Quebec to invest $10M in company developing Canadian-made satellite launch technology
See more sharing options
Send this page to someone via email
Share this item on Twitter
Share this item via WhatsApp
Share this item on Facebook
Quebec premier François Legault says the province will invest $10 million in a Montreal-area company that is developing a system to launch small satellites into space.
Legault announced the investment in Reaction Dynamics at the company's facility in Longueuil.
Economy Minister Christine Fréchette says the investment will allow the company to begin launching microsatellites into orbit from Canada as early as 2027.
Get breaking National news
For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
Reaction Dynamics plans to use a rocket called Aurora to launch the satellites.
Company President Bachar Elzein says the hybrid propulsion system they use contains fewer pieces than traditional rocket motors, making them safer and simpler to produce.
Legault said Canada is the only country in the G7 without domestic satellite launching capacity.
A first demonstration flight is expected to take place later this year.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Toronto Star
2 hours ago
- Toronto Star
Canadians favour other countries over Donald Trump's America, survey suggests
As G7 leaders gather in Kananaskis, Alta., a new poll suggests Canadians are souring on the U.S. and embracing relations with other world powers. The Pollara Strategic Insights survey found net impressions of the U.S. have plunged since President Donald Trump returned to office in January. At the same time, Canadians are feeling positive about the other G7 member nations: Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, France and Germany. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW 'We've kind of lost our best friend in the United States and maybe, as a country, Canada is now looking toward some of its older friends to reconnect with as a result of that,' said Dan Arnold, Pollara's chief strategy officer, referring to Trump's tariffs on Canadian goods that have led to a trade war between the neighbouring countries. Indeed, the firm polled people in Canada and the U.K. and found similar results on both sides of the Atlantic. Five out of six Canadians — 83 per cent — said the bilateral relationship with Britain was 'important' with only 17 per cent saying it wasn't. Across the pond, 76 per cent of Britons said their country's relationship with Canada was 'important' while about one in four said it was not. The British have a more positive view of Canada (+78 per cent) than any other country in the poll — ahead of Japan (+61 per cent), Germany (+60 per cent), France (+50 per cent) and Ukraine (+47 per cent). But the poll found they have a negative view toward India (-1 per cent), the U.S. (-3 per cent), China (-24 per cent) and Russia (-63 per cent). ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW Among Canadians, Italy has a +66 per cent favourability rating followed by Japan at +64 per cent, the U.K. at +59 per cent, France at +57 per cent, Germany at +54 per cent and Ukraine at +41 per cent. China was at -27 per cent, India at -29 per cent, the U.S. at -47 per cent and Russia at -63 per cent. That's a 60 percentage point drop in Canadian sentiment toward the American since Pollara's survey last year when Joe Biden was U.S. president. Using online panels, Pollara surveyed 3,400 Canadians on May 16-20. While opt-in polls cannot be assigned a margin of error, for comparison purposes, a random sample of this size would have one of plus or minus 1.7 percentage points, 19 times out of 20. Similarly, the firm polled 2,511 Britons on May 2-16. The margin of error for comparable surveys is within 1.9 percentage points, 19 times out of 20. 'If the Americans aren't going to be the number-one ally in many respects for the next three years (of Trump's presidency) … then the Canada-U.K. relationship is something that bears some noting,' said Arnold, pointing out Canada's recently elected Prime Minister Mark Carney used to be governor of the Bank of England. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW Because of that, 60 per cent of Britons are familiar with him, and of those, 80 per cent had a positive view of Carney, who succeeded Justin Trudeau as Liberal leader on March 9 and was elected April 28. Just seven per cent had a negative view and the rest had no opinion. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer is not as well known among Canadians. Only 26 per cent were familiar with him. Of those, 58 per cent had a positive view with 30 per cent negative and the remainder had no opinion. That's an overall +28 per cent for Starmer, who won power last summer. The most admired foreign leader among Canadians was Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who will attend the G7 summit that begins Sunday. Zelenskyy, whose country was invaded by Russia in 2022, was at +53 per cent, ahead of French President Emmanuel Macron (+46 per cent), German Chancellor Friedrich Merz (+33 per cent), Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba (+31 per cent) and Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni (+29 per cent). On the negative side of the ledger, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who will also be at the G7, was at -17 per cent, ahead of Chinese President Xi Jinping (-52 per cent), Trump (-66 per cent) and Russian President Vladimir Putin (-69 per cent). Neither Xi nor Putin was invited to Kananaskis. Politics Headlines Newsletter Get the latest news and unmatched insights in your inbox every evening Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. Please enter a valid email address. Sign Up Yes, I'd also like to receive customized content suggestions and promotional messages from the Star. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Politics Headlines Newsletter You're signed up! You'll start getting Politics Headlines in your inbox soon. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page.
