Cal Poly's swimming and diving programs won't be reinstated despite fundraising efforts
SAN LUIS OBISPO, Calif. (AP) — A fundraising campaign to save the recently eliminated Cal Poly men's and women's swimming and diving programs came up short and the programs will not be reinstated, university president Jeffrey D. Armstrong announced this week.
The school announced the elimination of the programs in March, citing the financial hardships expected to arrive next month when schools can begin sharing revenue with athletes.
Advertisement
The Save Cal Poly Swim and Dive group was formed to try and save the programs. It's unclear how much the group raised, but Armstrong said in a statement it wasn't enough.
'I appreciate the efforts of many to attempt to raise the permanent funds needed to reinstate the swimming and diving programs at Cal Poly,' he said. 'While I appreciate the significant annual support and revocable bequests that have been identified, the fundraising effort has fallen well short of the goal to reinstate the program. As a result, the university is unable to reinstate the swimming and diving programs.'
He added that they extended the deadline and lowered the amount needed to give them a chance to save the programs.
'The university made several changes in good faith throughout the effort, including implementing multiple extensions to the deadline dates and lowering the threshold of permanent funds for an endowment to the absolute minimum that would be required to realistically support the programs,' he said.
Advertisement
The school said in March that athletes who were impacted by the elimination of the programs would have their scholarships honored as long as they are at Cal Poly or they can enter the transfer portal. Coaches did not have their contracts renewed after they expired in April. The school, a member of the Big West Conference, will sponsor 20 sports going forward.
The House settlement, which was approved June 6, is expected to financially benefit football and basketball stars at the biggest schools, who are likely to receive a big chunk of the $20.5 million per year that colleges are permitted to share with athletes over the next year. Schools across the country are deciding which sports to keep.
Armstrong said the move was difficult but that it was unavoidable.
'This is an unfortunate reality given the approved NCAA House settlement, state budget and the tenuous situation moving forward for both the state and the NCAA," he said. "I want to reiterate that the significant and unequitable changes in the NCAA and the House settlement (and new organizations resulting from this settlement) had an impact that weighed heavily in this decision.'
___
AP college sports: https://apnews.com/hub/college-sports
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
From heat to unrest: how five major Club World Cup storylines are shaping up
The Club World Cup is into the second round of games in the group stage, with matches across the United States showing off all that was hotly anticipated about this newly expanded tournament, as well as a few concerns. Here's a breakdown of five major storylines we were keeping track of before the games, and where we stand. Attendances Your view on how well-attended these games have been depends heavily on your perspective. Empty seats have been visible, sometimes in great numbers, at nearly every game (none of which have been sellouts). That said, the raw attendance numbers have not been half-bad, considering that many kick-off times have fallen at noon or 3pm during work days. Advertisement There have been 20 games at the Club World Cup so far. The average attendance has been 35,525. The median is about the same. About 730,000 tickets have been sold or distributed for these matches. All of these are reasonably solid figures. On the other hand, the stadiums have, on average, been about 55% full. The median percentage of capacity used – a figure that gives less weight to outliers such as the 3,142 who attended Mamelodi Sundowns v Ulsan in Orlando – is 45%. With a few exceptions, the tournament is being playing in massive NFL stadiums, and that means a lot of empty seats. The environments, though, have largely been very good. South American fans in particular have brought it, with Brazilians in New York and Argentinians in Miami creating noisy and invested atmospheres that seem right at home at a tournament with the World Cup name. Thanks to the massiveness of these stadiums, though, the optics are not always the best. Heat and weather It's been hot at times, but the tournament has also been lucky so far in that many cities, especially New York, have been experiencing cooler-than-normal temperatures over the past week. The most notable exception was Paris Saint-Germain v Atlético Madrid at the Rose Bowl in Pasadena, California, where the heat combined with crowd control issues and a lack of water contributed to what the Guardian was told was a 'dangerous' environment for fans. It wasn't comfortable for the players either. Advertisement 'Playing in this heat is impossible,' Atlético's Marcos Llorente said after. 