A US trade court just blocked a wide swath of Trump's tariffs. Here are the duties that may be impacted.
A startling decision Wednesday from the United States Court of International Trade appeared to put at least a temporary pause on many of President Trump's wide-ranging tariffs.
The Manhattan-based trade court ruled in an opinion issued by a three-judge panel that a key 1977 law called the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not give Trump "unbounded" authority to issue the worldwide and retaliatory tariffs the president has imposed by executive order in recent months.
Many of the president's actions "exceed any authority granted to the President by IEEPA to regulate importation by means of tariffs," read the decision, which blocked imposition of some of Trump' tariffs and invalidated the president's orders.
The ruling applies to a series of controversial actions that Trump has taken to impose tariffs on entire nations since taking office. The ruling is not expected to impact other actions he has taken focused on specific goods from automobiles to steel — which rely on a different legal authority.
The White House immediately reacted to the news, with spokesman Kush Desai saying in a statement that "it is not for unelected judges to decide how to properly address a national emergency."
Late Wednesday, the administration filed a notice with the court stating that it planned to appeal the decision.
Meanwhile, some of those who brought the cases celebrated. A law professor who helped bring the suit wrote a reaction online that suggested the legal wrangling will continue but said: 'The bottom line is a major victory in the legal battle against these harmful and illegal tariffs.'
The tariff orders were challenged by a New York liquor importer and several other American small businesses, as well as 11 state attorneys general.
With the Trump administration's plan to appeal, the matter will likely head to the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which has jurisdiction over international trade law disputes. The case could eventually reach the Supreme Court.
The decision's focus on IEEPA immediately throws into doubt some of the most far-reaching of Trump's tariff actions since taking office. Most notably, those include his "Liberation Day" tariffs of 10% on nearly the entire world, as well as the current threat of higher tariffs on countries that fail to reach a deal during his 90-day pause.
The president has also relied on IEEPA to impose duties on nations such as Mexico, Canada, and China, claiming that the nations' failure to curb the flow of illegal drugs and migration into the US threatened US national security.
The law was also the authority Trump planned to use when threatening, before deferring, on possible tariffs on Colombia.
The White House doubled down on its national security claim on Wednesday evening.
"Foreign countries' nonreciprocal treatment of the Unites States has fueled America's historic and persistent trade deficits," said Desai, the White House spokesman. "These deficits have created a national emergency that has decimated American communities, left our workers behind, and weakened our defense industrial base – facts that the court did not dispute."
Duties based on other laws like those Trump has imposed on certain aluminum and steel products are not included in the court's decision.
Recent duties on automobiles imposed by the president use so-called Section 232 tariff authority derived from a separate law called the Trade Expansion Act of 1962.
The tariffs on steel and aluminum also rely on Section 232.
Other sector-specific tariffs from Trump's first term — and from President Biden's time in office — also often relied on another tariff authority derived from Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974.
The ruling was immediately celebrated by some of Trump's critics in Washington. Senator Ron Wyden of Oregon said in a statement that he "argued from the start that Donald Trump's claim that he could simply decree sky-high new taxes on imported goods depended on mangling the Constitution beyond recognition.'
Oregon was one of the states that brought suit against the Trump administration.
'I have no doubt the legal wrangling will continue, but I'm committed to retaking Congress's authority over trade for good and shutting down Trump's ability to unilaterally declare trade war with the world," Wyden said.
The International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977 (IEEPA) says that during a national emergency, the president, in order to respond to an "unusual and extraordinary threat" from abroad, can regulate economic transactions, including imports.
Congress passed the IEEPA to restrict presidents from overstepping a 1917 World War I-era law known as the Trading With the Enemy Act (TWEA). The act, which regulates US transactions with enemy powers, allowed the president to exercise broad economic power during wartime and during national emergencies.
In this case, the trade court ruled that because the Constitution expressly allocates tariff power to Congress, IEEPA does not delegate "unbounded" tariff authority to the President. Instead, IEEPA's provisions impose "meaningful limits" on the authority that IEEPA confers, the panel said.
