Why Lucy Letby's lawyers are ramping up killer's freedom bid after bombshell twist in ANOTHER infamous murder case
TWO dramatic court cases saw her convicted of the murder of seven babies and the attempted murder of seven more - leaving Lucy Letby facing the rest of her life behind bars.
But supporters of the 35-year-old nurse, who believe she is the victim of a miscarriage of justice, are now clinging to fresh hope after a seismic twist in another infamous criminal case - and are calling on MPs to step in.
9
9
The growing band of Letby champions, including MP David Davis, have been buoyed by the recent release of Peter Sullivan, 68, who was freed after 38 years when his murder conviction was overturned.
The Court of Appeal quashed his conviction for the murder and sexual assault of 21-year-old florist Diane Sindall, who was battered to death in 1986, when a DNA testing breakthrough proved he was not a match for a semen sample found on her body.
On a Facebook group set up for Letby's followers, one supporter said: 'There's another victim, Peter Sullivan, of a miscarriage of justice freed after 38 years of wrongful incarceration for a crime he did not commit.
'We need to put more pressure on our local MPs to speed up Lucy's appeal.'
But far from offering a glimmer of hope to the 'Letby is innocent' brigade, the handling of Sullivan's case and that of Andrew Malkinson, wrongly convicted of rape, merely proves it could be years before the evidence is reviewed.
The Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC), which is currently considering an application for an appeal from Letby's lawyers, has been slammed by critics as 'not fit for purpose' after delays and blunders left the two innocent men floundering in jail years after new evidence that finally cleared them came to light.
The legal team for Malkinson, who served 17 years before his rape conviction was quashed in 2023, spent more than a decade pleading with the CCRC to conduct DNA tests on samples taken from the victim, but was repeatedly refused.
Those tests, it later emerged, would have seen him released at least a decade earlier.
Similarly Sullivan, who was dubbed the 'Beast of Birkenhead', spent 38 years behind bars protesting his innocence despite his lawyers telling the CCRC in 2008 that DNA analysis of a semen sample found on the victim would clear him.
And while the forensic test known as Y-STR, which eventually proved his innocence, became available in 2013, the CCRC waited until 2021 to order proper tests, and another four years before he was acquitted.
I defend baby killers like Lucy Letby – bombshell new theory could FREE her but I know real truth… & it's NOT medical
The Commission's chair, Helen Pitcher, who earned £95,000 a year for a two-day week, was forced to quit in April after Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood said she was 'unfit' for the role.
Now there are calls for the resignation of chief executive Karen Kneller, a lawyer who received a £130,000 salary from taxpayers last year.
A report into the Malkinson case, by KC Chris Henley, found Kneller was 'head of casework' at the time of the CCRC's "very poor" work and slammed staff for "muddled" thinking, "casual and dismissive" language and failing to read evidence.
She was also in the role when Peter Sullivan's team made their first approach.
9
9
Swell of support
Letby, originally from Hereford, is facing 15 whole life sentences for the murders and attempted murders at the Countess of Chester Hospital in Cheshire.
Since her two trials, in August 2023 and October 2024, a swell of support has been building for the 35-year-old.
Dr Shoo Lee, an eminent neonatal expert who claims his research was incorrectly interpreted by the prosecution to convict Letby, has said 'the medical evidence doesn't support murder [or attempted murder]' in any of the cases'.
He is backed by a growing number of those who believe the case against her is flawed.
In February, Letby's legal team submitted an application to the CCRC - set up in 1997 to review possible miscarriages of justice - with barrister Mark McDonald hand-delivering the full findings of a 14-strong international panel of experts.
Her supporters argue that the babies could have died of natural causes, and Dr Lee claimed his findings on skin discolouration used to support the theory that the nurse killed some of the children by injecting them with air was "misrepresented" in court and that the evidence "wasn't quite right".
He and the panel examined all 17 cases cited in the trial and concluded: 'Death or injury of all the affected infants were due either to natural causes or to errors in medical care.'
Last month, an email emerged which appeared to contradict a consultant's testament he had caught Letby 'red-handed', standing over the cot of the victim known as Baby K as he was deteriorating without calling for help.
In the bombshell missive sent to colleagues at the Countess of Chester Hospital on May 4, 2017, which was not read in court, Dr Ravi Jayaram wrote: 'At time of deterioration... Staff nurse Letby (was) at the incubator and called Dr Jayaram to inform of low saturations.'
