The BYU medical school's all-gas, no-brakes goal for when it will admit its first 60 students
Dr. Mark Ott's wife likes to keep him humble and focused by reminding him that until he secures accreditation, he is the inaugural dean of the 'imaginary' BYU School of Medicine.
Both Stefanie Ott and the members of the national accreditation board — the Liaison Committee on Medical Education — have Dr. Ott's full attention.
'They have incredibly challenging standards, and in fact, we are not a medical school until they say we are medical school,' he said Monday at the 35th annual International Society conference at BYU's Hinckley Center.
Job No. 1 is to submit more than 1,000 pages of planning documents to the LCME by Aug. 1. Dr. Ott said his team members have completed about 60% of that work.
If they manage to finish in time, and the LCME grants accreditation during the earliest possible window, BYU would be on schedule to open its doors to students in fall 2027.
'This is an incredible amount of work on an extremely aggressive timeline,' Dr. Ott said. He added, 'If everything went perfectly, the earliest they could be here would be the fall of 2027 or the year after that.'
That's because if BYU doesn't get the documents in on time, or the application is unsuccessful, the LCME requires a one-year wait to resubmit.
Since success is so important, BYU has hired a few consultants who are experts on the process. The school also has assembled an advisory council and 15 working groups with more than 150 professional volunteers.
'They are amazing people,' Dr. Ott said. 'These are all people that have full-time jobs, that have other responsibilities in healthcare or other related things, at BYU and around the country, and they're each putting in another 10 to 20 hours a week of work on top of their family, church and career responsibilities, and they're doing it as volunteers.'
Dr. Ott said his team recently reviewed the counsel they are receiving and made a startling realization.
'If we were paying for all these services that these people are giving between January and July, it would be roughly $10 million in salary,' he said. 'These are a bunch of very wonderful people.'
Dr. Ott said the top question he gets asked is where the BYU will build the medical school.
'It's going to be in exactly the right place,' he said to laughter.
An announcement will come relatively soon, he added: 'BYU has several properties that will work really well.'
Another question he fields regularly is why BYU and The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, which sponsors the university, waited until now to launch a medical school.
'The answer to that is very simple. It is very complicated to create a medical school, and it is extremely expensive,' he said.
In fact, he later said that the planning team still has not completed the financial model it will submit.
'It's very complicated, and the number is terrifyingly large,' Dr. Ott said, adding later that he expected that research dollars and philanthropy will help fund the school's work.
Later he said the timing is right because the pieces are now in place.
'Resources exist within The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and among its members that are phenomenal,' he said.
The right people are prepared, the right structure is in place at BYU and in the church and Intermountain Health has grown strong enough to provide vital clinical relationships and residencies, he said.
The right set of circumstances ... I don't think existed five years ago or 10 years ago,' Dr. Ott said. 'As much as people thought it would have been nice to have (a medical school), God is very patient. There's like a giant chessboard that he is bringing all pieces into alignment for this to succeed.
'It's just it's wonderful to be in my position and to see God's hand over and over and over.'
In response to an audience question, Dr. Ott said the LCME restricts a new school's first class of students to 60 in case a school fails and students have to scramble to find seats at other schools.
