Local food pantries brace for SNAP benefit cuts
PEORIA, Ill. (WMBD) — Millions of Americans may soon lose food assistance program benefits as the reconciliation bill moves through Congress, while local food pantries are already seeing a lot of new faces.
The reconciliation bill proposed $300 billion in cuts to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), which provides food benefits to low-income families.
'When there are things on the chopping block and funds are getting cut, we see an increase in demand in people that we have never seen before or are not the regulars,' said Julie Bonar, president and CEO of Neighborhood House in Peoria.
Bonar said the demand at their bimonthly food pantry has doubled in recent weeks. She said seniors and people with disabilities will be hurt most by the cuts.
'Oftentimes, we'll see individuals who have never been to a food pantry before because it really is not something they've had to utilize. But with losing those benefits, they still have to feed themselves or their families,' she said. 'The first time someone ever comes to a food pantry, it often can be very overwhelming because they're not used to having to come and ask for assistance.'
Nearly one in four people in Peoria County (23% of the population) depend on SNAP benefits. That's higher than the state average of 16%, according to the Illinois Department of Human Services.
The reconciliation bill increases the SNAP work requirement age from 54 to 64 for able-bodied people with kids. It also shifts the direct cost of food benefits to the states. That means Illinois will have to pick up the tab for everyone who remains in the program.
'I think that there's a lot of uncertainty, a lot of unknown and a lot of fear. And that is, I think, how all of us are feeling right now with all of the different changes that are happening so rapid fire and changing constantly,' said Bonar.
Neighborhood House relies on Midwest Food Bank and private donations to stock its pantry shelves. If you'd like to help, click here. The pantry is the 2nd and 4th Thursday of every month from 10 a.m. to noon.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Crypto Market Structure Bill Moves Out of House Committees, Stablecoin Action Pending
The House Agriculture and Financial Services Committees sent a major bipartisan message after advancing the U.S. crypto market structure bill on Tuesday, marking the first of several expected developments in the advancement of digital assets legislation expected this week. The House Financial Services Committee was hashing out some of the final details in a marathon hearing on Tuesday on the bill to set up digital assets market oversight before voting to advance it 32-19, even as the Agriculture Committee voted to advance the bill 47-6. At the same time, the Senate's legislation to regulate stablecoin issuers was rolling toward a final vote. This year's effort to finally set the U.S. stage for crypto trading, known as the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, was the focus of markups — special hearings in which congressional panels consider amendments and put a final polish on legislation before advancing it to the chamber floor. In this case, two House committees were considering the Clarity Act at the same time on Tuesday, and the agriculture panel finished first. "The Clarity Act provides certainty on digital assets to market participants, fills regulatory gaps at the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the Securities and Exchange Commission, bolsters American innovation and brings needed customer protections to digital asset related activities and intermediaries," said the agriculture panel's chairman, Glenn "GT" Thompson, as he opened his committee's hearing. The panel's ranking Democrat, Representative Angie Craig, noted that "this is not a perfect bill," but also said the tens of millions of Americans using cryptocurrency "will continue to grow whether Congress acts or not, but if we don't act, it will grow without the consumer protections that retail investors need and deserve, protections like those that govern other corners of the American financial system." The House bill outlines the jurisdictional borders between the two U.S. markets regulators and establishes a new leading role for the CFTC over the trading of digital commodities, which represents the bulk of crypto activity. Because the two congressional committees each oversees different elements of the crypto market — commodities and securities — each has a piece of the relevant jurisdiction, so the panels' work to amend the legislation will have to be melded. Congressional staffers said that the products of successful markups from each committee would then be combined into a unified "committee report" to be considered by the wider House. The legislation has been continually overhauled right up to the markups, with Republicans hoping to keep enough Democrats on board that a bipartisan support can influence how much the Senate embraces the bill if it passes the House. But Democrats in the House Financial Services Committee were still meeting to examine points of the bill they have concern with as recently as late Monday. Representative David Scott, one of the Democrats who serves on both committees, expressed the discontent of some in his party. "The bill allows crypto firms to bypass proper oversight and ignore investor protections, as I have outlined on multiple occasions here and in the finance committee," he said, arguing that the bill doesn't properly fund the commodities regulator. "The CFTC, though essential, is not designed to oversee retail-facing investment products." Scott added, "This is a gift to the worst actors in this industry." Others remain concerned that the legislation doesn't directly block senior government officials — most notably President Donald Trump — from personally benefiting from crypto business interests. Maxine Waters, the top Democrat on the House Financial Services Committee, raised similar concerns when she introduced an amendment Tuesday to the HUD Transparency Act of 2025 that would direct its inspector-general to investigate a suggestion that the Department of Housing and Urban Development might evaluate crypto or stablecoins for payments. "Unfortunately, Trump and his administration are trying to force crypto down the throats of people living in HUD-assisted housing," she said. "I for one would want to know if HUD is using Trump's stablecoin, how they choose the stablecoin and what fees are being paid into the president's pocket." During Tuesday's