'Mansion tax' for £1 million Scottish homes rejected by MSPs
The Scottish Greens had tabled an amendment to the SNP Government's Housing Bill in order to bring in a new top tax rate for properties which sell for more than £1 million.
Currently, Scotland levies a Land and Buildings Transaction Tax (LBTT) on residential property sales above £145,000.
READ MORE: SNP reject Reform UK claims they 'organised protests against Nigel Farage'
For homes between £145,001 and £250,000, a 2% rate is paid, which goes up to 5% for properties between £250,001 to £325,000, and 10% for sales worth £325,001 to £750,000.
The current top rate of 12% is charged on properties sold for more than £750,000.
The Greens' 'mansion tax' amendment would leave those bands unchanged but would create a new tax rate of 15% on residential sales worth more than £1m.
The party tabled other amendments to the same bill, including an additional charge for overseas buyers of Scottish properties, plans which would enable councils to further increase council tax on holiday homes, and proposals which would make it easier for tenants to keep pets and service animals in their home.
However, on Tuesday the proposal was rejected by SNP, Labour and Conservative members of Holyrood's Local Government and Housing Committee.
MSP Ross Greer (above), who tabled the amendment, told The National that it was 'disappointing' that MSPs rejected the proposal and that 'only the very wealthiest people in the country, who can afford to pay more, would have been impacted' by the new tax.
The MSP continued: 'Scotland has enough wealth to end injustices like child poverty tomorrow, but far too much of this money is in the hands of a tiny number of super-rich people and big corporations.
READ MORE: Scottish MPs panned over up to £3500-a-month taxpayer-funded London homes
'Property taxes are important to ensure the wealthiest people pay their fair share back into our public services. I hope other MSPs remember that when they next complain about cuts to public services due to a lack of money.'
The SNP's Housing Bill is currently at Stage 2, where MSPs are considering amendments. The deadline for the end of Stage 2 proceedings is on June 6, after which an updated version of the bill with approved amendments will be published.
Scrutiny of the bill was split between Holyrood's Local Government, Housing and Planning and Social Justice and Social Security committees.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
32 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Rangers confirm as new manager as Russell Martin lays out 3 goals for new club
Russell Martin has signed a three-year deal to move to Ibrox after being sacked by Southampton last December, having won just one of their first 16 Premier League games after securing promotion from the Championship Rangers have confirmed the appointment of Russell Martin as the club's new head coach. The 39-year-old former MK Dons, Swansea and Southampton boss has signed a three-year contract. Martin guided Southampton to promotion to the Premier League last year but was sacked in December following one win from their first 16 games. He will be joined at Ibrox by assistant head coach Matt Gill and performance coach Rhys Owen. Rangers finished last season under the caretaker management of former captain Barry Ferguson, having dismissed Philippe Clement in February. Now ex-Scotland defender Martin, who had a short loan spell as a player at Rangers in 2018, is tasked with wrestling power back from the other side of Glasgow. The 'Gers have looked on ruefully for over a decade as Celtic have dominated Scottish football, with that stranglehold continuing last term with a 13th Premiership title in the past 14 years. 'From my time here, I had a taste of how special this club is, the expectation, the passion and the history,' he told the club's website. 'Now, as I return, I'm determined to bring success back, for the supporters, the players, and everyone inside this club. "I'm here to set standards, work hard and do my very best to earn the respect of the Rangers fans. "There's a lot to be done, but the goal is clear: win matches, win trophies and give Rangers fans a team that they can be proud of. "We want to play with bravery, to take the ball, to be aggressive, and to stand up in the big moments." Martin's arrival is the latest in a series of major changes at the club. An American consortium led by Andrew Cavenagh and 49ers Enterprises secured a majority shareholding on Friday, while new sporting director Kevin Thelwell officially began work on Monday. Rangers chief executive Patrick Stewart, who led the recruitment process alongside Thelwell, said: 'Our criteria for our next coach were clear: we wanted a coach who will excel in terms of how we want to play, improve our culture, develop our squad, and ultimately win matches. Russell was the standout candidate.'
The Herald Scotland
36 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
'Arrogant' Sir Keir has killed independence. What can SNP do about it?
