Key Hawaii Republicans, voters mixed on Trump
COURTESY STATE OF HAWAII State Reps. Diamond Garcia and Kanani Souza COURTESY STATE OF HAWAII State Reps. Diamond Garcia and Kanani Souza Key Hawaii Republicans offered differing viewsw of President Donald Trump three months into his second term, with some continuing their full support while others are hearing from constituents who regret voting for him.
State House Minority Floor Leader Diamond Garcia (Ewa-Kapolei ) continues to back Trump and his administration's efforts to slash spending and reduce the federal workforce through his new, unofficial Department of Government Efficiency, arguing both are long overdue.
'The vast majority of the American people support the efforts of DOGE and what they're doing, ' Garcia said. 'The American people want accountability.'
Assistant Minority Leader Kanani Souza, like Garcia and other House and Senate Republicans, also represents a West Oahu district, Kapolei-Makakilo.
But she's heard differently from her constituents, including fears about Trump's elimination of federal programs aimed at supporting diversity, equity and inclusion, and his often-conflicting messages about possible cuts to programs including Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and food stamps.
Souza said some people are 'concerned about funding cuts for Native Hawaiian programs.'
Don 't miss out on what 's happening !
Stay in touch with breaking news, as it happens, conveniently in your email inbox. It 's FREE !
Email 28141 Sign Up By clicking to sign up, you agree to Star-Advertiser 's and Google 's and. This form is protected by reCAPTCHA.
'A lot of my constituents, both sides of the aisle, are concerned with whether Social Security will be cut in the future. A lot of what we're seeing is a wait-and-see scenario, ' she said.
Souza and Garcia represent different ends of Hawaii Republican ideology in the nine-member Republican House caucus and three-member Senate Republican caucus.
House Minority Whip Elijah Pierick, who represents the West Side district of Royal Kunia-Waipahu-Honouliuli, agrees with Garcia that America should focus on its own citizens rather than send aid to foreign countries, sometimes for programs that 'mainstream ' Americans may not support.
'I think our U.S. citizens in our state are much more important to be focused on than people in every other country, ' Pierick said.
Unlike Souza's constituents, Garcia said voters in his district tell him they like Trump's policies after years of feeling 'left behind.'
Trump's predecessors, Garcia said, 'were focusing on all of these ridiculous other things like climate change and gender issues versus the cost of living. That's why West Oahu has pretty much flipped red.'
'People were just frustrated that this is what the government was focusing on, not on lowering the cost of living, not on bringing Hawaiians back to Hawaii from the mainland.'
Similarly, Assistant House Minority Leader David Alcos III (Ocean Pointe-Barbers Point ) said he and his constituents share conservative values and their confidence in Trump's decision making.
'While I acknowledge that there are differing opinions, the overwhelming majority I encounter are supportive of President Trump, ' he wrote in a text to the Honolulu Star-Advertiser. 'My constituents feel that for the first time in a long while, their voices are being heard, and they see real action being taken on the issues that matter to them.
'Many have also expressed their support for the work being done by Elon Musk, particularly regarding a wasteful overspending by the government, and savings of our taxpayers' money.'
But Souza has noticed what she calls a 'shift ' toward common ground between some Republican and Democratic voters over their concerns for Trump's actions.
'I have some other constituents who are telling me, 'I voted for President Trump and I'm not happy with what I'm seeing, '' she said.
'This is a very different scenario than maybe even six months ago or eight months ago when I was campaigning. It was very polarized.'
Under the new administration in Washington, the Legislature now has to look to 'forecasting our needs at the state level in case some of these programs are cut from (federal ) funding, ' Souza said.
Pierick trusts Trump's decision making and thinks Hawaii should rely less on federally funded programs.
'I don't think we should feed anybody that's not working as an adult that's able to work, ' Pierick said. 'Everybody that's getting these free handouts needs to go to work, get a job, use a paycheck to buy their own food. Hawaii needs to grow up and not have a baby mentality of 'We need more resources.' We need to be more self sufficient.'
Tamara McKay, chair of the Hawaii Republican Party, called the reaction among local Republicans to Trump's first months in office 'definitely mixed, of course.' But she believes in the overall goals of Trump and his administration, even if it means reduced funding for Hawaii's nonprofit organizations, education and other programs, including a reduced federal workforce across the islands.
'Once he cleans house, we will be able to move forward in a healthy way for the country, ' McKay said. 'A lot of people are saying they want DOGE to come to Hawaii because they feel the level of corruption in the state of Hawaii is out of control. I agree. We need a good enema. It's not exclusive to one party. Our whole state needs to be reset.'