He added: 'Baby K subsequently deteriorated and eventually died, but events around this would fit with explainable events associated with extreme prematurity.'
'Not fit for purpose'
9
Following the release of Peter Sullivan, Letby has been flooded with a fresh wave of support, with her loyal band of followers drawing apparent inspiration from the latest acquittal.
One man wrote: 'A new police investigation and new compensation claims. Those people in charge don't want that to happen anytime soon.'
Another posted: 'Lucy and Peter Sullivan were found guilty of a crime by a jury and sentenced accordingly.
'I believe that only pressure from MPs and Lucy's legal team can speed up her case review. Unfortunately our legal system is not fit for purpose when it comes to addressing mistakes.'
A link about how to raise the matter with your local MP has been posted to the site.
A follower said: 'In Lucy's case there was NO crime so hopefully we can keep pushing that aspect and save the long wait for a retrial.'
One woman referred to the CCRC as the 'Criminally Corrupt Reluctance Committee'.
Referring to how Mr Sullivan must feel and drawing parallels between the two cases, another supporter said: 'It must be horribly frustrating for him… just as it is for Lucy.'
The page, vowing that one day Letby will be freed, has seen an increase to over 3,400 followers.
Internet sleuths still pore over the evidence from the trials and press coverage in online forums such as Reddit and Mumsnet.
The pages have been flooded with discussions about supposed 'similarities' between the former nurse and Mr Sullivan, who they say were both wrongly jailed.
One fan said: 'Worth noting that Mr Sullivan appears to have repeatedly made false statements to the police, a bit like what the Crown claimed Letby did.'
Another posted: 'I was struck by the careful emphasis throughout that no one was being blamed for having got it wrong before. It makes me worried for Lucy Letby.'
£1million payout
9
9
After the CCRC refused Sullivan's first attempt to challenge his conviction in 2008 he lost his appeal bid in 2019, before again asking the CCRC to refer his case in 2021, raising concerns over police interviews, bite mark evidence used during his trial and the murder weapon.
Merseyside Police reopened the investigation in 2023 after the commission found that DNA samples taken from the scene did not match Mr Sullivan.
He's now in line for a £1million payout, the maximum compensation claim for a wrongful conviction.
Letby lost two bids last year to challenge her convictions at the Court of Appeal.
Lawyer Katie Wheatley, partner at Bindmans and head of the Crime, Fraud and Regulatory team, said that while the two cases are 'very different in nature', the legal test for the CCRC remains the same.
She said: 'Mr Sullivan was cleared by the Court of Appeal after new DNA tests obtained by the CCRC cast very significant doubt on the safety of his conviction.
'In Lucy Letby's case, her lawyer has said that the CCRC has been provided with new medical evidence from a panel of neonatologists and paediatric experts.
'It will be up to the CCRC to review this material and carry out any further investigations it considers appropriate.
'When considering whether to refer Lucy Letby's case to the Court of Appeal, the CCRC will apply the legal test for referral which is whether it considers there is a real possibility that the Court of Appeal will quash her convictions.
'Thus, while the cases are very different in nature, the legal test applied by the CCRC will be the same.'
Timeline of horror - how Letby targeted babies
LUCY Letby carried out her horrific crimes in a year-long period at Countess of Chester Hospital.
She used insulin and air to inject newborns while working on the neo-natal ward.
The collapses and deaths of the children were not 'naturally-occurring tragedies' and instead the gruesome work of 'poisoner' Letby.
Her rampage was finally uncovered after staff grew suspicious of the "significant rise" in the number of babies dying or suffering "catastrophic" collapses.
Letby was found to be the "common denominator" among the horrifying incidents.
Officers then searched her three-bedroom home in Chester and discovered a chilling cache of evidence.
The nurse had scribbled haunting notes in diaries and on Post-It notes, including one that read: "I am evil I did this."
The note added: "I don't deserve to live. I killed them on purpose because I'm not good enough to care for them.
"I am a horrible person."
A probe into whether Letby harmed any other babies at the Countess of Chester Hospital and Liverpool Women's Hospital is ongoing.
A corporate manslaughter investigation is also ongoing, as is now a gross negligence manslaughter one.
The CCRC receives 1,500-1,600 cases each year, referring around 30 back to the Court of Appeal.