Sir Keir Starmer hasn't categorically ruled out another referendum but he doesn't have to. He says no one is raising independence with him as a priority. And that's the SNP's real problem – not a Prime Minister who doesn't want a referendum, but an apathetic population. Scottish voters do not decisively support independence (they remain split around 50/50 on the issue) and are much less enamoured of the SNP than they used to be. Read more Rebecca McQuillan They have many other things on their minds besides the constitution. Those are the real roadblocks to independence, those are the reasons John Swinney has stopped the posturing: there is no voter demand for a referendum and the SNP wouldn't necessarily win one anyway. It would take an earthquake in Scottish politics to push support for independence to the level needed to win a referendum comfortably. Some believe the threat of a Nigel Farage premiership could be that seismic event. The Reform leader becoming PM would certainly register on the Richter scale, or so a poll at the weekend suggested. A Norstat survey for the Sunday Times found that independence support currently sits at 54 per cent once don't knows are removed but that Farage becoming PM would push it up to 58 per cent. But even if Reform are still contenders by 2029 (not a certainty) the Farage effect alone isn't going to bring about an independent Scotland. When even Brexit and three years of Boris Johnson – all of it against Scotland's will – failed to shift the dial decisively on independence then clearly something else has to change. People have to be convinced that life would be better in an independent Scotland. John Swinney knows this. He occasionally talks process – how the Northern Ireland border poll mechanism is an interesting precedent, for instance – but the tactical chat has been conspicuously absent. He recognises what the real challenge is for the SNP and hasn't avoided saying it out loud. Scottish independence will only happen if support for the SNP is 'very high' and if people are persuaded by the 'merits and arguments' for independence, says the First Minister. He wants to hasten the process along, he says, but building voter confidence in independence as a proposition depends heavily on building confidence in the SNP as a government. Can independence recapture the Scottish imagination? (Image: Stewart Attwood)We could summarise as follows: support for the SNP has to recover to its old highs, support for independence needs to be around 60 per cent or higher, and people have to want a referendum as a priority. That's how you force Westminster to concede to a legal referendum and that's how Yes feel confident of winning it. The trouble is, those conditions are hard to achieve – very hard indeed. Firstly, the SNP itself is struggling to regain the support it leached away under Humza Yousaf and the last months of Nicola Sturgeon. NHS waiting lists, violence in schools, drugs deaths, business disaffection, homelessness, the ferries fiasco, arguments over trans rights and a list of other problems have all taken their toll on the Scottish Government's reputation. There's not much sign of voters falling back in love with them. Secondly, support for independence remains volatile and frequently falls below 50 per cent. There's no sign voters are any more convinced about it now than they were five years ago. And thirdly, independence is a long way from being anyone's priority outside of core SNP supporters. Making decisive arguments in favour of independence so that voters believe it is the better option than remaining in the UK has always been extremely tough. Even Brexit, which seemed to prove the SNP's long-held belief that Scotland's current democratic arrangements were unfair, created new challenges by creating the prospect of a hard border between Scotland and the rest of the UK in the event of independence. It was also horribly stressful and unpleasant. Divorces are. People were put right off the idea of referendums where public opinion is finely balanced: a cautionary tale for Scotland if ever there was one. Read more Now the picture has become more complicated still. The global security situation has changed. It is more threatening to Scotland and the UK than it has been in decades and that is not inclining people towards independence. Most people in Scotland favour retaining the UK's nuclear deterrent and 47 per cent believe Scotland is safer within the UK (compared to 35 per cent who don't). At a time of such insecurity, it's hardly surprising there is so little demand for a big all-consuming row about the constitution. Next year we have a Scottish election and that will shift the pieces on the board. If Reform keep up some momentum and send a group of MSPs to Holyrood, they look set to be very much the minority. Still, their presence could potentially change the way voters viewed an independent Scotland – it might no longer look much like a haven from hard-right conservatives. On the other hand, having more Reform MSPs might encourage more people to support the SNP. But the Scottish election, from where we're standing now, doesn't look like it will significantly change the fundamentals that John Swinney himself has set out as the prerequisites for winning an independence referendum. No wonder Keir Starmer sounded so relaxed discussing it. Independence, for the foreseeable, is in the deep freeze. Rebecca McQuillan is a journalist specialising in politics and Scottish affairs. She can be found on Bluesky at @ and on X at @BecMcQ
The National
42 minutes ago
- The National
Ukraine's remarkable Operation Spiderweb shows how warfare has changed
