Tennessee's death penalty is back
Tennessee is set to resume the executions of people on death row, even as more Tennesseans express opposition to it. (Photo by)
Quietly, on Dec. 27, 2024, the Tennessee Department of Correction (TDOC) completed a multi-year lethal injection protocol review ordered by Gov. Bill Lee in 2022. The completed review marked the end of a pause Lee had placed on executions.
The ink was barely dry on TDOC's report when, on Feb. 14, the Tennessee Attorney General's Office asked the state Supreme Court to set execution dates for five of the 46 people currently on death row.
This all comes at a time when Gallup reports Americans' support for capital punishment is at a five-decade low, a drop in support that's evident even in red states. According to a 2022 Vanderbilt poll, a majority of Tennesseans now oppose the death penalty.
Tennessee's history regarding capital punishment is surprisingly progressive, and with no executions in five years, there's no reason the 2020 execution of Nicholas Sutton shouldn't be Tennessee's last.
Moments when Tennessee went against the grain regarding capital punishment include:
Tennessee became the first state in the nation to turn away from the traditional and mandatory death sentence for convicted murderers in 1838.
Tennessee was the only former Confederate state to abolish execution in the late 1800s. The state legislature formally ended capital punishment in 1915, reinstating it in 1919.
Tennessee had one of the longest pauses on executions in the nation, with no executions committed between 1960 and 2000.
In 1965, Gov. Frank Clement commuted the sentences of everyone on Tennessee's death row after a bill to abolish capital punishment was defeated by just one vote.
Tennessee became one of the first of four states to exclude the death penalty for those with intellectual disabilities in 1990.
Throughout the 2000s and 2010s, multiple moratoriums were placed on capital punishment while the state reviewed its execution protocols.
Why examine the history? Because it's not a foregone conclusion that just because Tennessee is a red state, its residents must sit idly by and condone state-sanctioned murder
Could I put an amendment on that bill (regarding methods of execution) that would include hanging by a tree?
– Rep. Paul Sherrell, R-Sparta, Feb. 28, 2023
Th death penalty is uncivilized in theory and unfair in practice. It must be opposed because:
It can result in the deaths of innocent people. The U.S. criminal justice system is deeply flawed and often makes mistakes. Since 1973, at least 200 people who were on death row were later exonerated. For every eight people executed in the U.S., one person sentenced to death is exonerated, meaning the system is only right 88% of the time. It's impossible to know how many innocent Americans have been executed before they could be exonerated, because courts don't entertain claims of innocence for dead people. But civil rights groups have gathered troves of evidence showing dozens of executed prisoners were innocent.
It is not an effective deterrent. The death penalty is often used as a political tool to create the illusion of being 'tough on crime' while doing nothing to address the underlying social and economic factors that lead to crime. The states with the highest murder rates all practice capital punishment. Meanwhile, Canada's murder rate is half what it was when our neighbors to the north abolished their death penalty in 1976.
It is applied unfairly. The death penalty is disproportionately imposed upon those whose victims are white, on offenders who are people of color, and on people who are poor and uneducated. In Tennessee, only 40% of homicides involve white victims, yet 74% of all death sentences are for those convicted of killing white people.
It is a blatant violation of one's Constitutional rights. The death penalty constitutes cruel and unusual punishment, a violation of the Eighth Amendment. According to the ACLU, 'It is cruel because it is a relic of the earliest days of penology, when slavery, branding, and other corporal punishments were commonplace. Like those barbaric practices, executions have no place in a civilized society. It is unusual because only the United States of all the western industrialized nations engages in this punishment.'
Though the death penalty feels as well-entrenched as ever and though Tennessee may soon return to executing prisoners, the practice is hanging on by a thread. In Tennessee and other red states, the only group still supporting capital punishment are conservatives.
Why are many conservatives quick to call out inefficiencies and errors in government, yet they're willing to back the government to the hilt when it comes to the life-or-death decision to carry out an execution? Many conservatives say the government is untrustworthy and makes mistakes all the time, but not on matters of capital punishment?
