The New Pope and Why the World is Enthralled With Him
このページを 日本語 で読む
Pope Francis passed away on April 21, and his successor, Pope Leo XIV, has now ascended to the papacy. In the weeks leading up to the May 18 inauguration, I followed this historic transition closely, drawing on my years of research into the papacy and its long lineage.
Remarkably, even in Japan, a predominantly non-Christian nation with just 410,000 Catholics, representing a mere 0.03% of the global Catholic population, the conclave drew widespread interest. Media outlets across the world, including those in Muslim-majority countries, provided detailed coverage of the event.
On April 20, during Easter celebrations, Pope Francis made a surprise appearance on the balcony of St Peter's Basilica, stunning the faithful. He passed away early the next morning. In that final, unexpected moment, he drew on every last reserve of strength to offer himself fully to the people, an act that epitomized the lifelong devotion expected of God's representative on earth.
There was little time for mourning before a wave of interview requests came flooding in. Alongside serious news programs, even entertainment talk shows reached out with a barrage of questions: "Where does the word 'conclave' come from?' "Who's the frontrunner for the papacy?' "What do the cardinals eat?'
This spike in public curiosity was no doubt fueled by Conclave , a film still showing in Japanese theaters. Set in a sealed chamber cut off from the outside world, it dramatizes the political maneuvering behind the selection of a new pope — fiction that quickly became reality. Pope Francis attends the weekly general audience in Saint Peter's Square at the Vatican, June 5, 2024. (©Reuters/Yara Nardi)
When the official start date of the conclave, May 7, was announced, I promptly canceled my planned trip to the United States and rerouted to the Vatican, the heart of the Roman Catholic Church.
I attended the memorial Mass for Pope Francis and had the rare chance to witness, from inside St Peter's Basilica, the procession of cardinals participating in the conclave. Each time a cardinal from a particular country entered, the faithful from that nation erupted in applause. At a separate Mass, I was fortunate enough to briefly speak with Japanese Cardinal Isao Kikuchi.
As the conclave approached, preparations intensified. Every day, cardinals gathered behind the basilica in the Synod Hall for discussions that lasted hours.
The square outside was thick with anticipation. Global media and paparazzi waited eagerly, zooming in on even the smallest gestures. If a conservative cardinal was spotted walking beside another, headlines exploded with speculation. Pundits wondered aloud if it signaled secret talks or a brewing counteroffensive against Francis's reformers.
On the first day of the conclave, a single round of voting ended in deadlock. Black smoke rose from the chimney of the Sistine Chapel, signaling that no pope had been chosen. Still, the crowd of faithful and journalists held their ground. By the second day, their numbers had only grown. Once again, the morning vote yielded black smoke. Some drifted away for lunch, but as the afternoon session approached, St Peter's Square quickly filled again.
Then, just as the tension began to dissipate, a sudden shift: white smoke began to rise. A new pope had been elected. The square exploded with cheers and emotion.
Most were convinced they would see Cardinal Parolin of Italy, the clear favorite, step onto the balcony. Instead, it was Cardinal Prevost of the United States who emerged. The unexpected outcome prompted scattered boos from disappointed Italian worshippers.
But hearts quickly turned as the new pope stepped forward and spoke his first words: "Peace be with you.' He vowed to reshape the Catholic Church into a bridge for dialogue, an institution of connection rather than division.
With decades of experience in the Peruvian Church and strong backing from Latin American nations like Argentina and Brazil, a chorus erupted from the "cheering squad from the other side of the world.' Cries of "Leo! Leo! Leo!' echoed through the square, transforming it into something more akin to a jubilant football stadium than a solemn religious site.
Cardinal Parolin, widely viewed as the frontrunner and known for his closeness to China, had entered the conclave with 40 votes. He later gained another 30 from supporters of Cardinal Tagle of the Philippines, putting him over 70. However, he still fell shy of the 89 needed for the two-thirds majority.
In the final rounds, momentum shifted. Parolin's backers, along with African cardinals, many from former French colonies who shared cultural ties with Prevost, and the Latin American bloc, threw their support behind Cardinal Prevost. He ultimately secured over 100 votes, sealing his election as the new pope.
Given that Pope Leo XIV hails from the US, speculation quickly surfaced about potential influence from President Donald Trump. However, Cardinals Burke and Dolan, reportedly Trump's preferred candidates, were ultimately not selected.
Former Japanese Prime Minister Taro Aso, who was baptized with the Christian name Francis, attended the inauguration. He is said to have had conversations with US Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio during the event.