'The ultimate size of our class will be much larger than that,' he said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time Business News
a day ago
- Time Business News
Engaging with Regulatory Bodies on Responsible UK Vape Sales
The landscape of vape sales in the UK is uniquely shaped by stringent regulations designed to protect public health and guide ethical business practices. For vape retailers and manufacturers, compliance is more than a legal requirement—it is a cornerstone of responsible commercial conduct. Engaging proactively with regulatory bodies not only ensures operational alignment with current laws but also reinforces consumer trust, supports public safety, and secures the long-term sustainability of the industry. In a market subject to evolving legislation and heightened scrutiny, meaningful engagement with authorities is a strategic necessity. In today's competitive vaping market, retailers need efficient ways to manage inventory and reduce costs while meeting customer demand. One effective strategy is to purchase products in larger quantities, which helps secure better pricing and ensures consistent stock availability. Many businesses benefit from bulk buy vapes options, allowing them to acquire a wide range of popular devices and e-liquids at discounted rates. This approach not only improves profit margins but also provides flexibility to respond quickly to market trends. By leveraging bulk purchasing, retailers can strengthen their supply chain and build stronger customer loyalty through reliable product availability. The regulatory environment for vape sales in the UK is governed by multiple agencies, each with distinct responsibilities. The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) oversees product notifications and ensures compliance with the Tobacco and Related Products Regulations (TRPR). The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) enforces marketing standards, while Trading Standards conducts checks on labelling, age restrictions, and in-store practices. Staying informed of each agency's expectations is essential. These bodies not only set the framework within which vape businesses must operate, but they also offer guidance, resources, and channels for dialogue. Understanding their functions enables more effective communication, compliance, and responsiveness in the face of industry shifts. Engaging with regulators should not be reactive or limited to times of audit or investigation. Proactive communication—such as seeking clarification on guidelines, requesting feedback on proposed product labels, or attending public consultations—positions a business as responsible and committed to public health objectives. When vape companies reach out to authorities before launching a product or campaign, they reduce the risk of penalties and demonstrate a genuine intent to align with industry standards. Regular interaction also provides the opportunity to influence policy development by sharing data, consumer insights, and innovations that can help shape balanced, evidence-based regulation. UK vape legislation is subject to regular updates, particularly in response to scientific research, public health trends, and political agendas. Businesses that remain passive risk falling out of compliance, often unknowingly. Subscribing to official channels, participating in industry webinars, and engaging with trade associations offer vital access to real-time information and policy updates. A business that integrates these updates into its operational workflow is better prepared to adapt swiftly. Whether it's revising packaging to reflect new warning requirements or adjusting sales processes to incorporate updated age verification rules, responsiveness is a marker of maturity and ethical commitment. Regulatory bodies occasionally open public or industry consultations to gather input on proposed legislation or amendments. Vape businesses should view these as opportunities to participate in shaping the rules that govern them. Submitting informed responses or attending policy forums allows businesses to advocate for fair, practical regulations that protect consumers while preserving commercial viability. In addition to formal consultations, engaging with trade bodies such as the UK Vaping Industry Association (UKVIA) provides a unified voice in policy discussions. These organisations often act as intermediaries between regulators and the industry, helping ensure that business realities are considered in the drafting of new rules. A business's ability to engage meaningfully with regulators depends on the strength of its internal compliance infrastructure. This includes having dedicated compliance officers, maintaining accurate product records, implementing rigorous staff training, and conducting regular audits of sales and marketing practices. Such structures not only facilitate engagement with external bodies but also signal credibility and professionalism. When regulatory inspections occur, businesses with organised documentation and transparent processes are more likely to receive cooperative treatment and constructive feedback rather than punitive action. Compliance is often seen as a cost, but proactive engagement can also serve as a competitive differentiator. Brands known for working constructively with regulators are often viewed more favourably by consumers, retailers, and investors. They attract partnerships with like-minded suppliers, are less likely to face disruption from enforcement action, and are better positioned to expand into other regulated markets. Furthermore, as regulators increasingly focus on sustainability, youth protection, and product safety, engaged companies are more likely to anticipate and adapt to future requirements. This agility allows them to innovate confidently while avoiding costly delays or recalls. Ultimately, regulatory engagement must be rooted in a broader