She wants the Trump administration to investigate Hawaii's nonprofit organizations, the state Office of Elections, state Department of Education and the federal veterans affairs and Social Security agencies in how they operate and spend money.
At the same time, McKay said she understands the ongoing questions and concerns over how Musk has been operating DOGE.
'I agree there is some frustration and lack of transparency, ' she said. 'I can see both sides. In some cases, it's too fast and not strategic and using a hatchet approach. With some of the programs (that were cut ), I have to agree it was too much too soon. But I do believe you're going to see in the next couple of months that it's going to get better.'
While Trump promised to end the wars in Gaza and Ukraine immediately, as well as turn around the U.S. economy, McKay said he promised instant results he could not deliver on.
'We love Trump. We love Trump, ' she said. 'But sometimes it's unrealistic to say the economy's going to get better on Day One. He was not being realistic.'
House Minority Leader Lauren Matsumoto (Mililani-Waipio Acres-Mililani Mauka ) said she's more focused on state issues than paying attention to every Trump administration headline coming out of Washington on a daily basis.
But constituents still turn to her office seeking explanations about the effects of the president's actions, especially his recent executive order to close the U.S. Department of Education and what it means for education in Hawaii.
Some constituents have reached out to Matsumoto, mistakenly believing that 'I talk to Trump every week because they want to know, 'What is Trump thinking about this or that ?' I say, 'I know just as much as you.''
Asked to characterize constituents' reaction to Trump so far, Matsumoto said, 'We get a mix of calls from people who are fearful of what's going to be happening next. … I do think the media, especially the national media, stirs up fears that may not be warranted. So they're hearing mixed messages about what the media are saying.'
Overall, Matsumoto's waiting to see how Trump's early actions affect Hawaii and the rest of the country.
'Maybe a shake-up is what needs to happen, ' she said. '… No matter what side you're on, people can admit that there's a need for changes. Change is not always easy, and sometimes there will be changes that people will have to reverse or fix.'
As for now, Matsumoto said, 'There's so much we don't know, and so much is speculation. But as a state, we need to take a deep-dive look at what we're spending and ensure we have a responsible government.
'I'm glad these conversations are coming to light.'
20 Comments By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. If your comments are inappropriate, you may be banned from posting. Report comments if you believe they do not follow our.
Having trouble with comments ? .
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump announces $1,000 government-funded accounts for American babies
Donald Trump unveiled a federal program Monday providing $1,000 government-funded investment accounts for American babies, getting backing from top business leaders who said they plan to contribute billions more to an initiative tied to 'the big beautiful bill'. At a White House roundtable with over a dozen CEOs, including from Uber, Goldman Sachs and Dell Technologies, Trump relayed the details of 'Trump accounts' – tax-deferred investment accounts tracking stock market performance for children born between 2025 and 2029. 'For every US citizen born after December 31, 2024, before January 1, 2029, the federal government will make a one-time contribution of $1,000 into a tax-deferred account that will track the overall stock market,' Trump said. The accounts will be controlled by guardians and allow additional private contributions up to $5,000 annually. Trump called it 'a pro-family initiative that will help millions of Americans harness the strength of our economy to lift up the next generation'. Related: Trump's 'big, beautiful' bill is built on falsehoods about low-income families | Brigid Schulte and Haley Swenson CEOs from major companies including Michael Dell, Dara Khosrowshahi of Uber, David Solomon of Goldman Sachs, and Vladimir Tenev of Robinhood committed billions for employees' children's accounts. Trump praised the executives as 'really the greatest business minds we have today' who are 'committed to contributing millions of dollars to the Trump account'. Mike Johnson, the House speaker, also at the roundtable, championed the program, saying: 'It's a bold, transformative policy that gives every eligible American child a financial head start from day one. Republicans are proud to be the party we always have been. It supports life and families, prosperity and opportunity.' The program passed the House as part of a massive budget bill but faces stiffer Senate Republican resistance over the broader package. The accounts cannot be implemented as a standalone program and depend entirely on passage of what Trump calls the 'one big, beautiful bill' that is 'among the most important pieces of legislation in our country's history', claiming it's 'fully funded through targeted reforms' including welfare changes and a proposed remittance tax. However, the congressional budget office last week found the bill would also add $2.4tn to the national debt over the next decade while cutting Medicaid and food assistance programs. The CBO analysis showed the bill, which passed the House by a single vote and no Democratic support, would leave 10.9 million more Americans without healthcare by 2034. The