High Court dismisses challenge against Clare wind farm
The High Court has dismissed objectors' judicial review challenge against the green light for a 579 ft high eight turbine wind farm for lands in south east Clare.
Over 300 people from the area lodged objections against the Fahy Beg wind farm proposal and Clare County Council refused planning permission to RWE Renewables Ireland Ltd for the 38.4 MW wind-farm on lands 1.5km from Bridgetown, and 3.5km from O'Briensbridge in south-east Clare in May 2023.
As part of the proposal, the wind-farm developers are to establish a Community Benefit Fund which will distribute up to €3.12m over the first 15 years of the wind farm.
Documents lodged with the application state that the provision of the Community Benefit Fund "will have a significant long-term, positive effect on the socio-economic profile of the study area and wider area".
The council refused across five grounds including that the planned wind farm would depreciate the price of property as it would be visually over-bearing on those properties.
However, RWE Renewables Ireland appealed and An Bord Pléanála overturned the council refusal to grant planning permission in March 2024.
In response, the Fahybeg Windfarm Opposition Group and Sean Conway launched High Court judicial review proceedings seeking to have the appeals board decision quashed for the wind farm which is to be located on a site 14km north of Limerick city.
However, Mr Justice Richard Humphreys - who presides over the Planning and Environment Division of the High Court - has dismissed all grounds of the judicial review challenge.
The applicants claimed that the decision should be quashed as the planned wind farm would materially contravene the Development Plan due to the loss of part of Ballymoloney Woods.
Mr Justice Humphreys stated that on the basis of the applicants' analysis, the felling of any tree necessarily constitutes a material contravention of the Development Plan.
Mr Justice Humphreys stated that this approach represented an "excessively literalist and absolutist interpretation" of development plan objectives.
Mr Justice Humphreys stated that the application failed to engage with the specifics of the individual trees which are actually being felled, pointing 0.4 of a hectare or 0.2% of the total amount of long established woodland is being removed.
He said: "There is no absolute prohibition on the removal of trees, contrary to the applicants' complaints, and a reasonably informed reader would not read such a preclusion into the Development Plan when same is read objectively and holistically."
Mr Justice Humphreys also dismissed the objectors' claim that planning permission should be quashed due to the impact that the wind farm would have on property prices in the area.
He said that there is no substantive evidence presented that would conclusively indicate a depreciation in property values directly attributable to the wind farm's presence at this particular location.
Mr Justice Humphreys made no order in relation to costs.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Independent
8 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Regulator takes proceedings against Sky Ireland
The case, lodged in the High Court, seeks an order compelling Sky to tell customers in a prominent way when a fixed contract is going to be automatically renewed, and to do this at least a month in advance. Sky has said it does not believe that ComReg is interpreting the relevant European regulation correctly, and is preparing to defend its position. In a statement to the Irish Independent today, ComReg confirmed it has issued proceedings in relation to the alleged contravention by Sky Ireland of Regulation 89.6 of the EU's electronic communications code. These came into force in 2022. ComReg said it has sought a restraining order requiring Sky 'not to repeat the contravention of Regulation 89 (6)' and also requiring it to 'refrain from not informing customers in a prominent and timely manner before a fixed duration contract is automatically prolonged, being not less than one month before the prolongation date, and on a durable medium, of the end of contractual commitment and of the means by which to terminate the contract'. A durable medium is defined as a paper record, but could also be interpreted as an email. The regulator is also seeking an order requiring Sky to 'refrain from not providing consumers with their best tariff advice' before a contract is automatically renewed, and to 'refrain from failing to provide consumers with their best tariff information at least annually after the automatic prolongation of their contract'. Asked to respond, a Sky spokesperson said: 'Sky takes its regulatory obligations very seriously and complies with all relevant laws in each of the markets in which it operates. 'In this instance, ComReg and Sky differ in their legal interpretation of Regulation 86 (9) of the European Electronics Communication Code. We look forward to outlining our arguments in this regard in due course.' This is not the first time Sky has come into conflict with the regulator. Two years ago it paid ComReg €54,000 for failing to put consumer references on all bills. These are the numbers needed when someone wants to switch provider. ComReg said Sky paid the fine instead of facing prosecution. A number of customers had contacted the regulator to report difficulties switching from Sky due to a lack of information. In 2019, Sky Ireland and ComReg settled a High Court dispute over broadband charges. The regulator had changed the rules around how Eir charged other telecos for using its network. Eir was allowed to charge rivals such as Sky up to €170 every time a customer moved from one supplier to another. Sky challenged the ruling, arguing that mistakes had been made in the decision. The case was settled after ComReg said it would consult with telecos over the issue.
