Tennessee's death penalty is back
Tennessee is set to resume the executions of people on death row, even as more Tennesseans express opposition to it. (Photo by)
Quietly, on Dec. 27, 2024, the Tennessee Department of Correction (TDOC) completed a multi-year lethal injection protocol review ordered by Gov. Bill Lee in 2022. The completed review marked the end of a pause Lee had placed on executions.
The ink was barely dry on TDOC's report when, on Feb. 14, the Tennessee Attorney General's Office asked the state Supreme Court to set execution dates for five of the 46 people currently on death row.
This all comes at a time when Gallup reports Americans' support for capital punishment is at a five-decade low, a drop in support that's evident even in red states. According to a 2022 Vanderbilt poll, a majority of Tennesseans now oppose the death penalty.
Tennessee's history regarding capital punishment is surprisingly progressive, and with no executions in five years, there's no reason the 2020 execution of Nicholas Sutton shouldn't be Tennessee's last.
Moments when Tennessee went against the grain regarding capital punishment include:
Tennessee became the first state in the nation to turn away from the traditional and mandatory death sentence for convicted murderers in 1838.
Tennessee was the only former Confederate state to abolish execution in the late 1800s. The state legislature formally ended capital punishment in 1915, reinstating it in 1919.
Tennessee had one of the longest pauses on executions in the nation, with no executions committed between 1960 and 2000.
In 1965, Gov. Frank Clement commuted the sentences of everyone on Tennessee's death row after a bill to abolish capital punishment was defeated by just one vote.
Tennessee became one of the first of four states to exclude the death penalty for those with intellectual disabilities in 1990.
Throughout the 2000s and 2010s, multiple moratoriums were placed on capital punishment while the state reviewed its execution protocols.
Why examine the history? Because it's not a foregone conclusion that just because Tennessee is a red state, its residents must sit idly by and condone state-sanctioned murder
Could I put an amendment on that bill (regarding methods of execution) that would include hanging by a tree?
– Rep. Paul Sherrell, R-Sparta, Feb. 28, 2023
Th death penalty is uncivilized in theory and unfair in practice. It must be opposed because:
It can result in the deaths of innocent people. The U.S. criminal justice system is deeply flawed and often makes mistakes. Since 1973, at least 200 people who were on death row were later exonerated. For every eight people executed in the U.S., one person sentenced to death is exonerated, meaning the system is only right 88% of the time. It's impossible to know how many innocent Americans have been executed before they could be exonerated, because courts don't entertain claims of innocence for dead people. But civil rights groups have gathered troves of evidence showing dozens of executed prisoners were innocent.
It is not an effective deterrent. The death penalty is often used as a political tool to create the illusion of being 'tough on crime' while doing nothing to address the underlying social and economic factors that lead to crime. The states with the highest murder rates all practice capital punishment. Meanwhile, Canada's murder rate is half what it was when our neighbors to the north abolished their death penalty in 1976.
It is applied unfairly. The death penalty is disproportionately imposed upon those whose victims are white, on offenders who are people of color, and on people who are poor and uneducated. In Tennessee, only 40% of homicides involve white victims, yet 74% of all death sentences are for those convicted of killing white people.
It is a blatant violation of one's Constitutional rights. The death penalty constitutes cruel and unusual punishment, a violation of the Eighth Amendment. According to the ACLU, 'It is cruel because it is a relic of the earliest days of penology, when slavery, branding, and other corporal punishments were commonplace. Like those barbaric practices, executions have no place in a civilized society. It is unusual because only the United States of all the western industrialized nations engages in this punishment.'
Though the death penalty feels as well-entrenched as ever and though Tennessee may soon return to executing prisoners, the practice is hanging on by a thread. In Tennessee and other red states, the only group still supporting capital punishment are conservatives.
Why are many conservatives quick to call out inefficiencies and errors in government, yet they're willing to back the government to the hilt when it comes to the life-or-death decision to carry out an execution? Many conservatives say the government is untrustworthy and makes mistakes all the time, but not on matters of capital punishment?