National Observer
2 hours ago
- National Observer
Ford's new energy plan for Ontario increases reliance on nuclear, fossil fuels
The Ford government is projecting a major shift toward nuclear power to meet rising electricity demand and support Ontario's transition to net-zero emissions by mid-century. Its newly released long-term Energy for Generations plan — billed as the province's first-ever integrated energy strategy — also shows an increased reliance on fossil fuels over the next decade, with emissions expected to rise before declining after 2030. The province describes the plan as 'a comprehensive roadmap to meet future energy needs, support new housing, and power the most competitive economy in the G7.' 'As energy demand soars, our plan leverages 'Made-In-Ontario' to build affordable, clean, and always reliable power, built by and for Canadians,' Ontario's Minister of Energy and Mines Stephen Lecce said in a statement. The plan will help the province meet growing electricity demand while achieving over 99 per cent zero-emissions electricity by 2050, he added. Critics say the plan misses key opportunities to scale-up renewables, puts energy affordability at risk and increases Ontario's dependence on foreign energy supplies. The plan projects total electricity production in 2050 to be just under 275 terawatt-hours (TWh), with nuclear making up the largest share at over 200 TWh. That means nuclear plants could supply more than 70 per cent of Ontario's electricity by 2050, up from about 50 per cent today. The plan projects the province could need up to 17,800 MW of new nuclear power by 2050, equivalent to building five new Darlington nuclear power stations. Currently, Ontario's nuclear fleet — Bruce, Darlington, and Pickering — provides 12,000 MW of capacity. The plan projects the province could need up to 17,800 MW of new nuclear power by 2050, equivalent to building five new Darlington stations. To support this buildout, the province says it is preparing new nuclear sites and has already begun early engagement with First Nation and local communities. A new nuclear technology panel will guide technology choices and project timelines, with input from Ontario Power Generation, Bruce Power, the Independent Electricity System Operator and government officials. The province says nuclear projects are complex and costly, and it plans to explore new ownership models and equity partnerships to attract private capital and help finance the expansion. It aims to attract investment from Canadian pension funds and institutional investors to 'keep more Canadian energy dollars working here at home,' the province said. 'This isn't a plan — it's a policy statement' Mark Winfield, professor at York University and co-chair of its Sustainable Energy Initiative, said the plan lacks a clear decision-making framework and basic accountability mechanisms. He said there is no process in place to evaluate whether the government's chosen energy path is the most affordable or lowest-risk for the province. 'There is no oversight or review process to assess whether this represents the least-cost or lowest-risk option for Ontario,' Winfield said. By 'review,' Winfield refers to independent assessments — such as those typically conducted by regulatory bodies or outside experts — that evaluate costs, risks, and alternatives before major infrastructure decisions are finalized. Winfield also questioned the long-term focus on nuclear. 'All of the proposed reactor technologies rely on enriched fuel that comes from the United States,' he said. 'This exposes Ontario to new energy security risks.' In recent months, the Ford government has committed billions to nuclear energy, announcing new builds and refurbishments it says will create tens of thousands of jobs. Earlier this year, it unveiled plans for a massive nuclear plant near Port Hope, projected to generate 10,000 megawatts — enough to power 10 million homes — though key details like costs and timelines remain undisclosed. Last week, the province introduced legislation to expand access to Ontario's public clean energy fund for nuclear projects. Industry groups welcomed Ontario's new energy plan, with major players praising the government's commitment to both nuclear power and natural gas. Enbridge Gas called the plan a 'clear affirmation' of the essential role natural gas will continue to play, citing its importance for affordability, grid stability and economic growth. The company said investments in gas infrastructure are foundational to Ontario's prosperity. The Organization of Canadian Nuclear Industries also applauded the plan, calling it a bold step toward clean energy leadership. The group highlighted Ontario's strong nuclear track record and said the proposed expansion — including large reactors and SMRs — positions the province to secure long-term clean energy supply. 'Where are the renewables?' Aliénor Rougeot, climate and energy program manager at Environmental Defence, said Ontario's new energy plan could lead to higher household bills, more air pollution and increased reliance on the US fossil gas. While she welcomed the idea of a long-term, integrated approach, she argued that the plan should be replaced with one built on publicly shared modelling. To Rougeot, the most glaring problem is the plan's failure to prioritize wind and solar — Ontario's cheapest and cleanest energy sources. 