
Why Geert Wilders' plan to become Netherlands leader may well backfire
It is a gamble that Geert Wilders may live to regret. Increasingly frustrated by his coalition partners' unwillingness to embrace his promised 'strictest asylum policy in Europe', the Dutch far-right leader brought down the government.
Wilders' calculation, if it is more than a fit of political pique, appears simple: if he can turn this autumn's snap elections into a referendum on immigration and asylum, his Freedom party (PVV) can win it – and he might even become the Netherlands' prime minister.
The plan, however, may well backfire, and for several reasons. Wilders has seriously alienated potential new coalition partners. The political landscape has changed. And polls suggest immigration and asylum are no longer voters' biggest concern.
'I signed up for the toughest asylum policy, not the downfall of the Netherlands,' the veteran anti-Islam campaigner said on Tuesday as, following through on his threat of the previous week, he pulled the PVV out of the four-party coalition cabinet.
He was looking forward to the election his move had precipitated, Wilders said, as prime minister Dick Schoof handed in the government's resignation to the king. 'I intend to become the next prime minister. I am going to make the PVV bigger than ever.'
The PVV's shock victory in elections in November 2023 led, after months of fraught talks, to a coalition with the populist Farmer-Citizen Movement (BBB), centrist New Social Contract (NSC) and liberal-conservative VVD that was sworn in last July.
The partners' price for the deal, however, was that Wilders, a volatile firebrand who has called the prophet Muhammad a 'paedophile', Islam 'fascist' and 'backward', and demanded bans on mosques, headscarves and the Qu'ran, could not be premier.
From the outset, the fractious right-wing alliance was beset with disagreements and in-fighting, achieving little. Some ministers from the PVV – a party whose policies are dictated by Wilders – proved inexperienced and incompetent.
Unused to the compromise and consensus essential to coalition politics, the far-right leader lashed out at the cabinet, weakening it further. The one policy area where he was utterly determined his agenda would be implemented was immigration.
The coalition partners, however, were reticent about his 10-point plan, which included using the army to secure borders, turning back all asylum seekers, closing refugee hostels, sending Syrian refugees home and suspending EU asylum quotas.
Lawyers said some proposals breached European human rights laws or the UN refugee convention. Wilders threatened to quit nonetheless unless the others signed up; they said it was up to the PVV immigration minister to table workable legislation.
So Wilders followed through on his threat.
The chances of the PVV returning to power and of Wilders finally becoming prime minister, however, look very far from certain. First, the veteran MP – the longest-serving in parliament – has upset his allies.
Senior figures from the VVD, BBB and NSC lined up on Tuesday to express their shock and indignation at his decision, talking of 'betrayal' and 'irresponsibility'. Wilders, they said, was 'putting himself first' and 'running away when things get difficult'.
Sign up to First Edition
Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
Second, the political landscape has shifted significantly since the PVV's win 18 months ago. Polls suggest that if an election were held now, the far-right party might just cling on to first place, but with perhaps 30 MPs compared with its current 37.
Support for two of the outgoing coalition partners, however, the BBB and NSC, has plummeted to 1%, while the VVD is projected to win almost as many seats as the PVV – as is the opposition Green/Left alliance, with the Christian Democrats also surging.
In one of Europe's most fragmented political landscapes, no party can rule alone. To secure a 76-seat majority, Wilders will need allies not just with enough seats, but who want to work with him again – which he has just ensured will be highly unlikely.
Finally, the re-election of Donald Trump has propelled European defence in the face of US isolationism, global security and economic turbulence to the top of the political agenda. Meanwhile, immigration has dropped from its 2022 peak.
The Netherlands received fewer than two first-time asylum applications per 1,000 inhabitants last year, slightly below the EU average, and 10 EU countries had a higher relative number of asylum seekers, including Germany and Belgium.
Wilders' shock electoral triumph was founded on voters' disillusion with established parties, as well as concerns about housing costs and healthcare that he successfully associated with high immigration. Those will still be issues this autumn.
