logo
Your guide to buying a reliable used Ford Focus

Your guide to buying a reliable used Ford Focus

Telegraph29-04-2025

It really is the end of the road. Ford has confirmed that the hatchback that has helped move millions of families in style and comfort – and with a dash of driving pleasure thrown in – will be discontinued in November this year.
That leaves a few months to get hold of a new one – but with tens of thousands of Focuses still on the road in the UK, finding a good used example isn't hard.
And given that the Focus has been in production for 27 years, early examples are knocking on the door of classic status. Second-generation cars, meanwhile, make brilliant banger fodder, while third- and fourth-generation models are still commonly found on forecourts.
In other words, as with the slightly smaller (and similarly discontinued) Fiesta, there's a Focus for everyone. Here's what you need to know before buying one.
Mk1 – the original
How old is it? This first-generation Focus was sold in the UK from 1998 to 2005
How much does it cost?* Prices start from £500
What's good about it? Sharp handling, lots of space, perky engines, extrovert styling, bound for classic status
What's not so good? Cheap interior plastics, lacklustre 1.4, nasty diesels, fake wood on top-spec Ghia versions
What's the Mk1 like?
An absolute revelation when it was introduced to replace the stodgy old Escort, the original Focus was a radical departure for Ford and completed the company's turnaround from maker of moribund 'pile 'em high, sell 'em cheap' fleet specials to cars you'd actually want to buy.
It looked like no other family hatchbaVk, both inside and out, while under the skin the honed suspension delivered a supple ride combined with handling that wouldn't shame the better hot hatchbacks of the time. Engines were smooth and responsive, while the swooping interior was light and airy. It wasn't quite as well built as the equivalent Volkswagen Golf, or even the Vauxhall Astra of the time – but it was much more exciting to look at and drive.
Which is the best version?
The best-seller was the mid-range 1.6 Zetec, a great option that showcases many of the Focus's talents. That said, upgrading to the 1.8 brings a welcome dose of extra power; those seeking thrills on a budget, however, might consider an ST170. The potent RS models are tremendously exciting – but also extremely expensive now.
Is the Mk1 reliable?
Yes, if it's been well looked-after – and there's the rub. Early Focuses have for so long been lodged firmly in banger territory that many will have been neglected, so finding one that's been serviced on time and on mileage, and had money spent where it was required, is tricky. If you can do so, though, a Focus should be dependable.
What do I need to look out for?
Rust is the greatest issue. Expect to find some somewhere, basically – and budget for frequent high-quality welding repairs over time. Also keep an eye out for sticky valves, dodgy fuel injectors and intermittent warning lights. Check all the electrics, too, as water can get into control units, and ensure the heater works on all fan speeds. Finally, erratic behaviour from the instrument cluster is a common problem, though easily fixable.
We found
2001 1.6 Zetec, 44,000 miles, 12 months' MOT, £1,825
Mk2 – the thinking man's Focus
How old is it? This second-generation Focus was sold in the UK from 2005 to 2011
How much does it cost?* Prices start from £500
What's good about it? Great all-round blend of quality, equipment, comfort, driver enjoyment and space; brilliant performance models
What's not so good? Some less reliable engine options, convertibles can be a liability
What's the Mk2 like?
Ford toned down the Mk1's zany styling for the second iteration, but in doing so it broadened the car's appeal, improving build quality at the same time and adding even more engine and body-style options, including for the first time a hard-top convertible.
The Mk2 had greater space inside and although didn't have quite as much steering feel as the Mk1, it was still fun to drive, with lots of grip and a responsive chassis. Again, a hot ST version headed the range until the fire-breathing RS arrived; both had a characterful five-cylinder turbo engine sourced from Volvo.
Which is the best version?
Go for the Mazda-sourced 1.8 if you can find one; it has a timing chain, so doesn't need frequent belt changes. But the hidden gem is the 1.6-litre Ti-VCT; pilfered from the smaller Fiesta Zetec-S, it makes the Focus feel far peppier than it has any right to. As for the diesel options, 2.0-litres give a solid blend of power and economy and tend to be reasonably reliable, but avoid the 1.6.
Is the Mk2 reliable?
There's more to go wrong in the Mk2 Focus than in the Mk1; with some approaching 20 years old, it's no wonder they are starting to feel rather creaky. The most reliable engines are the 1.8- and 2.0-litre petrols, or the 2.0-litre diesels. The 2.5-litre turbo engine in the ST is also robust, although avoid examples heavily modified for greater power.
What do I need to look out for?
Leaks around the rear end that allow rain water into the boot and rear footwell areas are not uncommon and can take time to trace. Dashboard displays stay lit for a while after the car is turned off, but beware those that stay on for over an hour. Sills and arches can rust. Ti-VCT engines can throw up problems with the cam timing module. Bonnet latches can break, making the bonnet tricky to open. 1.6-litre diesels are known for premature turbo failure. Folding hard-top roofs on convertibles can go out of alignment, leading to leaks and squeaks; they can also fail completely.