Granting the government — which can and does make mistakes — the right to kill Americans means handing it immense power with little oversight, something conservatives are typically loath to do. With that in mind, one does not even need to engage in questions about the morality of delivering death as punishment for a crime because the answer to the previous question — can the government be trusted to administer death as punishment? — is no.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
34 minutes ago
- Newsweek
More Hispanics Disapprove of Los Angeles Protests Than Approve—Poll
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. More Hispanic Americans disapprove than approve of the Los Angeles protests over President Donald Trump's mass deportations, according to a new poll. Why It Matters U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) have conducted raids across the country and have faced large protests in Los Angeles, as Trump's administration pledged to carry out the largest mass deportations in U.S. history. While most protesters were peaceful, there has been violence on the ground. Trump has deployed California's National Guard to assist in quelling the violence, despite objections from Governor Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, and other local officials who said bringing in the National Guard would only escalate the situation. While the raids are following legal directive from federal authorities, protests have erupted amid reports that detainees were being held in the basement of a federal building. ICE denied these allegations, with a spokesperson previously telling Newsweek the agency "categorically refutes the assertions made by immigration activists in Los Angeles." What to Know The protests have drawn national attention and divided Americans as immigration remains a major issue facing the country. Protesters have raised concerns about migrants—many of whom, but not all, are from Latin American countries—facing deportation regardless of whether they have committed violent crimes under Trump's policies. The Mexican flag has emerged as a symbol of the protests. A demonstrator waves a Mexico flag during anti-ICE protests in Los Angeles on June 9, 2025. A demonstrator waves a Mexico flag during anti-ICE protests in Los Angeles on June 9, 2025. RINGO CHIU/AFP via Getty Images A new poll from YouGov reveals how Americans view the protests. A plurality of all Americans, including Hispanic Americans, view the protests negatively. Forty-four percent of Hispanic respondents said they disapprove of the protests, while 39 percent said they approve of them. An additional 17 percent were unsure how they felt. Across all racial and ethnic groups, 45 percent disapproved and 36 percent approved of the protests, according to the poll, which surveyed 4,231 U.S. adults on June 9, 2025. The pollster also found that 38 percent of Americans believe the protests have been mostly peaceful, while 36 percent say they have been mostly violent. Twenty-six percent said they were not sure. Still, 50 percent of Americans—including 55 percent of Hispanic Americans—said they disapprove of Trump's handling of deportation. Thirty-nine percent of Americans, including 35 percent of Hispanic Americans, approve of his handling of deportations. What People Are Saying Governor Gavin Newsom posted on X, formerly Twitter, on Sunday: "I have formally requested the Trump administration rescind their unlawful deployment of troops in Los Angeles County and return them to my command. We didn't have a problem until Trump got involved. This is a serious breach of state sovereignty—inflaming tensions while pulling resources from where they're actually needed. Rescind the order. Return control to California." President Donald Trump, in a post to Truth Social on Tuesday: "If I didn't "SEND IN THE TROOPS" to Los Angeles the last three nights, that once beautiful and great City would be burning to the ground right now, much like 25,000 houses burned to the ground in L.A. due to an incompetent Governor and Mayor." What Happens Next As protests continued, U.S. Marines were also expected to head into Los Angeles on Tuesday following an order from Trump. Coordinated nationwide protests against Trump and his administration's policies are also planned to take place in cities in all 50 states on the president's birthday on June 14.
The Hill
34 minutes ago
- The Hill
Hawley bill would raise minimum wage to $15
Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) wants to double the federal minimum wage to $15 an hour, with legislation filed Tuesday to increase the rate adopted nearly two decades ago. 'For decades, working Americans have seen their wages flatline,' Hawley said in a statement to The Hill. 'One major culprit of this is the failure of the federal minimum wage to keep up with the economic reality facing hard-working Americans every day.' The increase would take effect next year, when Hawley's home state hikes its rate to the same level. Most states, like Missouri, have set minimum hourly wage levels above the $7.25 federal rate, and nearly a dozen of them will have minimum rates at or above $15 an hour after increases take effect this year. Five states — Alabama, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina and Tennessee — have never set their own rates, and three — Georgia, Oklahoma and Wyoming — have state minimums below $7.25 per hour. Those eight states all default to the federal rate. The Hawley legislation, cosponsored by Sen. Peter Welch (D-Vt.), also would set automatic increases to match inflation over time to prevent future standstills like the nation has faced since the last federal hike in 2009. Minimum wage hikes have historically faced pushback from some business advocacy groups. 'This proposal would more than double the minimum wage and slash over 800,000 jobs,' Rebekah Paxton, research director at the Employment Policies Institute, said in a statement on Hawley's latest push. 'An overwhelming majority of economists agree that drastic minimum wage hikes cut employment, limit opportunities for workers and shutter businesses.' 'Hawley's proposal would take similar failed policies like California's and export them nationwide,' she added. It's unclear whether the GOP-controlled Senate and House will take up the bipartisan legislation or what the timeline could look like as lawmakers try to hash out President Trump's priority legislation. The White House declined to comment on Hawley's proposed minimum wage increase. A spokesperson told The Hill in an email that they would not 'get ahead of the President on pending legislation.' Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent rejected the idea of increasing the minimum wage earlier this year. But Trump acknowledged in a 'Meet the Press' interview a month before the start of his second presidency that the current minimum wage is 'very low' but said he didn't want to raise it to a level that would ultimately force businesses to shutter. 'There is a level at which you could do it, absolutely,' the then-president elect told host Kristen Welker. 'I would consider it.' Trump added that the debate is 'very complicated' because the cost of living varies among states. 'It would be nice to have just a minimum wage for the whole country, but it wouldn't work because you have places where it's very inexpensive to live,' he said.
