British men urged to join ‘Dad strike' calling for more paternity leave
British fathers are being urged to join the world's first 'Dad strike' to protest about the UK's statutory paternity leave, which campaigners say is the least generous in Europe.
Fathers are planning to protest with their babies outside the Department for Business and Trade in London on 11 June in an effort to force the government to improve leave for dads and non-birthing partners.
The strike, organised by campaign group the Dad Shift, is being hailed as a 'revolutionary' moment in the UK's gender equality movement, with organisers arguing that women will continue to face maternity discrimination if low take-up of paternity and parental leave continues.
Ministers were accused of 'betraying' new fathers this week after it emerged that a promised 'day one' right to paternity leave would not include the right to statutory pay under Labour's flagship employment rights bill.
George Gabriel, from the Dad Shift, said low paternity leave pay meant many fathers could not afford to take any time off after the birth of their children. Research by the group shows that the average British father spends 43% fewer waking hours with their child in the first year of life – 1,403 hours compared with 3,293 for the average mother.
'The UK's rubbish paternity leave system means from the day our kids arrive most fathers are forced to make an impossible choice – between going out to work and provide for our families, and providing them with the one thing that matters most, our presence,' said Gabriel.
Eligible UK fathers and non-birthing parents currently get two weeks on less than half the minimum wage, with self-employed co-parents not qualifying for state support. Eligible mothers on maternity leave receive 90% of their average weekly earnings for the first six weeks, then £187.18 for 33 weeks.
Society and companies were far ahead of the government, said Gabriel. According to new polling by Whitestone for the Dad Shift, most children under 11 are picked up from school or nursery every day by their mothers, even though 86% of respondents agree 'it's better when both parents have opportunities to be equally active caregivers'.
Companies are increasingly offering partners better parental leave, with the BBC offering 52 weeks on a pay structure, while Aviva's co-parents get 52 weeks with the first 26 weeks at full pay, according to a Paternity League Table released this week by the childcare provider Koru Kids. Barclays, HSBC, KPMG, and BDO LLP offer only two weeks on full pay.
Marvyn Harrison, a self-employed father of two and a founder of the podcast Dope Black Dads, said the strike would play a key role in showing fathers who wanted to spend more time with their kids that they were not on their own. 'The most important thing we have to do is awaken men to the problem,' he said. 'Fighting for paternity leave and paternity pay is a [way] for us to start to interrupt how we over commit in the workplace and don't commit enough in our families.'
UK paternity leave, at £187.18 a week, is the least-generous statutory offer in Europe, with the UK ranked 40th out of 43 countries in the OECD. It accounts for 1.9% of all government spending on parental leave, with the rest spent on maternity leave. According to the Fatherhood Institute, which is campaigning for six weeks' well-paid leave in the baby's first year, this leaves an average-earning, full-time working father more than £1,000 worse off.
Take-up is also low compared with other countries. For every 100 babies born, only 31.6 men receive statutory paternity pay, compared with an average of 57 men in the 18 OECD with available data, according to evidence the group provided to the women and equalities select committee.
Companies are being urged to give fathers the afternoon off work to strike, with the communications agency The Romans and On The Tools, a platform for plumbers, electricians and other trades, pledging their support. 'So many dads in our industry feel they're missing out on crucial time with their children,' said Lee Wilcox, the chief executive of On the Tools
Pete Target, who works in local government, said he was going to strike because he remembered how he felt when, after two weeks with his newborn baby, he suddenly found himself thrust back into work. 'Being apart from my baby felt awful,' he said. 'I was busy bonding with him and it was a massive wrench.'
