Brinks says passing road funding and public safety trust fund will take conversations and compromise
Michigan Senate Majority Leader Winnie Brinks, D-Grand Rapids, participates in a PAC reception during the third day of the Mackinac Policy Conference at the Grand Hotel on Mackinac Island, Mich., on May 29, 2025. (Photo by Andrew Roth/Michigan Advance)
MACKINAC ISLAND – With a little over a month until the July 1 deadline, Michigan Senate Majority Leader Winnie Brinks (D-Grand Rapids) told the Michigan Advance she has concerns about whether the Legislature would be able to pass the state's budget for Fiscal Year 2026 before the end of June.
'We're at the stage where we need to negotiate the differences between a House budget and a Senate budget, and the House has not passed what you can reasonably or meaningfully call a budget that we can even negotiate from. So they're pretty far behind in the process. And so that gives me pause about that deadline,' Brinks said.
Michigan House Republicans took control of the chamber in the 2024 election, winning a 58-52 majority and bringing an end to Democrats' trifecta control of the House, Senate and governor's seat. As a result, the Legislature has deadlocked, passing only four bills since the start of the year.
Michigan House Speaker Matt Hall (R-Richland Township) has repeatedly refused to commit to meeting the July 1 deadline, when lawmakers are legally required to pass a budget. However, the state's fiscal year does not start until Oct. 1, with Hall telling reporters in January that the budget may not be done until Sept. 30. A failure to have a budget in place by the Oct. 1 deadline would force a state government shutdown.
As Democrats raise alarms about the potential for a shutdown, House Republicans have passed what they call a 'shutdown prevention plan' which allocates $20 billion for critical programs like schools and local law enforcement if the Legislature cannot reach an agreement by the end of September.
While there is no penalty if lawmakers fail to agree on a new budget by July 1, Brinks noted in an interview with the Advance during the Mackinac Policy Conference that completing the budget on time is critical for municipalities, K-12 schools and universities.
'They're all making their plans right now for how they expend resources and serve their folks that they serve. I don't want to show up at my kid's school and find out that they didn't know enough about the resources they have coming from the state to be able to hire enough teachers to teach the kids and have larger class sizes. That's a completely unnecessary thing, and it's completely avoidable,' Brinks said.
And while Hall has slammed the Democratic-led Senate for failing to act on bipartisan road funding legislation and policies establishing a public safety and violence prevention fund to support local law enforcement and community violence intervention organizations, Brinks said those conversations need to be held in the context of the state's budget.
'You know something like the public safety trust fund, while there's a policy element to it, it's essentially a budget conversation. So get back in the room and have a budget conversation. I know our appropriations chairs have had some conversation, but there's so much more to the process…. This is exactly the kind of thing that could be worked out in a budget process, and there will, by necessity, need to be compromise,' Brinks said.
Similarly, allocating $3 billion towards road funding should also be subject to bipartisan discussion, Brinks said.
'So far, there hasn't been a lot of willingness to actually have those conversations between us from Matt Hall, and so, you know, at that point, they're simply just ideas that have been thrown out in the ether. The real work comes in the conversation, in the negotiation, in the sitting down and hashing things out,' Brinks said.
'It's not glamorous, right? You don't get to start in your own press conference for two hours as a negotiation. That's not negotiating. If he wants to do that, that's fine. But in addition to that, he's going to have to really find some time or empower his caucus, and there are some capable people there to sit down and really, do that work,' Brinks said.
While the House and Senate were able to break through their deadlock earlier this month to extend the filing deadline for lawmakers' legally-required financial disclosures amid frustrations with the rollout of the state's new financial reporting system, Brinks said there are several other policies they could be working on if Hall was interested.
'We could be talking about prescription drug affordability. We could be talking about ways to ensure, you know, we have more affordable housing, we could, you know, be talking about FOIA, you know, something that passed with a really strong bipartisan vote,' Brinks said.
In January, members of the Senate voted 33-2 to advance Senate Bills 1 and 2 to the House. The package looks to extend FOIA to include the Legislature, the governor and the lieutenant governor, which are exempt under the current state law. However, Hall has declared the package dead, calling them 'a very low priority.'
