
Maine nonprofits try to navigate funding cuts, unclear rules and an uncertain future
Apr. 29—The staff at Victoria Mansion in Portland found out about the loss of federal funding in degrees.
First came the news that President Donald Trump had signed an executive order declaring the Institute of Museum and Library Services, the primary federal support for libraries and museums nationwide, was "unnecessary." Then the entire staff of the federal agency was placed on a 90-day leave.
Finally, Timothy Brosnihan, executive director of the mansion, got a short email last week saying the organization's grant from the IMLS "is no longer consistent with the agency's priorities and no longer serves the interest of the United States and the IMLS Program."
That loss leaves a $90,000 hole in the budget for an ongoing restoration project at the 19th-century mansion.
"To have a wrinkle like this in the final homestretch is a challenge," Brosnihan said. "Nothing like this has ever happened in our experience here."
Nonprofit community organizations and research facilities across the state have seen federal grants canceled over the past two months and are now facing a bigger challenge: how to come up with a large chunk of money that had previously seemed guaranteed. And even as they scramble to figure out how to cover funding gaps, they're also navigating an uncertain future and how to apply for new funding in the face of a slew of executive orders that target diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives and other topics.
The cancellation of federal grants has come fast and furious for Maine nonprofits, the vast majority of which are small organizations without deep pockets to cover the losses. The cuts have hit a wide swath of organizations statewide with varying missions ranging from support for the arts to historic preservation, scientific research and programs to end hunger.
"It's happening in an arbitrary, capricious and likely unlawful way," said Jennifer Hutchins, executive director of the Maine Association of Nonprofits, a nonpartisan, privately funded organization with a network of more than 1,000 nonprofits across the state. "The scale, the scope, the speed is unsurpassed and extraordinary."
The National Council of Nonprofits is advising organizations to conduct a risk assessment for federal funding, look at all of their funding sources and to plan ahead as much as possible. It also recommends nonprofits try to understand the circumstances under which their grants or contracts were canceled and review executive orders that focus on issues covered by the organization, including DEI initiatives, immigration and environmental policies.
But figuring out why grants were canceled and understanding what the new rules for future grants — if they're even awarded — isn't easy. Nonprofits are resilient and used to changes with new administrations, but they typically have more information about how and why things are changing, Hutchins said.
"A changing environment is not new to nonprofits," she said. "What's happening now is that no one is explaining what the rules are and how they've been changed. It's happening at a fast speed and without any clarity."
A SCRAMBLE FOR FUNDING
Victoria Mansion is in a constant state of restoration, requiring careful financial planning and coordination with the experts and artisans who do the work. Most of the money for the projects comes from private foundations and donors, but it has also received federal grants.
The recently canceled grant was from the Museums for American program and required the nonprofit to raise a match of $148,043. The grant was expected to cover half the cost of a paint conservation project in the Grand Stair Hall of the Danforth Street mansion.
With federal grants like these, recipients pay for the work first and are then reimbursed. The Victoria Mansion expected it would be reimbursed for another $90,000, which has been canceled. Now, it must now figure out how to cover that gap from private donors, Brosnihan said.
"It has definitely left us scrambling to figure out how we take this project to the finish line. It's not easy to simply shutter the project," he said. "Once you start some of these things, you have to see them through completion. It's left us determined to forge ahead."
The Children's Museum and Theatre of Maine and Sabbathday Lake Shaker Village also had federal grants canceled this month.
The Trump administration terminated a grant to Children's Museum for programs about Wabanaki culture and history. The Portland nonprofit had already received $40,000 of its $224,143 Museums for America grant, but a reimbursement request for $15,000 submitted earlier this year hadn't been fulfilled before the grant was canceled.
Sabbathday Lake Shaker Village in New Gloucester was told that $187,000 of a $750,000 multiyear grant from the National Endowment for the Humanities had been canceled — just weeks after it lost $1.2 million from a separate federal grant. The village, home to the last two Shakers in the world, is in the middle of a $4.4 million project to restore a historic herb house to be used as a history and cultural center.
The Shaker Village, which had already raised matching funds, now has to turn to private donors to try to complete the project, likely competing with other organizations in the same boat. In turn, private funders may be reprioritizing how they give their money and to which organizations.
"It's going to be very difficult because this situation that's happening right now is forcing all types of nonprofit organizations and other agencies to scramble to find alternative sources of funding to keep their doors open," Shaker Village Director Michael Graham said.
UNCERTAIN FUTURE
Through These Doors, Cumberland County's domestic violence resource center, receives about half of its annual $2.5 million to $3 million budget from the federal government, including direct grants from the Department of Justice Office of Violence Against Women for work with domestic violence survivors, shelter and transitional housing for people fleeing violence, and safety planning.