While the real details remain scant of Ukraine's recent swarm drone strike across swathes of Russia all the way from the Arctic region to the Far East, enough is known for the world to sit up and take notice. Analysts might be split over their assessment of just how damaging Operation Spiderweb was on Russia's long-range strategic bomber fleet. On the 'optimistic' side the attack say some destroyed several scores of aircraft, while those a little more cautious with the estimates, insist it was perhaps only a dozen or so. In one sense the numbers don't really matter but other things certainly do. To begin with, when seen from Ukraine's perspective, the daring attack sent a clear message to the Kremlin that nowhere is untouchable in Russia. READ MORE: 'New low': SNP slam Labour over MP lobbying trip to Israel amid Gaza genocide Far from not having any 'cards to play' as US president told his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelenskyy, Kyiv has made it clear that not only does it still hold cards but plays them with great audacity and cunning as it has done from the moment Russia invaded Ukrainian territory. The operation has also delivered a morale as well as strategic boost at a time when many Ukrainians felt that their backs were to the wall like never before. Just to add to that boost, a few days later Ukraine released a video of another attack, this time on Russia's most important link to Crimea, the Kerch Bridge. The fact that it was recorded using Russia's own surveillance system, once again displayed the out-of-the-box thinking that has become the hallmark of Ukraine's military intelligence and special forces operations. Almost from day one, Russia has found Ukraine a formidable adversary and has been itself on the receiving end of a number of ignominious strikes including the loss of its Black Sea Fleet flagship, the Moskva, and much of the Black Sea Fleet itself at the hands of a country which effectively lacks a navy. But there are wider messages the world can take from Operation Spiderweb, too, the first being that this war has now moved well beyond the parameters of its early days. With every month that passes in the conflict, the capacity for it to escalate into a new dangerous realm intensifies. Russian military assets wherever they might be, are now fully in Ukraine's crosshairs. Ukraine's own civilian population meanwhile have never been off limits to Russian forces and Moscow appears hell-bent on doubling down on them at every turn. Every war has its tipping points, and you can't help but feel that it would only take one serious overstep or miscalculation between these two protagonists for this to move into the unthinkable and Russia's use of its nuclear capability which in turn could drag in Ukraine's allies in an unprecedented way. But there are other messages also to be taken from Operation Spiderweb. As The Economist magazine pointed out in its aftermath, the world must wake up to the fact that 'new technology, deployed inventively, can be disproportionately lethal. The other is that the battlefield now stretches deep behind the front line, overturning the assumptions of the past quarter century'. In all of the visits I've made to Ukraine since the Russian invasion in 2022, I've been struck by the hybrid or new methods of warfare coming out of the conflict. As I once described it to a friend, what you encounter is like a cross between the Battle of the Somme and something out of the movie Bladerunner. READ MORE: Jeremy Corbyn brings in bill for public inquiry into UK complicity in Gaza genocide Or to put this another way, a war in which its protagonists live in a 'whites of their eyes' encounter one minute while at other times bringing injury or death to the enemy on a screen as you would in a computer video game. The power of drone warfare has been there for all to see and is causing a rethink of weapons priorities across the world. Russia and China have made drone technology a priority while the best that can be said for Europe is that it lags considerably behind. Which brings me to Britain's recent Strategic Defence Review, published curiously enough only the day after Operation Spiderweb. To hear Prime Minister Keir Starmer talk of making Britain a 'battle-ready, armour-clad nation' and moving to a state of 'warfighting readiness,' sent a chill down my spine. Listening also to UK Defence Secretary, John Healey, talk as if war with Russia was just around the corner was likewise enough to give anyone sleepless nights. God knows I'm no fan of this Labour Government – anything but – but when all is said and done it's impossible to get away from the fact that the world in which we live presents ever-increasing threats by the day. Those who would argue that by chucking more money and effort at preparedness and upgrading the UK's military might only make things worse do have a point. But only the most naive would assume that other nations, perhaps Russia or China, or even non-state actors, would not seek to take every advantage were Britain and its European allies to drop their guard. Some in fact might argue that for too long now that guard has been dropped and complacency set in hence the sudden realisation of vulnerability. Not being prepared for crises is not only stupid but a sign of poor government and whatever Starmer says there remains the glaring gap between ambition and money when it comes to defence. That said, the review is right in its warning that 'emerging technologies are already changing the character of warfare more profoundly than at any point in human history'. I'm sure we all wish it were otherwise. I'm sure too we would much prefer it were every single diplomatic effort made to reduce tensions across the globe to avoid the need to harness such technology for warfare. I wish the world was full of pacifists, but it's not, that is the inescapable evidence of history. After 40 years as a correspondent witnessing wars up close, I for one need no convincing of how much better it is to deter war than wage it.
