logo
Map Shows Where Teens Being Banned From Stores as Crime Surges

Map Shows Where Teens Being Banned From Stores as Crime Surges

Newsweek22-04-2025

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
In recent years, various stores and fast-food restaurants have implemented restrictions on teenagers due to rising levels of thefts and other crimes.
Why It Matters
Crime increased during the COVID pandemic, when stories of theft from grocery stores and pharmacies became commonplace and were accompanied by countless videos obtained from surveillance cameras.
And as nearly all violent crime returned to pre-pandemic levels by the first half of 2024, shoplifting was up by 10 percent compared to the first six months of 2019. By the end of 2024, an impact of Retail Theft & Violence study conducted by the National Retail Federation and the Loss Prevention Research Council found that shoplifting had increased 93 percent between 2019 and 2023.
Some states have implemented restrictions at store locations based on age as shoplifting has increased dramatically since pre-COVID.
Some states have implemented restrictions at store locations based on age as shoplifting has increased dramatically since pre-COVID.
Flourish
What To Know
Individual locations of retail and food-related businesses, including some of the biggest companies in the world, have established age restrictions to curb upticks in crime.
Last week, several Richmond, Virginia, businesses reportedly banned some middle school students from entering their stores without a parent, according to ABC affiliate WRIC.
One of the stores reportedly being targeted for theft has been Family Dollar, where an employee told WRIC that groups of five or more teens routinely come in as a crowd and are "very disrespectful," purportedly stealing Hot Wheels and alcohol. but leave without incident due to a shortage of employees.
A local middle school, River City, had to actually send correspondence to district parents informing them of the shoplifting and loitering being conducted by some students.
"We continue to encourage parents to also help reinforce positive behaviors at home and beyond school," school officials wrote.
In February, a McDonald's location in New York City posted signage discouraging anyone under the age of 20 from entering without a parent and identification, as part of a policy aimed to reduce crime.
The location at Nostrand and Flatbush Avenues in Brooklyn has drawn the attention of law enforcement for a while. More than 100 911 calls were made annually from inside and in front of the McDonald's, according to police data obtained by the New York Post. As of February, nearly 30 calls had already been made this year.
Newsweek has reached out to McDonald's via email for comment.
In October 2024, a Target in Boston reportedly implemented a similar policy according to posts that went viral on Reddit. A sign on the store's door read: "All guests under the age of 18 must be accompanied by an adult at this Target store."
About a year ago, Boston.com reported that a Target location in Dorchester closed all of their self-checkout machines due to rising theft.
An increase in thefts and fights led to the same action at a Target store in the Valley Plaza Mall, in Bakersfield, California, in August 2023, attributed to increased theft and fights. Signage informed consumers that teenagers had to be accompanied by a guardian in order to enter the store after 4 p.m.
Newsweek has reached out to Target via email for comment.
In August 2024, a dozen Giant food stores in the Washington D.C. region began banning bags over 14 inches and restricting entry to anyone under age 18 and without an adult after 6 p.m. Two of the stores were located in Baltimore, according to FOX 5.
Newsweek has reached out to Giant via email for comment.
The ground floor of Macy's Herald Square department store in Manhattan, New York.
The ground floor of Macy's Herald Square department store in Manhattan, New York.Chaperones and curfews are not new, of course.
In 2023, many businesses throughout the U.S. began implementing similar policies to protect customers and limit crime.
Westfield Garden State Plaza, New Jersey's oldest mall, started enforcing a policy in April 2023 in which anyone 18 years and under required an adult chaperone after 5 p.m. on Fridays and Saturdays, according to Business Insider. The mall added "waiting zones" for teens needing to be picked up post-curfew.
A Chick-fil-A in Royersford, Pennsylvania, a suburb of Philadelphia, implemented a chaperone policy in April 2023.
A Facebook post at the time stated that teens were too loud and using too much explicit language; "mistreatment of property" by throwing food and trash without discarding it; disrespect of employees; and "unsafe behaviors" like walking through drive-thru lanes.
"As you can imagine, this is not a pleasant experience," the post read. "We want to provide a comfortable and safe environment for our guests and our staff, and also to protect our building. Therefore, we cannot allow this to continue."
On April 22, 2023, Knott's Berry Farm in Buena Park, California, began requiring all guests ages 15 years old or younger to be accompanied by a chaperone who was at least 21 years old in order to be admitted to or remain in the park. The policy was in effect daily by 4 p.m. local time.
Newsweek has reached out to Knott's via email for comment.
What People Are Saying
Giant shopper Alice Bland to FOX 5 DC: "I'm for anything that works. If it makes anything better for the community, and it works to teach the kids not to steal. Anything that works for the community and anybody else, I say yes."
Family Dollar employee Latisha Sanchez to WRIC: "The school should have a better hold on what's going on. The kids are supposed to be in the school. They should know that the kids are coming out here, while y'all have a better hold of what's going on over there. It starts with them."
Barbara C. Staib, director of communications at the National Association for Shoplifting Prevention, previously told Newsweek: "Anything that makes people feel threatened or insecure in their ability to take care of their families, themselves, their homes, etc. will impact shoplifting. We saw it in the 2008-2009 housing and banking economic crisis."
What Happens Next
It remains unclear how many stores and retailers across the entire country have implemented age-specific restrictions.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