The Law Commission is currently consulting on whether the 'real possibility' legal test that the CCRC currently applies should be changed to reflect the body's own view of whether a conviction might be unsafe, rather than having to predict what the Court of Appeal might think.
Katie added: 'A change in the legal test might result in the CCRC broadening the focus of its investigations and being able to refer more cases to the Court of Appeal to review.'
Even if the CCRC decides to refer Letby's case following the 14-strong panel's findings, the complexity of the case means it could take years, according to legal experts.
Meanwhile, lawyers for the families of Letby's victims rubbished the report, claiming it's "full of analytical holes" and "a rehash" of the defence case heard at trial.
Detective Superintendent Paul Hughes, of Cheshire Police, also hit back at 'ill-informed and insensitive' critics questioning her guilt.
In a strongly worded statement, he insisted the former nurse's case had been 'rigorously and fairly tested' by two juries and two sets of appeal court judges after a painstaking six-year police investigation.
Referring to the victims' families, he added: 'Their dignity and composure in the face of intense public discussions with little sensitivity or humanity is remarkable.
'Their words are incredibly honest and powerful and must not be lost in a sea of noise.'
Undeterred
9
9
In November, Lady Justice Thirlwall is due to publish the findings from the public inquiry into how the former nurse was able to commit her crimes.
Cheshire Constabulary is continuing a review of deaths and non-fatal collapses of babies at the neonatal units of the Countess of Chester Hospital and the Liverpool Women's Hospital during Letby's time as a nurse from 2012 to 2016.
But Letby's supporters seem far from deterred and even threw a party to celebrate her 35th birthday at a pub in Clapham, south London.
They filled the public gallery during her trial and protested outside Manchester crown court, wearing yellow butterfly badges to match one seen in a photo of Letby in scrubs.
Every December since her conviction in 2023, they have sent her Christmas cards in prison.
But, even if there are flaws in the prosecution, it will be a long time before they can celebrate a fresh appeal.
The charges Letby was convicted on in full
Child A, allegation of murder. The Crown said Letby injected air intravenously into the bloodstream of the baby boy. COUNT 1 GUILTY.
Child B, allegation of attempted murder. The Crown said Letby attempted to murder the baby girl, the twin sister of Child A, by injecting air into her bloodstream. COUNT 2 GUILTY.
Child C, allegation of murder. Prosecutors said Letby forced air down a feeding tube and into the stomach of the baby boy. COUNT 3 GUILTY.
Child D, allegation of murder. The Crown said air was injected intravenously into the baby girl. COUNT 4 GUILTY.
Child E, allegation of murder. The Crown said Letby murdered the twin baby boy with an injection of air into the bloodstream and also deliberately caused bleeding to the infant. COUNT 5 GUILTY.
Child F, allegation of attempted murder. Letby was said by prosecutors to have poisoned the twin brother of Child E with insulin. COUNT 6 GUILTY.
Child G, three allegations of attempted murder. The Crown said Letby targeted the baby girl by overfeeding her with milk and pushing air down her feeding tube. COUNT 7 GUILTY, COUNT 8 GUILTY, COUNT 9 NOT GUILTY.
Child H, two allegations of attempted murder. Prosecutors said Letby sabotaged the care of the baby girl in some way which led to two profound oxygen desaturations. COUNT 10 NOT GUILTY, COUNT 11 JURY COULD NOT REACH VERDICT.
Child I, allegation of murder. The prosecution said Letby killed the baby girl at the fourth attempt and had given her air and overfed her with milk. COUNT 12 GUILTY.
Child J, allegation of attempted murder. No specific form of harm was identified by the prosecution but they said Letby did something to cause the collapse of the baby girl. COUNT 13 JURY COULD NOT REACH VERDICT.
Child K, allegation of attempted murder. The prosecution said Letby compromised the baby girl as she deliberately dislodged a breathing tube. COUNT 14 JURY COULD NOT REACH VERDICT.
Child L, allegation of attempted murder. The Crown said the nurse poisoned the twin baby boy with insulin. COUNT 15 GUILTY.
Child M, allegation of attempted murder. Prosecutors said Letby injected air into the bloodstream of Child L's twin brother. COUNT 16 GUILTY.
Child N, three allegations of attempted murder. The Crown said Letby inflicted trauma in the baby boy's throat and also injected him with air in the bloodstream. COUNT 17 GUILTY, COUNT 18 JURY COULD NOT REACH VERDICT, COUNT 19 JURY COULD NOT REACH VERDICT.
