
Officers who cover their faces could be charged with a misdemeanor under California proposal
Local, state, and federal law enforcement officers who cover their faces while conducting official business could face a misdemeanor charge in California under a new proposal announced Monday.
If approved, the bill would require all law enforcement officials to show their faces and be identifiable by their uniform, which should carry their name or other identifier. It would not apply to the National Guard or other troops and it would exempt SWAT teams and officers responding to natural disasters.
The Department of Homeland Security called the proposal 'despicable' in a post on X, saying ICE officers are facing a 'more than 400 percent increase in assault.'
State Sen. Scott Wiener, a Democrat representing San Francisco, and State Sen. Jesse Arreguin, a Democrat representing Berkeley and Oakland, said the proposal seeks to boost transparency and public trust in law enforcement. It also looks to protect against people trying to impersonate law enforcement, they said.
'We are seeing more and more law enforcement officers, particularly at the federal level, covering their faces entirely, not identifying themselves at all and, at times, even wearing army fatigues where we can't tell if these are law enforcement officers or a vigilante militia,' Wiener said.
'They are grabbing people off our streets and disappearing people, and it's terrifying,' he added.
In Los Angeles, a series of immigration raids June 6 by federal officers, some with face coverings, triggered days of turbulent protests across the city and beyond and led President Donald Trump to deploy National Guard troopsand Marines to the LA area. More than 100 people were detained during those raids and immigrant advocates say they have not been able to contact them.
The state senators said that in recent months, federal officers have conducted raids while covering their faces, and at times their badges and names, in Los Angeles, San Francisco, San Diego, Concord, Downey and Montebello.
'Law enforcement officers are public servants and people should be able to see their faces, see who they are, know who they are. Otherwise, there is no transparency and no accountability,' Wiener said.
Videos of raids showing masked officers using unmarked vehicles and grabbing people off the streets have circulated on social media in recent weeks.
DHS defended the officers' wearing of masks in its post on X. Besides an increase in assaults, DHS says people have launched websites to reveal the identifies of ICE officers.
'While ICE officers are being assaulted by rioters, a sanctuary politician is trying to outlaw officers wearing masks to protect themselves from being doxed and targeted by known and suspected terrorist sympathizers,' the statement says.
Ed Obayashi, a special prosecutor in California and an expert on national and state police practices, said the proposed legislation would be tough to enforce because federal officers can't be prosecuted by state courts for activities performed during their official duties.
'If they are following federal directives, they are following federal law,' Obayashi said.
He said that when it comes to local and state officers, they are already required by law to have identifiable information and department insignia on their uniforms.
Todd Lyons, ICE's acting director, has defended his officers using facemasks, saying they wear them to protect themselves from death threats and online harassment.
'I'm sorry if people are offended by them wearing masks, but I'm not going to let my officers and agents go out there and put their lives on the line, their family on the line because people don't like what immigration enforcement is,' he said at a news conference earlier this month in Boston to announce nearly 1,500 arrests in the region as part of a monthlong 'surge operation.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘Atrocious': Eric Trump Slammed For ‘Disgusting' Use Of Offensive Slur In Interview
Eric Trump on Monday was slammed for his use of a highly offensive term during an interview. President Donald Trump's son ― talking with conservative influencer Benny Johnson - was criticizing people who are protesting the immigration crackdowns by his father's administration in Los Angeles when he described those who had attacked police cars as 'mongoloids.' Eric Trump describes LA protesters as "mongoloids" — Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) June 16, 2025 The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines the word 'mongoloid' as a dated and 'now offensive' term to describe 'a person affected with Down syndrome.' Critics on social media slammed Trump as 'disgusting' for making the 'dehumanizing' comment. But "deplorables" led to weeks of tantrums. — Sally VW (@actorgrrrl) June 16, 2025 Trump calls protesters 'mongoloids' — straight-up slur on national Trump brand isn't just toxic. It's proudly cruel. When do we say enough? — AnatolijUkraine (@AnatoliUkraine) June 16, 2025 nazi talk... — Lawrence Fitzgerald (@lwfitzgerald) June 16, 2025 He's so disgusting. — Berngirl (@BGminimom) June 16, 2025 They are all so disgusting. Such a totally disgusting family. — Mary Ann Lissau (@nose4rose) June 16, 2025 Dehumanizing people is essential to carrying out the next phases. — AC Tatum (@actatumonline) June 16, 2025 This is the term they used 50 years ago about people who have down syndrome. The whole family are just atrocious human beings. — Bekah Freitas (@rebekahkfreitas) June 16, 2025 POS — Keith Robisch🇺🇸🇺🇸 (@robischk) June 16, 2025 Fascism Expert Shares Big Fear That Prompted Her To Leave Trump's America Ron DeSantis Finds A New Road To Trump's Heart Carrie Coon Drops A Powerful 4-Word Reason For Speaking Out On Trump


Washington Post
35 minutes ago
- Washington Post
NAACP won't invite Trump to convention, breaking a 116-year tradition
The NAACP will not invite President Donald Trump to its national convention this year — the first time in the civil rights organization's 116-year history that it has excluded a sitting president — citing what it described as his attacks on American democracy.
