
EXCLUSIVE Campaigners demand minimum five-year jail term for knife thugs amid fears Britain's blood-soaked streets are turning into a 'lawless hellscape'
Britain's knife crime epidemic has reached such crisis levels the nation now faces plunging into the 'abyss' of a 'lawless hellscape' unless urgent action is taken.
That's the chilling warning victims have today issued to Prime Minster Sir Keir Starmer as they demand tougher jail terms for knife thugs.
Campaigners are calling for mandatory five-year sentences for adults caught carrying blades on the street, and three years for youths.
It comes amid a 'national emergency' which has seen the scourge of knife crime spread to every corner of England and Wales.
County lines drugs gangs and rival cartels are warring in city streets while youngsters in towns are carrying knives into school and slaughtering children in parks.
Norman Brennan, a former police officer and director of the Law and Order Foundation - which campaigns for victims - said the 'tsunami' of bloodshed washing over Britain had now reached apocalyptic levels.
Mr Brennan - who was almost stabbed to death tackling a burglar during his time as a London cop - has teamed up with publican influencer Adam Brooks, whose father was murdered by a machete gang, to call for tougher sentences.
'This is a national crisis. It is an emergency like I've never seen. We are heading to the abyss,' he said.
In this chilling footage, two men who appear to be armed with machetes, were seen confronting each other at a packed market in East Ham, east London in October
'We have slipped into a tide of anarchy. There's no police on the streets. The public don't feel safe. Criminals walk around now feeling untouchable.
'I predicted this knife crime epidemic 20 years ago. I've been warning governments of all political colours of the perfect storm that was coming - and now it's here. It's a tsunami... it's a tide of bloodshed.'
The pair have launched a petition calling for change. In a matter of days, more than 32,000 people signed it. It needs 100,000 to be debated in parliament.
Currently a person aged 18 or over who is convicted of a second knife offence faces a mandatory minimum sentence of six months imprisonment and at least a four-month detention and training order for 16- and 17-year-olds.
The maximum sentence for possession of a knife is four years.
However, Norman and Adam hope harsher jail terms will act as a 'deterrence', and prevent youngsters from arming themselves with a knife and stabbing someone.
For Adam, it's an issue devastatingly close to his heart.
The father-of-three runs the Three Colts pub in Buckhurst Hill, Essex, following in the footsteps of his dad, Alan - who was brutally murdered in July 1991.
Alan was the landlord at The Gunmakers Arms boozer and the Clydesdale pub when he was hacked to death by machete-wielding gangsters after barring a notorious group of drug dealers from his boozer days earlier.
Adam was just 11 when his father was slaughtered and said the impact of losing his 'idol' and 'hero' - a respected East End boxer - had ruined his life and sent him on a 'suicide mission' in his youth, picking fights with criminals and bouncers.
'There isn't a day that goes by when I don't think of my dad. That was in 1991. That was 34 years ago. It's a pain that you feel for the rest of your life,' Adam told MailOnline.
'As a kid it messed me up...for a couple of years I was on a suicide mission. It's like I was seeking out the most dangerous person I could have a row with.
'I went on a bit of a kamikaze run for a few years, picking fights with doormen and gangsters and all sorts.
'Now I've got a 15-year-old son and I'm petrified of what could happen to him... I'm that scared, if I had enough money I'd think about moving my children to another country.'
Speaking bluntly of the UK's knife scourge, he said: 'In certain areas, it's a hellscape.'
Adam, who himself has been stabbed, said the devastating consequences knife crime can have on the families of the victims, was unimaginable.
'You're inflicting pain on families and friends for the rest of their lives. But you're also ruining your own life too and the lives of your family. There's no upside to carrying knives,' he added.
Stark figures show knife crime continues to rise, with recent figures for England and Wales showing a staggering 50,973 offences being recorded in 2023/24 - marking an 80 per cent surge in the last 10 years, the Office For National Statistics said.
In London, there has been a dramatic 17.4 per cent hike as the capital reached a shameful 14-year high of 15,859 offences, up from 12,786 the year before.
According to the Crime in England and Wales 2024 report, around 30 per cent of knife-enabled crime was recorded by the Metropolitan Police Service.
And in the quaint communities of Avon and Somerset, the region has seen a breathtaking 32 per cent explosion in knife crime.
Even in some of the UK's most desirable places to live, like Norwich and Guildford, aren't immune to the modern menace of knife crime.
