logo
Grand Forks district to offer stoles to Native graduates next year; parent group still seeks beading on caps

Grand Forks district to offer stoles to Native graduates next year; parent group still seeks beading on caps

Yahoo28-05-2025

May 27—GRAND FORKS — The Grand Forks Public Schools Native American Parent Committee voted Tuesday to formally ask district administration to consider allowing Indigenous students to wear
traditional beadwork on their graduation caps.
The meeting came after students were notified beadwork on their mortarboards would not be allowed at their graduation ceremonies this year. It's a longstanding district policy that no adornments are allowed on graduation caps, but parents say students have worn Indigenous beadwork without issue in years past.
According to some in attendance at Tuesday's meeting, the notification came too late for some families who had already begun beading their students' caps — a prayerful cultural practice often done by older members of a family for their younger loved ones. Eagle feathers on graduation caps, allowed explicitly by state law, will still be permitted.
Assistant superintendents Catherine Gillach and Matt Bakke and Central High School Principal Jon Strandell were on hand for the meeting. Gillach said the district intends to introduce stoles for American Indian students next year that families may bead however they want. The district had intended to provide the stoles to families this year, but ran out of time to have them delivered.
Gillach emphasized that the district wants to find a way to celebrate and honor its Indigenous students' cultural heritage, but that by hypothetically allowing some groups to decorate their caps and not others, the district runs the risk of violating Title VI of the Civil Rights Act. At minimum, she said, the district will have to proceed cautiously.
"We don't want to be the judge and the jury at the end," she said. "Like this expression is OK, and this one is respectful, this is not."
Chad Ward, Native American liaison for the district, said there's nothing wrong with the stoles proposal, but that the district's response to the issue has left many Native American families feeling like something important is being taken away from the ceremonies. He described the profound impacts of colonization and assimilation on Indigenous families, and that beadwork is an important way for many Indigenous people to practice their culture in their day-to-day lives. For many, it holds great significance to incorporate the beadwork into a day as important as a graduation.
"At the end of the day," Ward added, "with all due respect, this is Indian Country."
In an hourlong dialogue, Indigenous parents discussed the significance of beading the cap specifically.
Jayme Davis, a state representative from Belcourt, noted that many Indigenous families choose to bead the graduation cap because it is the symbol of graduation and the completion of a major milestone in the students' lives, much more so than the stoles.
"Stoles don't equate the visibility that the cap has. That for me, is the difference between the stole and the graduation cap, is that meaning," she said. "And to me — just for me — if this were coming down, it would say to me, 'Yeah, you can be Native, but not too Native. We don't want it too visible.'"
"... It's not just a racial thing, it's a political and cultural thing, and it's specifically for us, because we are the first peoples of this land," Davis continued. "So we're exercising this right, this sovereignty. We're not necessarily asking for privilege to do this. It should be a right for us."
Following the NAPC vote, conversations about beading on caps will continue at the district level, Gillach said.
Immediately following the NAPC meeting, the full Grand Forks School Board heard an update on Native American student graduation rates in the district.
The district is on track to meet and surpass a graduation rate goal set during the 2022-2023 school year, according to Superintendent Terry Brenner. That year, the four-year graduation rate for Native American students in the district was 46%. The district hoped to see that number rise to 80% by September 2028.
Last school year, the four-year Native American graduation rate was 73%.
Brenner credited the improvement in large part to programs and practices instituted by Ward as the new Native American liaison and funded by the NAPC, including celebration ceremonies for Indigenous students completing kindergarten, fifth grade, eighth grade and 12th grade. Other interventions, such as counselor tracking of earned credits, credit recovery options and a partnership with UND to match GFPS students with Native American student mentors, were also highlighted as successes.
There are still questions in the data, Brenner noted. Across district campuses, while 73% of Indigenous seniors are on track to graduate based on credits earned, only 42% of freshmen, 54% of sophomores and 53% of juniors are on track. (For comparison, when looking at the total student body across campuses, 77% of freshmen, 81% of sophomores, 83% of juniors and 84% of seniors are on track to graduate.)
Why do so many Indigenous students appear to spend most of their high school careers not on track to graduate, only to suddenly catch up as seniors? The answer is chronic absenteeism, said district Chief Academic Officer Amy Bartsch. Some 58% of Native American freshmen in the district are considered chronically absent, Bartsch said.
Bartsch called chronic absenteeism a "community issue that we all have to rally behind to support our families to make school accessible to all," and Gillach noted that the School Board has discussed issues of transportation in the past. But she also said the district needs to consider how to ensure the school environment itself is conducive to the success of its Indigenous students. Those conversations are already happening at the campus level, she said.
"Are we representing our students well enough in the curriculum?" she asked. "We work really hard on relationships, and yet we recognize there are some discrepancies between kids reporting that they feel safe and welcome, and feeling like they truly belong."
In other news:
* The district is poised to "open the virtual doors" to Grand Forks Virtual High School next school year, according to Gillach. Registration for the fully online program is now closed, and a pilot group of 26 high-schoolers are currently enrolled. They include 13 from Central High School, 11 from Red River High School, two homeschooled students and 10 students currently on Individualized Education Plans. The district has hopes to expand the program in future years.
* Lizette Miller, secretary at Community High School, was recognized as the district's Classified Employee of the Year. Community Principal Terry Bohan presented her with the award. Two additional district employees were also recognized as the Certified Employees of the Fourth Quarter. Behavior analyst Brittney Hansen was presented with the award by Special Education Director Elisa Diederich, and Viking Elementary literacy specialist Lisa Spicer was presented with the award by Viking Principal Jolyn Bergstrom.
* Discovery Elementary School was recognized as the school of the week during the meeting's "celebrating success" portion. The elementary school is celebrating 10 years since its opening.
* District Business Manager Brandon Baumbach presented the general fund financial statement for July 1, 2024, through April 30, 2025. During that time, total general fund revenue was $113,584,932 and total general fund expenditures were $94,337,173, resulting in revenue over expenses of $19,247,760.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NDP criticizes Ottawa's wildfire aid to First Nations
NDP criticizes Ottawa's wildfire aid to First Nations