He hopes the strike will start a dads' revolution, and force the government to listen. 'No more gritting teeth and just kind of pushing through,' he said. 'It's time to be more open about the struggles dads face and to show up and say, 'This is what we need. We have needs too'.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
33 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
SNP and Reform feed off each other – but Labour is still hungry
Nats activists never tire of referring to Labour & Tories as two cheeks of the same a*** - the same charge can now be levelled at SNP and Nigel Farage's Reform CHRIS MUSSON SNP and Reform feed off each other – but Labour is still hungry SNP activists never tire of referring to Labour and the Tories as two cheeks of the same a***. Well, the same charge can now be levelled at the Nats and Nigel Farage's Reform UK. 1 Reform came a close third to the SNP and winners Labour Neither will want to hear this, but their equally destructive stances on funding Scotland's public services reveal yet another similarity between the two parties, vying for power at Holyrood next year with Labour. Both claim to be the outsiders standing up to the Westminster establishment, though for the SNP this is also not-so-subtle code for England. The stock-in-trade for both is to blame others for all ills. Both engineered referendums to leave major economic unions, and both lean heavily on populist rhetoric. And as we discovered in the run-up to last week's crunch by-election, they both want to cut Scotland's funding off at the knees. They want to do so to further their own narrow, political aims. For the SNP, that's independence. For Reform, electoral domination down south. As underlined by the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election — where Reform came a close third to the SNP and winners Labour — support for Farage is surging amid falls in backing for traditional parties. Scottish Labour have been buoyed by that Hamilton result. and remain hungry for power. But they still face a huge battle. Because the more Reform's support grows, the more likely it becomes the SNP can win the 2026 Scottish Parliament elections with a far lower vote share than they got in 2021. And the two parties don't just share ideas — they are feeding off each other. There may be a point in the coming years — with Farage in No10 and the SNP in power at Holyrood — that these competing forms of nationalism create a perfect storm. Moment John Swinney is heckled by Reform UK campaigners as FM breezes past warring activists heads of Hamilton by-election Both parties have set out how they want the Scottish Government to have more independence in terms of funding, a move that would go a long way to ending the current 'pooling and sharing' of resources which Scotland voted to keep in 2014. The common theme is the scrapping of the Barnett Formula — the funding mechanism which drives Scotland's significantly higher share of public spending than the UK average. Last year, this meant thousands of pounds per person extra to spend on Scots services like the NHS and schools. Scotland spent £22.7billion more than the £88.5bn it raised in taxes in 2023/24. Including oil revenues, we brought in just £60 per head more in tax than the UK average. But we spent £2,417 per head more. Not a bad deal, you may think — unless you look for the worst in everything, as the SNP do. But Holyrood Finance Secretary Shona Robison wants to scrap this 'Union dividend'. She has resurrected an SNP aim to ditch the pooling and sharing — which means that extra spending is covered — and turn that £22.7bn overspend into Scotland's problem. Robison says that short of independence, 'moving to full fiscal autonomy for the Scottish Government would create a fairer system that would protect public services and allow investment in our economy'. Ms Robison knows full well that the opposite is true. Full fiscal autonomy may mean keeping all taxes raised in Scotland — income tax, VAT, corporation tax, oil revenues and so on. HOLYROOD sits just three days a week, when it's not enjoying long holidays. When it does, MSPs spend an inordinate amount of time debating meaningless motions. Last week, the Scottish Government staged a debate and vote congratulating itself for making 'significant progress' towards becoming one of 'Europe's fastest-growing start-up economies'. Some brass neck, given how anti-business and anti-growth the SNP have been. And the previous week, it had emerged that because Scotland's economy has lagged behind the UK average, we are losing hundreds of millions of pounds a year in funds for public services. That's the reality. So how about knuckling down to sorting that out, rather than grandstanding about this imaginary world? But it also means we have to pay for everything. And we simply can't afford it. It means the end of the Barnett Formula, and the Scottish Government having to find ten per cent of its GDP to fill that £22.7bn gap. Borrowing at these levels, even if it were possible, would provoke a response from the markets making Liz Truss's mini-budget disaster seem small fry. If you think the NHS and schools and roads are bad now, just wait for the super-charged austerity under full fiscal autonomy. It would be economic suicide, and Robison is not thick. Which leads me to think this is a kamikaze policy. Scots public services are the target, leading to the inevitable conclusion from SNP chiefs that things are so terrible the only way out of the wreck is independence. And what about Farage? Last week this newspaper tried to get some Scots policies out of him. Reform UK are quite light on those — meaning they really haven't got any. He did confirm he no longer wanted to axe MSPs — good news for the ones who could be elected for Reform in 2026. But one thing he did speak on during his Scots trip was scrapping the Barnett Formula. In his own words, he said it 'seems to me to be somewhat out of date', adding: 'What I'd like to see is a Scottish Government that's able to raise a bit more of its own revenue, and a Scottish economy that has genuine growth.' Like the SNP's funding policy, the consequences would be the opposite of what Farage says. It would strangle spending and growth. With a reduced settlement for public services here — while people in England get the same, or closer, to the current Scots levels — it would mean savage cuts, tax rises, or both. This would also suit the SNP's independence argument. Does Farage care much about that? I'm not sure he actually does. Scotland has never been his priority. Domination in England is. There would be a bit more money for England, styled as one in the eye for 'subsidy junkie' Scots, playing well to potential Reform voters down south. At the heart of it, like the SNP's stance, it's about making Scotland poorer, not wealthier. As the SNP's Trade Union Group put it last week: 'This is code for a bonfire of public services. And the effective end to devolution.' Correct. But they may want to look in the mirror, as SNP chiefs are proposing the same.