markup, Democrats on the Financial Services Committee offered dozens of amendments to do everything from block Trump from profiting off of or engaging in crypto ventures to setting requirements for the minimum number of commissioners the Securities and Exchange Commission and Commodity Futures Trading Commission must have before engaging in any rulemaking. These amendments all failed along party lines. While the House moves forward on the Clarity Act, the Senate is nearing a potential final vote this week on the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins of 2025" (GENIUS) Act, which would erect guardrails for the issuance of U.S. stablecoins, the dollar-based tokens that underpin a wide swath of crypto trading. Majority Leader John Thune, the Senate's top Republican who has recently joined the effort to push forward the stablecoin legislation, made a procedural move on Monday to soon advance to a final vote. Industry insiders are preparing for a vote as soon as Wednesday. Jaret Seiberg, a policy analyst at TD Cowen, said in a note to clients that Thune's move meant a "limit what amendments can be considered before a final vote on the package," including making it difficult for the backers of unrelated credit-card legislation to use the stablecoin bill as leverage to force consideration of their own effort. That was one of the final potential roadblocks to Senate advancement on the bill, which has already drawn strong bipartisan votes as it moved through the process in that chamber of Congress. The legislation's sponsor, Senator Bill Hagerty, had made it clear that the bill faces a very tight window for adoption this year, considering what else is on the Senate's plate. The GENIUS Act was on the Senate's floor agenda for Tuesday, with a 2:30 p.m. amendment deadline. If the GENIUS Act passes the Senate, it'll head to the House, where a similar stablecoin bill already awaits, having cleared its committee hurdles. At that point, lawmakers will have to decide their strategy on how to proceed, whether to include the stablecoin matter alongside the market structure bill as a single package, whether the House can just take up the Senate's bill as written or whether the House will seek to hash out its own version. UPDATE (June 11, 2025, 04:00 UTC): Adds Financial Services Committee vote.
New York Post
35 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump shows he called Newsom during LA riots as California gov claims there wasn't ‘even a voicemail'
President Donald Trump hit back at Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom's claims that the president did not recently call him, telling Fox News he spoke to the governor for about 16 minutes on Saturday. Trump told Fox News Tuesday while traveling to Fort Bragg, North Carolina, that Newsom did not pick up his first call over the weekend, but that he picked up the second call and the pair spoke for about 16 minutes on Saturday. 'I told him to, essentially, 'Get his ass in gear,' and stop the riots, which were out of control,' Trump said Tuesday. 'More than anything else, this shows what a liar he is – said I never called.' Trump provided a screenshot of the phone call dated June 7 at 1:23 a.m. White House director of communications Steven Cheung added in comment to Fox Digital Tuesday afternoon: 'The President called Gavin Newsom to tell him to get his ass in gear. The Governor has clearly decided to disgustingly side with the violent rioters instead of protecting Californians. The only liar here is Newsom who continues to fail his state as he prioritizes doing interviews with leftist media to gaslight the public instead of helping his state.' 4 US President Donald Trump speaks at Fort Bragg to celebrate the US Army's 250th anniversary at Pike Field at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, USA, 10 June 2025. STAN GILLILAND/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock Earlier Tuesday, Trump held an event addressing wildfire response and prevention from the Oval Office, where he fielded a handful of questions from the media regarding the ongoing anti-ICE riots in Los Angles, telling a reporter he spoke to Newsom 'a day ago.' 'A day ago. I called him up to tell him (he's) got to do a better job. He's done a bad job,' Trump said. In a response post on X, Newsom claimed Trump did not call him or leave a voicemail in the past day. 4 Trump announced Saturday that he was deploying 2,000 National Guard troops to help quell the violence. Toby Canham for NY Post 'There was no call. Not even a voicemail. Americans should be alarmed that a President deploying Marines onto our streets doesn't even know who he's talking to,' Newsom posted to X Tuesday afternoon, accompanied by video of Trump in the Oval Office. 'This call is from 3 days ago,' the governor's press office added on X following the White House's pushback on Newsom's claim that Trump did not call. Newsom's office added in an email to Fox News Digital Tuesday that: 'The Governor's comment is clearly in regards to the President's comment this morning of 'a day ago,'' adding that Newsom had already confirmed his Saturday phone call in a media interview on Sunday. 4 Gov. Gavin Newsom speaks during an address on Tuesday, June 10, 2025. AP Newsom spokesperson Izzy Gardon added in a comment to the Sacramento Bee Tuesday: 'I just personally looked through the governor's phone. No missed call. No voicemail. Nothing. The last time they spoke was Friday when the governor called him.' Los Angeles descended into violent riots Friday when federal immigration officials converged on the city to carry out raids targeting illegal immigrants. Local leaders such as Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass and Newsom, however, quickly denounced the raids in public statements while offering words of support for illegal immigrants in the state. Protests over the raids soon devolved into violence as rioters targeted and launched attacks on federal law enforcement officials. 4 Serious disorder takes place in downtown Los Angeles hundredsof law enforcement are deployed as are National Guard. Toby Canham for NY Post Trump announced Saturday that he was deploying 2,000 National Guard troops to help quell the violence. The Trump administration also deployed hundreds of U.S. Marines to respond to anti-immigration chaos on Monday evening as the violence continued. 'If I didn't 'SEND IN THE TROOPS' to Los Angeles the last three nights, that once beautiful and great City would be burning to the ground right now,' Trump posted to Truth Social on Tuesday morning.
