Want to ditch screens? Here are the top podcasts for kids
A few years back, I was Team Velociraptor by a large margin, curled up listening to a podcast with my T-Rex-loving grandson. Sucked in by the set-up. A race between two dinosaur species through weird terrains of all kinds. Over 14 or so minutes, University of Queensland palaeontologist Tim Richards and ABC sports editor Amanda Shalala call the contest, like it was happening before their eyes. Survivor for the ears, but 200 times more thrilling. Fart jokes, puns, actual palaeontological facts, bone length, permutations of teeth and a script which sounds like it was written by a football commentator. No wonder it gets fan mail and the reward of nearly seven million downloads.
This is ABC Kids' Dino Dome. At the end of June, a new season drops. Not that I don't love listening to T versus V for the umpteenth time or the explanation of why reptiles are not dinosaurs and pterodactyls can't fly. But I'm ready for new racers. From June 26, it's a special 'knock-out' format. Listeners will know the competing dinosaurs ahead of time as they face off in a round-robin. They won't tell me who is in the first round, but Richards says this season they will race Australia's most complete pterosaur. And what's the mystery?
'It's really hard to know when pterosaurs went to the bathroom because they have a silent p.'
Dinosaur jokes. Works for me. How did I end up being obsessed with a kids' podcast? Grandkids. Obviously.
There doesn't seem to be any curated guides to the best children's podcasts, so I'm sharing what I found, what I love, and what others suggested. All of them, the kind you can listen to with little ones, big ones or even by yourself. So what's on my list besides dinosaurs? Nature. History. Difficult life questions.
Unless you possess superhuman patience, it is not possible to keep reading books to your kids/grandkids/small humans in your care until they have had their fill. They have never had enough. Podcasts fill the gap. Kyla Slaven, a former UTS radio lecturer and then parent of a 10-year-old, had a wild idea about a decade ago: to create podcasts for kids. I thought she was completely mad, especially when she pitched Short and Curly (ABC), an ethics podcast. Yet, her foresight proved true. The very first episode in 2016, Can you trust a robot?, now seems eerily prescient. Podcasts, Slaven says, enable family listening in a way that live radio can't.
When I asked Helen Adam about the value of podcasts for children, her response went beyond simply filling a void in the market. Adam, an Associate Professor at Edith Cowan University and the president of the Primary English Teachers Association of Australia, has dedicated 42 years to researching how children learn to read.
She says podcasts serve as a 'bridge into reading and loving books'. Crucially, this bridge leads away from video clips and cartoons – which, despite their undeniable charm (love you Bingo, on behalf of all younger sisters), ultimately only lead back to more screen time.
'When you are watching, you are just a viewer. When you are reading or listening, you become those characters. It builds kids' background in patterns of language in how texts are put together, storylines, words, phrases. These are great benefits for language acquisition for kids,' says Adam.
'When you read, the neural pathways are similar to actually living that experience. And when you listen, it develops language comprehension.'
Turns out, podcasters could tell there was a need. Ann Jones, host of Noisy By Nature (ABC), says parents want engaging content without turning kids into zombies . Parents want lots of choice because kids are repeat listeners (as my velociraptor vs T-rex experience reveals).
Loading
Children, it seems, form an immediate bond with podcasts. Jones now experiences people approaching her on the street, and parents send her videos of their children mimicking her. Her favourite episode Noi-SEA: Humming Continental Shelf stars a dugong sounding like a cow, what sounds like a vacuum cleaner and the best real underwater sounds you've ever heard.
Jones says kids start consuming media almost from birth, highlighting the crucial juncture when media literacy must begin. What's true? What's not? And what powers our imaginations? New research also shows that podcasts for children often feature an even wider vocabulary than those aimed at adults, thereby stretching the word stocks of kids too. Also, the heartstrings. Take this.
'Hey, how do you remember your family back home?' Trust me, your eyes will start to prickle with tears when you hear this question – about whether kids who were convicts stayed in touch with their families – in Hey History! (UTS, Latrobe, HTA NSW and Impact Studios)
Many adult podcasts boil down to a couple of old mates having a laughing competition. Not that there's anything wrong with that. However, many of the children's podcasts recommended to me by various adults, children, and teachers would never neatly fit into the 'entertainment' category.
Anna Clark, a history professor, mother to Hey History!'s narrator Axel, and granddaughter of Australia's eminent historian Manning Clark, has for two decades been driven to reform how history is taught.
Hey History!, which won gold at this year's NYF Radio Awards for Best Children's Program, is her latest tool. She is executive producer of the podcast alongside Professor Clare Wright. Drawing on decades of research in history education, she wanted to create a resource for primary teachers (most of whom have done little or no Australian history since their own Year 10).
When I read the word resource, I cringe. Not this time. And that's partly due to narrator Axel, 15, a persuasive actor. The podcast's producer asked Axel to audition and offered him the role, for which he gets paid. (I ask him to tell me the worst thing about working with his mother. I assure him her feelings won't get hurt. 'She can take it,' I say. 'I know she can't,' he deadpans.)
Loading
Most of these podcasts are what Lulu Miller, queen of children's podcasts and host of Radiolab's Terrestrials, calls intergenerational. Anyone can listen and love what they are hearing. Here's how Miller describes the premise for Terrestrials: 'We are scouring the earth to bring very narrative stories which seem like fairytales, that seem like adventure stories about creatures...every episode is fact-checked, it's 100 per cent true.'
You have to listen to the episode on the silence of the bees. 'Is it a new disease? Is it because of pesticides? Maybe it's the cell phones!'
Spoiler alert: it's not the mobile phones. But around 2006, farmers across the US opened their beehives to find them empty. Terrestrials delves into why, featuring experts, didgeridoos, and genuine narrative tension.
Turns out most children's podcasts do a brilliant job of bringing it altogether: the tension, the narration, the music, and enough real experts to help us all understand and inspire further learning.
Want more suggestions? Museum Victoria's The Fact Detectives (now out of production but loads of episodes still). National Geographic's Greeking Out, Theo and Matt (a truly sweet father-reading-to-his-child dynamic), and Imagine This (ABC).
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