We found
2008 1.6 Zetec, 80,000 miles, full service history, £3,000
Mk3 – the difficult third album
How old is it? This third-generation Focus was sold in the UK from 2011 to 2018
How much does it cost?* Prices start from £1,500
What's good about it? Sophisticated ride-handling balance; smart, modern looks; some generous equipment levels
What's not so good? Bulky, plasticky interior fittings; small boot compared with rivals; cheaper versions very basic; later models had troublesome 1.0-litre engine
What's the Mk3 like?
If the Mk2 felt like an evolution of the Mk1, the Mk3 Focus was more of a radical departure. Gone were the high-level rear lights and squared-off styling, replaced by a more flowing and modern look (although some also saw it as more generic).
The interior felt more fully realised, with chunkier fixtures, although these bigger, bolder fittings exposed the cheaper plastics to greater scrutiny. What was more, rivals offered more space in the back seats and in the boot – the estate was especially disappointing in this regard.
But the Focus still provided the trademark blend of excellent damping and sharp handling. While the Mk3 didn't quite have the pin-sharp involvement of the original, it was still by far and away the driver's choice in its class.
Which is the best version?
Basic Studio (later renamed Style) models feel like an exercise in self-flagellation, so better to upgrade to Zetec or, better still, Titanium versions, which offered a lot more equipment. 1.6-litre petrols are commonplace but can feel a bit asthmatic; 2.0-litre diesels are better, while the 1.6- and later 1.5-litre turbos feel punchy. 1.0-litre petrols are great to drive, too, but suffer from reliability concerns (see below).
Is the Mk3 reliable?
Mid-table rankings in reliability surveys spoke to the Focus's average reliability record among its contemporaries, although these days it's helped by the fact that repairs are cheap and relatively easy. 1.0-litre petrols and 1.6-litre diesels are generally thought to be the least dependable engines; the former especially is difficult to recommend given its timing belt issues.
What do I need to look out for?
1.0-litre Focuses had a timing belt that ran through the oil to keep it lubricated. Unfortunately this degrades with time, leaving rubber particles in the lubricant that then clog the oil pick-up and, if not dealt with, can lead to serious engine damage. The timing belt needs changing at 10 years or 100,000 miles. This can be a big, costly job, which is why this version of the Focus is usually best avoided. Powershift automatic gearboxes also have a habit of being troublesome.
We found
2018 1.5T Titanium X, 50,000 miles, full service history, £9,950
Mk4 – evolution, not revolution
How old is it? This fourth-generation Focus was sold in the UK from 2018 to 2025
How much does it cost?* Prices start from £5,000
What's good about it? Modern technology, more space and that trademark Focus handling
What's not so good? Cheap interior plastics and a firmer ride than before
What's the Mk4 like?
Possibly the least visually compelling Focus, the Mk4 doesn't sit quite as well as previous Focuses, its kicked-up window-line feeling like an attempt to mimic an old BMW 1-Series. But beneath the skin it is really competent, with more space than the Mk3 and an especially practical estate version.
Inside, though, the Mk4 felt a little disappointing; while the cheap, scratchy plastics were no worse than the Mk3's, most rivals had moved upmarket, leaving the Focus behind. And despite the extra room, the Focus still couldn't match the best cars in its class for space.
What was more, the Mk4 lacked the suppleness of previous Focuses, its ride firmer and more overtly sporting – especially in ST-Line form, which can feel rather crashy. The payoff was sharper handling than the Mk3's, with crisper steering and a steadfast refusal to lean over in bends.
Which is the best version?
Even mid-range models can feel stingily equipped; early cars especially lack some of the refinements you'd find in, say, the equivalent Volkswagen Golf. ST-Line models are too firm, meanwhile, making the best of all worlds the relatively plush Titanium version. Again, 1.0-litre models are best avoided as a result of their reliability concerns; the 1.5 turbo is therefore the one to have.
Is the Mk4 reliable?
Generally speaking, yes; in recent reliability surveys, the Focus finished toward the upper end of its class. There is some evidence that diesel-engined cars can be less dependable than petrol ones, however.
What do I need to look out for?
As with the Mk3, the Mk4 Focus range included Ford's 1.0-litre Ecoboost engine, which suffered from timing belt degradation with serious potential consequences. Again, the timing belt needs changing at 10 years or 100,000 miles – a big bill worth keeping in mind. And again, the Powershift automatic gearbox is susceptible to problems. The Mk4 Focus was also on the receiving end of quite a few recalls – so check that all that the remedial work has been carried out.
We found
2019 1.5T Ecoboost Titanium, 21,000 miles, full service history, £14,900