Newsweek
39 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Trump Administration To Give $1,000 Boost to All Newborn Babies
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump has announced a $1,000 tax-deferred investment account for American babies born during his second term. The president revealed his plans at a roundtable at the White House on Monday, alongside several prominent CEOs, including those of Uber and Goldman Sachs. Newsweek has contacted the White House and the Democratic Party, via email, for comment. Why It Matters The president said these "Trump Accounts" are "fully funded through targeted reforms in the One Big Beautiful Bill," a piece of legislation that has faced much criticism and sparked the now-viral spat with Elon Musk. The broad budget package passed the House by one vote and is now headed to the Senate, where some Republicans have voiced concerns about certain parts of the bill, which the Congressional Budget Office has said will add $2.4 trillion to the U.S. national debt. President Donald Trump speaks during an "Invest in America" roundtable with business leaders at the White House, Monday, June 9, 2025, in Washington. President Donald Trump speaks during an "Invest in America" roundtable with business leaders at the White House, Monday, June 9, 2025, in Washington. AP What To Know The White House said the accounts will "afford a generation of children the chance to experience the miracle of compounded growth and set them on a course for prosperity from the very beginning." Every U.S. citizen born after December 31, 2024, before January 1, 2029, will receive a one-time contribution of $1,000 that will "track the overall stock market," Trump said. The accounts, which will be controlled by guardians, can allow additional private contributions of up to $5,000 annually. "This is a pro-family initiative that will help millions of Americans harness the strength of our economy to lift up the next generation. And they will be getting a big jump on life, especially if we get a little bit lucky with some of the numbers and the economies into the future," Trump said. "In addition to the substantial financial benefits of investing early in life, extensive research shows that children with savings accounts are more likely to graduate high school and college, buy a home, started a business and are less likely to be incarcerated. Trump Accounts will contribute to the lifelong success of millions of newborn babies," he added. The White House has expressed some concern about declining birth rates, with Vice President JD Vance saying on January 24 that he wanted "more babies" to be born in the U.S. In February, Trump signed an executive order expanding access to in vitro fertilization for Americans. And Transport Secretary Sean Duffy directed his department to give funding precedence to "communities with marriage and birth rates higher than the national average." The White House has also explored giving women a "baby bonus" of $5,000 to encourage Americans to have more children, The New York Times reported in April. What People Are Saying House Speaker Mike Johnson said: "It's a bold, transformative policy that gives every eligible American child a financial head start from day one. Republicans are proud to be the party we always have been. It supports life and families, prosperity and opportunity." Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon: "This initiative gets at the core of binding those future generations to the benefits and the potential of America's great companies and markets. Early childhood investments have far-reaching benefits, and Goldman Sachs is proud to support his initiative ... Our economy's future vitality is dependent on young people understanding the power of investing for the long term." Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi: "What if we could give that same powerful, real, tangible hope that comes from having a stake in your own future and a stake in the best companies in the world to every single child that's born in this country? That's the promise of the Invest in America Act. It's not just an account; it's a launchpad. It puts the unstoppable engine of compounding to work for our kids, building a future for them from day one." What Happens Next The bill, which includes the "Trump Accounts" program, is headed to the Senate, where changes are expected as legislators aim for a July 4 deadline. The chamber has a 53-47 Republican majority, so there is only a little room for GOP dissent if the bill is to become law.