'I kept flipping through the document, asking: Where are the renewables?' Rougeot said. The supply forecast is particularly troubling to her, as it shows Ontario having less wind and solar in 2050 than in 2030. She believes the refusal to give renewable energy a central role in the province's future grid will come at a high cost — both economically and environmentally. Wind and solar make up approximately nine per cent and two per cent of Ontario's current electricity generation, respectively. In its plan, the government says their role is expected to grow over time. Starting in 2025, nearly 3,000 megawatts of energy storage will be added to the grid. However, the plan argues that nuclear is more cost-effective and land-efficient than wind and solar. It claims that to generate the same amount of energy as a proposed 10,000 MW nuclear station at Wesleyville, Ontario would need roughly 100 times more land for solar and 500 times more land for wind. But new analysis suggests solar doesn't require large tracts of land — for example, more than half of Toronto's electricity needs could be met through rooftop and parking lot solar alone. A new report from the Ontario Clean Air Alliance argues that wind and solar could meet the same energy needs as the proposed Wesleyville nuclear station much faster and at far lower cost — potentially saving the province up to $19 billion annually. It highlights Ontario's untapped potential for offshore wind in the Great Lakes and large-scale solar at the Port Hope site. Another report warns that electricity from new nuclear could cost up to 3.6 times more than onshore wind, three times more than solar, and 1.7 times more than offshore wind. Lia Codrington, a senior analyst at the Pembina Institute, said the province's new energy plan represents a positive step toward long-term planning, noting that many jurisdictions around the world are already moving quickly toward clean energy and decarbonization. She viewed it as important for Ontario to follow that trend — and even potentially lead — by modernizing its electricity system. Codrington questioned the government's argument that land use limits renewable energy expansion. She said wind turbines allow for shared land use — such as farming — and solar panels can be installed on rooftops, parking lots, and other built environments. In her view, decisions about land use should reflect what Ontarians want in their communities when it comes to energy sources, not just technical comparisons in megawatts per square kilometre.
Globe and Mail
3 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
For G7 leaders, immense global challenges weigh on agenda overshadowed by Trump
The last time Canada hosted a G7 summit, Tristen Naylor gained access as an unusual spectator. He was embedded as an academic observing the summit management office that oversaw the 2018 events at Charlevoix, Que. It was, he recalls, a marvel of organization, governed by a 132-page event 'bible.' 'It's page after page of minute-by-minute play-by-play on how the summit runs, with schematics and diagrams of every room setup, who stands where, how many cars you need,' said Mr. Naylor, the director of the Oxbridge Diplomatic Academy. But as Canada once again prepares for some of the world's most powerful leaders to meet at G7 meetings that begin this weekend, all of that meticulous planning – and any hopes for agreement or even basic comity – must reckon with a series of unknowns. There are new faces: Britain's Keir Starmer, Germany's Friedrich Merz, Japan's Shigeru Ishiba and the host himself, Prime Minister Mark Carney. There is a horizon clouded with haze, from the wildfires burning across this country, from the street fires lit in protests across the United States, from the conflagrations still raging in Ukraine and Gaza, from the trade wars that have drawn the U.S. into conflict with the other countries whose leaders will attend – and, perhaps more than anything, from Donald Trump, who has returned to power with a palpable disdain for the elite multilateralism that is the pillar on which the G7 has stood for a half-century. And there is history. Carney should ignore any antics from Trump at G7 and focus on business, Chrétien says Canada to seek agreements in global peace, energy security and new partnerships at G7, Carney says The Charlevoix summit ended with Mr. Trump calling then-prime minister Justin Trudeau 'very dishonest & weak,' and withdrawing by tweet from a joint statement. Seven years later, 'at the end of the weekend, if there is no big explosive Trump story, that alone will be a success,' Mr. Naylor said. 'The game is damage limitation.' The world leaders gathering this weekend in Kananaskis, Alta., are confronted with a scale of problems that the original Group of Six meeting in 1975 had determined to avoid (Canada did not join until the following year). That first summit, held in France, concluded with an agreement to pursue the 'maximum possible level of trade liberalization,' while striking a note of optimism. 