Child O, allegation of murder. Prosecutors say Letby attacked the triplet boy by injecting him with air, overfeeding him with milk and inflicting trauma to his liver with "severe force". COUNT 20 GUILTY.
Child P, allegation of murder. Prosecutors said the nurse targeted the triplet brother of Child O by overfeeding him with milk, injecting air and dislodging his breathing tube. COUNT 21 GUILTY.
Child Q, allegation of attempted murder. The Crown said Letby injected the baby boy with liquid, and possibly air, down his feeding tube. COUNT 22 JURY COULD NOT REACH VERDICT.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
25 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Tough talk won't be sufficient to defend Britain from her enemies
SIR – Nothing sums up the failings of this Government better than the Prime Minister's grandiose statements on the necessity of effective defence, accompanied by a refusal to pledge the necessary budget. Even the absurdity of the promise to spend 3 per cent of GDP on defence in nine years' time – a figure plainly inadequate now, never mind in 2034 – was rendered the more so for being hastily qualified as an 'ambition'. In the meantime, the eternal truth remains: compromise on defence, and nothing else is secure. Philip J Ashe Garforth, West Yorkshire SIR – Thank goodness our enemies will wait until 2034 before attacking us. Nicholas Block Sturminster Newton, Dorset SIR – The PM has pledged to build 12 new attack submarines – one every 18 months. This will require a significant improvement on past performance. The Astute programme began in 1986, almost 40 years ago, and the seventh and final boat in the class is not due to be delivered until 2026, seven years after being laid down. By then the first, HMS Astute, will have been in service for 16 years. Astute was laid down in 2001, and since then build delays and cost overruns have been lamentable. Considering that we previously had experience of building several classes of such submarines for far less cost and in less time, this is not encouraging. Neil Russell Portsmouth, Hampshire SIR –There's no point in planning to build 12 new attack submarines unless the Navy has a credible strategy to recruit a sufficient number of officers to command them. In the past 10 years, only half the number required to sustain the submarine force have passed the gruelling command qualification course, creating a vicious circle of decline, which will soon be unrecoverable. The extent of the problem was illustrated last year, when the Navy was ridiculed for having advertised on LinkedIn to find a retired rear-admiral to lead the submarine service. Rear Admiral Philip Mathias (retd) Southsea, Hampshire SIR – One wonders whether, as a nation, we are willing to pay the price financially, politically and culturally, as we did during the Cold War, when the threat felt real and collective resilience was part of the national psyche. At recent VE Day events, we were reminded of a time when Britain understood the value of shared sacrifice and national preparedness. Defence is not merely a line in the budget; it is a reflection of our willingness to protect what we hold dear, and our capacity to act together with resolve when history demands it. John O'Brien Ukraine holds firm SIR – Ukraine's audacious and meticulously planned attack on military aviation assets across Russia has astounded the world (report, June 2). That the operation was kept secret for 18 months was itself an extraordinary achievement. Withholding the information from Donald Trump was a wise decision for two reasons: he might have sought to dissuade President Zelensky from going through with the plan; and operational security would have been placed at unnecessary risk. Mr Zelensky has proved himself to be a worthy, courageous and charismatic leader of a beleaguered yet defiant nation, which has held Russia at bay for more than three brutal years. The will of Ukraine's people to fight for their survival, and resist the illegal subjugation of their sovereign nation, remains strong and unyielding. Ukraine deserves all the support that its allies can provide – and Donald Trump must now acknowledge that he is indeed being 'tapped along' by Vladimir Putin. David Platts Newark, Nottinghamshire Rebuilding Gaza SIR – Since the October 7 2023 attacks by Hamas, Israel has had to defend itself, leading to charges of committing genocide; intentionally targeting civilians, schools, and hospitals; starving Gazans; and violating prisoners' rights. Whether one believes that Israel is guilty of these charges or that it has every right to do what's necessary to protect its citizens, many crucial questions remain. At some point, there will be a lasting ceasefire. Which countries will risk the lives of their soldiers to serve as peacekeepers? Which will finance the rebuilding of Gaza? How many years of rebuilding will it take to bring Gazans to the same level of existence they had on October 6 2023? Will Gazans ever be permitted to work inside Israel, as many did before the war began? I don't pretend to have any of these answers, but with America getting diplomatically and militarily closer to multiple countries in the region, it's incumbent