When Trump issued a sweeping freeze on federal funding this year, Through These Doors Executive Director Rebecca Hobbs started worrying. While the freeze was rescinded, Hobbs lost confidence in the system.
Worried about the availability of money from the grants, Through These Doors has started submitting for reimbursements more frequently. Hobbs is also concerned about future grants, noting that application forms have disappeared from government websites.
"It is not unreasonably dramatic for me to say that lives will be lost if our funding is significantly cut," she said.
At the Shaw Institute in Blue Hill, executive director and senior research scientist Charles Rolsky is unsure about the money he expects to receive through a $150,000 grant from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to study the impact of PFAS on seals over a 30-year period. The funding was frozen and then unfrozen, but Rolsky doesn't fully trust that it will be available.
"If something happens once, it can happen again," he said.
'I'M NOT GOING TO STOP'
Some nonprofits are now considering how they need to change their mission statements, grant applications or tax forms to comply with Trump's executive orders regarding DEI initiatives.
Hutchins, from the Maine Association of Nonprofits, said most nonprofits in Maine are community organizations that are apolitical and are just "neighbors coming to neighbors and deciding they want to make their community a better place." But she already sees a chilling effect.
"Nonprofits are saying they don't want to lift their heads up and say too much because it might shine a spotlight on them," she said.
The National Council of Nonprofits had advised organizations to review their mission statements, social media accounts and IRS 990 forms for potential conflicts with executive orders, including those that restrict grants and contracts for groups with DEI initiatives and LGBTQ+ issues.
"As you make changes to reduce risk, make sure you are communicating with key stakeholders to explain what changes you are making and what work is still continuing that aligns with your mission," the council advised.
For Hobbs, the limitations on all nonprofits is troubling, especially for domestic violence centers that operate without gender or income requirements for the people they help.
"It's important we be able to serve anyone affected by abuse and not distinguish between groups," she said. "We're very concerned about certain groups being identified and us being told we can't serve them."
Rolsky has decided he's not going to stop talking about climate change and DEI, even if that makes it more difficult to secure federal grants.
"At first, I was scared because we do speak about DEI initiatives. There's a better chance (applications) get rejected now, but I'm not going to stop," he said. "They're all things we've benefited from as people, and I wouldn't be able to sleep at night if I stopped."
Copy the Story Link
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Verge
30 minutes ago
- The Verge
A ban on state AI laws could smash Big Tech's legal guardrails
Senate Commerce Republicans have kept a ten year moratorium on state AI laws in their latest version of President Donald Trump's massive budget package. And a growing number of lawmakers and civil society groups warn that its broad language could put consumer protections on the chopping block. Republicans who support the provision, which the House cleared as part of its 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act,' say it will help ensure AI companies aren't bogged down by a complicated patchwork of regulations. But opponents warn that should it survive a vote and a congressional rule that might prohibit it, Big Tech companies could be exempted from state legal guardrails for years to come, without any promise of federal standards to take their place. 'What this moratorium does is prevent every state in the country from having basic regulations to protect workers and to protect consumers,' Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA), whose district includes Silicon Valley, tells The Verge in an interview. He warns that as written, the language included in the House-passed budget reconciliation package could restrict state laws that attempt to regulate social media companies, prevent algorithmic rent discrimination, or limit AI deepfakes that could mislead consumers and voters. 'It would basically give a free rein to corporations to develop AI in any way they wanted, and to develop automatic decision making without protecting consumers, workers, and kids.' 'One thing that is pretty certain … is that it goes further than AI' The bounds of what the moratorium could cover are unclear — and opponents say that's the point. 'The ban's language on automated decision making is so broad that we really can't be 100 percent certain which state laws it could touch,' says Jonathan Walter, senior policy advisor at the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights. 'But one thing that is pretty certain, and feels like there is at least some consensus on, is that it goes further than AI.' That could include accuracy standards and independent testing required for facial recognition models in states like Colorado and Washington, he says, as well as aspects of broad data privacy bills across several states. An analysis by nonprofit AI advocacy group Americans for Responsible Innovation (ARI) found that a social media-focused law like New York's ' Stop Addictive Feeds Exploitation for Kids Act ' could be unintentionally voided by the provision. Center for Democracy and Technology state engagement director Travis Hall says in a statement that the House text would block 'basic consumer protection laws from applying to AI systems.' Even state governments' restrictions on their own use of AI could be blocked. The new Senate language adds its own set of wrinkles. The provision is no longer a straightforward ban, but it conditions state broadband infrastructure funds on adhering to the familiar 10-year moratorium. Unlike the House version, the Senate version would also cover criminal state laws. Supporters of the AI moratorium argue it wouldn't apply to as many laws as critics claim, but Public Citizen Big Tech accountability advocate J.B. Branch says that 'any Big Tech attorney who's worth their salt is going to make the argument that it does apply, that that's the way that it was intended to be written.' Khanna says that some of his colleagues may not have fully realized the rule's scope. 