Vance had sharply criticized Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in February. However, at the Vatican, the two met again following the new pope's inaugural mass. A photo of Vance and Zelenskyy smiling together was later posted on social media, hinting at a potential thaw. Ukrainian President Zelenskyy (right) and his wife Olena (center) meet with Pope Leo XIV (left) at the Vatican. May 18 (©Reuters)
Vance had also previously clashed with the pope. However, he signaled a willingness to work with the new pontiff to help end the Russia-Ukraine war, even though they remain at odds over immigration policy, a key concern for the Vatican.
The Vatican, under the leadership of the pope, has been the world's smallest sovereign state and a symbol of permanent neutrality since 1929. Throughout modern history, it has often served as a quiet but influential mediator in international political disputes.
Amid a world growing ever more unstable, starting with the renewed tariff wars under a second Trump administration, many are now turning to the newly elected pope as a potential beacon of reason and stability.
This may help explain the extraordinary global attention surrounding this papal election. It is an interest that reaches far beyond matters of faith.
(Read the article in Japanese .)
Author: Saho Matsumoto, Professor, College of International Relations, Nihon University.
このページを 日本語 で読む
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
8 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Calls to action
A trio of books on reconciliation were all released within the span of a few weeks ahead of the summer publishing season. Who are they each for? Readers wanting to learn more about their role in the 94 calls to action in the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), but who are unsure where to start, might find one or more of these titles a valuable resource, depending on their current base of knowledge and what they hope to get out of it. ● ● ● Kathryne Langsford photo Bruce McIvor Kathryne Langsford photo Bruce McIvor Bruce McIvor (Standoff: Why Reconciliation Fails Indigenous People and How to Fix It) is Red River Métis, an adjunct professor at UBC law school and a founder and senior partner at First Peoples Law. He wrote Indigenous Rights in One Minute which covers, concisely, over 100 different legal concepts, court decisions and pieces of legislation related to Indigenous rights. The central conceit, from which McIvor does not waver, is that each item — from the Doctrine of Discovery to Section 35 to the Haida Decision — is covered in about one minute of reading or less. Indigenous Rights in One Minute Indigenous Rights in One Minute The attorney and author briefly covers the history and current legal relevance of every legal footnote that contributes to the current judicial and legislative understanding of the rights of Indigenous people as well as Indigenous Peoples, each one in a page or two. With a detailed table of contents as well as a glossary, index and list of further reading, the book is certainly set up to act as a handy reference text for non-lawyers who nevertheless may be affected by, or otherwise desiring to be aware of, the relevant case law. It might also be a crucial resource for many working in or with advocacy organizations, or Indigenous and non-Indigenous governments. While it is very possible to jump around in the text, there is a throughline here. Reading the book from front to back builds in the reader a sense of the general shape of Indigenous rights in Canada, its current state, the historical forces that have shaped those rights and the directions it might move towards in the future. McIvor warns at the very beginning that he has a point of view and that he will share it. But even his editorial comments are brief and evidence-based. The one-minute constraint doesn't allow him to add many rhetorical flourishes, and blunt observations, such as that Aboriginal title is intentionally limited 'to ensure it doesn't become an insurmountable obstacle to removing Indigenous people from their lands so those lands can be exploited by non-Indigenous people,' are hard to deny on the facts. The courtroom battles Indigenous individuals and communities have been taking on against the Canadian government mirror the extensive legal work taken on by American Civil Rights activists since the 1960s. For a non-lawyer to make a proper survey of even a small field of law is not easy, and there's so much hard-to-find information packed in here, it's easy to imagine this slim layperson's reference volume will become a permanent resident of any shelves it lands upon. ● ● ● Supplied photo Rose LeMay Supplied photo Rose LeMay For first-time author Rose LeMay, the complete opposite approach made the most sense when writing Ally Is a Verb. LeMay is Tlingit, still operates in her First Nation's homeland in B.C. and has made a career as a speaker and corporate trainer specializing in practical steps allies can take in implementing the TRC's Calls to Action for reconciliation. Her book often reads like it could be spoken aloud in a meeting space — the writing is dynamic, conversational and passionate. If McIvor thought it necessary to note that he is not impartial on the topics he writes about, LeMay's point of view is so immediately clear that any such disclaimer would be unnecessary. In her second chapter, Unpacking the Great Canadian Lie, LeMay muses about whether a bloodier but briefer direct military conflict — such as occurred between Indigenous Peoples and the United States army, especially throughout the 19th century — might actually have been preferable in some ways to what actually occurred in this country. At least then, she reckons, the enemy would have been clearly identifiable. Instead, bearing the pretended benevolence of the Indian Act, LeMay writes that, 'Canada walked in smiling and held out its hand