RTÉ News
16 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Councillor calls for League of Ireland team to be set up in Clare
The possibility of Clare becoming home to a League of Ireland soccer team is to be raised in the chamber of Clare County Council. At last night's June meeting of the local authority Sinn Féin councillor Tommy Guilfoyle had a motion on the agenda calling for "the appropriate personnel in Clare County Council to come together and set up a discussion to explore the possible setup of a League of Ireland soccer team in the Banner County with all the relevant stakeholders". While the meeting over ran and the motion was deferred to the July monthly meeting, Councillor Guilfoyle is adamant that there is sufficient demand for a League of Ireland team in the county. "For years I've lived in this community, and I've seen the wealth of young people who play soccer," the Clarecastle-based councillor said. "So, we have all these kids playing soccer in county Clare but the majority of them if they want to play League of Ireland are going to Treaty United in Limerick or Galway United," he added. As to who would finance the early stages of this potential project, Councillor Guilfoyle said that it would not be the local authority. "I wouldn't be putting that to the council at all," he said. "My view of the council getting involved is to bring parties together. "We have an economic development department, we have a tourism department and we have a sporting department. "Three people from those departments could come together, call in others, sit down and have a conversation about this." "That conversation would itch the ear off an investor. I know it would," Councillor Guilfoyle predicted. "And what happens then is investors ears cock," he added. In 2023 Newmarket Celtic became the first Clare club to win the FAI Junior Cup while Avenue United reached the final of that competition in 1990. Alan O'Callaghan who is Cathaoirleach of Clare County Council is supportive of the concept of a League of Ireland team being based in the county. "We're sowing a seed into people's heads at a higher level like the FAI," he said. "There are going to be huge challenges with funding but hopefully something might come out of it, you'd never know." "There might be someone that would be willing to say, 'this is not a bad idea,'" he suggested. Funding from county council ruled out However, Councillor O'Callaghan ruled out any source of funding from the county council. "We don't have that kind of money but there are different programmes that do pop-up for funding through Sports Capital Grants. "Maybe the council can put one forward and maybe identify a site." In Lees Road municipal sports ground in Ennis a number of people were supportive of a Clare bid to hosting League of Ireland soccer. "I travel up to Sligo, to Treaty [Limerick] and to Galway to watch League of Ireland. I would much prefer to watch a team in Clare. I'd have more of an emotional attachment to that," one person said. "I think it would be a great idea. There's lots of interest in soccer in Clare. It would be worth giving it a try and see what happens," another added. "The more soccer we have here the better. Anyone interested in soccer in Clare is going to Limerick or Galway to see League of Ireland matches," a third person pointed out.
RTÉ News
a day ago
- RTÉ News
High Court dismisses challenge against Clare wind farm
The High Court has dismissed objectors' judicial review challenge against the green light for a 579 ft high eight turbine wind farm for lands in south east Clare. Over 300 people from the area lodged objections against the Fahy Beg wind farm proposal and Clare County Council refused planning permission to RWE Renewables Ireland Ltd for the 38.4 MW wind-farm on lands 1.5km from Bridgetown, and 3.5km from O'Briensbridge in south-east Clare in May 2023. As part of the proposal, the wind-farm developers are to establish a Community Benefit Fund which will distribute up to €3.12m over the first 15 years of the wind farm. Documents lodged with the application state that the provision of the Community Benefit Fund "will have a significant long-term, positive effect on the socio-economic profile of the study area and wider area". The council refused across five grounds including that the planned wind farm would depreciate the price of property as it would be visually over-bearing on those properties. However, RWE Renewables Ireland appealed and An Bord Pléanála overturned the council refusal to grant planning permission in March 2024. In response, the Fahybeg Windfarm Opposition Group and Sean Conway launched High Court judicial review proceedings seeking to have the appeals board decision quashed for the wind farm which is to be located on a site 14km north of Limerick city. However, Mr Justice Richard Humphreys - who presides over the Planning and Environment Division of the High Court - has dismissed all grounds of the judicial review challenge. The applicants claimed that the decision should be quashed as the planned wind farm would materially contravene the Development Plan due to the loss of part of Ballymoloney Woods. Mr Justice Humphreys stated that on the basis of the applicants' analysis, the felling of any tree necessarily constitutes a material contravention of the Development Plan. Mr Justice Humphreys stated that this approach represented an "excessively literalist and absolutist interpretation" of development plan objectives. Mr Justice Humphreys stated that the application failed to engage with the specifics of the individual trees which are actually being felled, pointing 0.4 of a hectare or 0.2% of the total amount of long established woodland is being removed. He said: "There is no absolute prohibition on the removal of trees, contrary to the applicants' complaints, and a reasonably informed reader would not read such a preclusion into the Development Plan when same is read objectively and holistically." Mr Justice Humphreys also dismissed the objectors' claim that planning permission should be quashed due to the impact that the wind farm would have on property prices in the area. He said that there is no substantive evidence presented that would conclusively indicate a depreciation in property values directly attributable to the wind farm's presence at this particular location. Mr Justice Humphreys made no order in relation to costs.