'Our success will strengthen, indeed is essential to, democratic societies everywhere,' the leaders said in their closing communiqué. Ottawa under pressure to raise plight of Jimmy Lai at G7 summit Opinion: Massive fires burning across Alberta have helped put climate change back on the G7 agenda Fifty years later, the World Bank is forecasting the slowest decade of global growth since the 1960s – the result, in part, of rising tariff rates – while new levels of doubt have shrouded democratic governance. One third of the world's voters now live in countries where election quality has eroded, the International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance has found. The immensity of those issues stands in contrast to the limited hopes for this G7 meeting, which are so dim that Canada is not planning for a joint communiqué at its conclusion, a senior official told reporters Thursday. Instead, the summit hosts are looking for short joint statements focused on concrete actions and agreements in certain areas. The Globe is not identifying the official, who was not authorized to speak publicly. Forgoing such a communiqué again this year could sidestep sparring over what language everyone, Mr. Trump included, would find acceptable. It would also reflect reality. This year's summit will draw together leaders as a group. But the greatest priority for most of those leaders is one man alone. Since he has returned to office, Mr. Trump has shattered expectations about how international trade should flow, how diplomacy should be done and even how secure other countries should feel within their own borders. If that means limited progress on matters of acute global concern, all may not be lost. The G7 has always been a place where personality matters, its annual gathering structured with extensive time for discussion outside the strictures of formal government business. Historically, leaders 'were supposed to develop a personal level of relationship and trust, so that at a point in which they might need one another, they knew and trusted one another,' said Douglas Rediker, a Washington-based political adviser who is a non-resident senior fellow at the Brookings Institution. That mandate, he said, matters more than ever. 'This becomes a meeting about taking the temperature of Donald Trump as a man, as a leader, as a policy-maker – as someone they can and cannot do business with, and can and cannot trust,' Mr. Rediker said. By the standard measure of things, this should be Mr. Carney's party. As host, he has power over the guest list and influence over the broad agenda for conversation. For Mr. Carney, a former central banker who has spent much of his life in elite company, the summit offers a venue to show action at a time when patience for political puffery has grown thin. 'The publics in the western world are just tired of leaders that spout rhetoric and then don't get anything done,' said Janice Stein, the founding director of the Munk School of Global Affairs. Mr. Carney, she said, has at the G7 a moment to pursue his ambition to remake Canada and its place in the world. The question is 'how much support can he build for his priorities, and how much traction will he get for them at the G7?' Elements of that strategy have come into view with those invited. With Mexico's Claudia Sheinbaum, Mr. Carney 'is rebalancing our relationships with other powers, but he is still renegotiating a security and economic relationship with the United States. Claudia Sheinbaum is a big piece of that,' Ms. Stein said. India's Narendra Modi represents an enormous economy that is for Canada a potential counterweight to China and the U.S. India, which like Canada has struggled to navigate Mr. Trump's tariffs, 'also needs to ramp up its trade policies,' Raja Mohan, a distinguished fellow with the Delhi-based Council for Strategic and Defense Research, said this week in remarks to the Asia Pacific Foundation of Canada. A meeting between Mr. Carney and Mr. Modi, he said, could deliver a fresh start to trade talks that have been stalled since 2023. 'So there is a moment, there, of economic reconstitution that is possible,' Mr. Mohan said. Elsewhere, though, foreign leaders are preparing for Kananaskis with questions about just how Mr. Carney intends to rebalance international relationships. Opinion: Mark Carney's go-it-alone approach is born of necessity Germany embraces militarism for the first time since the Second World War Take North American trade. The U.S. government has privately given some positive signals on the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement, a senior Mexican government official said. On one recent occasion, a top U.S. Trade Representative official said behind closed doors that the U.S. may choose to only 'review' USMCA rather than renegotiate it, the Mexican official said. The Trump administration is considering a timeline of July or September to get started, the source said, and Mexico would like to work more closely with Canada. The Globe is not identifying the official because they are not authorized to speak publicly. But there has, to date, been little co-ordination between the two countries, particularly at the political level, the official said. Other countries will arrive in Canada with eyes trained on Washington, not Ottawa. For Mr. Ishiba, one of the primary attractions of Kananaskis is the chance of a sideline meeting with Mr. Trump, where the Japanese Prime Minister has said he will press his country's case personally as tariff negotiations between the two countries drag on. In return for any tariff carve-outs, Japan is likely to promise to buy large amounts of U.S. energy and weapons. 'Japan's major priority will be twofold – ensuring the focus is on a rules-based international order and making progress on bilateral tariff negotiations when Ishiba and Trump meet,' said Rintaro Nishimura, a Tokyo-based associate with the Asia Group, a strategic advisory firm. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, meanwhile, will arrive in Kananaskis with hopes that other G7 leaders can together persuade Mr. Trump to take tough new measures against Russia. Response to Russia's actions in Ukraine, including massive air attacks over the past week, should be met not with 'silence from the world, but concrete action,' Mr. Zelensky wrote on social media this week. 