logo
PFAS-contaminated compost sold to public, WA environmental regulator confirms

PFAS-contaminated compost sold to public, WA environmental regulator confirms

Leonard Machen had been filling his home vegetable garden with compost from a council-owned organic waste facility for years when he heard rumours it might be contaminated.
Based in Dardanup, about 180 kilometres south of Perth, Bunbury Harvey Regional Council (BHRC) has been turning kerbside food organics and garden organics (FOGO) waste from more than 40,000 South West households into compost for over a decade.
It then sells it back to residents and donates it to schools and community gardens.
The ABC can now confirm samples of the compost tested by the Department of Water and Environmental Regulation (DWER) in May and October last year contained a group of toxic "forever chemicals" called PFAS "above laboratory detection limits".
Mr Machen said the scale of the health risk was unclear but he had started removing the compost from his garden to be safe.
"You can't get any real answers from anyone," he said.
The facility stopped selling the compost and ceased all FOGO processing in December.
Local governments have started diverting it to landfill as they explore alternative solutions.
PFAS is found in a range of household products, even ones that claim to be compostable, like coffee cups.
Federal guidelines warn the chemicals can bioaccumulate in plants and animals with adverse impacts, and some varieties are recognised internationally as being toxic to humans and wildlife.
DWER said the FOGO waste was likely contaminated by household waste and plastics mixed up in green bins before it reached the facility.
The department said concentrations were generally low but any waste containing detectable levels of PFAS was unsuitable for recycling into compost.
However, it declined to comment on whether people should remove the contaminated product from their gardens.
BHRC chief executive Nick Edwards said while the council stopped selling the compost out of caution he did not think it was unsafe and would still happily use it on his own garden.
He said preliminary results of independent testing commissioned by BHRC had not detected PFAS, though he would not share the name of the company conducting the testing.
"It's important the focus is on the results rather than the company that's doing them," he said.
Mr Edwards said he was committed to getting the facility back up and running but it would take a whole-of-community effort.
The facility has struggled in recent years to manage increasing volumes of contaminated waste.
Mr Edwards said the waste was largely processed manually, then put through an 8-millimetre sieve before being sold.
Mr Machen, who has found several larger items like a plastic toy lion and roll of sticky tape in the compost, said decontamination measures were clearly falling short.
Jill Cross, a member of the Dardanup Environmental Action Group, said she had struggled to get clear information from BHRC or DWER about the level of PFAS contamination and potential health risks.
She said residents were worried that by the time it was better understood, it would be too late.
"It will be in the dust which will blow onto agricultural land and into Dardanup town site," she said.
"It will blow on people's roofs, into their water tanks."
Ms Cross said the regulator had failed to take BHRC to task on its management of the facility.
In 2016, BHRC successfully pushed back on several aspects of DWER's proposed composting standards, including the mandate that organic processing facilities be enclosed to prevent the spread of pollutants and minimise methane emissions.
In 2023, DWER issued a prevention notice to BHRC for failing to store waste, including partially processed compost stockpiles, under its licence, which posed a significant risk of pollution.
When asked if BHRC had complied with that notice, DWER said it was the subject of an "ongoing investigation".
"Therefore, it is not appropriate to make comment on the compliance status of the notice," a spokesperson said.
Mr Edwards told the ABC the facility met some but not all of the requirements by the deadline and was working closely with DWER on the remainder.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Hit her on the bottom': Sydney doctor's nurse harassment exposed
‘Hit her on the bottom': Sydney doctor's nurse harassment exposed

News.com.au

time2 hours ago

  • News.com.au

‘Hit her on the bottom': Sydney doctor's nurse harassment exposed

EXCLUSIVE A Sydney doctor who admitted to actions that amounted to sexually harassing three nurses while on night shift has been struck off from the profession for at least 12 months. Muruga Balaji Kandasamy Mohan faced the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal this week after three female nurses came forward over his conduct while working as an ICU doctor at Strathfield Private Hospital. Mr Mohan obtained his Bachelor of Medicine and Surgery from Madurai Medical College in India in 1995 before registering as a doctor in NSW in 2006. He began working at Strathfield Private Hospital in 2009 before departing the hospital in September 2022. The tribunal heard how in July 2022, Mr Mohan pulled one of the nurses by the wrist into a small medication room, pulled down her surgical mask, touched her lip with his thumb and told her she looked beautiful. On another occasion, he pulled the same nurse into a 'darkened room' by her waist, before asking where she lived, how far her house was from the hospital and if he could see a 'picture of her house on her mobile telephone.' The tribunal heard how the incident left her 'shaking and scared' and 'quite traumatised'. 'She asked other nurses on her shift not to leave her alone with [Mr Mohan],' the tribunal heard. In 2021 – over a three to four month period -Mr Mohan asked another nurse to show him 'sexy pictures' on her phone about five times and told her she was 'beautiful and sexy'. He also massaged her shoulders on 'approximately five occasions'. 'She said that when [Mr Mohan] massaged her shoulders she told him she would report him and, on another occasion, told him that his conduct was unprofessional,' the tribunal heard. '[The nurse] said that [Mr Mohan] would 'laugh off' her comments.' The tribunal heard the third nurse said Mr Mohan would make sexual comments to her and would 'hit her on the bottom as she went past' while working at the hospital in 2018 and 2019. 'Because of the power imbalance between doctors and nurses … she did not make a complaint,' the tribunal heard. In a statement read out by the tribunal, Mr Mohan admitted to his behaviour and called it 'unacceptable'. He told the tribunal he believed the acts would be taken 'as a compliment'. The tribunal panel cancelled Mr Mohan's registration, banning him from applying for re-registration for 12 months. 'The Respondent's conduct was an abuse of power,' the tribunal decision stated. 'The complained of conduct was situational, that is the Respondent took advantage of the relatively isolated circumstances of night shift in a hospital ward. His conduct was deliberate.' Mr Mohan was previously a part owner of the Northwest Medical Centre in NSW until November 2024. He was also part owner of Churchill Family Practice in Victoria until May 2025, however, now has no financial interests in any general practices. After leaving Strathfield Private Hospital in September 2022, Mr Mohan was working one day per week in a general practice in Sydney.