While Hall has pointed to the public safety trust fund as a bipartisan slam dunk, Brinks said the same about FOIA reform.
'It could be an easy bipartisan win that really helps improve transparency and the ethical environment in our state,' she said.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Republicans suggest PBS ‘grooming' children with Pride post
A group of congressional Republicans accused PBS on Monday of 'grooming' children after 'Sesame Street,' one of the nonprofit TV network's flagship programs, shared a social media post recognizing Pride Month. 'On our street, everyone is welcome. Together, let's build a world where every person and family feels loved and respected for who they are. Happy #PrideMonth!' the longtime children's education show wrote in a post early Sunday on the social platform X. The post, uploaded at midnight on June 1, the official start of LGBTQ Pride Month, included an illustration of 'Sesame Street's' colorful cast of puppets holding hands, their outstretched arms arranged in the order of a rainbow. The Republican Study Committee (RSC), a coalition of GOP House members whose membership is not public, responded to the post with a meme of Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and the words 'I am once again asking PBS to stop grooming children.' Representatives for PBS, 'Sesame Street' and Sanders did not immediately return requests for comment. The RSC did not respond to an email asking for additional comment on the post. The group's accusation comes amid a broader battle between PBS and Congress and the White House over the broadcaster's federal funding, which President Trump threatened last month in an executive order. PBS sued the Trump administration over the order, which claims it and the nonprofit radio network NPR produces 'biased and partisan news coverage.' NPR is also challenging Trump's order. The 'Sesame Street' Pride Month post drew backlash from other House and Senate Republicans, who used it to justify the administration's argument that it cut funding from PBS. Rep. Mary Miller (R-Ill.), whose website identifies her as an RSC member, also accused PBS of 'grooming' children with the post, which she said 'is evil and should infuriate every parent in America.' 'DEFUND!!' Miller wrote Monday on X. 'Federal funds aren't for grooming,' Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) wrote from his personal X account, responding to a separate 'Sesame Street' clip from a 2020 episode that featured 'Queer Eye' host Jonathan Van Ness. Reacting to the same clip, Rep. Andy Biggs (R-Ariz.) said, 'PBS is grooming children on American taxpayers' dime. This is unacceptable. Congress must defund them and hold the executives accountable.' The strong responses to 'Sesame Street's' post, including accusations of grooming, also come as the Trump administration increasingly targets LGBTQ Americans with policies and rhetoric that advocacy groups and LGBTQ people say threaten their safety and basic rights. Executive orders signed by Trump since his return to office in January aim to bar transgender people from serving openly in the military, ban trans athletes from competing in girls' and women's sports, end federal support for gender-affirming care for minors and slash funding for LGBTQ health programs. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
First he snubbed her, now he wants her job. Hochul's deputy launching bid for governor.
NEW YORK — New York Gov. Kathy Hochul's No. 2 — Lt. Gov. Antonio Delgado — has long had designs on her job and plans to launch his long-shot bid to unseat her Tuesday, his spokesperson told POLITICO. Delgado previewed the announcement in a video released Monday that includes images of him in New York City speaking with people and calling for 'universal health care' and 'universal pre-K.' He also pledged to fight 'the Trump administration's attacks' on deep blue New York. 'The powerful and well connected have their champions,' he said in the video. 'I'm running for governor to be yours.' A Hochul campaign spokesperson declined to comment. The Democratic Governors Association in a statement praised Hochul's record and pledged to support her. 