ICE detains the most followed person on TikTok, Khaby Lame
ICE detains the most followed person on TikTok, Khaby Lame

The Hill

time5 hours ago

  • The Hill

ICE detains the most followed person on TikTok, Khaby Lame

(NewsNation) — U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement reportedly detained the most-followed creator on TikTok on Friday. Khaby Lame, whose full name is Seringe Khabane Lame, is an Italian-Senegalese influencer. He was detained for immigration violations at the Harry Reid International Airport in Las Vegas, Nevada, according to USA Today. Lame, 25, is a current citizen of Italy and reportedly 'overstayed the terms of his visa,' ICE reported. ICE allegedly gave Lame the option to depart the country voluntarily after he was detained, and Lame chose to leave the U.S. Lame became famous during the COVID-19 pandemic when he was laid off from his job in Italy. He uses the hashtag 'learnfromkhaby' on most of his videos, and he follows along as another creator talks about a complicated hack. Once he watches the 'hack,' he shows himself easily completing it, typically without saying anything. Lame is reportedly an ambassador for the men's clothing company Boss. He is also an ambassador for Binance and UNICEF. Lame moved from Senegal to Italy as a baby, but as The Associated Press reported, he didn't gain Italian citizenship until 2022. In 2024, he was named one of People's Creators of the Year. He told the publication at the time, 'Before TikTok, I was working in a factory. I had a lot of different jobs. I was helping support my family — three little brothers, one older brother and my parents. Then my world changed completely. It's a whole different life now.' Lame's detainment is one small part of President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown. During his presidential campaign, he had promised to create mass deportations, which have led to ICE raiding workplaces, airports and more across the country.

Kristi Noem Urged Pete Hegseth and US Military to Arrest LA Rioters
Kristi Noem Urged Pete Hegseth and US Military to Arrest LA Rioters

Newsweek

time5 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Kristi Noem Urged Pete Hegseth and US Military to Arrest LA Rioters

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem asked Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to deploy the military in Los Angeles to arrest "lawbreakers" in the riots. In the Sunday letter, first obtained by the San Francisco Chronicle, Noem asked Hegseth to direct the military forces to "either detain, just as they would at any federal facility guarded by military, lawbreakers under Title 18 until they can be arrested and processed by federal law enforcement, or arrest them." She also requested the Defense Department send military drones and weapons to assist law enforcement during the riots which broke out after U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) carried out multiple raids across L.A. This is is breaking news. More updates to follow.

A Prosecutor Allegedly Tried To Jail Him for Fighting Civil Forfeiture. He May Finally Get His Day in Court.
A Prosecutor Allegedly Tried To Jail Him for Fighting Civil Forfeiture. He May Finally Get His Day in Court.