The counties they grace have seen a steep rise in knife-related offences over the last eight years - 196 per cent for Norfolk and an almost unbelievable 681 per cent for Surrey, home to Britain's 'stockbroker belt'.
While knife crime in both areas remains relatively low compared to the rest of the country, they are representative of a wider phenomenon that is worrying police and crime experts.
MailOnline's analysis of police figures shows other English and Welsh counties that saw the highest rise in knife offences from 2015/16 to 2023/24 are also largely rural in character.
In second place after Surrey was Gwent with a 240 per cent increase, followed by Norfolk and then Avon and Somerset (134 per cent).
'We have a knife crime epidemic in this country and it is only getting worse,' Mr Brooks added in a post on social media.
'Our Government wants to do these silly propaganda stunts like rounding the edges of knives... Rounding the edges is never going to stop knife crime – it's not even going to make the tiniest of difference.
'It's all for propaganda and all for brownie points. We need tough action; we need five-year mandatory sentences if you're caught in public with a knife.
'We need these knives off our streets and the only way that happens is through tough action and through deterrence; we need to up stop and search and make these people realise they can be stopped at any time and if they're caught with a knife their going to prison for five years.
'No ifs, no buts, no appeals – you're caught with a knife... you're going to go away. Say goodbye to your family and off you go because we need these knives off the street.'
As well as calling for harsher jail sentences, Mr Brennan and Mr Brooks are also demanding for mass stop and search powers to be ramped up, a new national education and mentor programme for children and for parents to take greater responsibility if their children are caught with a blade.
A spokeswoman for the Metropolitan Police told MailOnline: 'Tackling violence remains a top priority for the Met, with targeted activity occurring in across all parts of the organisation to tackle everything from organised groups who habitually use violence to facilitate their criminal enterprises to those causing harm in their neighbourhoods through anti-social behaviour and criminality.
'The factors that contribute to people carrying and using knives are complex and require the collective effort of police, local partners, charities and our communities.
'We have already seen some success, reducing the number of personal robberies by over 10 per cent, which makes up a large proportion of knife crime. We are also reducing the number of victims who are injured by knives and sharp objects specifically, and have achieved significant reductions of 18% less victims injured by violence.
'We will continue to prioritise our activity and proactively target those causing the most harm.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
31 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Rachel Reeves only has herself to blame for this recession
Companies were hammered by a steep rise in employment taxes. Business rates went up sharply as reliefs were wound down. The living wage was pushed up, and stamp duty breaks were slashed. Against that dismal backdrop, it is probably a miracle that the GDP figures for April published today recorded only a 0.3 per cent month-on-month decline in output. The Chancellor Rachel Reeves will shamelessly try to blame that on the tariff war started by president Trump. But the blunt truth is this. The unfolding recession was entirely predictable – and she has only herself to blame. April was always going to be a tough month for anyone struggling to run a business in the UK. Employer National Insurance went up, and we saw the initial impact of that in the annual loss of 274,000 jobs in the employment data reported earlier this week. Likewise, one of the biggest rises in the living wage was imposed, and we saw the effect of that in declining hours worked in sectors such as shops and restaurants, which need lots of modestly paid staff. Business rates went up sharply, as reliefs were wound down, with many pubs facing an extra £12,000 or more in the amount that they have to pay to the local council, and closures are now running at 100 a month. Stamp duty went up as reliefs were phased out, and we have already seen the consequences of that in the 0.4 per cent decline in home prices reported by Halifax last week. In the background, industrial electricity prices have remained by far the highest in the world, forcing factories to close their doors. One by one Reeves has taken the major sectors of the British economy – property, hospitality, retailing and manufacturing – and whacked them with huge extra charges. Sure, it didn't help that the US imposed tariffs on the UK along with its other major trading partners. And yet, in reality, the sharp fall in output witnessed in April was entirely self-imposed. It took an extraordinary level of incompetence, and a breath-taking level of arrogance, to sequence such a punishing round of tax increases so that they all kicked in at the same time. It is not as if Reeves was not warned of the devastating impact of her tax rises on businesses. The M&S boss Stuart Machin called for the NI rise to be phased in back in February but was ignored. The British Beer and Pub Association called for help with business rates, but no one at the Treasury paid any attention. Rightmove called for stamp duty relief to be extended, and so did many other estate agents, but the Government didn't listen. The list goes on and on. Time and time again, businesses have told the Chancellor that her policies are killing their trade, only to be ignored. As it has turned out, however, they were completely right, and today's GDP figures have proved that. It is going to get much worse over the next few months. We have only seen the start of the fall in employment after the NI rise. After all, if your wage bill is out of control, it takes time to slim staff numbers. There are procedures to follow before you dismiss someone, and most small companies will rely on natural wastage, and simply not replace people, instead of risking the cost of an employment tribunal. Stamp duty has only just gone up, and it will take buyers a while to figure out they can no longer afford to move. Meanwhile, retail sales are falling again, and the inevitability of more tax rises on business in the autumn is deterring investment. Reeves chose to ignore the warnings that her tax raids would crash the economy. She will now have to reap the consequences of those decisions – and unfortunately so will the rest of us.


