Local artists push to use vacant church in Waterloo, Ont., as creative hub
Could a vacant church in Waterloo answer the prayers of local artists? CTV's Alexandra Holyk finds out.
One man's church is another man's treasure – at least, that's what artists in Waterloo Region are hoping for.
St. Columba Anglican Church in Waterloo, Ont., has sat empty for several months, but a local non-profit known as ArtsBuild Ontario wants to turn it into a creative hub.
'St. Columba can unlock all of that potential,' said ArtsBuild executive director Alex Glass. 'It's an incredible opportunity for the artists, for the neighbourhood, and for the community at large.'
Earlier this year, ArtsBuild launched a pilot program called 'Meanwhile Spaces,' which provides artists with free or low-rent facilities to pursue their projects. The program is hosted in two spaces so far – one in downtown Kitchener and another in Waterloo – and houses dozens of artists on a rotating basis.
'We have 50 artists on our roster who are looking for space,' said Glass.
The search for a space led ArtsBuild to 250 Lincoln Road. Back in February, the City of Waterloo purchased the church for $2.9 million with a plan to use the site for local arts programming, before eventually turning it into affordable housing.
'It's community supported, it's community initiated,' said Ward 5 Councillor Jen Vasic.
Waterloo Ward 5 Councillor Jen Vasic, Alex Glass, executive director of ArtsBuild Ontario
City of Waterloo Ward 5 Councillor Jen Vasic (left) stands with Alex Glass, executive director of ArtsBuild Ontario, outside St. Columba Anglican Church in Waterloo, Ont., on June 18, 2025. (Alexandra Holyk/CTV News)
Decision deferred
On Monday, Waterloo city council deferred the decision to sign a three-year lease agreement with ArtsBuild, citing cost concerns. The deferral motion narrowly passed with a vote of 4-3 and was brought forward by Ward 4 Councillor Diane Freeman.
Freeman noted the agreement would have 'financial implications' for the city.
'While we chose in February to dip into the reserve funds, the question now is was that the right thing to do?' Freeman asked.
As part of its $2.9 million purchase, the city allocated $500,000 to transform the space for artists and maintain operating costs.
Freeman also referenced her past stance on the future of St. Columba Church. She mentioned that she had not supported the motion in February, as she had preferred to see the area focused on affordable housing instead.
Vasic voted against the deferral, saying at the time she was 'embarrassed by the fact we're asking for one.'
'Is this an in good faith request?' Vasic asked in the meeting. 'Is this a deferral in good faith?'
Since the discussion, Vasic said she spoke with Freeman and understood her concerns.
'They're all really important matters,' Vasic said in an interview with CTV News Wednesday. 'Fiscal responsibility of the city, as well as arts and creative industries, and also housing.'
The decision was deferred to next week when council meets again on June 23.
Interior St. Columbia Anglican Church, Waterloo Ont.
The interior of St. Columba Anglican Church in Waterloo, Ont., was photographed on June 18, 2025. (Alexandra Holyk/CTV News)
Artists and community members speak out
People who live near St. Columba said they support the arts' initiative.
'I think it would be an ideal spot for the artists regionally, and for the community as a whole,' said Joanne Makulski, a local artist who lives across the street from the vacant church.
Artists like Jen Prior agree. A few months ago, Prior moved into the downtown Kitchener location as part of ArtsBuild's Meanwhile Spaces program.
'There's a huge need for it,' she said. 'I can't even tell you how many creatives I know that just don't have access to space.'
Artist Jen Prior Kitchener studio
Artist Jen Prior worked on a painting in a downtown Kitchener studio on June 18, 2025. (Alexandra Holyk/CTV News)
Rufus John also recently moved into a Meanwhile space at Wing404 in Waterloo. John founded Freedom Marching Project, an arts organization that curates safe creative spaces for marginalized and racialized youth.
'With ArtsBuild, what I really loved about the space is that we could call a space home for a while,' he said.
'Art can become expensive,' John continued. 'I think it's important that if a city can find ways to offset some of those costs, that would … be amazing.'