treasury-funded accounts, previously called 'Maga accounts' resemble existing 529 college plans but with lower contribution limits – leading some financial advisers to say the Trump accounts may not offer the best investment incentives. The move is also not without precedent: the United Kingdom operated a similar Child Trust Fund with government seed funding from 2002-2011 before discontinuing the program, while Singapore runs the Baby Bonus Scheme that includes government-matched savings accounts for children. Trump was optimistic about returns, saying beneficiaries would 'really be getting a big jump on life, especially if we get a little bit lucky with some of the numbers and the economies into the future'. Johnson warned that failure to pass the legislation would result in 'the largest tax increase in American history' and pushed for swift congressional action on what he called 'pro-growth legislation' that would 'help every single American'. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
First Thing: Donald Trump sends Marines to LA as mayor says city being used as ‘experiment'
Good morning. About 700 US marines were en route to Los Angeles on Tuesday after Donald Trump mobilized them the day before in response to protests over immigration raids. The president also doubled the number of national guard members to 4,000, in an extraordinary mobilization of troops against US residents that California leaders have called 'authoritarian'. The Pentagon mobilized the 700 active-duty marines after tensions between the federal government and the nation's second-largest city dramatically escalated over the weekend, with residents taking to the streets to demonstrate against a series of brutal crackdowns on immigrant communities. The raids have affected garment district works, day laborers and restaurants. Federal agents also arrested the president of a major California union who was serving as a community observer during the raids. Despite facing teargas and other munitions over the weekend, protesters continued to rally yesterday, and families of detained immigrants pleaded for their loved ones to be released. How is California responding? The state has filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration, accusing the US president of 'unlawfully' federalizing the state's national guard to quell a domestic protest. Days before Pete Hegseth fired three top aides last month over a Pentagon leak investigation into the disclosure of classified materials, according to four people familiar with the episode, a recently hired senior adviser said he could help with the inquiry. The adviser, Justin Fulcher, suggested to Hegseth's then chief of staff, and Hegseth's personal lawyer, Tim Parlatore, that he knew of warrantless surveillance conducted by the National Security Agency (NSA) that had identified the leakers. Fulcher offered to share the supposed evidence as long as he could help run the investigation, three of the people said. But when he eventually sat down with officials, it became clear he had no evidence of a wiretap, and the Pentagon had been duped. The extraordinary episode adds to the growing portrait of dysfunction inside Hegseth's front office. What happened next? The development was not communicated to the White House – so several Trump advisers who were told of the NSA wiretap claim believed that was part of the 'smoking gun' evidence against the three aides fired by Hegseth, until they developed their own doubts. The Swedish campaigner Greta Thunberg was leaving Tel Aviv on a flight to France after having been detained earlier with other activists on a Gaza-bound aid boat, Israel said today. 'Greta Thunberg is departing Israel on a flight to France,' Israel's foreign ministry said on its official X account, along with two photos of the activist on board a plane. The group of activists departed Italy on 1 June aboard the Madleen carrying a symbolic amount of food and supplies for Gaza, whose population is at risk of famine. Israeli forces intercepted the boat in international waters yesterday and towed it to the port of Ashdod. What about the other activists? 'The passengers of the 'Selfie Yacht' arrived at Ben Gurion airport to depart from Israel and return to their home countries,' the Israeli foreign ministry said. 'Those who refuse to sign deportation documents and leave Israel will be brought before a judicial authority.' The health secretary, Robert F Kennedy Jr, is getting rid of all 17 members on a key panel of vaccine experts and will replace them, he said yesterday. A former girlfriend of Sean 'Diddy' Combs told jurors in his sex-trafficking and racketeering trial that she repeatedly told the music mogul she didn't want to have sex with other men. Authorities said a Chinese scientist was arrested while arriving at a Detroit airport for the alleged smuggling of biological material, the second such case in two days. Donald Trump unveiled a federal program yesterday providing $1,000 government-funded investment accounts for American babies, getting backing from top business leaders who said they plan to contribute billions more to an initiative tied to 'the big beautiful bill'. Graphic sexual content, bullying, abuse and threats of violence are rife on Meta-owned products. Now Meta is pumping billions of dollars a year into building its metaverse, a virtual world for education, business, shopping and live events. But if Meta has utterly failed to keep women and girls safe in its existing online spaces, why should we trust it with the future? The unexplained deaths of hundreds of elephants near watering holes