The court also said the president's tariffs fell short of meeting the IEEPA's requirements because the duties do not address "an unusual and extraordinary threat" to national security.
Alexis Keenan is a legal reporter for Yahoo Finance. Follow Alexis on X @alexiskweed. Ben Werschkul is a Washington correspondent for Yahoo Finance.
Click here for political news related to business and money policies that will shape tomorrow's stock prices
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Harvard Business Review
30 minutes ago
- Harvard Business Review
The Skills and Habits Aspiring CEOs Need to Build
It's no secret that today's business environment is volatile and unpredictable. From the Covid-19 pandemic to shape-shifting tariffs to the rise of gen AI, CEOs have a fresh set of challenges that the standard management playbook is ill-equipped to address. As a result, many are heading for the exit. According to one survey of U.S. companies, nearly 2,000 CEOs announced their departures in 2024—the highest total on record. At the same time, executive recruiters report that fewer people are interested in, or ready to, replace these exiting CEOs. This raises a number of questions: Are we at an inflection point in what future CEOs need to be successful? Is enough being done to equip up-and-coming CEOs to navigate these evolving dynamics? How can companies ensure future leaders are prepared to make tough decisions in chaotic times, and lead diverse, tech-first, and global workforces? To answer these questions, we reached out to three experts: Ginny Rometty, former chairman, president, and CEO of IBM, serves on multiple boards and co-chairs OneTen. Nitin Nohria is the George F. Baker Jr. and Distinguished Service University Professor and former dean of Harvard Business School (HBS). He is the co-founder of HBS's New CEO Workshop. Gary Burnison is the CEO of Korn Ferry. We specifically asked: What skills and behaviors should aspiring CEOs prioritize on building now to thrive in an increasingly complex world? And how can organizations support them in building these skills? Here are their answers, edited for clarity. Ginni Rometty: Prioritize Behaviors—Not Just Hard Skills The rise of AI, geopolitical fragmentation, and evolving expectations around inclusion are reshaping leadership. Aspiring CEOs should prioritize behaviors—not just 'hard' skills—to navigate this landscape of constant change. There are three key areas you should focus on. Be an Olympic learner. When I stepped into the CEO role at IBM, we were facing a rapidly shifting technology landscape—and a business model that needed to evolve. I approached that moment the way an Olympic athlete approaches their training—constantly iterating, stretching, and seeking input. I didn't need to have all the answers; I needed to ask the right questions and create a culture where others felt safe to do the same. We instituted mandatory learning—40 hours for all employees—not as a simple requirement, but to make learning part of how the company worked and as a catalyst for a culture of growth. I personally taught the first hour of our monthly sessions for four years. This wasn't just symbolic; it signaled that in an era of technological disruption, continuous learning isn't optional but essential at every level of the organization. That mindset is one I encourage every aspiring leader to embrace. It's especially critical as AI and automation change the nature of work and decision-making. Organizations must cultivate curiosity and create space for reflection, co-creation, and experimentation. Steward good tech. As the influence of AI and emerging technologies grows, future CEOs will need to do more than adopt innovation—they must steward it responsibly. This means making decisions rooted in long-term values, not driven by achieving short-term metrics. One pivotal moment came when, at IBM, we decided to formally articulate our AI principles—especially around transparency and data responsibility. It wasn't driven by regulation, but by trust. We chose not to use client data to train our models, and we committed to being able to clearly explain how AI was being deployed. These weren't just policies; they were leadership choices made to earn and protect trust. Future leaders will be judged by how they balance innovation with responsibility and to enable that, organizations must embed ethics and stakeholder thinking into the core of leadership development. When creating tools of unprecedented power, the question they ask shouldn't be 'Can we?' but 'Should we? And how?' Build resilience through relationships and attitude. Don't treat relationships as transactional. Invest in people with authenticity, long before you need them. During moments of crisis—like responding to a global event or facing difficult public scrutiny—it wasn't just my preparation or mindset that carried me through. It was the team, and broad circle of