Prior also said cities need to step up and support the arts.
'I think the arts community here is really vibrant and we just really need more spaces for us to come together and to create, as well.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
an hour ago
- CBC
Alberta companies ordered to repay almost $165K to temporary foreign workers
Two Alberta-based companies are appealing Ontario labour ministry decisions that say they charged temporary foreign workers tens of thousands of dollars to be placed in retail jobs at a Canadian Tire. The companies were ordered to repay almost $165,000. Some of the workers were originally from the Philippines but ended up at a Canadian Tire in Etobicoke, Ont. Though they said they each paid up to $7,900 US to an Alberta company to get the position, once they got the jobs, they say they were underpaid and poorly treated. Many of the workers quit and found jobs in Atlantic Canada and other provinces around the country. An employment standards officer from the Ontario Ministry of Labour conducted an investigation following a series of complaints from workers in October 2023. The ministry issued repayment orders on May 14 against Allison Jones Consulting and AJ Immigration Group in eight cases. Both companies share an owner, Allison Jones, and a common address in St. Albert, Alta. "We trust the appeal process and are committed to a fair and accurate resolution based on a complete review of the facts," she wrote. One of the workers who received the recent decision was Rowell Pailan, who previously shared his story with CBC News from his home in Wolfville, N.S. Pailan says he came to Canada in 2023 after being offered a position as a stock clerk supervisor at an Ontario Canadian Tire. However, paystubs he showed CBC News indicated that while he started being paid at the wage in his contract, his wages were later reduced, making it challenging for him to pay his bills and provide for his family in the Philippines. He says he got the position after he paid the fee to Jones' company using money borrowed from family members. The Ontario Labour Ministry's employment standards officer said Jones should repay Pailan $10,655.52 in Canadian dollars, the calculated equivalent of the $7,900 US he paid in 2022, plus a ten per cent administration fee. "I [was] so happy and teary-eyed, because finally I got justice," he said in a phone interview. "Maybe they [were] thinking that they can do whatever they want, because we are eager to come into Canada," Pailan said, adding that he wants to send a message that people should not "take advantage" of temporary foreign workers. "We didn't have any idea about the amount in regards to the immigration fee, or whatever it is to come into Canada." Companies acted together, decision says It's illegal under federal and Ontario law for a recruiter to charge a foreign worker for a job placement; the recruiter is supposed to be paid by the employer. However, it is legal to charge a fee for immigration advice or assistance with immigration paperwork. In the written decision issued to Pailan and reviewed by CBC News, a lawyer for the two companies told the employment standards officer that Allison Jones Consulting and AJ Immigration are "separate and independent" companies, each with their own branding and invoicing. The lawyer told the officer that Allison Jones Consulting charged Canadian Tire for recruiting services, while AJ Immigration Group was a separate entity that provided immigration services to the foreign workers and charged them fees for these services. This did not convince employment standards officer Charles Beauparlant, who concluded the fees were not legal because both companies were related. He found they shared "common management" in the owner, Allison Jones. "It does not change the fact that both businesses functioned as one comprehensive and unified business," Beauparlant wrote in his decision in Pailan's case. Jones' position, according to the lawyer, was that she is the "directing mind" behind the recruitment company, but not the other company as she "does not participate in the day-to-day operation of AJ Immigration." In her email to CBC News, Jones re-stated her position. "We respectfully disagree with the findings and with the characterization of these two companies — Allison Jones Consulting Services Inc. and AJ Immigration Group Inc. — as a 'unified business,' " she wrote. "Each is a distinct legal entity, and both maintain that their respective practices fully comply with applicable legislation." Beauparlant found that evidence like employee emails and information on Jones' two business websites showed both companies were sharing employees and that Jones was the "controlling mind" behind both. He also noted that Jones was described as the leader of both companies in a sentence on the website for Allison Jones Consulting that read: "She has successfully led the companies since inception creating one of Canada's leading recruitment agencies and immigration consultancies." As well, Beauparlant wrote, "having AJ Immigration Group Inc. collect fees through a retainer agreement after each phase of recruitment demonstrates not only their involvement but further confirms that AJ Immigration was assisting in the process of finding the claimant employment." Pailan previously told CBC News that he had to pay in three stages. The officer issued identical orders to both of Jones' companies, but the Ontario Labour Ministry told CBC News the intent was that the companies should repay Pailan "jointly," not twice over. The ministry also fined Allison Jones Consulting $250 for each of the eight cases, totalling $2,000. 