on Donald Trump's administration to formulate an acceptable framework among Israel, its neighbouring countries, and global powers in Europe and Asia to end the suffering of Gazans. Paul L Newman Merion Station, Pennsylvania, USA Hare loss SIR – We have a thriving hare population (Letters, June 2), but hare coursers know this and visit frequently to practise their illegal sport. The police show no interest in apprehending them, even when the hare coursers have their vehicle stuck in a ditch and don't need chasing. Jonathan Yardley Wolverhampton Brown beer mix SIR – Your feature (May 31) on the demise of the term 'bitter' in favour of 'amber ales' reminded me of my time as a student in the Clarks company town of Street in Somerset in the early 1970s. As it was Quaker-dominated, finding a pub, let alone a decent ale, was a challenge. Instead, the tipple of choice for myself and my fellow students was a 'brown split'. This was created by mixing a half of the local keg beer (generally the ubiquitous Watney's Red Barrel) with a bottle of brown ale, ideally one from Newcastle. This satisfied my needs until the welcome arrival of real ales later in the decade. Geoff Pringle Long Sutton, Somerset Conservative betrayal SIR – The Conservative Party is dead. The only ones who haven't realised it yet are the party itself and the dwindling loyalists clinging to the wreckage. They're staggering around like political zombies – no soul, no direction, no credibility, kept alive only by inertia and blind tribal loyalty. The Conservatives have betrayed their voters on every major issue: immigration, national sovereignty, economic stability and freedom of speech. They promised conservative values and delivered managed decline, globalist appeasement and spineless governance. Their base is abandoning them in droves – and rightly so. The public have had enough of the lies, the empty slogans and the broken promises. What's left is a hollowed-out shell of a party that exists only to cling to power, not to serve the nation. It's time to stop pretending that reform can come from within. The only path forward is to tear down the failed establishment – and that means rejecting both the Conservatives and Labour. Anyone who wants to see real change in Britain needs to vote for Reform UK, and help drive a stake through the heart of this walking corpse once and for all. HMRC incompetence SIR – Being a UK resident, I had to complete an Irish form for the recovery of tax from the Irish Commissioners. This form has to be countersigned by HMRC. On August 23 2024, I sent the form with a covering letter to HMRC for its endorsement. I heard nothing, and sent a chaser letter in November, and still heard nothing. Last week, nine months later, I received a letter from HMRC with the form duly endorsed. Unfortunately, it was not the original form, but a copy. Its letter says that the 'copy has been authorised by one of our officers' and 'if Ireland does not accept this, please fill in and send us a new form'. Words fail me. Anne Preece Caldy, Wirral Duke as chancellor SIR – Prince Philip held the office of Chancellor of the University of Cambridge (Letters, June 2) with great dignity and distinction from 1976 to 2011. I can think of no better person to fill the current vacancy than the present Duke of Edinburgh. Derek Wellman Lincoln Put wild camping on a sustainable footing SIR – Ben East (Features, June 2) gives a useful summary of the dilemma facing the Government as to how to handle the demand for more wild camping provision in England. Living in an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, we often see tents in pleasant spots, usually owned by young campers, who are probably of limited means. However, there is good provision locally of regulated sites in nice locations, and I'd oppose any moves by the Government to introduce wild camping rights in this area similar to those enjoyed in Scotland. Perhaps a compromise would be to make more wild camping areas available in selected National Parks and AONBs, for a maximum of six tents, to be controlled by permits issued by the local ranger office. Owners of any private land used would be entitled to an annual fee to be paid by the taxpayer. This is not an ideal solution, but at least when arriving at your favourite Lake District tarn, you would be unlikely to find too many other campers. Ian Graham Carlisle, Cumbria Benefits for foreign staff working in the NHS SIR – While it may be statistically true that 'benefits claims by households with at least one foreign national have doubled to nearly £1 billion a month' (report, May 31), your article did not consider the advantages that many of these foreigners bring to this country. I was in an NHS hospital last week with a family member who received fantastic care from a consultant from Hong Kong, a doctor from eastern Europe, nurses from the Philippines, care workers from Portugal and Nigeria, and a porter from Portugal. Most such workers pay more in tax than they claim in benefits. I do not begrudge them claiming child benefit if they have children, or similar benefits that others in this country are able to claim. Philip Thomas Pudsey, West Yorkshire SIR – The news that foreign nationals are being paid nearly £1 billion a month in benefits is truly shocking, but hardly surprising given that illegal migrants continue to arrive in increasing numbers, safe in the knowledge that once they have landed on our shores and entered the asylum system, there is very little chance of them being returned to their country of origin or elsewhere. There is absolutely no deterrent. A string of absurd decisions by immigration tribunals has allowed claimants leave to remain in the UK on the basis of increasingly ludicrous evidence. This is not what the British public voted for, and their growing anger and frustration with this situation is understandable.