
Terrorists came, carried out big terror attack, some mistake somewhere: Iltija Mufti
Iltija Mufti, daughter of PDP chief Mehbooba Mufti, on Tuesday said that for terrorists to be able to carry out the Pahalgam assault in Jammu and Kashmir (J&K) in a place where tourists come in large numbers indicates that a mistake has happened, and it should be investigated.
In an interview with IANS, Iltija also praised her mother as "extremely peace-loving" and criticised the media for portraying her as "anti-India or non-secular."
Along with the Pahalgam terror attack, she also talked about the situation at the borders, Pakistani citizens being sent back, the Waqf (Amendment) Act, J&K Chief Minister Omar Abdullah's meeting with Prime Minister Narendra Modi, etc.
The following are the excerpts from the interview:
IANS: 26 innocent people were killed by terrorists in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam. What do you have to say?
Iltija Mufti: This was a dastardly attack, and we condemn it. There is no place for violence. We condemn terrorism. All of us saw how our guests -- the tourists -- were killed. Two young women, who were recently married, lost their husbands; we are saddened by it. Before being Kashmiris, Muslims, or Indians, we are human beings first, and such acts -- such as targeted killings -- break our hearts.
IANS: Who is to blame for this terror attack? Do you think Pakistan was behind it?
Iltija Mufti: For the last six years, since Article 370 was abrogated and the special status of Jammu and Kashmir was taken away, the entire law and order situation here -- including the security agencies, Intelligence agencies, police -- all come under the Ministry of Home Affairs. So, it is very difficult for me to speak on this matter, as they are not under my domain, nor are they under the domain of the J&K government.
These are questions that the central government sitting in Delhi will have to answer. I don't think this is the right time to start pointing fingers and saying mistakes were made here or there. There must be time given for a proper investigation into how this happened.
Places like Baisaran and Pahalgam see a large number of tourists every day, yet that day, terrorists came and carried out such a big attack. This certainly needs to be investigated. I don't have the authority to say who is to blame. There was some mistake somewhere -- that's why such a serious incident happened. Only after a full investigation can anything be said.
IANS: PDP chief Mehbooba Mufti went to Pahalgam and interacted with the locals. How do you see that?
Iltija Mufti: I think the image the media -- mostly the 'godi' media -- has created of Mehbooba ji, portraying her as anti-India or non-secular, is completely wrong. If you truly look at Mehbooba ji, you'll see she is extremely peace-loving.
It was very important for her to go to Pahalgam at this time -- not just for the local people, but also to show our tourists that we have always welcomed them and will continue to do so. You must have seen the visuals -- she went there, tourists were present, and photos were taken with them. We are very thankful that the tourists continue to show their trust in us.
Some media channels are portraying that tourists are not welcome in Jammu and Kashmir -- that is not true. Our doors, the doors of our hearts, and the doors of our state are always open for our tourists. We welcome them with love and hospitality -- and we will continue to do so.
IANS: Following this attack, Pakistani citizens are being sent back. How do you see this?
Iltija Mufti: Many people have been living here (in India) for the past 20–30 years. A Pakistani woman whose son was martyred while serving in the CRPF is also living here. When her son was martyred, Home Minister Amit Shah himself visited her. There are many such cases where people have been affected. If we look at this through the lens of humanity, it is clear that injustices are occurring.
That said, the government is taking steps it feels are necessary. However, in my personal opinion, we should also act with some humanity.
IANS: A CRPF personnel was dismissed after it was revealed that he is married to a Pakistani woman. What do you have to say about this?
Iltija Mufti: I am not very familiar with this case. If the police are withholding information, it is not my responsibility. I saw an interview with the soldier, in which he said he had informed the CRPF and security agencies. This is a personal matter concerning a CRPF soldier. An investigation is ongoing, so I cannot say much.
IANS: Do you think war is an option?
