Judge Orders Trump Admin to Address Discovery Requests in Abrego Garcia Case
A federal judge on Tuesday ordered the Trump administration to address 'all outstanding discovery requests' in the case of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, the illegal immigrant who was deported to his home country of El Salvador last month.
Abrego Garcia was deported despite an immigration judge issuing a withholding of removal order, which legally barred his deportation to his home country, in 2019 because of concerns for his safety.
The administration has since been ordered by the court to facilitate his return to the United States, including providing information on the steps it has taken—and plans to take—to bring him back.
In an eight-page
'For weeks, Defendants have sought refuge behind vague and unsubstantiated assertions of privilege, using them as a shield to obstruct discovery and evade compliance with this Court's orders,' Xinis stated.
According to the court document, the administration has objected to answering questions related to the case 'on the grounds of privilege,' including attorney-client privilege, the deliberative process privilege, the state secrets privilege, and 'an undefined 'government privilege.''
Related Stories
4/22/2025
4/21/2025
The judge rejected this argument, saying the privileges were invoked without any supporting information.
'Defendants have known, at least since last week, that this Court requires specific legal and factual showings to support any claim of privilege. Yet they have continued to rely on boilerplate assertions. That ends now,' she stated.
Xinis ordered the administration to provide the court with 'specific legal and factual bases' for each asserted privilege by no later than 6 p.m. on April 23.
'If defendants want to preserve their privilege claims, they must support them with the required detail. Otherwise, they will lose the protections they failed to properly invoke,' the judge stated.
The Department of Homeland Security did not respond to a request for comment by publication time.
In a court
The lawyers said that 'disclosing the details of any diplomatic discussions regarding Mr. Abrego Garcia at this time could negatively impact any outcome.'
The administration has argued that it lacks the authority to return Abrego Garcia because he is now in the custody of Salvadoran authorities.
Michael Kozak, a senior official at the State Department's Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs,
Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) speaks with Kilmar Abrego Garcia (L) in a hotel restaurant in San Salvador, El Salvador, on April 17, 2025.
Press Office Senator Van Hollen via AP
Kozak stated that Abrego Garcia provided this update to Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) on April 17 during the senator's visit to the country.
Van Hollen
President Donald Trump said that lawmakers from the Democratic Party were falsely portraying Abrego Garcia as an innocent person despite two separate courts finding him to be a member of 'the violent, killer gang MS-13,' in the country illegally, and subject to a deportation order.
'Those lying to the American People on behalf of violent criminals have to be held responsible by the Agencies and the Courts,' Trump said in a Truth Social
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Miles Taylor Challenges Trump Over ‘Revenge' Probe
Miles Taylor photographed in 2020 in Washington, DC. Credit - Bill O'Leary—The Washington Post via Getty Images A former Homeland Security official whom President Donald Trump accused of potentially 'treasonous' conduct is challenging the President's use of federal power to investigate him, filing an Inspectors General complaint on Tuesday over what he calls an 'unconstitutional order that targets a citizen not for a crime but for dissent.' Miles Taylor, who served as chief of staff at the Department of Homeland Security during Trump's first term, is urging federal watchdogs at the Department of Homeland Security and Department of Justice to investigate whether their departments are being weaponized to punish dissent through Trump's April 9 memo, in which he ordered an investigation into Taylor. 'The real harm will come if Trump's lieutenants are allowed to carry forward with these revenge investigations, unimpeded,' Taylor wrote in an op-ed for TIME published Tuesday. 'Indeed, it will create a precedent for this White House or any future president to investigate anyone they please.' Taylor penned a widely read anonymous 2018 New York Times opinion essay titled 'I Am Part of the Resistance Inside the Trump Administration,' which set off a leak investigation at the White House. Soon after, Taylor left the Administration and published an anonymous 2019 book that chronicled his observations during Trump's first term in office. He later revealed his authorship and publicly campaigned against Trump's reelection. Taylor's complaint filed this week zeroes in on presidential memorandums Trump signed in April, which singled out Taylor and another official from Trump's first term—former cybersecurity official Chris Krebs—who publicly contradicted Trump's false claims of widespread voter fraud after the 2020 election. Both Taylor and Krebs had their security clearances stripped. The memos marked a significant escalation in Trump's post-reelection efforts to use the power of his office to punish perceived enemies. Trump suggested that Taylor may have violated the Espionage Act and committed treason, a crime punishable by death. 