Viral supermarket scanning app sparks social media uproar
Viral supermarket scanning app sparks social media uproar

News.com.au

time4 hours ago

  • News.com.au

Viral supermarket scanning app sparks social media uproar

A viral video has shocked the fitness community after a popular food rating app, Yuka, gave the Rokeby's Protein Choc Honeycomb Shake a score of zero out of 100, leaving fans of the beloved drink demanding answers. In the video, which has racked up over 260,000 views, Mitchell Humbert – the founder of nutrition support website Mr Health – is seen scanning the Rokeby's shake in a supermarket aisle using the Yuka app. 'This might cause a few issues because it's a fan favourite,' he begins. 'Oh, I actually didn't think it was going to be this bad,' he says after scanning the item, visibly surprised. 'Zero out of 100. It's shocking for you. Put it down.' The shake is a staple for many fitness buffs and contains filtered low-fat milk, cream, erythritol, cocoa powder, natural flavours, lactase enzyme, carrageenan, and stevia. Nutritionally, it has 253 calories, 30 grams of protein, 6.4 grams of fat, 18.3 grams of carbs, and 16.6 grams of sugar per serve. Fans shocked by rating The reaction was immediate, with comments flooding in from confused and frustrated fans. 'Nooo I love this drink,' wrote one. 'Oh no, it's my favourite,' said another. 'Please tell me what it's bad for? Personally, at around 250 calories and 30g protein on the go, I don't see an issue with it?' asked a third. Others questioned the app's credibility: 'Something suss is going on here … The vanilla one scans 49/100. Same drink different flavour …' and 'The app is flawed. It says my pure butter is poor and the chemical spread is good,' another user claimed. A spokesperson for Rokeby told 'Rokeby Protein Smoothies contain 30 grams of whole natural protein made with local milk and real high-quality ingredients, delivering great nutrition our consumers love. We encourage consumers to seek out trusted, professional sources for nutritional information and advice'. The viral food scanner Launched in France in 2017, Yuka allows users to scan the barcodes of food and cosmetic products in stores or at home, instantly assigning them a score to indicate how 'healthy' it considers the item. Since its international expansion in 2022, Yuka has exploded in use, with more than 56 million users worldwide. After scanning a product, Yuka assigns a health value out of 100, with corresponding colour codes: excellent (dark green), good (light green), poor (orange), or bad (red). The score is generated by an algorithm weighing three factors: nutritional quality, the presence and risk level of additives, and whether the product is organic. Yuka uses the European 'Nutri-Score' system to assess nutritional quality, rewarding high protein and fibre, and penalising high sugar, salt, saturated fat, and calories. The app's in-house experts classify over 600 food additives as high, moderate, limited, or risk-free, based on scientific research. Organic certification gives products a small bonus. The app is known for its strict approach, especially towards additives and calories. Even products with seemingly 'clean' ingredient lists (like the Rokeby shake) can be penalised if they contain additives like carrageenan (a seaweed-derived additive) or natural sweeteners such as stevia. Nutrition experts weigh in Yuka's scoring system has drawn criticism from nutrition experts. Some say the Nutri-Score system is outdated, especially in how it penalises calories and fails to distinguish between natural and added sugars, according to The New York Times. Experts also point out that giving so much weight to additives may be excessive, since much of the research is based on animal studies or observational data that does not always translate to real-world risks for humans. There is also debate over including organic status, as there is no proven nutritional benefit to organic foods over conventional ones. Despite these concerns, experts do agree that Yuka's focus on limiting highly processed foods aligns with broader public health advice. However, they caution that labelling foods as simply 'good' or 'bad' could contribute to disordered eating, and that most whole foods – fruits, vegetables, nuts – don't even have barcodes to scan. Content creator responds to backlash Mr Humbert, whose video of him using the app went viral, told he highly values the tool and thinks it's helpful for people who struggle to understand nutrition labels. 'Most of the time, the criticism of my videos comes from people who aren't fully educated on nutrition and are simply upset to learn that the products they regularly consume aren't as healthy as they thought,' he said. 'It can be confronting — no one likes to be told their go-to snacks might be doing more harm than good. 'People are genuinely shocked once they see the truth behind some of these everyday products, and they appreciate having a tool that helps them make better choices.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store