Hamilton Spectator

time22 minutes ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

NDP criticizes Ottawa's wildfire aid to First Nations

As wildfires rage across Manitoba and Saskatchewan, displacing over 26,000 people — many from northern and First Nations communities — leaders say Ottawa's response has been both delayed and inadequate. The discussion reached a peak as NDP MP for Winnipeg Centre, Leah Gazan led an emergency debate on Tuesday in the House of Commons. Gazan accused the federal government of failing to protect Indigenous evacuees and violating their Charter and treaty rights. 'The federal government is obligated to uphold the dignity and well-being of First Nations that are affected by these wildfires,' she said. Gazan said First Nations leaders had told her evacuees — including children, Elders, and those with medical needs — were housed in crowded and poorly equipped facilities, creating risky and unstable situations. Families were split up and people were left without enough help in unfamiliar environments. Delays in evacuation efforts were especially severe in Mathias Colomb First Nation, where residents were flown out by helicopter, 'six people at a time when their airstrip was closed.' 'The helicopters are too slow and too small. We need the Canadian Armed Forces to step in now. Every hour we wait puts lives at risk,' said Gordie Bear, chief of Mathias Colomb Cree Nation in a press release on May 30. 'Our community is in immediate danger. We have over 2,300 people stranded with no road access and no way out by plane.' Minister of Emergency Management and Community Resilience, Eleanor Olszewski defended the response, calling it 'one of the fastest federal responses in recent memory.' Olszewski said the military was deployed immediately after the province asked for help. 'Our government acted swiftly when called upon,' Olszewski said. She said evacuations in remote areas took longer because 'when the landing strip could not accommodate larger planes, we had to source smaller ones, and so the evacuation was necessarily slower.' Gazan said that the current crisis is reflective of federal inaction during extreme weather events. She pointed to the 2011 floods in Lake St. Martin First Nation, when thousands were displaced for years and many could not return home for more than a decade. The long-term displacement led to mental health issues, family separation, and exploitation — especially among women and girls. She is concerned that the fire season arriving earlier, lasting longer and being harder to manage is 'the new normal.' She called for a national wildfire fighting force and a Youth Climate Court to help Canada respond to extreme weather and support climate resilience. Other MPs supported Gazan's concerns. Lori Idlout, NDP MP for Nunavut, said climate change is making disasters like these wildfires more frequent and severe, overwhelming local and provincial responders and raising concerns about housing, space and healthcare for those fleeing the fires. She said the debate is especially important for Nunavut, since many residents rely on Winnipeg for medical care and are now competing for resources with thousands of wildfire evacuees. 'My constituents must not fall through the cracks as Winnipeg sees a huge influx of people who require healthcare,' she said. Mandy Gull-Masty, Minister of Indigenous Services Canada, said during the debate the department gives advance payments so communities can act quickly during emergencies without waiting to be paid back. The Emergency Management Assistance Program covers eligible wildfire costs, including evacuation support and culturally sensitive services like mental health care, traditional food, language interpretation and child care. Gull-Masty also pointed to the FireSmart program, which supports fire training, fuel management and vegetation clearing projects in First Nations communities. 'Preparedness is key. These supports are about building strength before disaster strikes, so that communities can mitigate the impact to the greatest extent possible. It's not only to ensure that they have the ability to respond, but that they also have the capacity to recover and thrive,' she said. Wildfire activity remains high across Manitoba and Saskatchewan, with dry conditions and lightning sparking new blazes. Manitoba Wildfire Service reported more than 100 active fires as of June 3. Sonal Gupta / Local Journalism Initiative / Canada's National Observer Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