'Action from America, which has the power to force Russia into peace. Action from Europe, which has no alternative but to be strong. Action from others around the world who called for diplomacy and an end to the war – and whom Russia has ignored.' Lisa Yasko, a member of the Ukrainian parliament's Foreign Affairs Committee, said her country was looking to the G7 to lead the way with a new round of sanctions to punish Russia for refusing to accept a ceasefire. The joint communiqué issued by G7 foreign ministers at the end of their March meeting in Charlevoix had threatened exactly that. But as foreign leaders arrive in Canada seeking time with Mr. Trump, they worry his focus is directed somewhere else. Ms. Yasko said there was concern that Mr. Trump was too preoccupied with domestic politics – his feud with Elon Musk, and the deployment of troops to California – to focus on helping Ukraine, which has a dwindling supply of U.S. weaponry sent by Mr. Trump's predecessor, Joe Biden. Mr. Trump has approved only a single arms sale to Ukraine – US$310-million in spare parts and other support for F-16 fighter jets – since taking office in January. 'It's not that easy for the average Ukrainian person to understand why the Americans are not doing certain things,' Ms. Yasko said in a telephone interview. 'It all looks as if all the attention is more focused on the internal agenda, rather than what happens in foreign affairs, where the actions of United States are very much needed.' The G7 concluded last year's summit in Apulia, Italy, with a 36-page statement that listed 11 main points of agreement, from standing in solidarity with Ukraine to a renewed commitment toward gender equality and taking concrete steps on reducing climate change. Few expect such language to emerge from Kananaskis. 'This is not going to be Trudeau and Macron smiling and chatting it out. That is a different world,' said Sumantra Maitra, a senior fellow at the Center for Renewing America, a MAGA think tank. Instead, in the areas where previous summits found common ground, Mr. Trump's arrival at the gathering may bring reason for dispute. Take Mr. Zelensky, who sparred with the U.S. leader in the White House. Having the Ukrainian President there 'is potentially far more destabilizing than anything,' said Mr. Maitra, who has advised Mr. Trump but does not speak for the administration. Then there is Mr. Trump's personal distaste for some leaders, such as France's Emmanuel Macron, and his distrust of multinational institutions. 'He's not looking for some kind of consensus-building, kumbayah exercise on the international stage. That's not his style and approach,' said Nile Gardiner, a specialist in foreign policy with the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank. Across a series of issues at the G7, he said, 'one cannot rule out the strong potential for real conflict.' Mr. Trump, for example, has sought major spending increases among NATO allies, 'and I would expect that he will be raising that issue significantly, especially on Canadian soil, as Canada has been in President Trump's eyes one of the worst offenders on low defence spending,' Mr. Gardiner said. Mr. Carney has sought to blunt that blow, saying this week Canadian defence spending will soon reach two per cent of GDP. Mr. Trump is likely to seek more. Even so, against that set of low expectations, the G7 leaders may discover more areas of agreement than anticipated, said John Kirton, a political scientist at the University of Toronto who is director of the G7 Research Group. 'The secret to success is letting Donald Trump credibly claim that he led and won the G7 on some serious things. And there are standout candidates where it's relatively easy to do,' he said. Take a need for stimulus spending through tax cuts or defence spending. Or a commitment to fighting transnational crime and the drug trade. Or a pledge to make mandatory the removal of non-consensual sexual imagery, including pornographic deepfakes, from the internet – something the U.S. recently legislated. Or a common dedication to confronting China on security, trade and transnational repression. Or a pledge to act against crimes committed by undocumented migrants, a subject of nearly as much concern in Berlin as in Washington. Yet Mr. Trump could just as easily be provoked into anger by some perceived slight. Worse, he could back his hosts into a corner from which there is no polite exit. 'If he says something really outrageous about Canadian sovereignty or the 51st state that can't be characterized as a joke – the only precedent we have in this country for that kind of behaviour is 1967,' said Chris Alexander, a former cabinet minister under Stephen Harper, recalling Ottawa's bitter condemnation of Charles de Gaulle's 'Vive le Québec libre' refrain that preceded the French president cutting short his visit. Still, he said, diminished expectations for what this G7 will accomplish should not diminish its importance. Whatever it yields – be it insults or be it harmony – will offer insight into the direction of international affairs at a moment when Mr. Trump is far from the only leader questioning old assumptions. 'We are in something like a pivot away from globalization,' said Mr. Alexander. 'Does the summit amplify those trend lines? Or does it slow them down and moderate them? That is a question that I think is worth watching for.' With a report from Steven Chase