people, around me. People I had built trust with over years. The right relationships offer perspective, helping us gauge what truly matters or see things from a broader angle. During IBM's transformation, I relied on a diverse network of relationships—from my husband Mark, whose humor and steadiness kept me balanced, to colleagues who would share hard truths when I needed to hear them. Attitude is how we choose to deal with challenges. When facing criticism about IBM's strategy, I reminded myself that I knew the truth about our progress. Instead of absorbing the negativity, I focused on celebrating the quiet milestones—the ones that never made the headlines but signaled real progress. I also learned to compartmentalize—dealing with one crisis at a time, putting it in a mental box, and moving forward. Resilience allowed me to forge ahead through setbacks, conflict, crises, and critics. Organizations can help leaders build this by actively fostering networks, encouraging mentorship, and elevating emotional awareness as essential to success—for individuals, teams, and the company. The next generation of CEOs will succeed not by credentials alone, but by how they keep learning, lead with integrity, and respond to complexity. We need to prepare the next generation to lead with good power: leadership rooted in purpose, progress, and in service of others. The most effective CEOs will be those who understand that how we work and lead is as important as what we achieve. Nitin Nohria: Master the Art of Proportionality A skill that aspiring leaders must master right now is the ability to size up problems with a sense of proportion. In a world where leaders are inundated with a daily torrent of issues—some urgent, some trivial, some existential—the first and most essential act of leadership is triage. You must be able to distinguish the signal from the noise, set the right priorities, and focus energy where it truly matters. Consider something like tariffs. Leaders don't need a perfect forecast of how trade policy will evolve, but they need to size up its trajectory. What's the likely range of outcomes? Where will the dust settle? Making such judgments—calibrated, not knee-jerk—is what allows a leader to steer a company through uncertainty. One of the most valuable questions you can ask when sizing up a problem is: How much can I delay reacting in order to gather more information? In statistics, the Bayesian approach offers a useful guide: Start with an informed prior, update it as evidence accumulates, and revise your beliefs accordingly. Leaders must become better Bayesians—curious, circumspect, and constantly updating their understanding of a situation as new data emerges. Of course, there are moments when delay isn't an option. A fire needs to be extinguished, not analyzed. But the hallmark of good judgment is knowing the difference—when to wait, when to act, when to double down. That's the real art of proportion, and it's becoming a make-or-break leadership skill. This is not just about geopolitics—though we are clearly in a turbulent period. It applies equally to the pace of technological change, especially with AI. Advances are arriving so rapidly that smart people are predicting business models and entire industries may be reshaped in the next 18 to 24 months. In this environment, CEOs must be attuned not just to what is changing, but to how fast it's changing—and whether now is the time to watch, pivot, or accelerate. Organizations have a critical role to play in helping leaders develop these judgment skills. This is a moment for vigorous, open debate. One of the enduring strengths of Harvard Business School's case method is how it forces people to look at the same facts and come to different conclusions. The act of listening to others' reasoning—even, or especially, when they see things differently—sharpens your own judgment. The goal isn't always consensus. Often, the best insight comes from a contrarian or outlier perspective. That's why companies must create a culture where rigorous, honest, open-minded dialogue is not just tolerated but actively encouraged. Psychological safety —the ability to speak freely without fear of retribution—is not a luxury; it's a necessity in today's fast-moving world. This is what we try to cultivate in a great case classroom, and what organizations must learn to embed in their own cultures: a space where leaders are constantly testing, refining, and improving their sense of proportion—together. Gary Burnison: Focus on the Erstwhile 'Nice-to-Have' Skills So many factors are weighing heavily on CEOs today: shifting trade lanes, inflation and interest rates, the uncertainty swirling around AI, just to name a few. No wonder that, when talking with senior executives at global organizations, the two words I hear most often are perpetual uncertainty. Although the CEO role today is more complex than ever, with some executives giving a