an hour ago
Trump's actions in Los Angeles spur debate over deportation funds in his 'big, beautiful' bill
WASHINGTON -- President Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' in Congress includes more than tax breaks and spending cuts — it also seeks to pour billions of dollars into the administration's mass deportation agenda. Republican leaders capitalized Tuesday on the demonstrations in Los Angeles, where people are protesting Trump's immigration raids at Home Depot and other places, to make the case for swift passage of their sprawling 1,000-plus-page bill over staunch Democratic opposition. House Speaker Mike Johnson said the One Big Beautiful Bill Act delivers 'much-needed reinforcements,' including 10,000 new Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, $45 billion to expand migrant detention facilities and billions more to carry out at least 1 million deportations a year. 'All you have to do is look at what's happening in Los Angeles to realize that our law enforcement needs all the support that we can possibly give them,' said Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D. The focus on some $350 billion in national security funding comes as action on the massive package is lumbering along in Congress at a critical moment. Trump wants the bill on his desk by the Fourth of July. But Senate Republicans trying to heave it to passage without Democrats are also running up against objections from within their GOP ranks over the details. At the same time, Democrats are warning that Trump's executive reach into California — sending in the National Guard over the governor's objections and calling up the Marines — is inflaming tensions in what had been isolated protests in pockets of LA. They warned the president's heavy-handed approach has the potential to spread, if unchecked, to other communities nationwide. 'We are at a dangerous inflection point in our country,' said Rep. Jimmy Gomez, who represents the Los Angeles area. 'Trump created this political distraction to divide us and keep our focus away from his policies that are wreaking havoc on our economy and hurting working families," he said. "It's a deliberate attempt by Trump to incite unrest, test the limits of executive power and distract from the lawlessness of his administration.' At its core, the bill extends some $4.5 trillion in existing tax breaks that would otherwise expire at the end of the year without action in Congress, cutting some $1.4 trillion in spending over the decade to help offset costs. The Congressional Budget Office found the bill's changes to Medicaid and other programs would leave an estimated 10.9 million more people without health insurance and at least 3 million each month without food stamps from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. At the same time, CBO said the package will add some $2.4 trillion to deficits over the decade. One emerging area of concern for Republican leaders has been the bill's status before the Senate parliamentarian's office, which assesses whether the package complies with the strict rules used for legislation under the so-called budget reconciliation process. Late Monday, Republicans acknowledged potential 'red flags' coming from the parliamentarian's office that will require changes in the House bill before it can be sent to the Senate. Leaders are using the reconciliation process because it allows for simple majority passage in both chambers, were GOP majorities are razor-thin. House Majority Leader Steve Scalise said Republicans are preparing to address the concerns with a vote in the House, possibly as soon as this week, to change the package. Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer seized on the House's upcoming do-over vote as a chance for Republicans who are dissatisfied with the package to reassert their leverage and 'force the bill back to the drawing board.' 'They say they don't like parts of the bill — now is their opportunity to change it,' Schumer said. On Tuesday, Vice President JD Vance was dispatched to speak with one GOP holdout, Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, who has pushed for deeper spending reductions in the bill to prevent skyrocketing deficits from adding to the nation's $36 trillion debt load. Other Republican senators have raised concerns about the health care cuts. But Republicans are in agreement on border security, deportation and military funding, over the objections of Democrats who fought vigorously during the committee process to strip those provisions from the bill. The package includes about $150 billion for border security and deportation operations, including funding for hiring 10,000 new ICE officers — with what Johnson said are $10,000 hiring bonuses — as well as 3,000 new Border Patrol agents and other field operations and support staff. There's also funding for a daily detention capacity for 100,000 migrants and for flights for 1 million deportations annually. The package includes $46 billion for construction of Trump's long promised wall between the U.S.-Mexico border. Additionally, the bill includes $150 billion for the Pentagon, with $5 billion for the military deployment in support of border security, along with nearly $25 billion for Trump's 'Golden Dome' defense system over the U.S. Separately, the bill adds another $21 billion for the Coast Guard. Democrats have argued against the deportations, and warned that Trump appears to be stirring up protests so he can clamp down on migrant communities. Rep. Nanette Barragan — whose district represents the suburban city of Paramount, where the weekend Home Depot raid touched off protests — implored Americans: 'Listen to the words of this administration: They're using words like insurrection. They're using words like invasion.' She warned the administration is laying the groundwork for even steeper actions. 'That's a concern,' she said. 'That is dangerous. It's wrong.'
