logo
Stage set for 21 federal races in northern, central Alberta as candidate deadline passes

Stage set for 21 federal races in northern, central Alberta as candidate deadline passes

CBC10-04-2025

Social Sharing
With the deadline for candidate registration passed, voters in Edmonton and northern Alberta can now consider their options.
Candidates had until Monday to submit their nomination papers, and on Wednesday Elections Canada released a final list of confirmed candidates.
The electoral map looks different from the last election, after a nationwide redistribution of federal electoral districts based on the 2021 Canadian census. A total of five new ridings were created, three of which are in Alberta, and other districts were redrawn to account for population changes.
There are 21 electoral districts in central and northern Alberta. These include nine ridings in Edmonton as well as:
Battle River–Crowfoot
Fort McMurray–Cold Lake
Grande Prairie
Lakeland
Leduc–Wetaskiwin
Peace River–Westlock
Ponoka–Didsbury
Red Deer
St. Albert–Sturgeon River
Sherwood Park–Fort Saskatchewan
Parkland
Yellowhead
Of the 123 candidates running in those 21 ridings, 16 are incumbents, a few are ballot stalwarts, and many others are making their first appearance.
Six incumbents are running in districts that have had their boundaries redrawn. Of the five ridings that are open races, only two existed with the same boundaries in the last election.
The Conservatives and NDP fielded full slates as usual, while the Liberal Party and the People's Party of Canada both came up one shy, missing nominees in Ponoka–Didsbury and Peace River–Westlock respectively.
The Green Party previously put forward a candidate for each Alberta riding in all five federal elections between 2004 and 2015. But this year marks the second election in a row that they have not done so, with nine candidates in northern and central Alberta.
Some parties' appearances on the ballot fluctuate between elections. The Maverick Party, previously known as Wexit Canada, fielded 10 candidates in 2021, but folded in February.
Meanwhile, Naomi Rankin — leader of the Alberta chapter of the Communist Party of Canada — has stood as a candidate in every federal election since 1988, this time in Edmonton Centre.
One notable shift this year is the number of candidates running without the endorsement of a political party.
Those candidates can choose to run as independents, in which case "independent" appears under their name on the ballot in place of where party affiliation would appear. Alternatively, they may instead choose "no affiliation" and have a series of dashes appears on the ballot.
Ten independents and two non-affiliated candidates are running in the 21 districts in central and northern Alberta. That's a big jump from the two independents that ran in each of the last two elections.
Determining a reason for these kinds of shifts isn't possible with such a small data set, according to Anthony Sayers, a professor of political science at the University of Calgary.
"The challenge with changing numbers of independents or even other candidate features (such as variation in number of women, minorities etc.) is whether the effect is random variation or a response to some structural factor (say, increased unhappiness with the major parties, or the growing influence of women in parties)," he said in an email to CBC News.
"This would require a good deal of empirical work over a least a few elections."
Of the 123 candidates in northern and central Alberta, 31 publicly identify as women.
Previously, Edmonton had several ridings which extended beyond the city limits. With the redistribution, Edmonton still has nine districts, but all are now fully inside the city proper. Meanwhile, the areas surrounding the city have redrawn electoral boundaries, with new ridings like St. Albert–Sturgeon River and Leduc–Wetaskiwin.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Opinion: Most Canadians don't support taxpayer subsidies for LNG
Opinion: Most Canadians don't support taxpayer subsidies for LNG

Vancouver Sun

time3 hours ago

  • Vancouver Sun

Opinion: Most Canadians don't support taxpayer subsidies for LNG

Proponents often claim that Canada's LNG will reduce global warming by displacing coal in other countries. However, we have run out of time for a 'transition fuel' if we're to meet the goals of the Paris Agreement. In this context, new LNG infrastructure isn't a climate solution, but rather a substitute for investment in clean energy. Luckily, the price of renewables has dropped dramatically, making this transition both feasible and affordable. LNG is also a bad economic bet. The International Energy Agency has projected that LNG capacity will exceed demand by the next decade, making new capital investments especially risky. This is presumably why private investors are wavering and looking to Canadian governments to subsidize their projects with public dollars. A daily roundup of Opinion pieces from the Sun and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Informed Opinion will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. A recent poll found that 56 per cent of respondents, both in B.C. and nationally, oppose multibillion-dollar public subsidies for foreign-owned LNG projects. Only 18 per cent of Canadians, and 22 per cent of British Columbians, are supportive while the rest are unsure. In B.C., where most LNG projects are proposed and LNG Canada will soon come online, people have other priorities for their tax dollars. In fact, supporting oil-and-gas is at the bottom of a list led by health care, housing, education, renewable energy and transit. The lack of public support for subsidizing fossil fuels has been consistent for years. In 2018, two-thirds of Canadians opposed subsidizing oil-and-gas, 41 per cent strongly. More than half remained unsupportive, even after being told oil-and-gas subsidies would create jobs and economic growth. In 2021, 62 per cent of Canadians wanted the federal government to stop fossil fuel subsidies and there was mounting frustration that the government hadn't acted on a 2015 campaign promise to do so. In 2023, the majority of Canadians felt that oil companies, not taxpayers, should foot the bill for the Trans Mountain pipeline expansion. Only 30 per cent of British Columbians supported subsidies for LNG. A 2023 poll found 96 per cent of Canadians felt the federal government should disclose subsidies for fossil fuels. That year, the government of Canada signed a joint ministerial statement at the UN climate talks that committed them to do just that by the end of 2024. There is still no inventory of fossil fuel subsidies in mid-2025, undermining Canadians' ability to understand where their tax dollars are going. Canada claims to be a global leader on climate change, yet we continuously fail to meet our climate targets. The main reason is that emissions growth from oil-and-gas production has offset progress in other areas. According to the UN Environment Programme , governments around the world, including Canada, are planning for continued fossil fuel production that will result in more than double the global emissions scientists advise are consistent with limiting warming to 1.5 C. Canada, unfortunately, is one the biggest funders of the fossil fuel industry globally. That includes billions of taxpayer dollars that the federal and B.C. governments have already committed to LNG in the form of direct subsidies, lower tax and electricity rates, and public loans. Canadian taxpayers have been footing the bill for fossil fuel developments that threaten our own climate, health and economy. In this critical moment, Canada's leaders should instead use public funds to support projects that advance Canada's economy and safety, not only today but for decades to come. Kathryn Harrison is professor of political science at the University of B.C. Cara Pike is co-founder and senior adviser to at Carleton University in Ottawa.

