How George Floyd protests changed Denver — and where the movement stands now
Five years ago, George Floyd's murder sparked nationwide protests that morphed into a movement condemning police violence and calling for swift reforms.
Zoom in: Robert Davis, as co-leader of the reimagining police task force, advocated for reforms to improve Denver's policing practices in the aftermath of Floyd's killing.
He was a key figure in a movement calling for increased accountability and transparency for Denver law enforcement.
Why it matters: Five years after Floyd's death, Davis and other community members have lost optimism in a movement committed to ensuring a death like Floyd's won't happen again.
The global protests and corporate and institutional pledges have largely collapsed since the start of the second Trump administration.
In its place is a new political and cultural order backed by the administration rolling back DEI programs, civil rights initiatives and curtailing police reform efforts like consent decrees.
State of play: Lisa Calderon, executive director of Women Uprising, worked alongside Davis on the police task force to craft 112 policy recommendations for Denver law enforcement.
The recommendations included minimizing unnecessary public interaction with law enforcement and improved funding for alternative response efforts, like STAR.
Calderon namechecked what she considered lasting victories: DPD's limiting of low-level traffic stops and City Council voting to decriminalize jaywalking.
However, she says more can be done: "We have not seen the transformational changes that we had hoped."
Context: DPD has fully or partially implemented 64% of those suggestions, per their own tracking, though Davis says not all were implemented the way the task force recommended.
DPD did not immediately respond to a request for comment Tuesday.
Flashback: Floyd's 2020 murder brought renewed attention to Elijah McClain's 2019 death in neighboring Aurora, propelling the case to the national spotlight, and prompting Gov. Jared Polis to appoint a special prosecutor to investigate.
McClain, who was Black, died after being stopped by police and sedated with Ketamine by paramedics who were later convicted in 2023 for their role in his death.
Threat level: Denver has paid out $18.4 million in settlements related to the 2020 protests, per the latest data from the City Attorney's Office — a tangible reminder of how some officers mishandled George Floyd protest response.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Black America Web
29 minutes ago
- Black America Web
SCOTUS Refuses To Review Discrimination Case By Black Dancer Allegedly Told By Club Owners There Were ‘Too Many Black Girls'
Source: CHIP SOMODEVILLA / Getty On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court rejected an appeal filed by a Black dancer in Houston, Texas, who claims she has been discriminated against by several Houston clubs that place limits on how many Black women they will hire to perform. According to The Hill, professional dancer Chanel Nicholson filed her lawsuit in August 2021, claiming the clubs listed as defendants violated a federal law against racial discrimination in making and enforcing contracts by limiting the number of Black dancers who could work the same shift as a matter of policy. For example, Nicholson said a manager at the club Cover Girls told her she could not perform at the venue in November 2017 because there were already 'too many Black girls' in the club. She also claimed that, in August 2021, she was told by the manager at a club called Splendor that the club was 'not taking any more Black girls.' Now, off the top, anyone who has been paying attention to the way the conservative-leaning Supreme Court has treated discrimination cases recently might assume Nicholson's suit was dismissed for one (or both) of two reasons: she's a Black woman who is a dancer — so the courts are simply not taking her seriously for reasons rooted in systemic misogynoir — or she's not a white person filing a suit over a DEI policy, as that's pretty much what one has to be to get a federal anti-discrimination claim to shake their way under the current administration. Both of these might have been the real reason the plaintiff's case was dismissed, but the reason a district court gave was that the statute of limitations was up — despite the appearance that it wasn't. From the Hill: Nicholson said she was denied work repeatedly due to the quota, including in 2014, 2017 and 2021. However, her case was dismissed by a district court that concluded the applicable statute of limitations clock began ticking in 2014; the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit affirmed the decision. She asked the justices to decide when the statute of limitations starts to run in a claim of 'pattern or practice' of racial discrimination. They declined to hear her case. So, how exactly do the courts simply decide the statute of limitations clock started in 2014, and ignore the alleged offenses that happened years later? Well, apparently, all but two justices, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson and Justice Sonia Sotomayor, determined that the more recent discriminatory acts alleged by Nicholson were not acts that stood on their own, but 'continued effects' of past discrimination that is no longer actionable due to the statute. Brown Jackson wrote in her dissenting opinion that the court's decision to side with the district court 'flouts this Court's clear precedents.' 