'The Democratic Governors Association is 100 percent behind Governor Hochul as she continues to deliver for New York, take on Donald Trump, and build the operation it will take to beat Republicans up and down the ballot in 2026,' DGA executive director Meghan Meehan-Draper said. 'For years, Governor Hochul has been underestimated — and each time proved her critics wrong.' The Hudson Valley Democrat has been reaching out to Black elected officials to make his pitch, including leaders in Harlem and Brooklyn, four people familiar with his plans told POLITICO. One Democrat said Delgado is presenting Hochul as a weak top-of-the-ticket candidate who would hurt down-ballot contenders. Delgado is formalizing his campaign for governor four months after declining to endorse Hochul's reelection bid. But he snubbed her well before then, breaking with her last year by calling for President Joe Biden and then New York City Mayor Eric Adams to step down. Delgado, a moderate former House member who briefly had a rap career, holds a largely ceremonial role as Hochul's deputy. The responsibilities have conventionally included lower-stakes appearances to boost the governor while presiding over the state Senate. But Delgado has been on a de facto campaign tour of the state in recent months, hosting town halls and visiting churches to get his name out. He didn't reference Hochul once when he spoke Sunday from the pulpit of a predominantly Black church in Brooklyn. 'If we don't have moral leadership in a democracy, what do you think is going to happen to the democracy? It will collapse on itself,' Delgado told the congregation at Mt. Ollie Baptist Church. 'If you can't tell, I'm ready to make a change,' he went on to light applause, 'and I just want to ask you to pray for me.' Challenging a sitting governor is a difficult task. Hochul ascended to the office in 2021 after Andrew Cuomo's resignation. She quickly inherited the trappings of power that fall to chief executives in New York, including support from politically influential labor unions and a long line of donors eager to contribute to her campaign. Despite her middling poll numbers, Hochul is a formidable fundraiser. The governor in January reported $15.5 million in her campaign account and has raised money throughout the year. During the 2024 election cycle, Hochul built up the state Democratic Party's infrastructure, which she is expected to leverage for her re-election next year. Delgado had $968,751 in cash on hand, according to his January filing. The next report is not due until July. Hochul handily defeated two Democratic primary challengers in 2022 when she ran for a full term. She received more than 67 percent of the vote; New York City Public Advocate Jumaane Williams and Rep. Tom Suozzi received less than 20 percent each. Delgado remains largely unknown to most voters, a common problem for anyone who serves in the low-profile lieutenant governor's post. A Siena College poll in May found 58 percent of voters had no opinion of him or didn't know him. A Schenectady native and resident of the exurban Hudson Valley region, he does not come from a population center like New York City or the immediate suburbs — often a prerequisite for statewide success. Delgado is part of a long line of lieutenant governors who have chafed in the powerless office. The last sitting No. 2 to challenge a sitting governor was in 1998, when Betsy McCaughey Ross launched an unsuccessful bid to unseat then-Gov. George Pataki. Delgado has spent much of the year in even more governmental irrelevance than is normal for the job. After announcing he would not run again with Hochul — and hinting he would challenge her — the Hochul administration stripped him of his Capitol office space, staff and email access. The lieutenant governor will be up against Hochul's name recognition and fundraising strength in the primary one year from now. The incumbent governor isn't highly popular but she's formidable enough. A Siena College poll from May showed 46 percent of Democrats would support Hochul in a gubernatorial primary, compared to 12 percent for Delgado and 10 percent for Rep. Ritchie Torres, another potential challenger who says he'll make his decision after the New York City mayoral primary this month. On the Republican side, potential candidates for governor next year include Reps. Elise Stefanik and Mike Lawler and Nassau County Executive Bruce Blakeman.