Granting the government — which can and does make mistakes — the right to kill Americans means handing it immense power with little oversight, something conservatives are typically loath to do. With that in mind, one does not even need to engage in questions about the morality of delivering death as punishment for a crime because the answer to the previous question — can the government be trusted to administer death as punishment? — is no.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
ABC News Suspends Terry Moran After He Posts Online Calling Donald Trump's Adviser a 'World-Class Hater'
ABC News made the decision to suspend their correspondent, Terry Moran, after he shared a critical social media post about President Donald Trump's adviser, Stephen Miller "He's a world-class hater. You can see this just by looking at him because you can see that his hatreds are his spiritual nourishment," he wrote in the since-deleted post on X White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt asked ABC "how they plan to hold Terry accountable" just before his suspension was handed downABC News reporter Terry Moran has been suspended from the air after sharing an incendiary social media post about one of President Donald Trump's key advisers. In the early hours of Sunday, June 8, the 65-year-old senior national correspondent took to X to share a post about Stephen Miller, the president's homeland security adviser and deputy chief of staff for policy. Moran referred to both Miller and Trump as "world-class hater[s]" in the post, which has since been deleted. A spokesperson for ABC News commented on the post in a statement shared with PEOPLE, noting that Moran "has been suspended pending further evaluation." 'ABC News stands for objectivity and impartiality in its news coverage and does not condone subjective personal attacks on others. The post does not reflect the views of ABC News and violated our standards," their statement noted. Moran took aim at Miller and the president in the post, which was shared shortly after midnight on Sunday. Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. "The thing about Stephen Miller is not that he is the brains behind Trumpism," Moran wrote. "Yes, he is one of the people who conceptualizes the impulses of the Trumpist movement and translates them into police. But that's not what's interesting about Miller." The reporter continued: "It's not brains. It's bile. Miller is a man who is richly endowed with the capacity for hatred. He's a world-class hater. You can see this just by looking at him because you can see that his hatreds are his spiritual nourishment. He eats his hate." "Trump is a world-class hater. But his hatred is only a means to an end, and that end his his own glorification [sic]. That's his spiritual nourishment," he concluded. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt referred to the post as "a rampage against Stephen Miller" in a response on X. "This is unhinged and unacceptable," she wrote, adding, "We have reached out to @ABC to inquire about how they plan to hold Terry accountable." Vice President J.D. Vance also referred to the message as an "absolutely vile smear" in a message on the social media platform. "It's dripping with hatred. Remember that every time you watch ABC's coverage of the Trump administration," Vance wrote. "As it happens, I know Stephen quite well. And he's motivated by love of country. He's motivated by a fear that people like Terry Moran make rules that normal Americans have to follow, but well-connected people don't."Vance wrote, "It's why he fought so hard to get President Trump elected and why he works so hard to implement the agenda." He further commented that the news network "should apologize to Stephen." Moran's post comes a few weeks after he sat down for an exclusive interview with Trump, marking the end of his first 100 days in office since being inaugurated for a second time in January 2025. During the interview, Trump complained that the reporter was "not being very nice" after Moran informed the president that an image of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a legally protected father who was accidentally deported to El Salvador earlier this year, had been photoshopped. 'I picked you because, frankly, I had never heard of you, but that's okay,' Trump said. Another viral moment from the interview came when Moran asked Trump what the Declaration of Independence meant to him. "Well, it means exactly what it says, it's a declaration. A declaration of unity and love and respect, and it means a lot. And it's something very special to our country," the president replied as Moran stared at him with visible confusion on his face. Miller attracted attention in early May during a press briefing about the Department of Education and schools. Trump's advisor took issue with critical race theory, saying that a nation cannot be "successful" if it "teach[es] its children to hate themselves and their country." "Children will be taught to love America. Children will be taught to be patriots," he said. "Children will be taught civic values for schools that want federal taxpayer funding." Read the original article on People
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Corporation for Public Broadcasting can keep board members despite judge's ruling
By Jonathan Stempel (Reuters) -A federal judge said that three board members of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting can keep their seats, even as he denied the nonprofit a preliminary injunction to block U.S. President Donald Trump from removing them. In a decision on Sunday, U.S. District Judge Randolph Moss in Washington, D.C. said the nonprofit recently used indirect authority it obtained from Congress to protect its independence, by changing its bylaws to make it harder to remove directors at will, including by Trump. "The President is not free to remove directors and then unilaterally to appoint their replacements, thereby using his power to remove as an effective tool for altering board policy," Moss wrote. "Rather, the President's appointment authority is tempered by the requirement that he proceed only with the advice and consent of the Senate." Moss nonetheless said the CPB was unlikely to prevail on the merits, and could not show irreparable harm because it could still function and "in all likelihood" has blocked Trump from exercising unilateral authority to remove board members. Created by Congress in 1967, the CPB provides financial support for the Public Broadcasting Service, National Public Radio and more than 1,500 locally managed public radio and TV stations. It sued after Trump fired three of its five directors -- Diane Kaplan, Laura Ross and Thomas Rothman - ostensibly without providing a reason. PBS and NPR are also suing to block the Trump administration from canceling their federal funding. "We are very pleased that the court recognized CPB is an independent, non-profit corporation, free from governmental control or influence," CPB President Patricia Harrison said in a statement. Harrison said the nonprofit looks forward to continuing its work "to ensure accurate, unbiased and nonpartisan public media is available for all Americans." CPB received $535 million of federal funding for its current fiscal year. The White House and many Republicans have argued that the government should not provide funding to support programming that they consider too liberal. A White House spokesperson on Monday said CPB is "creating media to support a particular political party on the taxpayers' dime. Therefore, the President is exercising his lawful authority to limit funding to NPR and PBS." The case is Corporation for Public Broadcasting et al v Trump et al, U.S. District Court, District of Columbia, No. 25-01305.