Iltija Mufti: Whenever there is talk of war, the people of Jammu and Kashmir are caught in between, as we are a border state. We are the ones who suffer; we are the collateral damage. However, some things are not in our control. If the government feels it needs to act in retaliation to maintain law and order and ensure India's security, that is within its domain. I cannot comment on that.
I feel that war is never the answer. When PM Modi visited Russia, he said, "The era of war is over." I believe it's time to remember that.
IANS: Congress leader Charanjit Singh Channi has questioned the surgical strikes carried out by the Indian armed forces and said people are waiting for the "so-called 56-inch chest to act." How do you see this?
Iltija Mufti: Such baseless, provocative, and instigating remarks are not right -- especially at a time when so many of our people have been martyred. Not much time has passed since the attack. I believe our politicians should exercise sensitivity when issuing statements. Why must we engage in cheap rhetoric at a time like this?
IANS: You and your mother had highlighted that Kashmiris were being harassed across India following the Pahalgam terror attack. What is your take on it?
Iltija Mufti: As a Kashmiri, I am very disappointed. People are suspecting every Kashmiri across India. Even in Delhi, our students and businessmen are being targeted. PM Modi needs to talk to Kashmiris -- he has left them on their own. Since 2019, the humiliation we have faced and the way Muslims are being treated breaks my heart.
PM Modi is not just the Prime Minister of Hindus -- he is also the Prime Minister of Muslims, Sikhs, Christians, Buddhists, and every citizen of India. He must rise to our expectations and protect us. But what has happened in Kashmir over the last six years is extremely disappointing.
IANS: What is your take on the Waqf (Amendment) Act?
Iltija Mufti: I feel that just like the people of Kashmir and the country were misled when Article 370 was repealed -- it was claimed this was being done for the development and progress of the people of Jammu and Kashmir -- that was a false narrative, full of propaganda.
Similarly, look at the time that has passed since the Waqf (Amendment) Act was passed. It is sub judice, but even so, many madrasas and dargahs are being demolished. This Act is meant to disempower Muslims. People want to gather votes by demolishing mosques, so what can we say?
They are indulging in short-term politics and may gain short-term benefits, but in the long term, it is an attack on the soul of our country. This is Gandhiji's country. For me, the Waqf Act is a direct attack on Muslims. It is an anti-Muslim Act. You want to snatch whatever little freedom and religious autonomy Muslims still have.
IANS: What is your take on J&K Chief Minister Omar Abdullah's meeting with PM Modi and his Assembly speech?
Iltija Mufti: I feel that the people of Jammu and Kashmir have lost so much after 2019. We need to fight for a larger cause. The narrative of statehood that is being run by the NC -- which is currently the government here -- is the BJP's narrative. The NC didn't speak about the Waqf Act in the Assembly, nor did the BJP MLAs.
The NC demands statehood; BJP MLAs also demand statehood. If the NC is only going to echo the BJP's line, then what is the point of people electing 50 MLAs? If you're (NC) just going to follow the BJP's narrative, then you're betraying the people of J&K.
IANS: An Over Ground Worker (OGW), who had helped the Pahalgam terrorists, jumped into the river after he was taken to identify a terrorist hideout. How do you see this?
Iltija Mufti: Whoever was involved in the terror attack must be punished. Justice should be served to the families who lost loved ones. But here, anyone labelled as an OGW or accused based on a narrative often comes directly from the security agencies -- and it is not always verified. We have seen this ourselves.
I won't say all police officers are wrong, but whether it's the Army or police, fake encounters have happened here -- like in Bandipore, Kupwara, and even Rajouri-Poonch two years ago. So, the narrative you're being told is not always the truth.
In Pulwama last week, 10–15 houses were demolished, and only one of them belonged to a suspected militant. The rest belonged to innocent civilians. I am thankful to Mehbooba Mufti, who spoke to the Home Minister and informed him that the houses being demolished were not just of militants, but also of common people -- and that this is wrong. After that, Delhi stopped the demolitions. The government cannot term everyone as a militant or OGW.