cultural commitment to ethical responsibility. This means embedding compliance into every facet of the business—from marketing and product development to customer service and training. Leaders must communicate clearly that regulatory alignment is not optional or superficial, but central to the brand's identity. In turn, this fosters trust among customers and regulators alike. Authorities are more inclined to support companies that demonstrate respect for the rules and contribute positively to the broader public health mission. A collaborative relationship creates a safer, more transparent industry for everyone involved. The demand for vaping products continues to rise across the UK, prompting retailers to find reliable sources that offer both variety and competitive pricing. Access to a broad selection of high-quality items is essential for businesses looking to attract and retain customers. One effective way to achieve this is through vape wholesale UK, which provides retailers with the opportunity to purchase products in bulk while benefiting from local expertise and compliance with regulations. This model helps businesses maintain consistent stock levels, reduce costs, and quickly adapt to market trends, ultimately supporting sustainable growth in a competitive industry. Engaging with regulatory bodies is an essential component of responsible vape sales in the UK. It transforms compliance from a reactive task into a proactive strategy that protects consumers, enhances brand reputation, and supports sustainable growth. By communicating regularly, participating in policy development, and strengthening internal systems, vape businesses position themselves as trusted stakeholders in a heavily scrutinised market. In a sector defined by rapid evolution and public accountability, building strong, transparent relationships with regulators is not just advisable—it is indispensable. TIME BUSINESS NEWS
Miami Herald
3 days ago
- Miami Herald
Sugary drinks — from soda to juice — may increase diabetes risk more than food
It's no secret that consuming large amounts of sugar can contribute to chronic health problems. From obesity to cavities, doctors and health experts have warned against high sugar intake for decades. Now, however, a new study has found that the way the sugar is delivered — whether through a drink or eaten — may make a difference in the risk of type 2 diabetes. Researchers from Brigham Young University and two German institutions conducted a systematic review of research on type 2 diabetes, a condition that is rising globally, according to a May 27 news release from BYU. This means the research team looked through previous studies that included data on sugar consumption and the development of type 2 diabetes, then identified new relationships in the data. They were looking for a 'dose-response relationship,' meaning an increase in the exposure results in an increase or decrease of an adverse medical outcome. Sugar consumed through drinks like soda, energy drinks and fruit juice were compared to sugar consumed through food in how likely someone who consumed the sugar was to develop type 2 diabetes, according to the release. The results were published May 27 in the peer-reviewed journal Advances in Nutrition. 'This is the first study to draw clear dose-response relationships between different sugar sources and type 2 diabetes risk,' lead author Karen Della Corte said in the release. 'It highlights why drinking your sugar — whether from soda or juice — is more problematic for health than eating it.' The research showed someone drinking an additional 12-oz serving of sugar-sweetened drink per day increased their type 2 diabetes risk by 25%, according to the release. The increase continues for each additional drink, researchers said, and includes things like soft drinks and energy drinks as well as common sports drinks. 'This strong relationship showed that the increased risk began from the very first daily serving with no minimum threshold below which intake appeared to be safe,' according to the release. Fruit juices may seem like a better option, but the research showed an additional 8-oz serving of 100% fruit juice, nectars and juice drinks raised type 2 diabetes risk by 5%, researchers said. When compared to sucrose, or table sugar, and the overall sum of naturally occurring sugars in food, about 20 grams of sugar a day didn't increase the type 2 diabetes risk, instead showing a 'surprising protective association.' 'The above risks are relative and not absolute,' researchers said. 'For example, if the average person's baseline risk of developing type 2 diabetes is about 10%, four sodas a day could raise that to roughly 20%, not 100%.' The difference likely comes down to metabolism, according to the release. Sugar added to drinks is isolated sugar, and can overwhelm and disrupt the function of the liver, increasing fat and insulin resistance, researchers said. Sugars in food are often coupled with the other nutrients found in 'whole fruits, dairy products, or whole grains,' which do not overwhelm the liver. 'These embedded sugars elicit slower blood glucose responses due to accompanying fiber, fats, proteins and other beneficial nutrients,' researchers said. These findings show fruit juice is also an ineffective alternative to whole fruits, as the juice lacks the fiber and natural sugar, according to the release. 'This study underscores the need for even more stringent recommendations for liquid sugars such as those in sugar-sweetened beverages and fruit juice, as they appear to harmfully associate with metabolic health,' Della Corte said. 'Rather than condemning all added sugars, future dietary guidelines might consider the differential effects of sugar based on its source and form.' The research team includes Della Corte, Tyler Bosler, Cole McClure, Anette E. Buyken, James D LeCheminant, Lukas Schwingshackl and Dennis Della Corte.