'I think he's guilty of treason,' Trump said in the Oval Office when he signed the memo. Asked by TIME in April whether his memos calling for investigations into his critics were an appropriate use of presidential power—and whether they contradicted his own claims that former President Joe Biden had weaponized the government against him—Trump deflected: 'Oftentimes I'll have some people sitting right here, and behind them will be 10 or 15 people from their agency or their office, and they'll stand there, and then all of a sudden, I'll hear that like I'm, you know, they're all time experts in me,' Trump said. 'I know very little about Chris Krebs, but I think he was very deficient.' Taylor noted in his op-ed for TIME that Trump is following through on his earlier vows to punish him for speaking out. 'This is much bigger than me. This is about whether we will allow the President—any president, of any political party—to criminalize criticism,' Taylor wrote. 'That's why this Inspector General complaint matters.' Inspectors General are independent watchdogs embedded within federal departments, responsible for uncovering waste, fraud, abuse, and violations of law. By filing a complaint with the oversight bodies tasked with policing misconduct within the government, Taylor is seeking to trigger a formal investigation into whether federal agencies are being co-opted to serve the President's personal political agenda. Though Inspectors General lack enforcement power, their findings can lead to internal discipline, referrals to the Justice Department, or congressional scrutiny. Trump fired more than a dozen Inspectors General less than a week into his second term. Taylor's complaint asks the Inspectors General at the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Justice to determine whether Trump's memo is being used to initiate a politically motivated investigation into him in retaliation for public dissent. 'Now is the time for them to act,' he wrote, adding that 'DHS and DOJ watchdogs have a responsibility to investigate whether their departments are being misused to punish dissent, whether federal employees are violating constitutional rights, and whether this abuse of power is the beginning of something much worse.' Taylor and his legal team have argued that Trump's memo is 'unconstitutional' and warned that the President's directive amounted to 'an unprecedented' use of the executive branch to target a private citizen for exercising free speech. Taylor wrote that Trump's memo has upended his personal and professional life—forcing him to step away from his job because 'the blacklisting makes it impossible for me to carry out my work,' and exposing his family to harassment and doxxing by Trump supporters. A top Homeland Security official was even fired, he said, for attending his wedding. 'We are in a moment that will test democracy for the ages,' Taylor wrote. Write to Nik Popli at
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Abrego Garcia lawyers blast ‘shocking proposition' behind Trump admin resistance
Kilmar Abrego Garcia is still imprisoned in El Salvador after the U.S. government illegally sent him there in March. According to the latest filing from his lawyers, the Trump administration is still resisting facilitating his return, despite having been ordered to do so by judges at every level of the court system. 'The Government asks this Court to accept a shocking proposition: that federal officers may snatch residents of this country and deposit them in foreign prisons in admitted violation of federal law, while no court in the United States has jurisdiction to do anything about it,' Abrego Garcia's lawyers wrote Monday in their opposition to the government's motion to dismiss. The motion, filed last week, is pending before U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis, who ordered the government to facilitate his return nearly two months ago. The Supreme Court largely backed her order in April, but instead of approving it completely in a way that could've ended the matter, the high court's order left open questions while sending the case back to the Maryland judge for further litigation. The Supreme Court said on April 10 that Xinis' order 'properly requires the Government to 'facilitate' Abrego Garcia's release from custody in El Salvador and to ensure that his case is handled as it would have been had he not been improperly sent to El Salvador.' And yet, the government has not done that. Since then, the lower court litigation has been unfolding too slowly to the liking of Abrego Garcia's lawyers, who said in their opposition filing that the administration is just trying to rehash 'recycled arguments' in its dismissal motion. The government can now file a final reply brief before Xinis rules, and that reply would ordinarily be due in two weeks; but Abrego Garcia's lawyers have asked the judge to cut that due date to one week. 'Further briefing on recycled arguments should not prolong a case that has already dragged on far too long for Abrego Garcia and his family,' they wrote. So while news has emerged of yet more immigrants the government has wrongly sent to other countries since Abrego Garcia's illegal removal, his return is still not in sight. Subscribe to the Deadline: Legal Newsletter for expert analysis on the top legal stories of the week, including updates from the Supreme Court and developments in the Trump administration's legal cases. This article was originally published on