But will Wilders, a politician now likely to be seen more than ever as an opportunist good at yelling from the sidelines but not at actually governing, be able to benefit? Most analysts predict a centre-left or centre-right coalition led by Green/Left or the VVD.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Islamophobia fears ‘help Iranian propaganda spread in Britain'
Iran has 'leveraged' fears of offending Islamic communities to establish an extensive propaganda network in Britain, a report has warned. Research by the US-based National Union for Democracy in Iran (Nufdi) found that the UK has become a 'flashpoint' for influence operations in Europe by the Iranian regime and its Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC). It listed more than a dozen organisations which it claims are directly linked to Tehran and advance its agenda by lobbying organisations and MPs. The report comes after Dan Jarvis, the security minister, warned that Iran is becoming 'increasingly emboldened' and 'aggressive' in its actions in the UK. Nufdi campaigns for a democratic and secular Iran and holds an annual Iran conference in Washington DC. In the report, it warned that Tehran is exerting increasing influence in an 'attempt to influence the British populace to adopt an appeasement policy'. It said this included efforts to 'radicalise the pre-existing diaspora' and UK nationals and 'whitewash the actions' via organisations like cultural centres. 'These cultural centres enjoy the benefits of being protected by their religious/quasi-religious status and have become deeply rooted in several of the diaspora communities within the UK,' the group warned. 'The regime's influence within the cultural realm is particularly difficult to combat due to its leveraging minority Islamic communities and a perception of innocence, appearing as an institution fostering cooperation and community.' The report cited several examples of cultural centres in Britain hosting lectures by IRGC commanders. As well as cultural centres, Tehran's influence extended to the lobbying of politicians and 'a robust and deep-rooted educational network', it added. 'Whether it is... an inability of the Home Office to designate the IRGC as a terrorist organisation, or operating a vast network of propaganda centres masquerading as cultural centres, the IRI's [Islamic Republic of Iran] influence within the United Kingdom is vast… and highly effective,' the report concluded. Earlier this year, Mr Jarvis warned Parliament of an increasing threat from Iranian activities in the UK. He cited figures from MI5, which revealed that since the start of 2022, security services have had to respond to 20 Iran-backed plots against British citizens and residents. 'The regime has become increasingly emboldened, asserting itself more aggressively to advance their objectives and undermine ours,' he told MPs. 'This is evidenced by the fact that direct action against UK targets has substantially increased over recent years.' The Government has not proscribed the IRGC as a terrorist organisation, despite calls for it to do so, for fear of cutting off diplomatic ties with Iran. It has however, put the group on the enhanced tier of a new foreign agents registration scheme, meaning Iranian activities in the UK face greater scrutiny.


Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Trump says Department of Justice made decision to bring back Abrego Garcia
June 7 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump said on Saturday it was the Department of Justice, not him, that made the decision to bring back to the U.S. a man mistakenly deported from Maryland to El Salvador. Kilmar Abrego Garcia was flown back to face criminal charges of transporting illegal immigrants within the U.S., Attorney General Pam Bondi said on Friday. His return marked an inflection point in a case seized on by critics of Trump's immigration crackdown as a sign that his administration was disregarding civil liberties in its push to step up deportations of migrants. "Well, that wasn't my decision. The Department of Justice decided to do it that way, and that's fine," Trump told NBC News in an interview when asked about Abrego Garcia's return. Trump added that he had not spoken to El Salvador President Nayib Bukele about the move. Abrego Garcia, a 29-year-old Salvadoran whose wife and young child in Maryland are U.S. citizens, appeared in federal court in Nashville on Friday evening. His arraignment was set for June 13, when he will enter a plea, according to local media reports. Until then, he will remain in federal custody. If convicted, he would be deported to El Salvador after serving his sentence, Bondi said. The Trump administration has said Abrego Garcia was a member of the MS-13 gang, an accusation that his lawyers deny. Abrego Garcia was deported on March 15, more than two months before the charges were filed. He was briefly held in a mega-prison known as the Terrorism Confinement Center in El Salvador, despite a U.S. immigration judge's 2019 order barring him from being sent to the Central American nation because he would likely be persecuted by gangs. Trump said he thought it would be "a very easy case" against Abrego Garcia, who he accused of having a "horrible record of abuse" of women. Abrego Garcia's lawyer, Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg, has called the criminal charges "fantastical."


Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Former Reform UK chair Yusuf returns to party two days after quitting
June 7 (Reuters) - Zia Yusuf said on Saturday he would return to Britain's right-wing Reform UK party, two days after quitting as its chair, blaming his abrupt resignation on exhaustion from the job. Yusuf, a businessman who is not a lawmaker himself, resigned on Thursday hours after a row with a Reform lawmaker over her call for a ban on the burqa, the full-length garment worn by some Muslim women. Yusuf became Reform chair last year, tasked by party leader Nigel Farage with professionalising the party. While it has since overtaken Prime Minister Keir Starmer's Labour in the polls, the exit of several senior figures has raised questions over whether Farage can hold together a team ahead of the next election, expected in 2029. "After 11 months of working as a volunteer to build a political party from scratch, with barely a single day off, my tweet was a decision born of exhaustion," Yusuf said on X, referring to the earlier post announcing his resignation. Yusuf said he would focus on a new role overseeing an Elon Musk-inspired "UK DOGE team" within Reform that the party hopes will reduce wasteful spending at the councils it controls after its victory in a series of local elections last month. The party has seen departures from its upper ranks before. One of its lawmakers, Rupert Lowe, was suspended by the party in March over allegations including threats of physical violence against Yusuf. No charges were brought against Lowe, who denies the allegations. And in November its deputy leader Ben Habib quit, citing "fundamental differences" with Farage. Farage said Yusuf would assist Reform with policy, fundraising and media appearances in addition to his work on local councils. "Zia will continue to be an important part of the team we are building to fight and win the next general election," Farage wrote on X.