'An affront to our entire system' Chris Ramsaroop is an instructor at the University of Toronto and an organizer with Justice for Migrant Workers, which supported Pailan's case. He says it concerns him that workers must be the ones to ensure the process is followed. "There's an expectation that [the workers] need to come forward, rather than the province or the federal government taking steps to protect the interests of workers," he said. "This is an affront to our entire system — this is disgusting." Ramsaroop feels temporary foreign workers like Pailan are in extremely vulnerable positions, and placing the onus on them to pursue the case to the next level when there is an appeal is a high burden. Pailan says he worries that he won't get the money back after an appeal. "That amount is not a joke, it's totally big," he said, adding that he's trying to repay his relatives who lent him the money. Ramsaroop noted that temporary foreign workers are often tied to a single job by virtue of the closed-permit system, which makes their position in Canada vulnerable. "These injustices will continue as a result of a system where we have workers tied to a particular employer," he said. WATCH | Why this professor believes closed permit system should end: HR professor on why closed work permit system should end 8 months ago Duration 2:39 Canadian Tire store still under investigation The Ontario Ministry of Labour confirmed it's also investigating complaints against the Canadian Tire store where the workers were employed, but the case is still open. There is a separate federal investigation underway by Employment and Social Development Canada into that Canadian Tire, but as of early June, it wasn't complete either. The store owner, Ezhil Natarajan, previously told CBC News he "vehemently denies" all the allegations against him. Canadian Tire Corporation made a policy change in the fall of 2024 to prohibit its stores from using recruiters that charge fees to temporary foreign workers. The corporation said it made the decision together with its dealers, who own franchised stores and make their own hiring decisions.
National Post
an hour ago
- National Post
Ottawa in 'serious breach' in allowing used choppers to patrol border, industry says
OTTAWA — Canada's helicopter industry is charging the federal government with a 'serious breach' in allowing the RCMP to patrol the Canada-U.S. border with antiquated military helicopters that don't meet the government's own safety regulations, National Post has learned. Article content The second-hand helicopters, purchased on the open market by private Canadian operators who were then hired by the RCMP, were granted highly unusual special exemptions by Transport Canada. But documents show that the industry is accusing the federal government of breaking its own rules by allowing used choppers that don't meet Canadian safety standards and aren't supposed to carry passengers or even fly over developed areas. Article content Article content Article content 'It's not even something that should be considered,' said Trevor Mitchell, chief executive of the Helicopter Association of Canada (HAC), about the government's decision to provide the special exemptions. 'Why do some have to follow the rules and some don't?' Article content Article content For at least the last three years, the RCMP has been relying on a small number of private contractors to help patrol the border in search of illegal migrants, drug smugglers and other illicit activities. Those contractors, including two based in Ontario, have been using up to four Black Hawk helicopters that were purchased on the second-hand market after the U.S. military decided to update much of its own fleet. Article content According to the government's Canadian Civil Aircraft Register, the second-hand Sikorsky Black Hawk UH 60As are each at least 40 years old and were imported between 2022 and last year. Article content The special exemptions from Transport Canada, the industry says in a series of letters to senior government officials, allowed them to do non-military jobs in Canadian air space. Article content Article content HAC also says that the twin-engine Black Hawks didn't come with 'type certificates,' which act like recipe books for new owners in that they provide details about the aircraft's parts and how it should be maintained. Article content Article content But in a March 20 letter to Transport Minister Chrystia Freeland, Mitchell said even the conditions attached to the exemptions — such as not being allowed to carry passengers or fly over developed areas — have not been followed. 'We urge you to direct your department to ensure the safety restrictions attached to these aircraft are strictly enforced for the balance of the RCMP's contract and that the Force be urged to select a certified aircraft before the contract expires.' Article content The Canadian helicopter industry, which relies heavily on conforming to streams of rules and regulations as its safety pillars, is angry and confused over Transport's decision, Mitchell said. 'It's the hottest topic in the industry.'