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Florian Wirtz transfer latest: Liverpool still £10m short of Bayer Leverkusen's asking price for Germany star as Bundesliga club hold out for British-record fee
Liverpool remain in negotiations with Bayer Leverkusen over a deal for Florian Wirtz. Bayer want £120million and Liverpool are at £109m but Wirtz has made it clear he wants the move. The Germany star has been convinced by Arne Slot 's clear plan of where he will play in Liverpool's set-up as a No 10. Should the Reds accede to Bayer's demands, Wirtz would become the most expensive signing in British football, overtaking the £115m Chelsea paid Brighton for Moises Caicedo. Richard Hughes, Liverpool's Sporting Director, has proposed a package to his Leverkusen counterpart Simon Rolfes with easily attainable performance-related bonuses, such as Champions League qualification but the clubs are yet to agree a final fee. Talks will continue on Tuesday as the club attempt to find a middle ground. There is also a possibility that Bayer could bring a Liverpool player to Germany as part of the deal. Harvey Elliott and Jarell Quansah are both admired by Leverkusen, and either could be proposed as makeweight. Liverpool have already successfully conducted business with Bayer this summer, signing Jeremie Frimpong for £29.5m last week. Further talks are expected to take place this week with Bournemouth also for £40m-rated left-back Milos Kerkez. Hughes was Bournemouth's technical director at the time the south coast club snapped up the Hungary international from Dutch side AZ two years ago. Liverpool have yet to receive an approach from Everton for Ben Doak despite the winger being of interest to manager David Moyes. The former Celtic youth, who has been capped six times by Scotland at senior international level, spent the 2024-25 season out on loan at Middlesbrough. Doak impressed at the Riverside, producing seven assists and three goals in 24 Championship appearances.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Viktor Gyokeres has an incredible goal record and is a ready-made star, but Benjamin Sesko is proven in a major European league and has huge potential... so who should Arsenal sign this summer?
In an ideal world for Arsenal, Aston Villa would have beaten Man United on the final day of the season to edge Newcastle out of the picture in the race for the Champions League. There is no particular malice behind that thought, although a demoralising Carabao Cup semi-final defeat by the Magpies means Eddie Howe 's side aren't viewed particularly fondly by Gunners fans. But rather Toon striker Alexander Isak was viewed as a dream summer target for Mikel Arteta as he looks to reinforce his attacking options, yet given Champions League football will be returning to St James' Park, any move can now be ruled out. Nevertheless, it is still expected to be a big few months for Arsenal, boosted by a strong PSR position - and purse strings will be loosened as they try to strengthen across a variety of positions. There is no doubt that No 9 is the biggest priority though, with the lack of a quality option playing a big part in the third successive second place finish for Arteta's side as they drew 14 of their 38 Premier League games to finish 10 points adrift of Liverpool. Sporting Lisbon's Viktor Gyokeres and RB Leipzig's Benjamin Sesko are the two main contenders, but Arsenal fans and those inside the club are torn on who would be the better option. Both Gyokeres and Sesko are top class strikers in their own right and each have plenty of positives - and impressive goal records - to boost their case to Arsenal's recruitment team. On the one hand, a move for Sesko would make sense given the Slovenian star has been a long-term target. The Gunners have previously done much of the groundwork on a potential deal, having been close to signing him last summer before the player became unsure over how much game time he would get. Sesko has since netted 26 goals for club and country this season and at 21, the striker, who turns 22 on Saturday, presents an ideal profile for future growth. A transfer to Arsenal also feels like the perfect next step for Sesko, who has carefully constructed his career to date. After moving to Red Bull Salzburg at 16, he initially impressed on loan at their sister club FC Liefering who play in the Austrian second tier. Two strong seasons saw him score 22 goals in 44 games when he then made the step up to Salzburg's first team to fill the void left by Erling Haaland's departure