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Opinion - Elon Musk, American patriot
Before Elon Musk aligned himself with President Trump, there were legitimate reasons to both admire and criticize him. In 1999, after the sale of Zip2 to Compaq, Musk was worth $22 million — enough to live comfortably for the rest of his life. But instead of coasting, he threw himself into such high-risk, high-reward ventures as PayPal, Tesla and SpaceX. Today, he is arguably the most successful entrepreneur of his generation. Musk has captivated millions as a rare breed of entrepreneur: equal parts visionary, gambler and engineer. He earned admiration for his boldness: when both Tesla and SpaceX teetered on the brink of collapse, he didn't retreat or diversify — he doubled down, risking nearly his entire fortune to keep them alive. Others were drawn to his sweeping ambitions: to make humanity a multiplanetary species, to accelerate the transition to sustainable energy, and to explore the frontier of human-AI integration. And many simply respected his unfiltered voice — sometimes too blunt, but refreshingly free from the scripted gloss of a corporate PR machine. Yet Musk has always been polarizing. Critics cite his combative leadership style, labor disputes, missed deadlines and frequent social media controversies. Environmentalists point to his personal carbon footprint despite his clean-energy advocacy. His record-breaking Tesla pay package fueled perceptions of greed, and his turbulent personal life has long fascinated the tabloid press. Still, Musk is immensely wealthy, widely admired and his companies are thriving. He has no compelling reason to wade into government matters — especially not under an administration that deeply divides public opinion, and especially not in a role where his message would be unpopular. And yet he did. While Musk holds no formal public office, he has taken up an unofficial but unmistakable role: becoming the loudest and most influential voice calling for a leaner, more accountable government. He has made it his mission to highlight the dangers of unchecked federal spending, bureaucratic inefficiency and fiscal denialism. He knew that aligning himself with Trump — a political lightning rod — would alienate many of his customers, investors and employees. 'Republicans buy sneakers too,' Michael Jordan once said. Musk knew Democrats buy Teslas, and in disproportionate numbers. He did it anyway. Why? Because he understands math, and sees clearly that the massive gap between what the government takes in and what it spends isn't just irresponsible — it's a ticking time bomb. Left unaddressed, this trajectory leads not only to instability but to inevitable economic harm for the 99.999 percent of Americans who aren't billionaires. Ballooning deficits are not just abstract numbers. They are a looming threat to future prosperity. Persistent overspending drives up interest rates, crowds out private investment, limits the government's crisis-response capacity, and places an unfair burden on the next generation. Yet few in Washington are willing to confront this reality. Politicians love to announce new programs and subsidies. Cutting spending? That's political suicide. Musk has dared to say what most elected officials won't. In interviews, social media posts and public appearances, he's called for reining in wasteful agencies, reforming broken systems and reducing federal bloat. His prescriptions may be controversial, but they are not unserious. He has floated the privatization of Amtrak and the USPS, pushed for deregulation in innovation-heavy sectors, and questioned the size and scope of U.S. foreign aid. These aren't fringe ideas — they're overdue conversations. Naturally, the backlash has been swift. Critics accuse him of oversimplifying complex problems or threatening essential services. Musk himself has admitted he won't have all the answers. But someone had to start the painful, necessary process of fiscal realism — and few others with his platform have dared. Elon Musk didn't need to pick this fight. He had everything to lose and little to gain. But he stepped into the fray because he saw a country drifting toward economic peril, and he believed he could help shift the trajectory. Agree or disagree with his methods, that choice reflects not vanity or ambition, but patriotism. What's even more remarkable than Musk's initial alliance with Trump is how swiftly and forcefully he has turned against him. The same man he once saw as a partner in fiscal restraint is now advancing a tax-and-spending package Musk views as reckless and dangerous. By attacking what Trump calls his 'One Big Beautiful Bill,' Musk hasn't just broken with a former ally, he's jumped into an even bigger, riskier battle. And he's doing it on principle. While conventional CEOs stay quiet to protect their brand, Musk is torching bridges because he believes the country's long-term solvency is at stake. In an era when patriotism is often mistaken for partisanship, Musk offers a rare counterexample: someone willing to challenge both political parties when they abandon fiscal responsibility. His message may be polarizing, but his motive is clear: he's putting country before comfort, math before politics, and future generations before short-term applause. That's not recklessness. That's leadership. That's Elon Musk, American patriot. Peter Ciano is chief financial officer and senior vice president of corporate development at a pharmaceutical company. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