Trump agrees with longtime rival Elizabeth Warren on need to abolish the cap on US debt
Trump agrees with longtime rival Elizabeth Warren on need to abolish the cap on US debt

USA Today

time25 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Trump agrees with longtime rival Elizabeth Warren on need to abolish the cap on US debt

Trump agrees with longtime rival Elizabeth Warren on need to abolish the cap on US debt Eliminating the federal limit on government borrowing would remove one hurdle to congressional approval of the Trump's package of major policy priorities for tax cuts and border security. Show Caption Hide Caption Moody's pushes US out of top triple-A rating club, citing debt Moody's downgraded the U.S. sovereign credit rating on May 16 due to concerns about the nation's growing $36-trillion debt pile, in a move that could complicate President Donald Trump's efforts to cut taxes and send ripples through global markets. Trump agreed with Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., that the country should abolish the federal limit on borrowing. After credit-rating agencies downgraded the U.S. government, Trump said the debt limit should be scrapped to avoid economic catastrophe. WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump announced he agrees with a longtime antagonist, Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren, on the need to abolish the cap on the country's borrowing. The announcement marked a thaw in years-long criticism that Trump and Warren of Massachusetts have hurled at each other over government finances and other issues. The rare consensus came as Congress faces the need to raise the country's debt limit again, a hurdle to approving an 1,100-page package of Trump's priorities for tax cuts and border security. The United States is nearly $37 trillion in debt and every time it approaches the limit on borrowing set by Congress, lawmakers must take a painful vote to raise it or risk being unable to pay bills. More: When is the debt ceiling deadline? What happens when the US reaches debt limit Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has warned the country will reach the cap in August. A provision to increase the limit was included in the House-passed package of Trump's priorities. The two-term Republican president lashed out this week at Sen. Rand Paul, R-Kentucky, who opposes the House bill and called for a separate vote on the debt limit. The debt limit is largely procedural because Congress has always voted to increase it. But the vote every few years becomes a cudgel against members of the governing party because approval contributes to the appearance of unbridled spending. Congress imposed a debt limit in 1939 to modernize federal financing, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service. But political disputes about the accumulation of debt and difficulties raising the limit led credit-rating agencies to lower their grades for the federal government. The debate is another example of strange bedfellows in U.S. politics. Trump has derisively called Warren 'Pocahontas' for previously claiming Native American heritage. But Warren posted on social media May 30 that she agreed with Trump that 'the debt limit should be scrapped to prevent an economic catastrophe.' Trump endorsed the proposal in a social media post June 4 and said he was 'very pleased to announce' that he agreed with her. 'The Debt Limit should be entirely scrapped to prevent an Economic catastrophe,' Trump said. 'It is too devastating to be put in the hands of political people that may want to use it despite the horrendous effect it could have on our Country and, indirectly, even the World.'