to Borussia Dortmund in 2020. Sesko thrived and in the summer of 2023 he had interest from several teams across Europe, before he ultimately chose to join RB Leipzig to stay within the Red Bull network. Sesko almost joined Arsenal last summer and the Gunners have done due diligence on him In Germany, Sesko has gained crucial experience in a major European league and performed well despite Leipzig enduring two difficult campaigns. In 2024-25 he netted 21 times in 45 games, even though Leipzig crashed out in the League Phase of the Champions League following seven defeats in eight games and finished seventh in the Bundesliga. Sesko's variety of goals are also an added positive for potential suitors, with the 21-year-old having netted just six times from the penalty spot this season. Sesko is strong with both feet and has scored multiple headers - and overall he has an impressive career record of 90 goals and 25 assists in 210 matches. His experience of the Champions League would also be useful to Arsenal, although he is yet to enjoy any real success in the competition. Across four seasons, Sesko has scored just six goals in 28 games. However, it must be noted that the 21-year-old has generally played for teams that have struggled in the Champions League and he did manage to net four times in eight matches this time around. But when Arsenal are weighing up whether or not to go for Sesko, who is valued at £92.5m, there are also several factors that may encourage them to go for Gyokeres. The Swedish forward has enjoyed an incredible two years at Sporting and he is widely expected to leave Portugal this summer. In fact, it is understood that Sporting are currently searching for a new striker to replace the former Brighton and Coventry frontman. The Portuguese side are demanding in excess of £70m, meaning the Swede's options are limited to a few clubs with the financial power and willingness to spend that on a player. But Arsenal are one such team, and new sporting director Andrea Berta is said to admire Gyokeres from his time working at Atletico Madrid. And you can see why, with Gyokeres possessing an superb record of 97 goals in 102 games since joining Sporting for a bargain £20.2m fee. A 2024-25 campaign that saw the Swede net 54 goals and add 13 assists in 52 games has meant Gyokeres' profile has risen exponentially, something that was particularly boosted by his Champions League form. On what was his first experience of the competition, Gyokeres scored six goals in eight games, included a superb hat-trick against Man City in November. His rise has been less serene than Sesko's, with the 26-year-old, whose birthday is next week, failing to make the grade at Brighton during a four-year spell that also saw him struggle on loan at Swansea. However, a flame was lit once he joined Coventry and 40 goals across two seasons as a permanent player earned Gyokeres a move to Sporting. Despite his incredible record, there are a few concerns surrounding Gyokeres, including the fact that he will be 27 at the start of next season, five years senior to Sesko. His struggles at Brighton, although they now seem irrelevant, do raise some questions given he has never played in a top five European league, something Sesko has done with the Bundesliga. Mail Sport has previously reported how this is a view echoed internally at Arsenal, with figures torn on whether the striker can hit the ground running in the Premier League. There is also the fact that 20 of his 54 goals this season were penalties, although given Gyokeres scored every spot kick, perhaps that is something to be viewed positively. He also struggled to assert himself during Sporting's 5-1 thrashing by Arsenal in the Champions League. Nevertheless, the Swede's international record is impressive, with Gyokeres having netted 15 times in 26 games in comparison to Sesko's 16 in 41 for Slovenia, although again the standard of their respective teams should be taken into account. Whatever they decide, it feels as if Arsenal will be getting a top quality striker this summer and one that they hope will take them to a trophy after more than five years. Both strikers have their qualities, with Gyokeres possessing an incredible goal record over the past two years. In fact, in 2024-25, the 26-year-old averaged a goal every 79 minutes and converted 56 per cent of his chances. This outperformed Sesko, whose goal-per-minute ratio is 156, while he has a conversation rate of 47.1 per cent. A caveat to that is the quality of their leagues and the fact Gyokeres had 3.9 shots per game compared to Sesko's 2.31. He also averaged 9.16 touches in the opposition box, almost three times that of the Slovenian's 3.29. Overall, it feels like although Sesko has a poorer goal record than his striking rival, the fact that he is proven in a major European league and on an upward curve is extremely appealing. Arsenal have also done plenty of due diligence on him as a target and they have been tracking the 21-year-old for a long-time. The Gunners have plenty of money to spend this summer and although Sesko is likely to be more expensive than Gyokeres, his physicality, age and potential mean Mail Sport favours him narrowly as the better option.