CBC
an hour ago
- CBC
Nearly half of national public pension plan is invested in U.S. — and only 12% in Canada
Social Sharing As a former top Finance Department official, Susan Peterson played a key role years ago in creating the stable Canada Pension Plan that we see today. But even she was surprised by the numbers. A few weeks ago, the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board (CPPIB) revealed that 12 per cent of the CPP's assets are invested in Canada — its lowest level ever. The largest chunk of its $714-billion fund, 47 per cent, is currently invested in the United States — its highest level ever. Peterson doesn't think she's the only one surprised. "If Canadians knew out of the $714 billion such a miniscule amount was invested in Canada, I think they would say, whoa, what's wrong with this picture." The CPPIB is not alone. Experts say the Canada Pension Plan (CPP) is one of several Canadian pension plans that have been investing far more in the U.S. than in Canada in recent years. The CPP, whose investments are managed by the CPPIB, also known as CPP Investments, is a public pension plan that covers millions of Canadian workers across the country with the exception of Quebec, which has its own manager, the Caisse de dépôt et placement. Those who support this high level of U.S. investment, including the CPPIB itself, argue the plan's mandate is to make money. They argue U.S. investments offer more diversity and higher returns — which help ensure the plan will be able to pay out benefits for years to come. Others, however, question why the plan isn't doing more to invest in Canada to create Canadian jobs and infrastructure projects. They are also concerned about the plan's U.S. exposure at a time when President Donald Trump's administration has made the country a riskier place to invest. The Trump administration's "big, beautiful" tax reform bill also contains a section that risks hitting Canadian pension funds that have U.S. investments with a new withholding tax that experts predict could cost Canadians and Canadian companies billions if it is adopted. Some pension funds, like the Public Sector Pension Investment Board which has 41 per cent of its assets invested in the U.S., have said in recent days that they are reconsidering their U.S. exposure and are looking for more Canadian investment opportunities. Michel Leduc, head of public affairs and communications for the CPPIB, says it has to invest for the long term, regardless of individual governments or administrations. "We're investing money for people who aren't even born yet," he said. "That long-term thinking must be the strongest pillar of how we think about our investment strategy." But he says the CPPIB at the same time isn't "short-term stupid." "We're continuing to think through what could be some of the bigger impacts," he said. Leduc said the U.S. percentage has grown even though the fund has been diversifying away from the U.S. because the existing investments have grown in value. "U.S. stocks have gone up," he said. "It's just because we make good investments." Time to invest at home again? The CPPIB is also open to Canadian investment opportunities, Leduc said. Prime Minister Mark Carney has announced plans to invest and build in Canada. He has mentioned pension funds as one possible source of money. Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne said the government plans to host pension funds interested in investing at home. "People see Canada as the place to invest," Champagne told CBC News. "So, we'll always be talking to them and investors from around the world." There was a time when the CPP primarily invested in Canada. Initially, it was operated as a pay-as-you-go model with investments in Canada, largely in government bonds. However, in the late 1990s the pension plan was facing a crisis — Canada's chief auditor predicted that it would run out of money by 2014 unless something was done. Spearheaded by then finance minister Paul Martin, and aided by officials like Peterson, the federal government and provinces agreed to a package of reforms, including the creation of the CPPIB. While the CPPIB is a Crown corporation, it operates independently from government. For years, a foreign property rule capped the amount pension funds could invest outside Canada. Introduced in 1971, it limited investments by pension funds to 10 per cent of their assets going abroad. That was raised to 20 per cent in the 1990s and then 30 per cent in 2001. In his 2005 budget, Finance Minister Ralph Goodale repealed that rule, saying the move had the potential to increase venture capital investments by pension plans in Canada. Since then, there has been a steady reduction in the value of CPP's investments in