logo
Jeep Avenger 4xe review: Dumpy, cute and ready for off-road action

Jeep Avenger 4xe review: Dumpy, cute and ready for off-road action

Telegraph12 hours ago

With its rugged off-road demeanour including wheels shod with chunky mud and snow tyres, Jeep 's latest compact 4x4 looks fabulous. Dumpy, cute and ready for action all at the same time.
But then you might say the same of the US 4x4 specialist's Renegade, yesterday's baby Jeep, which is still available as a hybrid and plug-in hybrid at higher prices. In these straitened times, Jeep's owner Stellantis – as with all other large car-producing conglomerates – dictates that everything has to use a Group platform, sharing engines, drivetrains and countless other widgets to reduce cost.
But why on earth would you want a small Jeep capable of crawling up the side of a mountain when it's likely the most extreme driving you'll ever do is mount a kerb outside Sainsbury's or ford a large puddle?
The market seems to think so too, for while these small B-segment SUVs occupy 21 per cent of the entire European new-car market, four-wheel drive examples account for only 15 per cent of that segment. Jeep owners, however, are different and 28 per cent of them specify their small SUVs with all-wheel drive.
And why wouldn't you want a cutesy off-roader which can also cut the mustard when snow falls or the road with grass growing in the middle turns into a track? So, while the 2023 Car of the Year-winning Avenger starts at £24,999 with front-wheel drive, a significant number will choose this all-wheel-drive 4xe version, which starts at £30,999.
And as well as stereotypical 4x4 looks, the all-wheel-drive versions gain roof bars, suspension raised by 10mm for improved off-roading ground clearance along with more day-to-day niceties such as car park-proof, grey anti-scratch panels around the bumpers, sills and door panels.
The oily bits
The engine is the Group's 1.2-litre turbocharged three-cyclinder petrol unit providing 134bhp and 169lb ft of torque, driving the front wheels via a six-speed twin-clutch gearbox. The 48-volt hybrid system consists of two 28bhp electric motors, one in the gearbox acting as a motor/generator and another aft driving the rear wheels. With a 0.9kWh lithium-ion battery under the passenger seat, the system's peak power is 143bhp, enough to give this 1,455kg off-roader a top speed of 120mph, with 0-62mph in 9.5sec.
The quoted fuel consumption is 52.2mpg, but in a mixed route, including some low-speed off-roading, I achieved 44mpg. CO2 emissions are 122g/km, which means the first year VED will be £440.
The 4xe has a ground clearance of 210mm and will ford up to 400mm of water. Off-roading aficionados will appreciate the approach/breakover/departure angles of 22/21/35 degrees respectively. The suspension is different to the front-drive models, sharing MacPherson struts at the front but with an independent multi-link set-up in place of the technically inferior twist-beam axle of lesser models.
It's 4,090mm long, 1,810mm wide, 1,540mm high and has a 2,560mm wheelbase. The boot is 325 litres with the rear seats up and 1,218mm with them folded which, thanks to the space-hungry suspension and rear electric motor, is 30 litres less than the fully electric Avenger and 45 litres less than the standard hybrid.
Inside job
The plastic interior panels, with textured surfaces, are easy to clean and well put together, but more military Jeep than sophisticated Audi – far from premium in feel. The seats are comfortable and supportive, featuring a variety of materials depending on which of the three trim levels you choose; at the top of the range, a tie-up with outdoor equipment specialist North Face provides a washable vinyl. The driving position feels high and a little cramped at first and it takes patience to adjust an accommodating seat and steering wheel position.
The rear seats are cramped – to get four adults aboard requires everyone to compromise on leg room. The rear seat backs fold onto their bases but the load bed isn't flat.
And if the interior design feels a bit dated, with its 10.25-inch screens and slightly slow-to-react software, the design has wit and charm. The fording depth indicator is a little duck etched into the front panel, while The North Face editions have a facia end plate etched with a silhouette of the new Compass C-segment Jeep.
On the road
The initial pull away can be a bit grinding as the wet clutches of the six-speed DCT gearbox take up the strain, after that, however, the unit is smooth and quiet. An extra clutch deploys the rear electric motor, but it's hard to detect its operation in the 'snow and mud', nor the 'auto', driving modes.
For the most part the Jeep is front-wheel drive and none the worse for it. There is a 'sport' mode, which sharpens the responses to the accelerator pedal and the steering, but as you might expect this is not a sporting car. Overtaking requires anticipation verging on astrology. However, you can make swift progress driving gently; jam the accelerator pedal to the floor and there's a lot of gear-changing and variable noise, but not a lot of haste.
The ride is good, too, better than the standard Avenger and much better than the electric version.
Off the road
Anxious to prove the 4xe's mettle, Jeep laid out a tricky off-road course set out on a Florentine hill on greasy track across olive groves. Even with its tyre treads full of sticky mud, the little car clambered up rock beds and down slippery slopes.
Electronic hill descent control covers a lot of sins, but the controllability of the electric drivetrain was not only confidence-inspiring but allowed a gentle approach to the long, challenging route. Smoothness beats speed when it comes to such terrain.
The Telegraph verdict
There really is nothing else like this car on the market. A small SUV with authentic off-road ability, it will scrabble up slippery rocks, ford standing water and negotiate greasy descents. Suzuki used to provide this sort of thing with the Jimny, but everything else, the Dacia Duster, Mini Countryman All4, Kia Niro and others, are more compromised in their off-road capabilities.
The big question, of course, is whether you will use any of those capabilities and are also prepared to pay for them. For while the Jeep Avenger 4xe is a pretty good drive, rides well and is reasonably practical, it's quite expensive.
The off-road pedigree inherent in the Jeep brand will sway it for many although the 4x4 Dacia Duster, more than £6,000 cheaper, presents an equally compelling case.
The facts
On test: Jeep Avenger 4xe
Body style: five-door B-segment SUV
On sale: now
How much? from £30,999
How fast? 120mph, 0-62mph in 9.5sec
How economical? 52.2mpg (WLTP Combined), 44mpg on test
Engine & gearbox: 1.2-litre 134bhp/169lb ft three-cylinder petrol turbo engine with twin 28bhp electric motors, 0.9kWh lithium-ion battery and a 48-volt hybrid 4x4 system, six-speed twin clutch automatic gearbox, four-wheel drive (rear wheels electric only)
Maximum power/torque: 144bhp
CO2 emissions: 122g/km (WLTP Combined)
VED: £440 first year, then £195
Warranty: 3 years/unlimited mileage
The rivals
Jeep Renegade plug-in hybrid, from £38,500
Based on the popular but rudimentary Fiat 500L, the Renegade was launched in 2014 and has done solid business, but it's tricky to justify the price for a four-wheel-drive supermini. The PHEV was launched in 2020, but will be slowly phased out as the Revenge 4x4 takes its place. Quite fun to drive, but you might be better with the e-Hybrid version at £32,699.
Dacia Duster TCe 130 4x4, from £23,550
Manual only, with a mild hybrid-enhanced three-cylinder engine, this combination of older Renault technology under a new body is hard to beat on price, although cheaper versions feel precisely that. Drives respectably, the interior is reasonably spacious and it's pretty good to drive. Some of the touchscreen graphics are a bit amateur, but it all works. Likely to be overshadowed by the new Dacia Bigster in the eyes of family buyers, but for off-road fun and lack of frippery the Duster has few peers.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Labour at war over spending plans as Number 10 tries to stem threat from Farage
Labour at war over spending plans as Number 10 tries to stem threat from Farage