to shake, while the other hand was stealing our children and our land.' Ally is a Verb Ally is a Verb LeMay modelled her book on the change management approach she uses as a trainer: you explain the problem, present a solution and get people on board with being part of that solution. So she spends some of the first few chapters with a primer on the history of Indigenous Peoples' mistreatment at the hands of the Canadian government, from pre-Confederation to the Indian Act to residential schools, of which many in her own family were survivors. But before even this, LeMay spends some time in the opening chapter discussing the idea of reconciliation itself and how it can look, comparing Canada to three other countries that went through this process: Germany took a court-based approach post-Holocaust in the Nuremberg Trials, South Africa formed its own Truth and Reconciliation Commission after apartheid and Rwanda, after the 1994 genocide, landed somewhere in between. LeMay makes some thoughtful observations about the advantages and disadvantages of each approach, noting that our own government-created TRC had the effect of casting Canada itself as an observer and facilitator, neatly sidestepping the role of either perpetrator or defendant. These comparisons comprise some of the strongest insights of the book, and it's a good initial framing to set up subsequent chapters. The book also has some weak spots that probably stem from being adapted from oral content polished over the course of many live workshops and keynotes, and not undergoing all the changes appropriate to a written book-length format. Some chapters are veritably packed with a minutiae of stray observations that would make a real-time discussion more dynamic but make a written argument more muddled. At times quotes that aren't real quotes but rather air-quoted imitations of a hypothetical person or anthropomorphized institution (e.g., the Government of Canada) are written down using actual quotation marks. LeMay's book seems geared towards use in organizations for internal training. The chapters each end with a list of next steps and resources for further reading, making them well-suited as a ready-out-of-the-box corporate training program, wherein a facilitator or team leader might assign a chapter and set a meeting each week to discuss. Though one imagines most organizations would do better to hire LeMay to run the training herself, if they have the budget. ● ● ● Mike Deal / Free Press files David A. Robertson Mike Deal / Free Press files David A. Robertson David. A Robertson (the Misewa Saga; 7 Generations, a Plains Cree Saga) is the most experienced author of the group, having written numerous graphic novels as well as several works of fiction and non-fiction. He is a member of Norway House Cree Nation on his father's side but was raised mainly in Winnipeg, where he is still based. The idea of 52 Ways to Reconcile is to take one step towards reconciliation every week, with enough chapters to fill a full year, though that doesn't mean the book can't be read faster than that. Indeed, the engaging style makes it hard to stop after one short chapter. 52 Ways to Reconcile 52 Ways to Reconcile As with McIvor's book, 52 Ways could potentially be read out of order; after all, there's no reason that checking out an Indigenous restaurant (Week #33) can't come before engaging with Indigenous social media (Week #3). But there is a personal narrative threaded throughout 52 Ways, and to pick and choose chapters and not read the whole thing would be a shame. Robertson provides a mix of ways to advance reconciliation, some easier and others more involved. They may include putting either your time or money where your mouth is by supporting Indigenous communities or groups, learning an important lesson on land acknowledgements or unchecked idioms, or supporting and enjoying Indigenous creators in a variety of contexts, from film to music to podcasts to food to tourism to comics. Every chapter includes both a heartfelt case for why a given task is worth doing, another little bit of the author's personal journey in advancing reconciliation and a number of specific examples of where you can get started on any given week's suggestion. Robertson already consumes a lot of Indigenous media, supports a lot of Indigenous organizations and follows a lot of Indigenous sport teams, so he is not short on examples. Want a good podcast that will teach you about missing and murdered Indigenous women; a good Indigenous non-fiction, fiction or comic book writer; country band; jazz band; or electronica band? Robertson has at least one suggestion, but usually offers several. Of the three books covered here, Robertson's 52 Ways to Reconcile is probably the most universally accessible; indeed it should appeal to almost anyone. Of course that doesn't mean that any two, or even all three, of these books aren't worth picking up depending on what the reader wants to get out of each title, and how much reading time they have available. Joel Boyce is a Winnipeg writer and educator.
Toronto Star
9 hours ago
- Toronto Star
Can an American pope apply US-style fundraising and standards to fix troubled Vatican finances?
VATICAN CITY (AP) — As a bishop in Peru, Robert Prevost was often on the lookout for used cars that he could buy cheap and fix up himself for use in parishes around his diocese. With cars that were really broken down, he'd watch YouTube videos to learn how to fix them. That kind of make-do-with-less, fix-it-yourself mentality could serve Pope Leo XIV well as he addresses one of the greatest challenges facing him as pope: The Holy See's chronic, 50 million to 60 million euro ($57-68 million) structural deficit, 1 billion euro ($1.14 billion) pension fund shortfall and declining donations that together pose something of an existential threat to the central government of the 1.4-billion strong Catholic Church.