B.C. government takes heat over marked growth in public payroll
B.C. government takes heat over marked growth in public payroll

Global News

time3 hours ago

  • Global News

B.C. government takes heat over marked growth in public payroll

B.C.'s NDP government is defending itself in the wake of new reports detailing the dramatic increase in public sector employees and the cost of payroll. The province is in the midst of a staffing shortage across key public sectors – currently short more than 1,000 teachers and six times as many nurses. But while critical positions go unfilled, the size of the public sector continues to grow, with British Columbia leading the country in the growth of taxpayer-funded jobs. 'It's gone from $5 billion worth of people (earning) over $75,000 to now $11.5 billion, so it's more than doubled,' BC Conservative finance critic Peter Milobar said. 'This government has a real problem when it comes to hiring, reining in costs and bringing things under control, and that leads to our structural deficit of over $12 billion.' Story continues below advertisement 1:57 B.C. database shows public sector salaries Critics say the size of government has increased across the board under the NDP's watch. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy In 2017, there were just over 29,000 public servants. That number has increased to nearly 39,000, jumping 32 per cent over eight years. While the public sector is growing, private sector job growth is half of its historical average. The B.C. General Employees Union acknowledges the unionized workforce has grown, but says the real issue is the growth of non-union positions, and that management has increased at a pace nearly double that of union members. It's a claim that is echoed in health care, where the B.C. Nurses' Union says health authorities are top-heavy. 'Anecdotally, that's how it appears,' BCNU president Adrianne Gear said. 'From my members' perspective, it does seem like there is a lot of senior management leadership. Story continues below advertisement 'At any given time, we are almost 6,000 nurses short, that's how many vacancies we have, and when we move to full implementation of nurse-patient ratios … we are going to need many, many more nurses.' 1:20 How much could a new B.C. public sector contract cost taxpayers? The B.C. government has committed to hiring more front-line workers in health care, education and other critical occupations. But competition worldwide is intense. B.C. Premier David Eby said much of the growth is related to tackling that competition. 'They are doctors, they are nurses, they are teachers, they are people who provide vital services in our province. It is why we are leading Canada in recruiting family doctors and why we are on track to ensuring every British Columbian gets access to a family doctor. Ensuring we are competitive in wages for those doctors, ensuring we are competitive in wages for nurses, that we are the best place for a nurse to work in Canada,' Eby said. Story continues below advertisement 'It is how we are getting a handle on the big challenges we've faced in terms of closures at hospitals or shortages of nurses that are raising concerns among the profession here.' However, he admitted he was 'very concerned' about the growth in health care administration costs. He said the province is currently doing an 'extensive review' of B.C. health authorities to minimize those administrative costs. A renewed focus on B.C. resource economy, meanwhile, could bring an increase in private sector job creation. The business community is optimistic that the government is sending the right signals, but says it is waiting for the needed follow-through.

Canada to meet NATO's defence spending target this fiscal year
Canada to meet NATO's defence spending target this fiscal year

Canada Standard

time3 hours ago

  • Canada Standard

Canada to meet NATO's defence spending target this fiscal year

Xinhua 10 Jun 2025, 00:15 GMT+10 OTTAWA, June 9 (Xinhua) -- Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said on Monday his government would increase spending on the country's defence and security and achieve NATO's defence spending target this fiscal year. Carney said in a news release that the defence spending for 2025-26 will be over nine billion Canadian dollars (6.6 billion U.S. dollars), or two percent of GDP, meeting the NATO defence commitment half a decade ahead of schedule. According to the news release, measures in the defence spending increase plan include better pay for Canadian Armed Forces; new aircraft, armed vehicles, and ammunition; bolstering Canada's defence industrial capacity, as well as expanding the reach of the Canadian Coast Guard and integrating it into the NATO defence capabilities. "Canada requires these capabilities to uphold and assert its sovereignty and ensure our defence never becomes dependent on others again. As we strengthen the Canadian Armed Forces, we will also build up Canadian industry, driving innovation and creating good careers," said Carney. Carney promised to further accelerate the investments in years to follow. According to NATO's annual report, Canada's defence spending was around 1.45 percent of GDP last year.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store