Canada and a steady rise in U.S. investments. U.S. stocks rise in value In 2005, 74 per cent of the CPP's assets were invested in Canada. By 2015 it was down to 24.1 per cent. For the last two years it has stood at 12 per cent. At the same time, the plan's assets have grown — from $81.3 billion in 2005 to $714 billion on March 31. Its assets are projected to hit $1 trillion in the next few years, making it one of the largest pension plans in the world. However, as the proportion of the CPP's investment in Canada has dropped and its assets in the U.S. has increased, so too have questions about where the money is going. In March 2024, dozens of top Canadian executives penned an open letter to Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland and provincial finance ministers, concerned with "the decline in Canadian investments by pension funds and its impact on the Canadian economy." They called on the ministers "to amend the rules governing pension funds to encourage them to invest in Canada." "Investments made in Canada do not impact just pension portfolios; they also have a considerable impact on the country's economy; generating jobs, improving incomes and increasing contributions to retirement plans," the executives wrote. In April 2024, the federal government appointed former Bank of Canada governor Stephen Poloz to look at how to "catalyze greater domestic investment opportunities for Canadian pension funds." That resulted in proposals in the fall economic statement including measures to make it easier for pension funds to invest in Canadian companies, municipal-owned utility corporations, airports and AI data centres. Daniel Brosseau, co-founder of the Montreal investment firm Letko Brosseau, is concerned by the "long-term erosion" in Canadian pension fund investment in Canada and its impact on the economy. "It's been a long-term decline, and we're basically investing very little in Canada now," he said. Brosseau doubts the measures in the fall economic update will make much of a difference. "They don't allow the pension funds to distinguish between a Canadian and a foreign investment in any way," he said. "They will have no effect." Instead, Brosseau suggests the government tax the foreign income of pension plans. "They could clearly see a difference between a Canadian investment and a foreign investment, and that would change their behaviour," he said. Chris Roberts, director of social and economic policy for the Canadian Labour Congress, says the CPP's role in the Canadian economy is an important debate that is about to heat up — and he wants all Canadians to participate. "These are people who pay into the CPP every day and will draw a CPP benefit when they retire," he said. "They're often of the view that the CPP Investment Fund should invest more at home and create jobs and economic opportunities here in Canada." Lessons from Quebec Unlike Quebec's Caisse, which has a double mandate to make money and to also invest in Quebec's economic development, the CPP's only mandate is to make money, Roberts said. Sen. Clément Gignac, an economist by profession and a former Quebec cabinet minister, has asked questions in Senate proceedings about where the CPP is investing. He says Quebec has successfully made money for the province's retirement fund while also bolstering economic development. Gignac said Carney's pledge to invest in infrastructure could create opportunities for the CPP and other pension funds to invest in Canada. "Do we need to change the mandate officially, or will it come naturally?" he said. Gignac would like a Senate committee or a special commission to take a closer look at how Canada's largest pension plans, dubbed the Maple Eight, are investing their assets abroad. "If anything happens and geopolitics deteriorate, or we have a hostile foreign country who suddenly seize our assets, just like we have seized assets from Russia … or change the rules of the game on taxation, just like Mr. Trump wants to change them — it would be important if we have a robust risk-management analysis." Trish McAuliffe, president of the National Pensioners Federation, said her members would like to see prudent, ethical investment by the CPPIB as well as increased investment in Canada. "We love nothing better than to see great investments here…. investments in infrastructure, hospitals. Things that will benefit our age demographic but also our community at large," she said. McAuliffe said the federation attends stakeholder meetings with the CPPIB, and while at the early stages, she expects the question will be part of the federation's convention in October. "We're hopeful … that they're going to make the right decisions," she said. "But make no mistake — people are watching."