Winnipeg Free Press
9 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
How the Vatican manages money and where Pope Leo XIV might find more
VATICAN CITY (AP) — The world's smallest country has a big budget problem. The Vatican doesn't tax its residents or issue bonds. It primarily finances the Catholic Church's central government through donations that have been plunging, ticket sales for the Vatican Museums, as well as income from investments and an underperforming real estate portfolio. The last year the Holy See published a consolidated budget, in 2022, it projected 770 million euros ($878 million), with the bulk paying for embassies around the world and Vatican media operations. In recent years, it hasn't been able to cover costs. That leaves Pope Leo XIV facing challenges to drum up the funds needed to pull his city-state out of the red. Withering donations Anyone can donate money to the Vatican, but the regular sources come in two main forms. Canon law requires bishops around the world to pay an annual fee, with amounts varying and at bishops' discretion 'according to the resources of their dioceses.' U.S. bishops contributed over one-third of the $22 million (19.3 million euros) collected annually under the provision from 2021-2023, according to Vatican data. The other main source of annual donations is more well-known to ordinary Catholics: Peter's Pence, a special collection usually taken on the last Sunday of June. From 2021-2023, individual Catholics in the U.S. gave an average $27 million (23.7 million euros) to Peter's Pence, more than half the global total. American generosity hasn't prevented overall Peter's Pence contributions from cratering. After hitting a high of $101 million (88.6 million euros) in 2006, contributions hovered around $75 million (66.8 million euros) during the 2010's then tanked to $47 million (41.2 million euros) during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, when many churches were closed. Donations remained low in the following years, amid revelations of the Vatican's bungled investment in a London property, a former Harrod's warehouse that it hoped to develop into luxury apartments. The scandal and ensuing trial confirmed that the vast majority of Peter's Pence contributions had funded the Holy See's budgetary shortfalls, not papal charity initiatives as many parishioners had been led to believe. Peter's Pence donations rose slightly in 2023 and Vatican officials expect more growth going forward, in part because there has traditionally been a bump immediately after papal elections. New donors The Vatican bank and the city state's governorate, which controls the museums, also make annual contributions to the pope. As recently as a decade ago, the bank gave the pope around 55 million euros ($62.7 million) a year to help with the budget. But the amounts have dwindled; the bank gave nothing specifically to the pope in 2023, despite registering a net profit of 30 million euros ($34.2 million), according to its financial statements. The governorate's giving has likewise dropped off. Some Vatican officials ask how the Holy See can credibly ask donors to be more generous when its own institutions are holding back. Leo will need to attract donations from outside the U.S., no small task given the different culture of philanthropy, said the Rev. Robert Gahl, director of the Church Management Program at Catholic University of America's business school. He noted that in Europe there is much less of a tradition (and tax advantage) of individual philanthropy, with corporations and government entities doing most of the donating or allocating designated tax dollars. Even more important is leaving behind the 'mendicant mentality' of fundraising to address a particular problem, and instead encouraging Catholics to invest in the church as a project, he said. Speaking right after Leo's installation ceremony in St. Peter's Square, which drew around 200,000 people, Gahl asked: 'Don't you think there were a lot of people there that would have loved to contribute to that and to the pontificate?' In the U.S., donation baskets are passed around at every Sunday Mass. Not so at the Vatican. Untapped real estate The Vatican has 4,249 properties in Italy and 1,200 more in London, Paris, Geneva and Lausanne, Switzerland. Only about one-fifth are rented at fair market value, according to the annual report from the APSA patrimony office, which manages them. Some 70% generate no income because they house Vatican or other church offices; the remaining 10% are rented at reduced rents to Vatican employees. In 2023, these properties only generated 35 million euros ($39.9 million) in profit. Financial analysts have long identified such undervalued real estate as a source of potential revenue. But Ward Fitzgerald, the president of the U.S.-based Papal Foundation, which finances papal charities, said the Vatican should also be willing to sell properties, especially those too expensive to maintain. Many bishops are wrestling with similar downsizing questions as the number of church-going Catholics in parts of the U.S. and Europe shrinks and once-full churches stand empty. Toward that end, the Vatican recently sold the property housing its embassy in Tokyo's high-end Sanbancho neighborhood, near the Imperial Palace, to a developer building a 13-story apartment complex, according to the Kensetsu News trade journal. Yet there has long been institutional reluctance to part with even money-losing properties. Witness the Vatican announcement in 2021 that the cash-strapped Fatebenefratelli Catholic hospital in Rome, run by a religious order, would not be sold. Pope Francis simultaneously created a Vatican fundraising foundation to keep it and other Catholic hospitals afloat. Sundays Kevin Rollason's Sunday newsletter honouring and remembering lives well-lived in Manitoba. 'They have to come to grips with the fact that they own so much real estate that is not serving the mission of the church,' said Fitzgerald, who built a career in real estate private equity. ___ AP reporter Mari Yamaguchi in Tokyo contributed. ___ Associated Press religion coverage receives support through the AP's collaboration with The Conversation US, with funding from Lilly Endowment Inc. The AP is solely responsible for this content.