'We have long held that '[e]ach discrete discriminatory act starts a new clock for filing charges alleging that act,' regardless of whether similar instances of discrimination have occurred in the past,' she wrote. 'Because the Fifth Circuit's contrary ruling was patently erroneous, this Court should have granted Nicholson's petition and summarily reversed the judgment.' Jackson's opinion focused on the allegations from 2017 and 2021, arguing that both alleged 'discrete' instances of discrimination occurred within the four years before Nicholson filed her lawsuit, making the 5th Circuit's claim that the statute of limitations was up 'patently erroneous.' 'To conclude that Nicholson's claims are time-barred because there were earlier instances of discriminatory treatment, as the Fifth Circuit did, impermissibly inoculates the clubs' more recent discriminatory conduct,' Jackson wrote. 'If sustained discriminatory motivation is all that is required to transform recent, racially discriminatory acts into the 'continued effects' of earlier discriminatory conduct, then past discrimination could inexplicably prevent recovery for later, similarly unlawful conduct.' It really makes no sense for a court to conclude that different acts of racism committed by different people at different times are all part of the same 'continued effects' of the first act of racial discrimination. It's almost as if racial discrimination is treated like a trivial thing until white people are filing suits over diversity efforts. We're just basically repackaging white supremacy — that's how we're making America great again. SEE ALSO: Tulsa's 1st Black Mayor Proposes Reparations Plan For Descendants Of Race Massacre, But Will It Work In Trump's America? Op-Ed: Misogynoir Is Why Many Black Women Don't Care That Telvin Osborne's Killer Won't Be Charged SEE ALSO SCOTUS Refuses To Review Discrimination Case By Black Dancer Allegedly Told By Club Owners There Were 'Too Many Black Girls' was originally published on Black America Web Featured Video CLOSE
Black America Web
29 minutes ago
- Black America Web
Tulsa's 1st Black Mayor Proposes Reparations Plan For Descendants Of Race Massacre, But Will It Work In Trump's America?
Source: UCG / Getty Tulsa, Oklahoma's first Black mayor has proposed a reparations plan (of sorts) for the descendants of one of the most notorious and horrific race massacres in America's history, but can such a proposal come to fruition in a state that has, multiple times, denied reparations to the actual survivors of the 1921 Tulsa Race Massacre? According to the Associated Press, the reparations proposal, which Mayor Monroe Nichols won't even officially call a reparations plan due to how politically polarizing the term is, wouldn't provide direct payments to citizens. Instead, Nichols characterized his proposal as one that would put the Tulsa community on the 'road to repair' by creating a private charitable trust with a goal to secure $105 million in assets, including $60 million 'to go toward improving buildings and revitalizing the city's north side,' AP reported. The mayor said his plan wouldn't require city council approval, but the city council would have to approve the transfer of any city-owned assets to the trust. 'For 104 years, the Tulsa Race Massacre has been a stain on our city's history,' Nichols said Sunday, announcing the proposal to an audience of several hundred people at the Greenwood Cultural Center, which is located in a district of North Tulsa that was decimated by the white mob in 1921. 'The massacre was hidden from history books, only to be followed by the intentional acts of redlining, a highway built to choke off economic vitality and the perpetual underinvestment of local, state and federal governments.' 'Now it's time to take the next big steps to restore,' he declared. 'The Greenwood District at its height was a center of commerce,' Nichols told AP. 'So what was lost was not just something from North Tulsa or the Black community. It actually robbed Tulsa of an economic future that would have rivaled anywhere else in the world.' Nichols, who signed an executive order earlier this year recognizing June 1 as Tulsa Race Massacre Observance Day, acknowledged that a major hurdle that could get in the way of his plan is the war on all things diversity, equity and inclusion waged by the administration of President Donald Trump. 'The fact that this lines up with a broader national conversation is a tough environment, but it doesn't change the work we have to do,' he said. Source: UCG / Getty Of course, Nichols would be right to be wary about Trump's overreaching administration medling in his city's affairs over nonsensical (and racist as hell) DEI concerns. This is, after all, the same administration that recently ended a wastewater settlement for a mostly Black Alabama town, falsely calling it 'environmental justice as viewed through a distorting, DEI lens,' simply because environmental racism was addressed in the reaching of the settlement. Even more recently, Trump expressed his intention to end a Biden-era program to expand high-speed internet to underserved communities, including rural areas, falsely claiming it provides 