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Labour at war over spending plans as Number 10 tries to stem threat from Farage

Sir Keir Starmer is fighting to quell mounting Labour tensions over how to deal with the threat from Nigel Farage, as bitter Whitehall negotiations over the Government's Spending Review go down to the wire. Sources describe 'very unpleasant' exchanges between Rachel Reeves and senior Cabinet ministers, including Home Secretary Yvette Cooper and Local Government Secretary Angela Rayner, as the Chancellor prepares to give the NHS a £30billion boost at the expense of the police and local councils. Preparations for Wednesday's announcement have been held against the backdrop of slamming doors and raised voices, as No 10 and the Treasury work out how to divide a limited pot of public money in a way most likely to arrest the surge in support for Mr Farage's Reform UK. Ms Reeves is expected to set out plans for an extra £113billion in spending on infrastructure projects such as Sizewell C nuclear power plant, and an extra 2.8 per cent real-terms increase in the NHS's £200billion-a-year budget, amounting to an extra £30billion by 2028. But with the economy barely growing, other departments have had to take a hit as a result. A source said: 'It turned nasty between Yvette and Rachel. It was just as bad as that between Rachel and Angela, who walked out during her negotiations. 'Yvette was just passing on the concerns of the police, who said that without more money they would be forced to make stark choices about which crimes they prioritise. 'The anger of the police shows they've been briefed by Cooper on how the negotiations are going, and they're not happy.' Reeves plotting £3bn tax raid on pension By CALUM MUIRHEAD Rachel Reeves is planning a £3billion tax raid on millions of pensions. The new Pension Schemes Bill lays out a blueprint for companies to take out 'surplus' cash from certain schemes. The theory behind the plan is that companies can use the money to invest in their business and that would fuel growth. But experts fear this could lead to a repeat of the Robert Maxwell scandal of the early 1990s, when the late tycoon stole £400 million from his staff pension fund to prop up his companies. The Chancellor, who is desperate to raise tax revenues, would benefit because any 'surpluses' released are taxed at 25 per cent, which could raise almost £3billion over a decade. The bill, tabled in Parliament last week, will affect old-style pension schemes where retirement incomes are linked to people's pay packets, which have around nine million members. A minister said: 'The negotiations over the final settlements are still not sorted for some departments. They're going to carry on fighting it out over the weekend.' Another source added: 'Rachel will stand up and promise things she can't deliver. There will be a lot of guff about how she will deliver security for the country. 'But how can you promise to deliver security when Trump's doing what he's doing on tariffs and Putin is so active?' At the heart of the schism is an ideological divide between the party's Blairites, represented in No 10 by Liz Lloyd, Sir Keir's head of policy delivery, and Morgan McSweeney, the Downing Street chief of staff. Mr McSweeney is desperate to tackle small boats migration while Ms Lloyd is encouraging spending more on the NHS. Rachel Reeves is planning a £3billion tax raid on millions of pensions. The new Pension Schemes Bill lays out a blueprint for companies to take out 'surplus' cash from certain schemes. The theory behind the plan is that companies can use the money to invest in their business and that would fuel growth. But experts fear this could lead to a repeat of the Robert Maxwell scandal of the early 1990s, when the late tycoon stole £400 million from his staff pension fund to prop up his companies. The Chancellor, who is desperate to raise tax revenues, would benefit because any 'surpluses' released are taxed at 25 per cent, which could raise almost £3billion over a decade. The bill, tabled in Parliament last week, will affect old-style pension schemes where retirement incomes are linked to people's pay packets, which have around nine million members.