across the Okavango delta in May 2020 alarmed conservationists. Nearly five years later, scientists finally published a paper indicating what they believe to be the reason behind the deaths: toxic water caused by an algal bloom. Millions of people are prevented from having the number of children they want by a toxic mix of economic barriers and sexism, a new UN report has warned. While right-wing governments, including the US and Hungary, are increasingly blaming falling fertility rates on a rejection of parenthood, the report found most people wanted children. Gen Z are making headlines for their hesitancy to use bar tabs – instead preferring to close out and pay after every single drink, no matter how many rounds they order. But do younger people have a monopoly on poor bar etiquette? Alaina Demopoulos spoke to bartenders across the US about which generation behaves best. First Thing is delivered to thousands of inboxes every weekday. If you're not already signed up, subscribe now. If you have any questions or comments about any of our newsletters please email newsletters@
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
New York legislature passes medical aid in dying bill
Jun. 10—ALBANY — The New York state legislature has passed a bill to legalize physician-assisted suicide, a program supporters are calling "medical aid in dying." On Monday evening, with just a few days left for voting for the scheduled legislative session, the state Senate voted to pass its copy of the legislation. The state Assembly passed it earlier this year, and the bill now awaits Gov. Kathleen C. Hochul's decision to sign, veto or amend the legislation. Under the terms of the bill, people with a terminal illness who have an estimated six months or less before their disease will kill them can ask their physician for a prescription for life-ending drugs, which they can take home and consume on their own. The legislation has some protections, requiring a physician to evaluate the patient's ability to make decisions and refer them for psychiatric evaluation if there are questions over capacity. Patients have to make an oral and written request for the life-ending drugs, and the request be witnessed by two adults who are not closely related to the patient or likely to benefit after their death. It also permits medical professionals to recuse themselves from requests for medically assisted suicide, ordering them to refer requests they refuse to other doctors. Supporters of the bill say it will give New Yorkers suffering from terminal illnesses a safe, humane way to end their lives. They point to cases where terminally ill people have chosen to stop eating or drinking or chosen to end their lives in other, not legally sanctioned ways. Opponents of the bill raise concerns over the message it sends to sick people, that they should choose death rather than fight for their health, as well as practical concerns over whether the medication that would be prescribed could be a health hazard if not properly stored. They also expressed concerns over the bill's approach to how the death will be recorded. Under the bill's terms, someone who takes advantage of the program would have their cause of death listed as their terminal illness, not the ingestion of life-ending drugs. They also raised concerns over the lack of post-dispensation tracking for the lethal drugs, raising concerns they could be misused. The bill has circulated in Albany for nearly a decade, going most years without a floor vote in either chamber. Just last year, it lacked majority support in the Senate, but a successful lobbying effort this year pushed it to approval in the Assembly and now in the Senate. Debate stretched into Monday evening, with detractors in the Senate expressing concern. Sen. Steven D. Rhoads, R-Nassau, questioned why the bill doesn't include a specific requirement that doctors review a patient's medical records before prescribing the medication. "There is nothing in the bill that requires that," he said during floor debate. But proponents of the bill said it's a meaningful step towards medical autonomy and the right to choose — Senator Brad Hoylman-Sigal, D-Manhattan, the Senate sponsor of the bill, said that some identified gaps in the bill will be filled in the regulation-crafting process with the state Department of Health, which will be tasked with overseeing the implementation and authorization necessary to allow New York doctors and pharmacies to dispense these lethal medications. The lobbying isn't over yet. A major opponent of the bill, the New York State Catholic Conference, took to the halls of the Capitol on Monday in a last-ditch effort to kill the bill's chances in the Senate. Their effort was unsuccessful, but they've continued to push the governor to reject the bill. Sen. Mark C. Walczyk, R-Sackets Harbor, said in a statement that he was sad to see the bill pass. "I have tremendous sympathy for those with terminal illnesses and respect families who face end-of-life decisions," Walczyk said in a statement. "This legislation lacks critical protections for the vulnerable, structurally incentivizes suicide, and devalues human life. We need only look at the examples of states and nations that have promoted this policy. Instead of providing an option for individuals to end their lives, we should focus on improving health care for the vulnerable and enhancing hospice and palliative care for the terminally ill to ensure that every New Yorker has access to compassionate support during their most vulnerable moments, rather than offering a misguided solution that encourages despair."