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Tax Bill to Boost Biden's Chip Tax Credit to 30%
(Bloomberg) -- The Senate's draft tax bill calls for increasing an investment credit for semiconductor manufacturers, a potential boon for chipmakers that the Trump administration is urging to increase the size of their US projects. As Part of a $45 Billion Push, ICE Prepares for a Vast Expansion of Detention Space Security Concerns Hit Some of the World's 'Most Livable Cities' As American Architects Gather in Boston, Retrofits Are All the Rage The measure would increase the tax credit to 30% of investments in plants, up from 25%, giving chipmakers further incentive to break ground on new facilities before an existing 2026 deadline. Companies that start projects by the end of next year can continue to claim credits for continuous construction after that date — a policy that's designed to get sites up and running while recognizing that chip factories take years to build. The tax credit is one of the key incentives on offer from the 2022 Chips and Science Act, a bipartisan law that was a pillar of President Joe Biden's domestic policy. The program also includes $39 billion in grants and up to $75 billion in loans for manufacturing projects, designed to boost the American semiconductor industry after decades of production shifting to Asia. The tax credit, which isn't capped, was already likely to be costlier than those other forms of subsidies — a function of how much investment the Chips Act has spurred. In almost every case, it will account for the greatest share of Chips Act incentives going to any one company, including those that didn't win grant awards. Major beneficiaries of the grant program include Intel Corp., Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Samsung Electronics Co. and Micron Technology Inc. President Donald Trump earlier this year called for repealing the Chips Act, but lawmakers in both parties have shown little desire to eliminate subsidies that provide high-paying jobs in their districts, in a sector seen as critical to national security. The Commerce Department, meanwhile, has continued to implement the grant program — while urging larger investments and reworking terms of awards that took months to negotiate. 'We're getting more value for the same dollars,' Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said this month. Bloomberg reported in March that Lutnick's team had signaled to chipmakers that it could withhold promised grants if companies don't boost the size of their projects. At the same time, Lutnick had expressed interest in expanding the size of the Chips Act tax credit, people familiar with the matter had said, though it was unclear by how much. So far, the Trump administration has secured increases in promised investment from TSMC, Micron and GlobalFoundries Inc. — which the White House has touted as evidence that Trump's policies are working. None of those included additional Chips Act grants beyond what had already been finalized or proposed. Still, more company spending on projects very likely means more foregone government revenue in the form of tax credits — a number that would grow if the Senate bill becomes law. The tax credit is 'where the money is,' Haviv Ilan — the chief executive officer of Texas Instruments Inc., which won a $1.6 billion Chips Act grant under the Biden administration — said last month. Trump's team has shown an 'openness' to tax credits, Haviv said: 'I don't like subsidies as well. I think it's a discretionary decision of someone, and they pull in all kinds of other stuff to it. So, there is a lot of bad connotation to it, rightfully so.' Senators are hoping to send the tax bill — which calls for trillions of dollars' worth of tax cuts for households and businesses — to Trump's desk by the July 4 holiday. The bill is likely to undergo revisions in the Senate before it receives a floor vote. The House will also have to approve the final version before it can become law. (Updates with additional context starting in first paragraph.) Ken Griffin on Trump, Harvard and Why Novice Investors Won't Beat the Pros American Mid: Hampton Inn's Good-Enough Formula for World Domination How a Tiny Middleman Could Access Two-Factor Login Codes From Tech Giants The Spying Scandal Rocking the World of HR Software US Allies and Adversaries Are Dodging Trump's Tariff Threats ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.