cut the backlog in the system which is costing the government billions of pounds. Other parts of wider UK policies will impact Northern Ireland, including the government's plans to increase defence spending annually by between 3.6-3.8%. The precise location of defence spending increases will be announced later in the year in the defence investment plan, but it will include Northern Ireland, where the government spent £240m in 2023-24 on an industry that employs 600 people. Speaking to the Belfast Telegraph, Chief Secretary to the Treasury Darren Jones said that 'both' new and existing defence facilities here would receive investment 'because there is just so much extra money going into defence spending.' Mr Jones added that Northern Ireland would also see investment in the advanced manufacturing sector, including aerospace businesses. Northern Ireland will also have access to an additional £350m from the British Business Bank, the governmental body that offers financing and investment to private firms across the UK. It was through the bank that the Covid-relief loans were provided to companies. It has supported 6,000 businesses in NI since 2014 and its NI investments include Reform RX, a Pilates reformer company which was recently sold on to a major US firm. Northern Ireland will also be part of other pieces of investment, including the government's plan to aggressively grow AI capabilities in NI. An AI unit will be set up within the Executive, part of what Deputy First Minister Emma Little-Pengelly called 'a huge agenda.' 'We are determined to try and ensure Northern Ireland can do transformation in efficiency and productivity improvements through all of the tools that are there. That includes the advances in AI,' she said. 'This has been underway for a number of months, as referenced in our programme for government. We believe that digitisation and AI agenda can really improve public services and the way that we deliver those public services.' Responding to the spending review, Andrew Webb, the chief economist of Grant Thornton NI, said reform was necessary to ensure increased public spending was effective. 'Our public services face accumulated pressure - financial, structural, and societal. 'The Spending Review acknowledges this by calling for reform, but when we look around and see infrastructure deficits in areas such as waste water that are in the billions of pounds, we know we have a massive task on our hands. 'Our challenges aren't just money-related. New money helps, but money alone won't fix planning bottlenecks, staff shortages, or fragmented governance. "Northern Ireland needs a structured, long-range recovery plan with investment in the right places, powers aligned with purpose, and a relentless focus on outcomes. 'Otherwise, we risk repeating the cycle of pouring more money in and improving little.' Meanwhile, Stormont Finance Minister John O'Dowd said that agreements secured with the Treasury by his department will 'deliver an additional £600m of funding provided for vital public services here.' Mr O'Dowd was referring to the Treasury's willingness to exclude over £300m of agriculture funding from funding calculations, saving the Executive £600m over the period of the spending review. An independent review of Northern Ireland's Level of Need by Professor Gerald Holtham was also published yesterday, recommending an increase in the Barnett adjustment factor.
Scotsman
37 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Scotland 2050: Just what can we do to tackle the country's problems?
PA Today's younger workers have been betrayed by those who prefer to exercise power for the sake of it, rather than risk unpopularity by asking where scarce resources should be prioritised Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... In 1945, Labour Leader Clement Attlee placed before a victorious but war torn nation, a prospectus to forge a new Britain in the post war world. He defeated Winston Churchill in a landslide General Election victory and set about enacting his party's manifesto which was titled, 'Let Us Face the Future'. That Government extended the boundaries of public ownership, embedded a new National Health Service, established the building blocks of a Welfare State and gave practical meaning to what would become a benign but enduring social democracy. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Not until Mrs Thatcher liberalised markets and privatised key industries, did the Attlee settlement come under any serious attack. And, even although the parameters of the post war settlement were redefined by Margaret Thatcher, much of the central tenets were to endure. Eighty years after the building of the new Jerusalem, politicians at both Holyrood and Westminster are grappling to deal with a host of new problems, many created by the successes of the post war consensus. People are living longer, the range of drugs and operations available has transformed lives, the notion of 'cradle to grave' welfare has expanded to deliver a huge social security bill and projections of eye watering demands to pay for future pensions and social care. The truth is that the Attlee revolution stalled some time ago, financially groaning under the sheer weight of demand for more spending and turbo charged by a demographic time bomb which exploded as the political classes fashioned policies to deal with the short term demands of the electoral cycle. The underlying structural challenges and increasing unaffordability of 'welfare without end' has been ignored. On the 17th June, a conference at the Assembly Rooms in Edinburgh will ponder the challenges and issues that will look at 'Scotland 2050, Scotland's Future'. An alternative name for the gathering of political, business, and civic leaders could well be, 'Let Us Face the Future'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Bernard Ponsonby | contributed I will have the pleasure of chairing the day and help tease out just exactly what our leaders plan to do to solve issues which, in part, help explain the genesis of some voters abandoning the mainstream parties. Many on the political right of course, believe the problem lies in the fact the Attlee revolution has never been properly dismantled and argue that what is needed is an aggressive dis-membering of the state, a more market focussed view of delivery and a determination to simply limit welfare to those who genuinely can't work. They would argue that what is needed is 'Attlee in reverse' and a diet version of state intervention. That prospectus is more Nigel Farage than mainstream Conservative. And indeed, with issues like furlough and subsidising energy bills, the last Conservative government was arguably the most interventionist since Attlee. Scotland seems a slave to social democratic instinct and yet its proponents (Labour, SNP and Lib Dem) seem incapable of moving on from the traditional model of delivery: tax to spend and tax more to spend more. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad It was evident some time ago that this model is bust and in the absence of economic growth, the policies that were born of social democratic instinct became unaffordable. But how do they become sustainable? That is one question that this conference will try and answer. A crisis in the NHS, the Housing Sector, an exploding bill for welfare and pensions, and an acceptance of inter-generational unfairness as the baby boomers enjoy the fruits of the Attlee revolution, denied to their children and absolutely denied to their grandchildren. An inertia of thought and of a tendency to park and then ignore tough decisions have led to today's generation being denied the benefits some of us took for granted, like student grants, subsidised mortgages, affordable housing, and decent pension provision. Today's younger workers have been betrayed by those who prefer to exercise power for the sake of it, rather than risk unpopularity by asking where scarce resources should be prioritised and channelled. I will want to ask in the question and answer sessions, why it is that this was allowed to happen and more importantly, what our leaders intend to do about it? The conference will hear from some key figures: John Swinney, Anas Sarwar, Alex Cole-Hamilton, Kate Forbes, Jeane Freeman, Willie Rennie, Paul Sweeney, and Mairi Spowage from the Fraser of Allender Institute, to list just a few. It will tackle key themes: Building a resilient economy; Scotland's clean energy and tackling the country's housing crisis.
