logo
Liberals pick up another seat by a single vote after results of judicial recount in Montreal-area riding

Liberals pick up another seat by a single vote after results of judicial recount in Montreal-area riding

Globe and Mail12-05-2025

Thanks to a single vote, the federal Liberals have won a Montreal-area riding, edging the party closer to the number of seats required for a majority government.
A judicial recount found that Tatiana Auguste won the riding of Terrebonne by one vote over Bloc Québécois incumbent Nathalie Sinclair-Desgagné, who had initially appeared to be the winner there in last month's federal election.
That gives the Liberals 170 seats in the House of Commons, two short of the 172 needed to form a majority government, which would bolster the party's ability to advance its political agenda.
Meanwhile, the number of Bloc seats has fallen to 22. The Conservatives won 143 seats in the federal election, the NDP won seven seats, and the Green Party won a single seat.
Although there are announcements of three other judicial recounts on the Elections Canada website, there is no path for the Liberals to secure a majority through their outcomes.
Ms. Auguste did not respond to The Globe and Mail's requests for comment but said in a statement posted on social media that after a long electoral process and rigorous judicial counting her victory had been confirmed.
Poilievre rejects severance offered to defeated MPs after losing Ontario riding
A total 61,118 votes were cast in the riding, but the initial outcome was close enough to warrant a judicial recount – a process launched when there is a difference of less than 0.1 per cent between the leading candidate and second-place candidate.
Last Wednesday, Chief Electoral Officer of Canada Stéphane Perrault announced, in a statement, that there would be a judicial recount in the riding because the difference between the two leading candidates was 44 votes.
The recount, conducted by Quebec Superior Court Justice Danielle Turcotte, began on Thursday.
By Saturday night, the result was a single-vote victory for Ms. Auguste, a former assistant to Montreal Liberal MP Emmanuel Dubourg, who was running in her first election.
Ms. Auguste won 23,352 votes compared to 23,351 for Ms. Sinclair-Desgagné, who had been elected to represent the riding in 2021.
Political scientist Hamish Telford said he had never heard of a federal or provincial election decided by one vote.
Prof. Telford, who teaches at the University of the Fraser Valley in British Columbia, said it may have happened in the distant past when the number of voters was much smaller.
'But it is statistically improbable in the modern era. It is a reminder that every vote counts but again it is unlikely that an election will be decided by one vote so I am not sure it will influence voters,' he said in a statement.
Alex Marland, a politics professor at Nova Scotia's Acadia University, said the one-vote story out of Terrebonne may be used in the future as an example by political parties and campaign teams that every vote matters.
One of the three other judicial recounts is in the Newfoundland and Labrador riding of Terra Nova-The Peninsulas, where the difference between the two front-running candidates is 12 votes. Liberal Anthony Germain is ahead at this point, over Conservative Party candidate Jonathan Rowe.
The second is in Milton East–Halton Hills South, near Toronto, where the current difference is 29 votes, and Liberal candidate Kristina Tesser Derksen is ahead of Conservative candidate Parm Gill.
Finally, there's a judicial recount scheduled in Windsor – Tecumseh – Lakeshore where the current difference between the two leading candidates is 77 votes. Conservative challenger Kathy Borrelli initially won that riding over Liberal incumbent Irek Kusmierczyk.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Alberta Premier grilled on province's coal policy at rowdy, angry town hall
Alberta Premier grilled on province's coal policy at rowdy, angry town hall

Globe and Mail

time3 hours ago

  • Globe and Mail

Alberta Premier grilled on province's coal policy at rowdy, angry town hall

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith and three of her ministers got an earful on Wednesday night from southern Alberta locals at a rowdy, hours-long town hall to discuss the province's coal policy. About 500 people, dressed in cowboy hats, belt buckles, and jeans, packed a community hall in Fort Macleod, Alta., for an event marked by heckling, competing applause and placards. 'If we are not prepared to look and find middle-ground solutions to allow for industries to proceed while reducing our environmental footprint, you're going to find that different industries become the next on the hit list,' Smith said through a chorus of protesting voices and verbal jabs. 'Banning industries is just not something we are going to do.' The premier and her ministers of energy, environment and agriculture took questions and were shouted down on several occasions by attendees as they defended changes to the province's coal policy. Many in the crowd held small placards reading 'lie' and 'false,' raising them each time they disagreed with a statement. There was a notable group that came in support of the province's coal policy, frequently applauding the ministers and shooting back at other crowd members. Many attendees carried notebooks and pens, keenly taking notes throughout. The town hall came weeks after the Alberta Energy Regulator, or AER, granted an Australia-based coal company permission to start a controversial coal exploration on the eastern slopes of the Rocky Mountains. Northback Holding Corp.'s project at Grassy Mountain was initially rejected in 2021 when a panel ruled that the likely environmental effects on fish and water quality outweighed the potential economic benefits. Alberta regulator approves controversial coal exploration applications at Grassy Mountain Late last year, the project was exempted from the Alberta government's decision to ban open-pit coal mines because Northback's application was considered an 'advanced' proposal. The issue has been polarizing in southern Alberta, where the debate has primarily revolved around the economic implications of development against environmental effects. A non-binding referendum in Crowsnest Pass saw 70 per cent of voters saying they'd support the nearby coal project. Despite frequent pushback over the two-and-a-half-hour event, Smith rarely chose to get into back-and-forth discussions with attendees. She defended the province's approach to coal developments, pitching responsible development that prioritizes environmental standards. Smith also frequently cited a lawsuit by five coal companies that say they're owed $15 billion by the province in lost revenues and sunk costs. She argued again on Wednesday that she had taxpayers in mind when the province lifted its moratorium on coal mining and development on the eastern slopes. 'If we do nothing, then we are told we'll likely lose those cases and have to pay ($15 billion).' An energetic Brian Jean, the province's energy minister, frequently challenged the boisterous crowd and at times trotted offstage to hand his business card to those asking questions. 'I live in the oilsands. You can't tell me what I'm concerned about and what I'm not concerned about. I'm very concerned about our earth and our planet,' he said. Coal mines on Alberta's eastern slopes are poisoning fish populations, study says Several questions returned to a new study by Alberta government scientists, yet to be peer reviewed, which recently said old coal mines on the eastern slopes are poisoning fish and any further coal mining there would result in 'population collapse' of fish species in a nearby lake. Asked about the report, Environment Minister Rebecca Schulz said the province is looking into the issue and is waiting for it to be confirmed by the peer-review process. She said further studies to be released later this year are being conducted. 'We want to understand what is happening there so that we can prevent that from happening in the future.' The premier also jousted with protesters while speaking to reporters before the town hall. When a group gathered behind her and started yelling, she turned around and asked them to let her finish the interview. 'I'm looking for a little bit of courtesy,' she said. The event was scheduled to last two hours, but Smith asked to take questions for an extra 30 minutes after the clock had run out.