You first say that after 2019, the people of J&K were integrated. Integration is not just about geography or borders, it is also emotional and psychological integration. That integration must happen too. If you look at everyone here with suspicion and hatred, as extremists or OGWs, then how will the distance between Kashmir and Delhi ever be bridged?
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
19 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Restore Section 13 on loan waivers in Disaster Management Act, CM writes to PM
Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan on Thursday wrote a letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi seeking his intervention to restore Section 13 of the Disaster Management Act related to relief in loan repayment for victims of disaster. Mr. Vijayan pointed out in the letter that the removal of this Section, which was included in the law with purely humanitarian considerations, will further distress the victims of natural disasters. The Chief Minister wrote to the Prime Minister in the context of the Union Government informing the Kerala High Court that the law does not allow the loan waiver of the victims of the Mundakkai-Chooralmala landslides in Wayanad district, citing the amendment made in March 2025 to the Disaster Management Act. Section 13, which the Union government omitted as part of an amendment, reads — 'The National Authority may, in cases of disasters of severe magnitude, recommend relief in repayment of loans or for grant of fresh loans to the persons affected by disaster on such concessional terms as may be appropriate.' 'The above Section enables providing much needed financial relief to victims of disasters, who face unprecedented crisis and will have to rebuild their lives after incurring heavy losses. The said provision in the Disaster Management Act was included with a humanitarian intent and deleting the same amounts to putting the victims of natural disasters to added hardship,' wrote Mr. Vijayan. The CM's office said in a press release that Kerala had submitted its first memorandum to the Union government on August 17, 2024, immediately after the disaster. In addition to the memorandum, a Post-Disaster Needs Assessment was conducted and a detailed report was submitted to the Union Government on November 13, 2024. On both these occasions, Section 13 of the Disaster Management Act was in force. However, it was only much later, March 29, 2025, that the Union Government issued a gazette notification amending the Act by deleting this Section. This amendment does not have retrospective effect. Yet the Union government is taking the position that since the Act has been amended, it cannot provide assistance anymore, said the release.


Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Beed caste atrocity shows we are still far away from achieving caste equality
Written by Neeraj Bunkar On June 4, a chilling incident in Beed district, Maharashtra, again laid bare the persistent scourge of caste-based violence in India. Vaibhav Khandagale, a Dalit man, was brutally assaulted by a mob of 10–12 'upper caste' Maratha men, some of whom were his classmates and supposedly friends. The attack, driven by casteist hatred, was not just an assault on Vaibhav's body, but also an affront to the principles of equality enshrined in our Constitution. The SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, enacted on September 11, 1989, was designed to protect marginalised communities from caste-based discrimination and violence. It defines atrocities as 'offences' committed against Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) by non-SC/ST individuals, including acts like physical assault, humiliation, and the denial of rights. Section 3(1)(r) of the Act, cited in the FIR registered by Vaibhav in Beed, addresses intentional insults or intimidation meant to humiliate SC/ST members in public view, punishable with imprisonment from six months to five years and a fine. Section 3(1)(s) covers abuses using casteist slurs, while Section 3(2) (va) enhances penalties for offences under the Indian Penal Code (now Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023). The FIR, registered under multiple sections of the BNS, 2023 (Section 119(1) for causing hurt, Section 333 for cheating, and Section 351(2) for criminal force), alongside SC/ST Act provisions, reflects the gravity of the incident. However, the response from local authorities raises serious concerns about the Act's enforcement. Vaibhav's brother, Dhananjay, according to reports, alleges that the police delayed registering the FIR, forcing the family to wait hours at the Shirur Kasar police station. Even after persistent pressure, the police initially resisted including critical BNS sections related to attempted