'The heat is terrible. My toes hurt, even my toenails … We are adapting to the heat of playing at these hours … no one in Europe is used to it.' The next several days will see more of these situations. A brutal heatwave is set to hit much of the eastern United States starting on Friday, covering many of the stadiums where the remaining games will be played. Evening kick-offs will be hot but theoretically bearable once the sun is down. The problematic games will be those that kick off in the afternoon local time – there are 14 of those left in the group stage, including six that start at noon, when the heat will probably be at its worst in the direct sunlight. And that's without even getting into weather delays. Already, there have been three weather-related delays – mostly for lightning as thunderstorms have gathered amid the humid weather. There is very little Fifa can do about those, of course – but it's a trend worth keeping an eye on. There is a chance, of course, the delays could disrupt the simultaneous kick-offs in the group finales. Political unrest The opening matches of this tournament were awash with reports that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice) and/or Customs and Border Protection officers would be present at games and looking to continue their public raids, which have been met with counterprotests across the country. That has yet to happen. Advertisement Make no mistake, security is high at these games, as they are at any major sporting event in the United States. But there haven't been any reported attempts at mass arrests as there have been in other places around the country. That is not to say politics, world events and the tournament haven't overlapped. Mehdi Taremi, Inter's Iran striker, has been forced to miss the tournament after being stuck in Tehran after Israel's attacks on the city. And this week Fifa's president, Gianni Infantino, and a delegation from Juventus (including the US internationals Weston McKennie and Tim Weah) stood in the Oval Office as Trump answered questions about a potential war with Iran and awkwardly asked the players if women could play for Juventus (a reference to the right-wing talking point about trans women in women's sports). Club performances On the field, the story of the tournament so far has been the performance of South American clubs. Teams representing Conmebol have not lost, the only undefeated confederation remaining after one matchday in every group. They've achieved some pretty big results along the way – including Botafogo's 1-0 win over the reigning Champions League winners PSG on Thursday night, and River Plate's 2-2 draw with Benfica. Advertisement Asian and Oceanian teams are having far less fun. The confederations' five teams have yet to win, with Auckland City suffering a 10-0 demolition by Bayern Munich. The lone bright spot for Asian clubs was Al-Hilal's 1-1 draw with Real Madrid – a game in which the Saudi Pro League side looked every bit Madrid's equals in Xabi Alonso's first game in charge. Generally speaking, and in line with past editions of the Club World Cup, the so-called 'smaller' teams are the ones bringing real life to this party, while most Uefa teams are waiting for their first big challenge. The final group games and knockouts should be plenty of fun. Standout players It's a bit early to say anyone is making a case for the Golden Ball given most teams have played one game, but a few players have stood out. Advertisement One, unsurprisingly, is Lionel Messi. The Inter Miami superstar is a player Fifa bent over backwards to get into the tournament, awarding Miami a 'host nation' slot after they failed to qualify through other means. That decision has paid off. Messi is 37 and has clearly slowed a little, but he remains capable of delivering in big moments, as he did with a winning free-kick goal against Porto. Pretty much all of Bayern stand out after that ridiculous scoreline, even if it came against amateur opposition. Jamal Musiala has the early claim on the Golden Boot, having scored a hat-trick in that game. For Manchester City, Phil Foden got off on the right foot with a goal and an assist against Wydad, and Chelsea's new signing Liam Delap made a positive impact on his debut, a 2-0 win over LAFC. Kylian Mbappé, meanwhile, has been a notable absence, having been briefly in hospital this week with gastroenteritis.
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Want $2,000 in Annual Dividends? Invest $11,000 in Each of These 3 Stocks
The three stocks listed here each pay high dividends that yield more than 5%. Their dividend payments look to be safe and sustainable for the foreseeable future. These stocks cover different industries and can provide you with some excellent diversification. 10 stocks we like better than Verizon Communications › Generating high dividend income can be tricky, because you don't want to just load up on stocks with the highest yields. That can result in disappointment later on, because if those high dividend payments aren't safe, they could end up getting cut or suspended entirely. It's important to carefully consider a company's financials and what lies ahead before relying on its dividend. Verizon Communications (NYSE: VZ), United Parcel Service (NYSE: UPS), and Vici Properties (NYSE: VICI) all pay dividends that yield more than 5% today, and they all look fairly safe. By investing $11,000 in each one of these high-yielding stocks, you could generate around $2,000 in dividends over the course of a full year. Here's why these can be excellent income stocks to buy right now. One of the most underrated dividend stocks available today is Verizon. The stock struggles to generate much momentum, even though its payout looks remarkably safe. Over the past 12 months, shares of Verizon are only up around 7%. But when you consider that its 6.4% yield is safer than it looks, it should be attracting a lot more interest from dividend investors. Verizon's payout ratio is a sustainable 64% of its earnings. The company has also increased its dividend for 18 consecutive years. In 10 years, the company's quarterly per-share dividend has gone from $0.55 to $0.6775 -- that's an increase of 23%. By investing $11,000 into this top telecom stock, you'd be generating approximately $704 in annual dividends, based on its current yield, and there's a strong possibility that the payout will rise over time. This year, the company projects to generate free cash flow of at least $17.5 billion, which will be