Heated Hampstead council meeting ends with police removing former mayor
Heated Hampstead council meeting ends with police removing former mayor

CTV News

time3 hours ago

  • CTV News

Heated Hampstead council meeting ends with police removing former mayor

Former Hampstead mayor William Steinberg was removed by police during a heated council meeting after clashing with Mayor Jeremy Levi over spending and transparency. The mayor and former mayor of Hampstead went toe to toe during Monday's council meeting, hurling accusations of misappropriating public funds at each other in a heated exchange that ended with the latter being expelled by Montreal police (SPVM). According to the SPVM, the town of Hamstead requested police assistance in expelling a 77-year-old man who was behaving 'inappropriately or disruptively' during the meeting. The confrontation lasted about 15 minutes, during which both men continuously interrupted each other. 'The police intervened to remove this man. There was nothing criminal and no arrest was made,' said SPVM spokesperson Julien Lévesque. Former mayor William Steinberg called his removal 'disgraceful' and said that he was looking for answers. Former mayor of Hampstead William Steinberg During the exchange, Steinberg confronted Mayor Jeremy Levi about a 40.5 per cent salary increase for councillors, totalling $207,738, and questioned expensive travel and hotel stays, including a $900-a-night stay at the Dallas Omni hotel. 'I want to be clear, I'm not saying they did anything illegal. You elect people, they can pretty much do what they want, and it's too bad you elected them. So, 40 per cent salary increase, of course, it's outrageous,' said Steinberg in a recent interview. He said his wife was also kicked out of the meeting when she later 'called [Levi] on a lie. 'I mean, this is not transparent. This is not honest,' said Steinberg. Steinberg was mayor of Hampstead for 16 years until he lost to Levi in 2021. Hampstead Mayor Jeremy Levi Levi defended the salary increase, saying that Steinberg 'erroneously' advised the council that the mayor's salary has to be three times that of a councillor. 'We looked into that and that was never the case. It's factually incorrect. I looked at the amount of work that council puts in. You know better than anybody else the amount of work that gets involved with council,' Levi told Steinberg during the exchange. 'So, we thought it was perfectly acceptable for $38,000 for a councillor to have as their salary, which is very in line with other councillors throughout the city. I don't see why they would be required to pay it back.' As for the Dallas hotel stay, Levi said the conference took place at the Omni, and the rate was $480 U.S. a night. Levi then noted he looked into Steinberg's expense reimbursements during his mandate and found the former mayor claimed over $16,000 compared to $200 so far under his own term. Steinberg argued that Levi misrepresented his expenses by focusing only on reimbursements, some of which were purchases made on behalf of the town. Many of the allegations Steinberg has made against Levi and the rest of the council are found in his blog, where he also mentions a January 2024 report by the Commission municipale du Québec (CMQ) into the improper use of credit cards by municipal employees and 'inadequate control of the expenses incurred.' According to the former mayor, he obtained the financial information through numerous access to information requests. Levi has repeatedly defended Hampstead's director general, Richard Sun, claiming he did not engage in any wrongdoing and that the council has no grounds to suspect foul play or improper conduct. In a statement to CTV News, Levi's office said that several of the expenses cited in the blog post were incurred during the pandemic when traditional town-wide holiday gatherings were not feasible. 'Council instead authorized smaller, department-specific meals in local restaurants to recognize staff efforts—an approach aligned with the town's intent to maintain employee morale and support local businesses, in accordance with public health guidelines,' Hampstead spokesperson Sarah-Eve Longtin said. Additionally, she said that only a single adjustment of 29 per cent for a salary increase was approved in July 2022. In terms of the CMQ report, Longtin said the town has taken concrete action in response to the CMQ's recommendations, including the implementation of a strengthened policy framework governing the use of town credit cards. 'Internal procedures regarding expense approval, documentation, and accountability have been reinforced through revised protocols and staff training,' she added. Steinberg said that he plans on publishing a new blog post within the next few days. 'I have no plans to run. I want this council replaced by honest, ethical people who care about Hampstead,' he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store