murder. Shockingly, a counter-complaint was reportedly filed by the wife of the main accused, falsely alleging theft and threats by Vaibhav's family. This case mirrors broader trends documented by the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB). In 2022, India recorded 57,582 cases of atrocities against SCs, up from 50,291 in 2020. Maharashtra alone reported 2,743 cases in 2022, a steady rise from 2,569 in 2020. Uttar Pradesh topped the list with 15,368 cases, followed by Rajasthan (8,752) and Madhya Pradesh (7,733). In Maharashtra, however, the conviction rates for these crimes remain alarmingly low, undermining the Act's purpose. For SCs, the conviction rate was a mere 8.8 per cent in 2018, dipping to 7.2 per cent in 2019, rising slightly to 11.8 per cent in 2020, then falling again to 10.7 per cent in 2021 and 8.9 per cent in 2022. For STs, the rates were similarly dismal: 11.3 per cent in 2018, 11.9 per cent in 2019, 12.5 per cent in 2020, 11.8 per cent in 2021, and 12.8 per cent in 2022. By the end of 2022, 14,504 cases involving crimes against SCs and 4,149 against STs were still pending trial in Maharashtra, reflecting a backlog that delays justice for victims. The Act mandates robust mechanisms like Special Courts and Special Public Prosecutors to ensure speedy trials (Sections 14 and 15). It also prohibits anticipatory bail (Section 18) and mandates state governments to provide legal aid and rehabilitation (Section 21). Yet, Dhananjay's account of delayed police response, insensitive officers, and hospital negligence in initiating a medico-legal case highlights a gap between the law's intent and its execution. The Beed incident also exposes the social and political pressures that undermine justice. The Act's provisions for externment (Section 10) and forfeiture of property (Section 7) could deter such intimidation, but their application remains rare. The collective silence of 200 villagers during the assault further illustrates the social boycott faced by Dalit families. The SC/ST Act remains a vital shield for India's marginalised, but its effectiveness hinges on impartial enforcement and societal change. Without systemic reforms — stronger police accountability, proactive legal aid, and widespread awareness — the Act risks remaining a paper promise, leaving countless Vaibhavs vulnerable to the enduring shadow of caste. The writer is a research scholar at Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, United Kingdom


United News of India
an hour ago
- United News of India
Former Bangladesh PM urges party members to unite people against Yunus' ‘illegal' government
Dhaka, June 12 (UNI) Former Bangladesh Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina has urged party leaders and activists to stand by the people, unite them, and launch a robust movement to oust the 'illegal' interim government led by 'conspirator and mob king', Chief Advisor Mohammed Yunus. In her latest audio message, the 77-year-old Awami League president called Yunus, his aides, and student coordinators criminals, accusing them of plundering public funds, killing Awami League members, and looting their homes and businesses. She alleged that the leaders of the so-called Anti-Discrimination Movement are now ironically fostering discrimination across the country, promoting the rampant rise of Islamic extremism and eroding its political fabric, reports the party's media agency Daily Republic. Sheikh Hasina noted that the anti-quota movement remained peaceful until July 15, but thereafter, protesters began attacking police, torching government buildings, and blocking roads. Accusing the SAD members of targeting police and military personnel, she highlighted her administration's work in domestic security, stating that it necessary actions to protect lives and property. 'We did nothing wrong.' She also slammed her rival party - the Bangladesh Nationalist Party led by ex-PM Khaleda Zia - for engaging in looting and terrorism and condemning the Jamaat-e-Islami for murders and cutting tendons. Sheikh Hasina firmly stated that she never agreed to 'sell out the country to foreigners.' Stating that she never once agreed to sell out the country's Saint Martin Island or allow a military base in the Bay of Bengal, she said 'I could have come to power in 2001 if I had agreed to sell gas. I gave shelter to 10 lakh Rohingyas on humanitarian grounds. 'I did not want conflict with the Myanmar government and did not allow insurgency and militancy using our land. Is this my crime?' She further alleged that Yunus, his advisers, and coordinators would eventually flee the country, but those responsible for looting and killing would face justice. She criticised Yunus for failing to hold accountable those who killed police and Awami League members, instead granting them indemnity. UNI ANV SSP