ABC News
9 hours ago
- ABC News
Little Disasters: S1 Episode 1
Skip to main content Go back to home page Home Live TV Shows Movies ABC News ABC Kids Categories Mystery Drama Relationships When Jess takes her baby to hospital with an unexplained head injury, her close friend, A&E doctor Liz, makes the excruciating decision to call social services, igniting an explosive chain of events. New series starts Sunday 15 June at 9pm on ABC iview and ABC TV. Diane Kruger, Jo Joyner, Ben Bailey Smith, Shelley Conn, Emily Taaffe, JJ Feild, Stephen Campbell Moore, Patrick Baladi

ABC News
11 hours ago
- ABC News
Word nerd? Grammar guardian? Try your hand at Guy Montgomery's Spelling Bee quiz
Are you a word nerd? A grammar guardian? Well, my friend, you're in the right place. Guy Montgomery and Aaron Chen are here once again to provide you with the chance to feel smug and laud your skills over your nearest and dearest. Will you earn yourself a highly sought-after picture of a novelty-sized ticket to the next quiz? Or be forced to wear the (virtual) dunce's hat? Now, let's get spelling! Stream the new series of Guy Montgomery's Guy Mont Spelling Bee free on ABC iview or catch it on Wednesdays at 8:35pm on ABC TV.

Sydney Morning Herald
11 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
I loved confronting the left-wing mob on the Q+A panel. I'll miss it dearly
The irony. After making its name in the heady days of internet cancellations, the ABC's Q+A has finally received a taste of its own medicine. Not for the crime of expressing non-conformist opinions, for which panellists were pursued, but for the crime of becoming so conformist there was no thrill left in switching on the TV. So says the cynic in me. Unsentimentally – but no less acutely – I will miss a show that once inspired Australians to engage with politics and talk about policy as though it were theirs to shape. Over the past few years I have appeared a number of times on Q+A, hosted by Tony Jones, then Hamish Macdonald and Patricia Karvelas. All of the hosts were unfailingly kind, as were their producers. I have a particular soft spot for Lindsay Olney, a talented senior producer who overcame my view of the show as a firing squad trained on non-progressives and convinced me that it might be OK to go on – just this once. Also for Tony Jones, the host of the first show I appeared on, who sensed my nerves and ensured I was treated with courtesy. It wasn't these people who eventually killed the ABC talk shows. It was the people whose response to an unfamiliar view is not curiosity, but outrage. The live tweet stream that was the genius stroke for democratising the show unfortunately also encouraged online mob behaviour around each episode. It could be hard to take. Politicians, especially from the right of politics, learnt to decline invitations to join the show. What was originally an opportunity to include the audience in a discussion became a trap. A word out-of-place or simply misconstrued would be weaponised by partisans and political opponents. When politicians did appear in later times, it was to deliver contrived messages rather than spontaneous answers. The advice to first-timers going onto Q+A was to lock yourself out of Twitter (and then X) for the week. The comments could be brutal and highly personal. Inevitably they would include threats and sexualised comments from some particularly unhinged netizens. Producers admitted that conservative women were often reluctant to come on because the attacks on them outweighed any possible professional benefit appearing could confer. That makes me angry. So many clever women have been silenced by zealots from the side of politics that claims to champion female empowerment. They were a loss to the viewers of the ABC. Loading There was a similar dynamic around The Drum, which stopped screening at the end of 2023. Many on the right were critical of that show as well, for similar reasons. Both Q+A and The Drum tended to invite only one token 'right-winger', who would be there to represent a broad spectrum of ideas against a panel of 'left-wingers'. They had a point. This one-against-all sense was amplified on Q+A by the live studio audience. It was always supposed to be selected to reflect the spectrum of community opinion, but those who clapped and booed seemed invariably to come from the left of the political spectrum. Yet personally, I relished the set-up. I'm always at my happiest taking on the world and challenging lazy thinking and intellectual orthodoxy. These shows, and even this quirk of balance, was tailor-made for me. That was my motivation for going on. But the thoughtful feedback I'd receive afterwards showed me there was value in it for others as well. For many viewers, these ABC panel shows were the only exposure they had to non-left ideas. People would write to me, when I'd been on, to say they'd appreciated hearing a perspective they'd never considered. For a year after The Drum was taken off-air, people would stop me in the street or come up to me in shops to say how sad they were that it was no longer screening. I expect with Q+A it'll be the same.