Daily Record
38 minutes ago
- Daily Record
Greta Thunberg's Gaza aid ship diverted by Israeli forces as activist says she was 'kidnapped'
Greta Thunberg has released a video saying she and other activists have been 'intercepted and kidnapped' in international waters. In a distressing video, Greta Thunberg made an urgent plea for assistance, saying that she and fellow activists "have been intercepted and kidnapped" in international waters. The environmental advocate was among 13 activists aboard the Madleen, a vessel under the British flag run by the Freedom Flotilla Coalition, which aimed to deliver humanitarian aid to Palestinians. The ship was seized as contact was lost following an interception by Israeli commandos on the Mediterranean Sea, reports the Mirror. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Israel has confirmed the boat was escorted to Ashdod port, situated in the country's southern district, deriding the ship as a "selfie yacht". The ministry stated: "It is a media gimmick for publicity (which includes less than a single truckload of aid) - a 'selfie yacht'." Greta, 22, shared a video on X amidst reports of the incident, in which she raises the alarm that she and her companions required immediate support. The Swedish activist fervently expressed: "My name is Greta Thunberg, and I am from Sweden. If you see this video, we are being intercepted and kidnapped in international waters by the Israeli occupational forces, or forces that support Israel." She continued with a call to action: "I urge all my friends, family and comrades to put pressure on the Swedish government to release me and the others as soon as possible." The footage was reportedly filmed prior to this morning's skirmishes, with activists instructed to avoid mobile phone use and fortunately recorded before they were allegedly confronted with "a white chemical" attack. Reports from the scene indicated some individuals complained of "eyes burning", an event speculated to have occurred in Mediterranean waters. However, at approximately 4:30 am local time, Israeli forces redirected the ship towards Ashdod. Subsequently, a spokesperson for Israel's Ministry of Foreign Affairs issued a statement: "With recent reports of a 'celebrities yacht' heading to Gaza, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs wishes to clarify the following: The maritime zone off the coast of Gaza is closed to unauthorised vessels under a legal naval blockade, consistent with international law. "The yacht is claiming that it is delivering humanitarian aid. In fact, it is a media gimmick for publicity (which includes less than a single truckload of aid) - a 'selfie yacht'. "Humanitarian aid is delivered regularly and effectively via different channels and routes, and is transferred through established distribution mechanisms. Over the past two weeks, more than 1,200 aid trucks have entered Gaza from Israel. The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation has distributed close to 11 million meals directly to civilians in Gaza. "The Gaza maritime zone remains an active conflict area, and Hamas has previously exploited sea routes for terrorist attacks, including the October 7th massacre. Unauthorised attempts to breach the blockade are dangerous, unlawful, and undermine ongoing humanitarian efforts. We call on all actors to act responsibly and to channel humanitarian aid through legitimate, coordinated mechanisms, not through provocation."
ITV News
an hour ago
- ITV News
Protests turn violent in LA as thousands demonstrate against National Guard deployment
Tear gas and flash bangs were used to control the crowd, as ITV News' Daniel Rosney reports Tensions have escalated in Los Angeles as thousands of protesters clashed with police, after President Donald Trump deployed National Guard troops as part of his latest immigration crackdown. Demonstrators set fire to self-driving cars, blocked motorways and hurled chunks of concrete and electric scooters at police officers, who responded with tear gas and rubber bullets. Some were detained on Sunday evening, as police arrested those refusing to disperse. Sunday marked the third and most intense day of protests against Trump's immigration policy in the region. A British news photographer was hospitalised and underwent emergency surgery after being hit by a sponge bullet while documenting a standoff between authorities and protesters. Nick Stern said: 'My initial concern was, were they firing live rounds? 'Some of the protesters came and helped me, and they ended up carrying me, and I noticed that there was blood pouring down my leg.' The arrival of around 2,000 National Guard troops came after two days of protests, which began on Friday, when federal agents arrested a number of immigrants in the city. More than 100 immigrant arrests were made last week in Los Angeles, according to federal authorities. Many more were arrested while protesting, including a prominent union leader who was accused of impeding law enforcement. The Guard is a US military reserve force often mobilised in domestic emergencies, answering to both state governors and the president. It was deployed to protect LA's federal buildings, including the downtown detention centre where protesters concentrated. Troops stood carrying long guns and riot shields on Sunday morning, as protesters shouted 'shame' and 'go home". After some demonstrators came close to them, another set of uniformed officers advanced on the group, shooting smoke-filled canisters into the street. Minutes later, the Los Angeles Police Department fired rounds of crowd-control munitions to disperse the protesters, who they said were assembled unlawfully. Much of the group then moved to block traffic on the 101 freeway until police cleared them by the late afternoon. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said deploying the troops was 'essential to halting and reversing the invasion of illegal criminals into the United States'. Democratic Governor of California Gavin Newsom requested that Trump remove the guard members in a letter on Sunday afternoon, calling their deployment a breach of state sovereignty. As he prepared to board Air Force One in New Jersey on Sunday, Trump told reporters that there were 'violent people' in Los Angeles, adding: "They're not gonna get away with it."