Time Business News
29-05-2025
- Time Business News
Understanding Pregnancy Discrimination and Your Rights in New Jersey
Welcoming a child into the world should be a joyful and exciting time—not one overshadowed by fear of losing your job or being treated unfairly at work. Unfortunately, many women in New Jersey still face discrimination in the workplace due to pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions. At NJ Employment Lawyers, LLC, we advocate for the rights of working mothers and expectant employees. If your employer has denied accommodations, treated you differently, or retaliated against you because of your pregnancy, you may have a legal claim for pregnancy discrimination. Pregnancy discrimination is a form of unlawful employment discrimination that occurs when an employee or job applicant is treated unfavorably due to pregnancy, childbirth, or a related medical condition. It can take many forms, including: Refusing to hire or promote a pregnant person Reducing work hours or responsibilities after learning of a pregnancy Forcing an employee to take leave even though they are able and willing to work Failing to provide reasonable accommodations, such as modified tasks or schedules Firing or disciplining someone for taking maternity or family leave Such conduct is prohibited under both the federal Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA) and the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (NJLAD). In New Jersey, employers are required to provide reasonable accommodations for pregnant employees, including changes to job duties or work schedules when medically advised. These accommodations might include: Allowing more frequent breaks Light-duty assignments Temporary transfers to less hazardous roles Time off to recover from childbirth Employers may not retaliate against an employee for requesting accommodations. Denying these requests without justification may constitute discrimination. Employees in New Jersey may qualify for job-protected leave under multiple statutes, including: Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) – Up to 12 weeks of unpaid, job-protected leave for childbirth and bonding with a new child. – Up to 12 weeks of unpaid, job-protected leave for childbirth and bonding with a new child. New Jersey Family Leave Act (NJFLA) – Similar protections for bonding leave, often usable consecutively with FMLA. – Similar protections for bonding leave, often usable consecutively with FMLA. New Jersey Temporary Disability Benefits – Provides partial wage replacement during pregnancy and recovery. – Provides partial wage replacement during pregnancy and recovery. New Jersey Family Leave Insurance (FLI) – Pays a portion of wages while bonding with a newborn or caring for a family member. If your employer discourages, penalizes, or terminates you for using these leave entitlements, that may be grounds for legal action. Wondering if you've experienced pregnancy discrimination? Some red flags include: A sudden change in your performance reviews after announcing your pregnancy Exclusion from meetings, training, or advancement opportunities Being told your pregnancy will 'interfere' with your duties Discipline or job loss shortly after taking maternity leave Each of these may be more than just poor treatment—they could be legal violations under state and federal law. We understand how emotionally and financially stressful pregnancy discrimination can be. Our attorneys at NJ Employment Lawyers, LLC will take the time to understand your experience, gather evidence, and fight for the compensation and accountability you deserve. We've successfully handled cases involving layoffs during maternity leave, denied accommodations, and retaliation for using family leave. Whether through settlement negotiations or courtroom litigation, we work tirelessly to protect your rights and restore your peace of mind. If you're experiencing pregnancy discrimination in New Jersey, you don't have to face it alone. Reach out to our team today to take the first step toward justice. Address:101 Eisenhower Pkwy #300 Roseland, NJ 07068 Phone: (973) 358-7027 About Us: NJ Employment Lawyers, LLC represents employees across New Jersey in pregnancy discrimination, wrongful termination, retaliation, and other employment law matters. We are proud to defend the rights of working parents every day. TIME BUSINESS NEWS