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Epic fail: the 1980 Ford Mustang V8
Epic fail: the 1980 Ford Mustang V8

Top Gear

timean hour ago

  • Top Gear

Epic fail: the 1980 Ford Mustang V8

Epic fail: the 1980 Ford Mustang V8 OK, some third-gen Mustangs weren't entirely awful. But some really were Skip 1 photos in the image carousel and continue reading Turn on Javascript to see all the available pictures. Many wise, knowledgeable car enthusiasts will sagely inform you the third gen 'fox body' Mustang is anything but a fail. They will inform you that, in the near half century since its launch, it has proven itself an ultimate tuner car: cheap to buy, easy to work on, straightforward to boost to big horsepower. The fox body Mustang, they will tell you, is a legend. Epic Fail is here to tell you that these people are wrong. Yes, the Gen 3 Mustang has indeed proven itself a fine platform for modification, but that's just proof of how badly Ford ballsed it up first time round. No one's ever felt the need to modify the Mona Lisa. Advertisement - Page continues below OK, some third-gen Mustangs weren't entirely awful. But some really were. Case in point is 1980's 4.2-litre V8 model. This hydrocarbon gargling, fire breathing beast churned out – ready for this? – a grand total of 118bhp. That's a specific output of 29bhp per litre. If your 1.0-litre Ford Fiesta made such pitiful power density, it... well, it wouldn't actually move. There were, in Ford's defence, some mitigating circumstances behind the V8's flaccid firepower. In the wake of the 1979 oil crisis, the Blue Oval tried to figure out a way to squeeze some extra economy from its hoggish 5.0-litre V8, and came up with the not especially ingenious solution of simply sleeving it down, and hoping that'd do. It didn't. If the 4.2 did save its owners on fuel bills, that was simply because they couldn't be bothered to drive it. The other issue afflicting the third gen Mustang was its deeply gawky design, which with modern eyes appear to be the work of either a) primitive AI or b) whatever they used to build Erling Haaland. Ford boasted it had set three separate design teams in competition to come up with its design, thus offering proof that too many cooks really do spoil the muscle car broth. At least it gave all those future tuners plenty to improve upon. Advertisement - Page continues below Top Gear Newsletter Thank you for subscribing to our newsletter. Look out for your regular round-up of news, reviews and offers in your inbox. Get all the latest news, reviews and exclusives, direct to your inbox. Success Your Email*

The ‘FX' cosmetic package for the Ford Mustang GT is pure ‘80s vibes
The ‘FX' cosmetic package for the Ford Mustang GT is pure ‘80s vibes

Top Gear

timean hour ago

  • Top Gear

The ‘FX' cosmetic package for the Ford Mustang GT is pure ‘80s vibes

Inspired by the Fox Body, it gets Oxford White accents and tartan upholstery Turn on Javascript to see all the available pictures. Ford is rolling back the decades with this styling pack for the Mustang GT, which incorporates various elements reminiscent of the Fox Body generation from the Eighties. It's as retro as a slightly worn pair of Nike Blazers, we reckon. Which is very. Christened the 'FX' package, the grille nostrils, badging and reimagined split-spoke 19in alloys are all painted in 'Oxford White'. Ford will also recast the taillights in white if you want, and offer this original Fox Body shade of 'Adriatic Blue Metallic' across the Mustang lineup.