comfortably higher than how much it pays out in dividends over an entire year (around $11.3 billion). At just 10 times its trailing earnings, this can be a terrific dividend stock to add to your portfolio right now. Logistics giant United Parcel Service, better known as UPS, offers a slightly higher yield than Verizon at 6.5%. If you invest $11,000 into the stock, you can also expect to generate a little more in annual dividends -- $715. Share prices of UPS are down by 20% since the start of the year (returns as of June 16), and that has pushed its yield higher, making this an attractive time to load up on the stock. Its payout ratio is around 100%, and it has generated $5.4 billion in free cash flow over the past 12 months, which is about as much as its dividend payments have totaled over that timeframe. Although that seems tight, the company is making efforts to cut costs to improve its bottom line. Earlier this year, it announced plans to lay off 20,000 workers amid challenging macroeconomic conditions and uncertainty. UPS' business has remained fairly stable thus far, however, with revenue through the first three months of the year totaling $21.5 billion, versus $21.7 billion in the prior-year period. The stock trades at around 15 times its trailing earnings, which is a bit cheaper than normal, and gives you some margin of safety in the event that it doesn't perform as well as you might expect. There is some risk here, but with the dividend still sustainable now and cost reductions in place, UPS should be able to continue making dividend payments for the foreseeable future. The lowest-yielding stock on this list is Vici Properties, a real estate investment trust (REIT) that currently pays investors a dividend that yields 5.4%. An $11,000 investment in this stock would produce annual dividend income totaling roughly $594. When you add that to the income you could generate from the other stocks listed above, then your total dividend income from all three of these stocks (when investing $11,000 in each of them) would total around $2,013. For REITs, the key metric to focus on is funds from operations, or FFO. That's an adjusted earnings calculation that helps these companies determine how much they can afford to pay out in dividends. For the first three months of 2025, Vici's FFO per share totaled $0.51. That is higher than its current quarterly dividend of $0.4325, suggesting that the payout is safe. REITs can be safe income-generating investments to own, since they bring in a lot of recurring income from their tenants. Vici's portfolio includes top gaming destinations such as Caesars Palace in Las Vegas and the Venetian Resort. Even if the economy struggles, the REIT's robust portfolio, which centers on some of the biggest resorts in the world, should offer you some safety. Vici is another fairly modestly priced stock to own, as it trades at 13 times its trailing earnings. Before you buy stock in Verizon Communications, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Verizon Communications wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $659,171!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $891,722!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 995% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 David Jagielski has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends United Parcel Service. The Motley Fool recommends Verizon Communications and Vici Properties. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Want $2,000 in Annual Dividends? Invest $11,000 in Each of These 3 Stocks was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Analyst's QB rankings shockingly leaves Commanders' Jayden Daniels outside of top 10
Rankings are subjective. Remember that. That doesn't mean we can't review some rankings and ask: "What were they thinking?" Such is the case with a recent list from Charles McDonald of Yahoo Sports. McDonald ranked his version of the NFL's top 10 quarterbacks and omitted the Washington Commanders' QB Jayden Daniels. Advertisement Here's McDonald's list: At first glance, I thought it was a mistake. How could McDonald leave Daniels off his list? It's understandable if he didn't rank Daniels No. 5. While several already believe Daniels is a top-five signal caller, some believe he still has much to prove. Neither perspective is wrong. Daniels did things last season that no other rookie has ever done. He won the NFL Offensive Rookie of the Year award, led the Commanders to the NFC championship game and the franchise's best season in 33 years. McDonald's top four is inarguable: Patrick Mahomes, Lamar Jackson, Josh Allen, and Joe Burrow. Regardless of the order, those are the NFL's top four QBs heading into 2025. Beginning at No. 5 is where things get interesting. Advertisement McDonald chose Justin Herbert over Daniels. Herbert is 0-2 as a starting quarterback in the playoffs, while Daniels won two playoff games as a rookie. No, there's more to quarterbacking than playoff wins or win/loss record, but, based on last season, would you take Herbert over Daniels? McDonald ranked the QBs into four tiers: the Patrick Mahomes tier, the almost-Mahomes tier, the ceiling-raiser tier, and the floor-raiser tier. Jackson and Allen landed in the second tier, while Burrow, Herbert and Matthew Stafford all landed in the third tier. Finally, Dak Prescott, Geno Smith, Jordan Love and C.J. Stroud landed in the final tier. Daniels should be in everyone's top 10. So should Baker Mayfield. Could anyone make the case that Prescott, Smith and Love are better than Daniels or Mayfield? Who would make up your top 10? Where would you rank Daniels? Advertisement Remember, rankings are subjective. This article originally appeared on Commanders Wire: QB rankings shockingly leaves Commanders' Jayden Daniels out of top 10