Is Angela 'Two Homes' Rayner paying the council tax surcharge on her grace-and-favour second residence?
Is Angela 'Two Homes' Rayner paying the council tax surcharge on her grace-and-favour second residence?

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Is Angela 'Two Homes' Rayner paying the council tax surcharge on her grace-and-favour second residence?

Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner was last night facing questions over whether she is paying her own council tax surcharge on her second home. 'Two Homes' Rayner moved into her four-bedroom, grace-and-favour residence in Admiralty House in December – four months before her Local Government Department started levying an extra 100 per cent council tax charge on second homes. Official records of MPs' expenses show that when she entered the Government, Ms Rayner designated her Ashton-under-Lyne constituency home as her 'primary residence', and her pre-Admiralty home – a rented London flat – as her second home. That allowed her to claim back the £1,621 council tax bill on the London flat from the taxpayer as one of the housing costs reimbursed by Commons authorities. But if she is still designating Ashton as her primary residence now, the £2,034 council tax bill for Admiralty House doubles to a whopping £4,068 if classed as a second home. And, as a minister living in an official residence, she would have to pay both that and the £3,338 bill for the Ashton house herself – a total of £7,406. Ashton does not attract a second-home premium because she has family members living there permanently, but questions have been raised as to whether or not she is paying the full £7,406. Tory Shadow Minister Richard Holden asked the PM and the Chancellor if they were paying council tax on their Downing St flats as primary residences, and was informed that they were. If she is still designating Ashton as her primary residence now, the £2,034 council tax bill for Admiralty House (pictured) doubles to a whopping £4,068 if classed as a second home But on asking the same of Ms Rayner, he was stonewalled with: 'The Deputy Prime Minister's council tax responsibility is properly discharged.' In a letter to Ms Rayner, Kevin Hollinrake, Shadow Secretary for Housing and Communities, asked if she had evaded the surcharge by 'flipping' her primary residence designation. He said: 'If the minister in charge of council tax has dodged the super-tax by 'flipping', this raises serious concerns about the ethics and integrity of Labour ministers.' She became known as 'Two Homes' Rayner after this newspaper revealed she shuttled between two council properties early in her marriage. When her office was asked if she was paying a bill of £4,068 in London and £3,338 in her constituency, a source said: 'The administration of council tax for Admiralty House is for the Cabinet Office and Westminster Council, as has been the case for successive Secretaries of State.'

Britain to allocate $116 billion to R&D in spending plan
Britain to allocate $116 billion to R&D in spending plan

Reuters

timean hour ago

  • Reuters

Britain to allocate $116 billion to R&D in spending plan

LONDON, June 8 (Reuters) - British finance minister Rachel Reeves will allocate 86 billion pounds ($116 billion) in this week's spending review to fund research and development, the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT) said on Sunday. It said the package, funding everything from new drug treatments and longer-lasting batteries to artificial intelligence breakthroughs, would be worth over 22.5 billion pounds a year by 2029/30, driving new jobs and economic growth. Reeves will divide more than 2 trillion pounds ($2.7 trillion) of public money between her ministerial colleagues on Wednesday, making choices that will define what the year-old Labour government can achieve in the next four years. The DSIT said the announcement on R&D follows Reeves' commitment last week to 15.6 billion pounds of government investment in local transport in city regions in the Northern England, Midlands and the South West. ($1 = 0.7398 pounds)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store