Time Magazine
an hour ago
- Time Magazine
Miles Taylor Files First Legal Challenge As Named Target of Trump's Retaliatory Memo
A former Homeland Security official whom President Donald Trump accused of potentially 'treasonous' conduct is challenging the President's use of federal power to investigate him, filing an Inspectors General complaint on Tuesday over what he calls an 'unconstitutional order that targets a citizen not for a crime but for dissent.' Miles Taylor, who served as chief of staff at the Department of Homeland Security during Trump's first term, is urging federal watchdogs at the Department of Homeland Security and Department of Justice to investigate whether their departments are being weaponized to punish dissent through Trump's April 9 memo, in which he ordered an investigation into Taylor. 'The real harm will come if Trump's lieutenants are allowed to carry forward with these revenge investigations, unimpeded,' Taylor wrote in an op-ed for TIME published Tuesday. 'Indeed, it will create a precedent for this White House or any future president to investigate anyone they please.' Taylor penned a widely read anonymous 2018 New York Times opinion essay titled 'I Am Part of the Resistance Inside the Trump Administration,' which set off a leak investigation at the White House. Soon after, Taylor left the Administration and published an anonymous 2019 book that chronicled his observations during Trump's first term in office. He later revealed his authorship and publicly campaigned against Trump's reelection. Taylor's complaint filed this week zeroes in on presidential memorandums Trump signed in April, which singled out Taylor and another official from Trump's first term—former cybersecurity official Chris Krebs—who publicly contradicted Trump's false claims of widespread voter fraud after the 2020 election. Both Taylor and Krebs had their security clearances stripped. The memos marked a significant escalation in Trump's post-reelection efforts to use the power of his office to punish perceived enemies. Trump suggested that Taylor may have violated the Espionage Act and committed treason, a crime punishable by death. 'I think he's guilty of treason,' Trump said in the Oval Office when he signed the memo. Asked by TIME in April whether his memos calling for investigations into his critics were an appropriate use of presidential power—and whether they contradicted his own claims that former President Joe Biden had weaponized the government against him—Trump deflected: 'Oftentimes I'll have some people sitting right here, and behind them will be 10 or 15 people from their agency or their office, and they'll stand there, and then all of a sudden, I'll hear that like I'm, you know, they're all time experts in me,' Trump said. 'I know very little about Chris Krebs, but I think he was very deficient.' Taylor noted in his op-ed for TIME that Trump is following through on his earlier vows to punish him for speaking out. 'This is much bigger than me. This is about whether we will allow the President— any president, of any political party —to criminalize criticism,' Taylor wrote. 'That's why this Inspector General complaint matters.' Inspectors General are independent watchdogs embedded within federal departments, responsible for uncovering waste, fraud, abuse, and violations of law. By filing a complaint with the oversight bodies tasked with policing misconduct within the government, Taylor is seeking to trigger a formal investigation into whether federal agencies are being co-opted to serve the President's personal political agenda. Though Inspectors General lack enforcement power, their findings can lead to internal discipline, referrals to the Justice Department, or congressional scrutiny. Trump fired more than a dozen Inspectors General less than a week into his second term. Taylor's complaint asks the Inspectors General at the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Justice to determine whether Trump's memo is being used to initiate a politically motivated investigation into him in retaliation for public dissent. 'Now is the time for them to act,' he wrote, adding that 'DHS and DOJ watchdogs have a responsibility to investigate whether their departments are being misused to punish dissent, whether federal employees are violating constitutional rights, and whether this abuse of power is the beginning of something much worse.' Taylor and his legal team have argued that Trump's memo is 'unconstitutional' and warned that the President's directive amounted to 'an unprecedented' use of the executive branch to target a private citizen for exercising free speech. Taylor wrote that Trump's memo has upended his personal and professional life—forcing him to step away from his job because 'the blacklisting makes it impossible for me to carry out my work,' and exposing his family to harassment and doxxing by Trump supporters. A top Homeland Security official was even fired, he said, for attending his wedding. 'We are in a moment that will test democracy for the ages,' Taylor wrote.