New Mexico Appeals Court orders dismissal of oil and gas pollution lawsuit
New Mexico Appeals Court orders dismissal of oil and gas pollution lawsuit

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

New Mexico Appeals Court orders dismissal of oil and gas pollution lawsuit

A pumpjack operates north of Carlsbad, NM. The New Mexico Court of Appeals ruled to dismiss a lawsuit alleging the state violated the state constituion and failied to protect residents from oil and gas pollution.(Photo by Jerry Redfern / Capital & Main) The New Mexico Court of Appeals ordered a lower court Tuesday to toss a case alleging that state officials failed to protect residents from oil and gas pollution in violation of the New Mexico State Constitution. In the order issued Tuesday, justices in the New Mexico Court of Appeals reversed a lower court's ruling and concluded that the judiciary does not have the power to address the plaintiffs' claims. 'The relief Plaintiffs seek—as presented by their complaint—exceeds the boundary of that which the judiciary is authorized to grant,' wrote Chief Judge Jacqueline Medina. Justices ordered the lower court to dismiss the complaint. The civil lawsuit was first filed in May of 2023 on behalf of environmental groups, youth activists and individuals from the Pueblos, the Permian Basin and Navajo Nation against the Legislature, New Mexico's top officials and rulemaking bodies on oil and gas. The lawsuit alleged the state government failed to limit permitting of oil and gas production and did not adequately enforce pollution laws, which plaintiffs argued is a violation of a 1971 amendment to the state constitution, called the Pollution Control Clause. 'The protection of the state's beautiful and healthful environment is hereby declared to be of fundamental importance to the public interest, health, safety and the general welfare. The legislature shall provide for control of pollution and control of despoilment of the air, water and other natural resources of this state, consistent with the use and development of these resources for the maximum benefit of the people.' Further, the plaintiffs argued the state's actions around oil and gas production and pollution discriminated against Indigenous people, youth and frontline communities. Plaintiffs requested the courts rule that the state has a constitutional duty to prevent pollution — similar to landmark rulings in education and workers' compensation — and asked the courts to 'suspend additional permitting of oil and gas wells' until the state is in compliance. Moreover, plaintiffs asked the courts order state government to install a regulatory structure and plan to protect from pollution. Attorneys for the State of New Mexico argued the ruling oversteps separations of power between the branches of government, and that youth and frontline communities are not protected classes and there's no discriminatory intent. In June 2024, First District Judge Matthew Wilson dismissed the plaintiffs' claims against the Legislature, but allowed the case to continue moving through the courts to determine if a constitutional right to pollution control exists. On Tuesday, the Appeals Court determined the state Constitution does not grant any specific right 'to any individual or group, to be free from a given amount of pollution. Nor can it be inferred to create an enforceable right to a beautiful and healthful environment,' Medina wrote. Additionally, justices agreed with the state's arguments that frontline and youth are not classifications for discriminatory treatment. Gail Evans, lead counsel for the Center for Biological Diversity, said plaintiffs plan to appeal Tuesday's decision. 'New Mexicans amended our constitution 50 years ago to protect our residents from pollution. With this terrible ruling, the court has eviscerated our constitutionally protected rights,' Evans said in a written statement. 'This will lead to more air pollution, more contaminated land and water, and more sickness in our communities. We'll continue our fight against the filthy oil and gas industry on behalf of all New Mexicans and will be appealing this decision to the state Supreme Court.' SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store