second thought to demands of the job, the position still remains both competitive and coveted, with plenty of aspiring leaders eager to take on the challenges. Their success will be determined largely by developing skill sets and adapting their mindset to meet today's moments. Based on more than 108 million assessments of professionals conducted by our firm over the past five decades, we know how leaders are wired—from their traits to their competencies to their drivers. Today, three key traits stand out above the rest: agility, resilience, and integrative thinking. Once seen as 'nice to have,' these traits are now mission critical. Agility: If only things worked like an Excel spreadsheet—on time, on budget, and displayed with complete clarity. But that's not realistic. Leading in this environment means anticipating what lies ahead—by accurately perceiving the reality of today. Then it's all about course-correcting in real time—navigating ambiguity with agility. While it seems to contradict a leader's every instinct, agility, at its core, is being willing to act without knowing every possible outcome. That takes big-picture thinking, calculated risk-taking, and embracing the unknowns of today's world. Resilience: Through every challenge and circumstance—the good, the bad, and everything in between—aspiring CEOs need to show their resilience. One way this happens, surprisingly perhaps, is with failure. After all, it's not the moment of failure that counts; it's what leaders will do after that. Resilience is all about the response—not retreating into isolation. That means staying visible and communicative, modeling composure and confidence, and empowering others—all of which generate momentum to move forward. Integrative thinking: While critical thinking is essential, far more important for aspiring CEOs is integrative thinking. It's a way of processing ideas that can open more possibilities. Integrative thinking has helped guide the best of leaders through crises. It's a little like playing 3D chess—and, to be honest, it doesn't come naturally to most people. For leaders who prioritize this skill, integrative thinking will help them lead their organizations in an increasingly complex world. Think of it as tapping Google Earth—and give yourself the broadest perspective. For example, you will need ask yourself thought-provoking questions that widen your lens. How do the decisions I'm making affect other parts of the company? Do they align with the overall strategy? What are the long-term, broad implications of taking an action? Integrative thinking is all about considering multiple and even opposing ideas and perspectives and synthesizing them into a new solution. Today calls for shifting our lens from 30,000 feet to ground level—and having awareness of all the airspace in between. More than any specific skill, trait, or behavior, what leadership really requires is self-awareness. No wonder Socrates called self-knowledge 'the beginning of wisdom.' Before focusing outward, it's important to first look inward. That's how the next generation of leaders will move onward—and even into the CEO role. Research from Korn Ferry shows that when it comes to self-awareness—and being accountable for how we are perceived—many leaders struggle, and a whopping 79% of leaders fail to see their own skills and deficiencies clearly. Not only that, but people who greatly overstate their abilities are about six times more likely to derail than those who are self-aware. Organizations will need to develop the CEOs of tomorrow by helping them see themselves more clearly through ongoing assessment, feedback, and reflection. More Resources
Axios
32 minutes ago
- Axios
ICE ramps up immigrant arrests in courthouses across U.S.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents — often dressed in plainclothes — are now arresting immigrants at courthouses nationwide, sometimes moments after their hearings end. Why it matters: The courthouse crackdown is part of a sweeping Trump administration effort to fast-track removals and increase the number of deportations this year — a strategy that's dramatically expanding who gets targeted and how. The big picture: The recent ramp-up follows a January policy shift that authorizes ICE to target courthouses for the first time in years — a move advocates say is quietly upending the legal process for immigrants. Under the Biden administration, ICE was not allowed to conduct enforcement operations at or near courthouses. What they're saying: "ICE is now following the law" and placing immigrants in expedited removal, "as they always should have been," a senior Homeland Security spokesperson told Axios. Immigrant activists describe it as a trap, warning that courthouses are becoming enforcement zones where due process rights are eroding. How it works: An immigration court that dismisses the case — often because the Department of Homeland Security