'I don't think they have thought through how broad the moratorium is and how much it would hamper the ability to protect consumers, kids, against automation,' he says. In the days since it passed through the House, even Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA), a staunch Trump ally, said she would have voted against the OBBB had she realized the AI moratorium was included in the massive package of text. California's SB 1047 is the poster child for what industry players dub overzealous state legislation. The bill, which intended to place safety guardrails on large AI models, was vetoed by Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom following an intense pressure campaign by OpenAI and others. Companies like OpenAI, whose CEO Sam Altman once advocated for industry regulation, have more recently focused on clearing away rules that they say could stop them from competing with China in the AI race. 'What you're really doing with this moratorium is creating the Wild West' Khanna concedes that there are 'some poorly-crafted state regulations' and making sure the US stays ahead of China in the AI race should be a priority. 'But the approach to that should be that we craft good federal regulation,' he says. With the pace and unpredictability of AI innovation, Branch says, 'to handcuff the states from trying to protect their citizens' without being able to anticipate future harms, 'it's just reckless.' And if no state legislation is guaranteed for a decade, Khanna says, Congress faces little pressure to pass its own laws. 'What you're really doing with this moratorium is creating the Wild West,' he says. Before the Senate Commerce text was released, dozens of Khanna's California Democratic colleagues in the House, led by Rep. Doris Matsui (D-CA), signed a letter to Senate leaders urging them to remove the AI provision — saying it 'exposes Americans to a growing list of harms as AI technologies are adopted across sectors from healthcare to education, housing, and transportation.' They warn that the sweeping definition of AI 'arguably covers any computer processing.' Over 250 state lawmakers representing every state also urge Congress to drop the provision. 'As AI technology develops at a rapid pace, state and local governments are more nimble in their response than Congress and federal agencies,' they write. 'Legislation that cuts off this democratic dialogue at the state level would freeze policy innovation in developing the best practices for AI governance at a time when experimentation is vital.' Khanna warns that missing the boat on AI regulation could have even higher stakes than other internet policies like net neutrality. 'It's not just going to impact the structure of the internet,' he says. 'It's going to impact people's jobs. It's going to impact the role algorithms can play in social media. It's going to impact every part of our lives, and it's going to allow a few people [who] control AI to profit, without accountability to the public good, to the American public.'


News24
30 minutes ago
- News24
Elon Musk deletes post claiming Trump 'in the Epstein files'
Elon Musk accused Donald Trump of being linked to Jeffrey Epstein through secret government files, but provided no evidence to back up his claims and later deleted the posts. The ongoing feud between Musk and Trump escalated rapidly after Musk criticised a spending bill. Trump and Epstein were known to have socialised in the past, though Trump has denied involvement in Epstein's alleged crimes, which remain a controversial topic among conspiracy theories. Tech billionaire Elon Musk has deleted an explosive allegation linking Donald Trump with disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein that he posted on social media during a vicious public fallout with the US president this week. Musk -- who exited his role as a top White House advisor just last week -- alleged on Thursday that the Republican leader is featured in secret government files on former associates of Epstein, who died by suicide in 2019 while he faced sex trafficking charges. The Trump administration has acknowledged it is reviewing tens of thousands of documents, videos and investigative material that his "MAGA" movement says will unmask public figures complicit in Epstein's crimes. "Time to drop the really big bomb: (Trump) is in the Epstein files," Musk posted on his social media platform, X as his growing feud with the president boiled over into a spectacularly public row on Thursday. "That is the real reason they have not been made public." Musk did not reveal which files he was talking about and offered no evidence for his claim. He initially doubled down on the claim, writing in a follow-up message: "Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out." However, he appeared to have deleted both tweets by Saturday morning. Supporters on the conspiratorial end of Trump's "Make America Great Again" base allege that Epstein's associates had their roles in his crimes covered up by government officials and others. They point the finger at Democrats and Hollywood celebrities, although not at Trump himself. No official source has ever confirmed that the president appears in any of the material. Trump knew and socialised with Epstein but has denied spending time on Little Saint James, the private redoubt in the US Virgin Islands where prosecutors alleged Epstein trafficked underage girls for sex. "Terrific guy," Trump, who was Epstein's neighbour in both Florida and New York, said in an early 2000s profile of the financier. "He's a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side." Just last week Trump gave Musk a glowing send-off as he left his cost-cutting role at the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). But their relationship imploded within days as Musk described as an "abomination" a spending bill that, if passed by Congress, could define Trump's second term in office. Trump hit back in an Oval Office diatribe and from there the row detonated, leaving Washington and riveted social media users alike stunned by the blistering break-up between the world's richest person and the world's most powerful. With real political and economic risks to their row, both men appeared to inch back from the brink on Friday, but the White House denied reports they would talk.