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump wants his ‘One Big, Beautiful Bill' to sail through the Senate. These five factions stand in the way
On Monday evening, the U.S. Senate returns from a week-long recess to take up President Donald Trump's proposed domestic spending bill, which he's dubbed the 'One Big, Beautiful Bill.' The House of Representatives barely passed the bill last month in the wee hours of May 22. It was a coup for House Speaker Mike Johnson. But passing it through the House was only halftime. And while House Republicans were just as divided as Senate Republicans, the upper chamber GOP has to navigate stricter and more arcane rules. Senate Republicans have only 53 votes, which is not enough to overcome a Democratic filibuster. Thus, they plan to use a process called budget reconciliation, wherein they can pass legislation with only 51 votes as long as it is tied to the budget. Trump has also said he understands the Senate will inevitably change the bill. 'I want the Senate and the senators to make the changes they want,' he told reporters. 'It will go back to the House and we'll see if we can get them. In some cases, the changes may be something I'd agree with, to be honest.' The bill also represents Senate Majority Leader John Thune's first major challenge. Thune inherited the mantle from his mentor Mitch McConnell after serving as the whip for Republicans since 2019. But to get this bill across the finish line, he will need to satisfy multiple factions and leaders in the Senate. Here are the five groups that Thune will need to navigate. The Fiscal Hawks The Senate does not have a formal group of conservatives who want to slash spending the way that the House does with the Freedom Caucus. But they still have a bevy of fiscal conservatives. Chief among them is Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, who last month told The Independent that reductions in spending were 'fake cuts.' Other senators in this faction include Mike Lee of Utah and Rand Paul of Kentucky. Sen. Rick Scott of Florida, who challenged Thune for the top job in the Senate last year, told Turning Point USA leader Charlie Kirk that he is a 'no' on the bill in its current form. To win them over, Thune will need to probably exact some kind of spending cuts. But that might infuriate the next group. The MAGA populists No part of the bill has received more attention than the changes to Medicaid. Specifically, the legislation would require able-bodied adults without dependent children to work, participate in community service or education for at least 80 hours a month. In a last-minute deal to appease conservatives, House Republican leaders moved up the work requirements to begin at the end of 2026 rather than in 2029. Republicans who hail from states that expanded Medicaid might also fret about this. Chief among these Republicans is Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri, who has sought to reorient the GOP to become the party of working-class voters and has adopted a more populist tone compared to other Republicans. Hawley has said he would oppose major changes to Medicaid because of how many people in his state depend on it and the Children's Health Insurance Program. If the Senate keeps the changes to Medicaid made in the House or goes even further on Medicaid, expect Hawley to stand up. The Moderates and the front-liners Republicans have a pretty favorable map in the coming midterms. With 53 seats, they only truly face risks in two swing state races: Thom Tillis' re-election campaign in North Carolina and Susan Collins' campaign in Michigan. Tillis for the most part has focused on renewing the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, the 2017 tax cuts that Trump signed in his first presidency. But Tillis also joined Sens. John Curtis of Utah, Jerry Moran of Kansas and Alaska's Lisa Murkowski, the most moderate Republican senator, on a letter calling to preserve renewable energy tax credits in the Inflation Reduction Act, former president Joe Biden's signature climate legislation. The House legislation phases out many of the credits and some conservatives, such as the aforementioned Lee and Scott, want a rollback in those credits. Historically, Republican moderates and swing-state incumbents have to eat the provisions conservatives insert into legislation. But if a handful of them break, there is a chance they might have leverage. The Senate Parliamentarian The most important person that Thune may have to convince is not even a senator, but rather a mostly anonymous rule keeper — the Senate parliamentarian. Consider the parliamentarian as the Senate's referee who polices the rules. The current parliamentarian, Elizabeth MacDonough, is seen by most as an impartial arbiter of the rules. MacDonough will be responsible for subjecting the bill to what is called the 'Byrd Bath,' the strict criteria for what can be included in budget reconciliation, named for the late majority leader Robert Byrd. Perhaps the biggest peril for Republicans will be if she rules that the revenue and spending parts of the bill are 'merely incidental' to the parts that do not relate directly to the budget. MacDonough infuriated progressive Democrats twice during Biden's presidency: once when she advised against allowing a minimum wage increase in the American Rescue Plan, Democrats' Covid relief legislation; and a second time when during the deliberations for Build Back Better when she advised against allowing immigration reform. Already, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) said Democrats plan to challenge the provision in the bill to restrict the ability of courts to hold government officials in contempt. Also expect other provisions on immigration and the ban on using Medicaid dollars to pay for gender-affirming care to be challenged. Donald Trump Yes, the president could become a stumbling block to his own bill. Even if Thune satisfies all members of his conference and gets most of the bill through the so-called Byrd Bath, Trump's approval matters most. While the president has never cared much about the intricacies of policies, he responds to public perception and opinion. If he thinks the bill will cause backlash as modified in the Senate because of spending or Medicaid cuts, he might send Thune back to the drawing board. Also, if it does not go far enough on beefing up immigration enforcement, he could balk and send it back.