withdraws the charges or because the applicant has no active relief from removal — opens the door for ICE to swoop in post-dismissal, no longer restrained by a pending court case. These immigrants, if they've been in the U.S. for less than two years, are then arrested on-site and fast-tracked for deportation. Failure to appear at court results in a removal order called an "in absentia" deportation order. Driving the news: Under a February executive order from President Trump, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is now defaulting to issuing Notices to Appear (NTAs) for anyone denied an immigration benefit — including asylum, green cards and work permits. The policy change increased the number of NTAs issued by the agency compared to under the Biden administration. ICE and Customs and Border Protection also issue NTAs. Someone denied a visa extension can now be swept into removal proceedings, even without a criminal record. NTAs are also being issued to immigrants who commit fraud, including giving false information to an employer. State of play: The policy shift has supercharged the deportation pipeline and contributed to a surge of courthouse arrests across the country. By the numbers: Federal immigration authorities have launched deportation proceedings against more than 22,100 immigrants since late February, according to new USCIS data out Thursday. USCIS is now issuing about 1,840 NTAs every week, including hundreds tied to asylum and Temporary Protected Status (TPS) cases, per new agency figures. Zoom in: In recent weeks, ICE officers have ramped up arrests in immigration courts in numerous cities, from Seattle and Phoenix to San Antonio and New York City. At Denver's immigration court, for example, at least eight immigrants — including two young children — have been detained by ICE in the last two weeks, according to local organizers. What they're saying: Denver activists say the arrests are fueling fear and signal a collapse of due process. "The truth here is that the jack boots of ICE are terrorizing immigrant communities that are trying to take advantage of the due process of law that they are entitled to," Denver immigration attorney Hans Meyer said at a press conference last week. Now immigrants are "questioning if the legal way is really the right way," Jennifer Piper, the American Friends Service Committee's Denver program director, added.
32 minutes ago
Coinbase adds former top Obama and Harris adviser Plouffe as it broadens its political reach
WASHINGTON -- A senior adviser to Kamala Harris' 2024 presidential campaign is joining Coinbase's global advisory council, which already includes several former U.S. senators and Donald Trump's ex-campaign manager, as the cryptocurrency exchange broadens its political reach. David Plouffe, a top Democratic strategist best known as an architect of Barack Obama's successful 2008 presidential campaign, is the latest addition to the council, joining as the cryptocurrency industry plays an increasingly prominent role in shaping fast-moving legislation in Congress. The legislation aims to create a comprehensive framework for the regulation of digital assets and comes amid a shift in Washington. President Trump, a Republican, has pledged to make the U.S. the global capital of cryptocurrency, contrasting with what industry leaders viewed as a stifling regulatory approach under the previous Democratic administration. Trump and his family have also been aggressively expanding their personal business into almost every part of the cryptocurrency ecosystem, including raising billions of dollars to buy bitcoin, creating a new stablecoin and launching and promoting a Trump-themed meme coin. Chris LaCivita, the former co-campaign manager of Trump's successful 2024 presidential bid, joined Coinbase's advisory council in January. Former U.S. Sen. Kyrsten Sinema, a Democrat-turned-independent from Arizona, also joined the council, which consists of a number of other high-profile figures from both major political parties. Plouffe previously served on the global advisory board for Binance, the world's largest cryptocurrency exchange, before joining Harris' presidential campaign as a senior adviser in August. Faryar Shirzad, Coinbase's chief policy officer, described the role of the advisers as being a 'sound board' to discuss policy efforts and business strategy. In Congress, legislation is advancing far more quickly than usual for a new industry — a pace that some involved in shaping the bills say comes amid an all-out pressure campaign from the cryptocurrency sector. On Wednesday, a group of Democrats joined the Republican majority to advance legislation regulating stablecoins, a type of cryptocurrency typically pegged to the U.S. dollar. Final passage through the Senate could come next week. Meanwhile, a more sweeping bill to implement cryptocurrency market structure has begun moving through House committees.