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Here's what to know about American Samoans in Alaska who are being prosecuted after trying to vote
WHITTIER, Alaska (AP) — They were born on U.S. soil, are entitled to U.S. passports and allowed to serve in the U.S. military, but 11 people in a small Alaska town are facing criminal charges after they tried to participate in a fundamental part of American democracy: voting. The defendants, who range in age from their 20s to their 60s, were all born in American Samoa — the only U.S. territory where residents are not automatically granted citizenship at birth. Prosecutors say they falsely claimed American citizenship when registering or trying to vote. The cases are highlighting another side of the debate over exaggerated allegations of voting by noncitizens, as well as what it means to be born on American soil, as President Donald Trump tries to redefine birthright citizenship by ending it for children of people who are in the country illegally. Here's what to know about the prosecutions in Alaska and the status of American Samoans when it comes to voting. What is the Alaska case about? The investigation began after Tupe Smith, a mom in the cruise-ship stop of Whittier, decided to run for a vacant seat on the regional school board in 2023. She was unopposed and won with about 95% of the vote. That's when she learned she wasn't allowed to hold public office because she wasn't a U.S. citizen. Smith says she knew she wasn't allowed to vote in federal elections but thought she could vote in local or state races, and that she never would have voted if she knew it wasn't legal. She says she told elections workers that she was a U.S. national, not a citizen, and was told to check a box saying she was a citizen anyway. About 10 months later, troopers returned to Whittier and issued court summonses to her husband and nine other American Samoans. While Smith appeals the charges against her, the state filed charges against the others in April. The state argues that Smith's false claim of citizenship was intentional, and her claim to the contrary was undercut by the clear language on the voter application forms she filled out in 2020 and 2022. The forms said that if the applicant did not answer yes to being over 18 years old and a U.S. citizen, 'do not complete this form, as you are not eligible to vote.' Why can't American Samoans vote in the U.S.? The 14th Amendment to the Constitution promises U.S. citizenship to those born on U.S. soil and subject to its jurisdiction. American Samoa has been U.S. soil since 1900, when several of its chiefs ceded their land and vowed allegiance to the United States. For that reason, Smith's lawyers argue, American Samoans must be recognized as U.S. citizens by birthright, and they should be allowed to vote in the U.S. But the islands' residents have never been so considered — Congress declined to extend birthright citizenship to American Samoa in the 1930s — and many American Samoans don't want it. They worry that it would disrupt their cultural practices, including communal land ownership. The 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals cited that in 2021 when it declined to extend automatic citizenship to those born in American Samoa, saying it would be wrong to force citizenship on those who don't want it. The Supreme Court declined to review the decision. People born in all other U.S. territories — Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, the Northern Mariana Islands and Guam — are U.S. citizens. They can vote in U.S. elections if they move to a state. American Samoans can participate in local elections on American Samoa, including for a nonvoting representative in Congress. Have other states prosecuted American Samoans for trying to vote? Supporters of the American Samoans in Whittier have called the prosecutions unprecedented. One of Smith's attorneys, Neil Weare, suggested authorities are going after 'low-hanging fruit' in the absence of evidence that illegal immigrants frequently cast ballots in U.S. elections. Even state-level investigations have found voting by noncitizens to be exceptionally rare. In Oregon, officials inadvertently registered nearly 200 American Samoan residents to vote when they got their driver's licenses under the state's motor-voter law. Of those, 10 cast ballots in an election, according to the Oregon Secretary of State's office, but officials found they did not intend to break the law and no crime was committed. In Hawaii, one resident who was born in American Samoa, Sai Timoteo, ran for the state Legislature in 2018 before learning she wasn't allowed to hold public office or vote. She also avoided charges. Is there any legislation to fix this? American Samoans can become U.S. citizens — a requirement not just for voting, but for certain jobs, such as those that require a security clearance. However, the process can be costly and cumbersome. Given that many oppose automatic citizenship, the territory's nonvoting representative in Congress, Aumua Amata Coleman Radewagen, has introduced legislation that would streamline the naturalization of American Samoans who do wish to become U.S. citizens. The bill would allow U.S. nationals in outlying U.S. territories — that is, American Samoa — to be naturalized without relocating to one of the U.S. states. It would also allow the Department of Homeland Security to waive personal interviews of U.S. nationals as part of the process and to reduce fees for them. ___ Bohrer reported from Juneau, Alaska, and Johnson from Seattle.