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

A Prosecutor Allegedly Tried To Jail Him for Fighting Civil Forfeiture. He May Finally Get His Day in Court.

A prosecutor who allegedly weaponized the criminal code to retaliate against a man for filing a class-action lawsuit that challenged the notorious civil forfeiture program in Wayne County, Michigan, is not entitled to prosecutorial immunity, a state appeals court ruled Monday, sending the man's lawsuit against that prosecutor back to the trial court. It is a significant legal victory when considering that such claims are often dead on arrival. Police seized Robert Reeves' Chevrolet Camaro and $2,000 in cash in 2019 on suspicion that he had stolen a skid steer from Home Depot. But as Reason's C.J. Ciaramella wrote in 2023, Reeves was not arrested or charged with a crime, and he was not able to actually challenge the seizure of his vehicle, as the Wayne County Prosecutor's Office (WCPO) declined to file a notice of intent to forfeit it. About seven months later, Reeves joined the class-action suit, filed by the Institute for Justice, a public-interest law firm, which alleged that Wayne County's civil forfeiture program violated the Constitution in multiple ways. Prosecutors responded expeditiously. First, the WCPO wrote the next day to a state police task force instructing it to release Reeves' car and his cash. Then, two weeks later, prosecutors filed felony charges against Reeves for allegedly receiving and concealing stolen property. Perhaps most notably, the government asked a judge to suspend his lawsuit while the criminal case against him proceeded, and Wayne County's Department of Corporation Counsel (DCC) used the charges as a defense against the suit. A judge would dismiss those charges for lack of evidence—in February 2021, over a year later, in part after delays brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic. Prosecutors were undeterred. They refiled the same charges shortly after that dismissal, only for them to again be dismissed for lack of evidence, this time in January 2022. Reeves then sued, alleging those criminal prosecutions violated his First and 14th Amendment rights as part of a concerted effort to derail his complaint against the county's civil forfeiture program—the practice that allows law enforcement to seize people's property even if they have not charged, much less convicted, the owner of a crime. "The pending charges caused Robert to be disqualified for expungement of prior offenses at a free expungement clinic, to spend time imprisoned in a COVID-infested jail, and to lose at least one job, when a police-officer client refused to allow [Reeves] to work as a contractor at his home specifically because of the pending charges," his complaint says. "Defendants' retaliatory prosecutions against [Reeves] were motivated by [Reeves'] participation in a federal class action lawsuit against Wayne County—protected activity under the First and Fourteenth Amendments." His complaint also notes that the "defendants worked together across departments—with the WCPO taking advice and direction from the DCC—in an irregular effort to pursue the criminal prosecutions." Suits like Reeves' are usually doomed before they begin, as prosecutors are protected by absolute immunity for judicial or quasi-judicial functions. In practice, that means victims have no recourse against district attorneys who may falsify evidence, introduce perjured testimony, coerce witnesses, or hide exculpatory information from the defense. But the State of Michigan Court of Appeals reversed a trial court decision and ruled yesterday that Dennis Doherty, the prosecutor who allegedly retaliated against Reeves by bringing felony charges, was not entitled to that protection, because the alleged misconduct did not qualify as quasi-judicial acts. "[Reeves] alleged that Doherty contacted the new officer in charge of the task force to seek clarification, recommended submission of the warrant request, and directed the officer in charge to file that request," the court wrote. "Those allegations suggest that Doherty's conduct was aimed at reviving a dormant prosecution and falls within the category of investigative or administrative acts, not quasi-judicial ones." For those acts, prosecutors are entitled to qualified immunity, the legal doctrine that permits civil suits against state and local government officials only if a plaintiff can prove it was already "clearly established" that the misconduct in question was unconstitutional. The trial court will now evaluate that question here. It's still a very high bar to meet. But in a commentary on how difficult it can be for victims of government abuse to find recourse, Reeves has a glimmer of hope after facing what are typically impossible odds. The post A Prosecutor Allegedly Tried To Jail Him for Fighting Civil Forfeiture. He May Finally Get His Day in Court. appeared first on

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store