Ford slips down sales list as century-old nemesis makes fun of slump
Ford slips down sales list as century-old nemesis makes fun of slump

Daily Mail​

time11 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Ford slips down sales list as century-old nemesis makes fun of slump

America's biggest automaker is charging ahead. General Motors — the owner of Chevrolet, GMC, Cadillac, and Buick — says it has sold 62,000 EVs through May of this year. Chevy led the electric charge with its two crossover SUVs, the Equinox and the Blazer, selling 37,000 units by the end of May. The EV sales number is a stunning feat for the competition between America's most iconic carmakers: Chevy's sales were enough to beat Ford Corporation's entire EV lineup over the same period. GM namecalled Chevy's Ford-beating sales in its press release. Ford's three-pronged lineup of E-Transit commercial vans, F-150 Lightning pickups, and Mustang Mach-E crossovers sold 34,000 in the same month. That's an eight percent dip on a year ago. Ford blamed the drop on a redesigns of the Mach-E and Lightning. A spokesperson told the modest design changes resulted in temporary inventory shortages. Ford said EV sales will rebound as stock returns, adding, 'We expect to see a strong June sales month as stock hits dealer lots.' Chevy's sudden sales surge comes as the battery-powered industry goes through several major shifts. While Tesla still dominates the EV market, its grip is slipping. Legacy car brands like Chevy, Hyundai, Kia, and Toyota are launching a slate of new cars that often undercut Tesla's pricing. Customers are responding positively, with GM claiming that May was its second-best EV sales month ever. 'Customers are responding in record numbers to our world-class portfolio of electric and gas-powered vehicles,' Rory Harvey, the company's VP and president of global markets, said. 'We more than doubled our EV sales compared to the same period last year.' But even as legacy carmakers post electric milestones, headwinds are intensifying. Consumer interest in EVs is sliding, government incentives are under threat, and supply chains are starting to feel the pinch of geopolitical tension. A new poll from AAA found that 63 percent of Americans say they're 'unlikely or very unlikely' to consider an EV for their next vehicle — a 10-point jump in just two years. Ford said its EV sales decline was largely attributed to a redesign of the Mustang Mach-E 'Since we began tracking interest in fully electric vehicles, we've seen some variability,' Greg Brannon, director of automotive engineering. 'While the automotive industry is committed to long-term electrification and providing a diverse range of models, underlying consumer hesitation remains.' Political winds aren't helping either. The Replican backed spending bill — dubbed the Big, Beautiful Bill by President Donald Trump — aims to slash the federal $7,500 EV tax credit, which has helped keep prices competitive. Killing the subsidy would instantly make EVs more expensive for many buyers. According to the AAA poll, Americans listed higher prices as the biggest problem with EVs. 'It's our belief that consumers will switch to electric when EVs achieve price parity with gas cars,' Seth Goldstein, an EV analyst at Morningstar, told Meanwhile, automakers are bracing for supply shortages after China responded to Trump's tariffs by tightening exports of rare-earth magnets — a key component in EV motors. While gas cars use around half a pound of the material, electric cars need nearly a pound per vehicle. Automakers are betting big on new tech to weather the storm. Drivers have grown more skeptical of EVs, according to new polls from AAA GM is investing heavily in lithium-iron-phosphate (LFP) battery development, which could cut costs, reduce reliance on rare earths, and enable domestic production — all while meeting or exceeding current range standards. Toyota is launching three new EV models in the US, while several companies are looking at reshoring EV production across America. Automakers looking at the future of the industry still largely believe that Americans will eventually transition to fully electric vehicles. It just will take more time than originally expected. Jeremy Snyder, chief commercial officer of the newly-unveiled Slate electric truck company, told the Daily Mail that US EV manufacturing is a no-brainer. 'Building EVs for a new company is the only obvious solution,' he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store