'woke handouts based on race,' despite the fact that poor people from rural communites could absolutely be of any race (and would also include a significant portion of his MAGA cultists). But if Nichols is worried about Trump putting the kibosh on his proposal, he should be doubly worried about what his own state government might do. Last year, the Oklahoma Supreme Court sided with lower courts in dismissing a lawsuit or reparations filed by 110-year-olds Viola Ford Fletcher and Lessie Benningfield Randle, the two remaining survivors of the massacre. Here's what I wrote about that previously: None of it is terribly surprising, of course. The same year the lawsuit seeking reparations was filed, Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Stitt signed into law another Republican white fragility bill prohibiting teachings in K-12 schools that include Critical Race Theory, a college-level academic framework that is not taught in K-12 schools, as well as any other race-based curriculum that causes 'discomfort, guilt, anguish or psychological distress' to (white) students. (Oklahoma wants to be Florida so bad.) Then, in 2022, Stitt called for an investigation into Tulsa Public Schools after claims that the school district violated the state's anti-CRT law, which was denounced by both the Oklahoma City Public Schools Board of Education and the Tulsa Race Massacre Centennial Commission, of which Stitt had the caucasity to be a member of until he was booted from the commission for signing the law that would certainly whitewash the manner in which the Tulsa massacre could be taught—in Tulsa. So yeah — good luck to Mayor Nichols, and we hope his bare-minimum proposal becomes a reality in Tulsa, but he might be fighting an uphill battle in a state that, much like the current federal government, will always prioritize white nationalism, white supremacy and white people's eternally fragile feelings over racial justice. SEE ALSO: Op-Ed: Misogynoir Is Why Many Black Women Don't Care That Telvin Osborne's Killer Won't Be Charged Trump Admin To Settle Suit Claiming Program For 'Disadvantaged' Businesses Only Serves 'Women And Certain Minorities' SEE ALSO Tulsa's 1st Black Mayor Proposes Reparations Plan For Descendants Of Race Massacre, But Will It Work In Trump's America? was originally published on Black America Web Featured Video CLOSE
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Mob brutally attacks teen at Palmdale concert, family seeks hate crime charges
Family members are demanding justice and hate crime charges after a high school student was brutally beaten by a mob at an impromptu Palmdale rock concert. Video of the violent attack, which has since gone viral, shows 17-year-old Elijah Green curled up on the dirt while a group of at least four people, believed to be adults, repeatedly stomp on, kick and punch him while others are heard supporting the fight from out of frame. Audio from the footage also captures the offenders using racial slurs amidst the physical assault. 'We were in the hospital watching the video,' said Elijah's mother, Roneika Green, during a Monday morning news conference. 'No mother should have to watch their child being stomped like this.' The incident allegedly happened last month after some people in attendance claimed Elijah had touched a woman inappropriately the night before. However, Roneika denies that, and instead said her son tripped and leaned against the woman to try to break his fall. The Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department provided KTLA with a statement regarding the night of the attack that read in part, 'Palmdale Station is aware of an assault with a deadly weapon that occurred on the above date at an impromptu concert at the intersection of Old Harold Road and Firethorn Avenue.' LASD said detectives have been assigned to the case and are in 'extensive contact with the victim and his family.' Officials did not explicitly say the victim's name or age, or provide further information about the report of an assault with a deadly weapon. Najee Ali, a local civil rights activist and Senior Organizer with Los Angeles Metropolitan Churches, said Elijah's family reached out to him to serve as their spokesperson and advocate. 'The racially motivated assault of Elijah Green is one of the most horrifying hate crimes against a young Black person I've ever witnessed,' stated Ali. 'This is L.A. vs Hate, and we are calling for a unified response from every community organization and leader who stands for justice.' While the extent of Elijah's injuries were not explicitly stated, Ali's statement included a quote from Roneika, saying, 'As a mother, watching my son get nearly beaten to death by a racist mob—while no one helped him—is something I'll never forget.' Officials said this is an active investigation. 'The Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department take any allegation of hate crimes seriously, and all cases will be thoroughly reviewed by the District Attorney's Office in cooperation with the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department,' read the department's statement. Authorities urge anyone with information to contact the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department Palmdale Station Detective Peirson at 661-272-2477. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