Telegraph
31 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Reeves dismisses Khan in row over police funding
Rachel Reeves has rejected claims made by Sir Sadiq Khan that her spending review will result in the number of police officers being cut. In her spending review on Wednesday the Chancellor announced a 2.3 per cent real-terms increase in police spending power. But the National Police Chiefs' Council (NPCC) said the funding settlement 'falls far short of what is required to fund the Government's ambitions and maintain our existing workforce'. Sir Sadiq, the Mayor of London, said he was concerned the spending review 'could result in insufficient funding for the [Metropolitan Police] and fewer police officers'. Asked if Sir Sadiq was wrong, the Chancellor told the BBC Radio 4 Today programme: 'I really don't accept that there needs to be cuts when we are actually increasing the money that the police force gets.' Told about the NPCC's warning, Ms Reeves said: 'The police have been allocated a budget which has a real-terms increase of 2.3 per cent a year and they now need to live within those budgets.' Making 'sums add up' Ms Reeves said the police were getting a 'substantial' increase in spending power. She told BBC Breakfast: 'That [2.3 per cent] is a substantial increase and that is for every year of this spending review period, so for the next three years. 'So there is no reason for those numbers to decline. The spending power of police is going up substantially and the spending that we set out yesterday was an average across all parts of government of 2.3 per cent a year, and so policing are in line with that average across other government departments. 'But look, I wasn't able to say yes to everything that people asked for in the spending review. People always are going to want more whether it is in health, education, defence or indeed for policing. 'But my job as Chancellor is to make sure that the sums add up and we can't spend more than we have coming in.' Senior officers have warned that a lack of funds will put at risk Labour's promises to deploy an extra 13,000 neighbourhood police officers, as well as their pledge to halve violence against women and girls and reduce knife crime. The extra funding for the police is expected to amount to just £200 million in real-terms by the end of the decade.


The Independent
33 minutes ago
- The Independent
Australia's defense minister downplays concerns over Pentagon review of multi-billion submarine deal
Australia 's defense minister dismissed concerns Thursday that a deal between the U.S., Australia and Britain to provide his country with nuclear-powered submarines could be in jeopardy, following a report that the Pentagon had ordered a review. Australian Defense Minister Richard Marles told Sky News Australia that he had known about the review of the deal 'for some time," saying that it was a 'very natural step for the incoming administration to take.' He noted that the UK's government also reviewed the deal, the centerpiece of a three-way alliance known as AUKUS after it was elected, and that his own government had looked at it as part of its own review of Australia's entire defense posture. "I think an incoming government having a look at this is something that they have a perfect right to do and we welcome it and we'll work with it,' he said. The deal, worth more than $200 billion, was signed between the three countries in 2021 under then President Joe Biden, designed to provide Australia, one of Washington's staunchest allies in the region, with greater maritime capabilities to counter China's increasingly strong navy. The deal also involves the U.S. selling several of its Virginia-class submarines to Australia to bridge the gap as the new submarines are being jointly built. In January, Australia made the first of six $500 million payments to the U.S. under the AUKUS deal, meant to bolster American submarine manufacturing. Marles met with U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on the sidelines of a defense conference in Singapore less than two weeks ago, and told reporters afterward that he had come away with 'a sense of confidence about the way in which AUKUS is proceeding.' 'AUKUS is on track and we are meeting all the timelines that are associated with it,' he said. 'We are very optimistic.' Hegseth's address to the defense forum made multiple mentions of cooperation with Australia but no reference to AUKUS, however, though he did later mention the deal when he was taking questions. Hegseth did urge allies in the Indo-Pacific to increase their defense spending, and underscored the need for a 'strong, resolute and capable network of allies and partners' as the U.S. seeks to counter China.