B.C. judge orders limit in tailings dam deposits at Mount Polley mine
VANCOUVER - The Supreme Court in British Columbia has ordered that the Mount Polley mine limit the tailings it can deposit into its storage facility while a First Nation challenges an addition to the dam in court.
The court's decision issued Thursday orders the Mount Polley Mining Corp. not to deposit mine tailings that would require the raising of the storage facility dam by four meters until July 1.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
14 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Brazil's Supreme Court justices agree to make social media companies liable for user content
BRASILIA, Brazil (AP) — The majority of justices on Brazil's Supreme Court have agreed to make social media companies liable for illegal postings by their users. Gilmar Mendes on Wednesday became the sixth of the court's 11 justices to vote to open a path for companies like Meta, X and Microsoft to be sued and pay fines for content published by their users. Voting is ongoing but a simple majority is all that is needed for the measure to pass. The ruling will come after U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio warned of possible visa restrictions against foreign officials allegedly involved in censoring American citizens. The only dissenting Brazilian justice so far is André Mendonça and his vote was made public last week. The social media proposal would become law once voting is finished and the result is published. But Brazil's Congress could still pass another law to reverse the measure. The current legislation states social media companies can only be held responsible in those cases if they do not remove hazardous content after a court order.
Vancouver Sun
a day ago
- Vancouver Sun
Catholic cemetery bookkeeper sued by Vancouver archdiocese for $575,000
The bookkeeper for the Gardens of Gethsemani Catholic Cemetery in Surrey is being sued for the return of $575,000 after her employer discovered years of unauthorized payments, according to a lawsuit filed in B.C. Supreme Court. The Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Vancouver filed a notice of civil claim alleging that Marcia Terlaak wrote cheques to herself totalling at least that amount over the nine years she was operations manager for the largest Catholic cemetery in B.C., which covers 16 hectares in Surrey. Her husband, Dustin Terlaak, is named as co-defendant for his 'full knowledge and participation,' the case alleges. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. Marcia Terlaak, whose online LinkedIn account as recently as a month ago listed her as Coquitlam's cemetery supervisor, was fired from the Gardens of Gethsemani in July 2021 and received a severance. She had worked there in charge of all finances since 2009. Her role included keeping books for a second Catholic cemetery, St. Peter's in New Westminster, where she had sole signing authority. The lawsuit alleges money is also missing from its accounts. The lawsuit claims that in 2018, three years before she was let go, Terlaak stopped reconciling the bank account for St. Peter's, and in July of that year stopped recording transactions in the St. Peter's bank account. The Roman Catholic Cemeteries of the Archdiocese of Vancouver, which operated both cemeteries, alleged that in August 2023 it discovered that between mid-2012 and up to May 2021, Terlaak had issued cheques from the cemetery accounts to herself, to personal credit card accounts in her name, and to other names. And it alleges she also withdrew 'unconventionally large amounts' from petty cash, and that all the unauthorized payments were for the 'personal benefit, gain and profit of herself and/or Dustin Terlaak.' The lawsuit alleges her husband's participation included 'receiving, converting, hiding and otherwise benefiting from the funds misappropriated' by her. The lawsuit claims they used the money in 2019 to purchase a Surrey property in Panorama Ridge, selling it, and then buying a White Rock condo on North Bluff Road, where they still live. The four-bedroom, 3,550-sq.-ft. Panorama Ridge property was listed on a realtor's website this week for $1.3 million. The two-bedroom, 1,710-sq.-ft. White Rock condo was purchased for $775,000, according to an online real estate website. The lawsuit said the cemeteries have suffered damages, losses and expenses because of the fraud, including loss of use of the funds and the cost of investigating. They are seeking an order that the Terlaaks pay all the money back to them, plus aggravated and punitive damages. The lawsuit asked the court to place a certificate of pending litigation against the White Rock condo and place all of the couple's other personal property, including proceeds from the sale of the Surrey property, furniture, household items, jewelry, any vehicles and any other real estate into a 'substantive constructive trust.' The Terlaaks 'do not have the ability to personally pay an award of damages equal to the funds' lost by the cemeteries, it said. None of the allegations have been proven in court. Messages left with the Terlaaks were not returned on Tuesday. The cemeteries' lawyer declined to comment. It's not surprising fraud can continue for years at not-for-profits where there are not usually enough employees to ensure separation of duties, such as having the same person responsible for recording, custody and authorizing of funds, said Michael Favere-Marchesi, associate accounting professor at Simon Fraser University's Beedie School of Business. Favere-Marchesi, commenting previously on a case of an employee being accused of stealing from the City of Surrey and not on the cemeteries lawsuit, said this type of individual-worker fraud is also more common in the public than the private sector, where owners have to answer to shareholders where there are internal control systems. 'When there are weaknesses in those systems, it is not unusual for fraud to happen for long periods of time before they're discovered,' he said. And fraud is easier if one person is responsible for all finances because with two or more people, 'to commit a crime, you would need collusion,' he said. Also, employees who handle finances need to be properly assessed for the 'triangle of fraud' characteristics — that is, did they have motivation, opportunity and rationalization to be able to steal funds, he said. Motivation would include anyone who lived beyond their means, for instance, and should be flagged, he said. slazaruk@
Winnipeg Free Press
a day ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Wisconsin lawsuit seeks to ban Elon Musk from offering $1 million checks to voters
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — A government watchdog group in Wisconsin filed a lawsuit Wednesday seeking to prohibit billionaire Elon Musk from ever again offering cash payments to voters in the battleground state like he did in this spring's hotly contested Supreme Court race. Musk handed out $1 million checks to three Wisconsin voters, including two in person just days before the state's April 1 Supreme Court election, in an effort to help elect conservative candidate Brad Schimel. Two weeks before the election, Musk's political action committee, America PAC, offered $100 to voters who signed a petition in opposition to 'activist judges,' or referred someone to sign it. It was all part of more than $20 million that Musk and groups he support spent on the race in an effort to flip majority control of the Wisconsin Supreme Court. More than $100 million was spent by both sides, making it the most expensive court race in U.S. history. Musk's preferred candidate lost to Democratic-backed Susan Crawford by 10 percentage points. Her victory cemented the 4-3 liberal majority on the Wisconsin Supreme Court until at least 2028. Since that election, Musk announced he will spend less on political campaigns and then feuded publicly with President Donald Trump after exiting his administration. The lawsuit filed Wednesday in state court by the Wisconsin Democracy Campaign says that Musk's actions create 'the risk that Wisconsin elections will become an open auction, where votes go to the preferred candidates of the highest bidders and the election outcome is determined by which candidate has a patron willing and able to pay the highest sum to Wisconsin voters.' The lawsuit says that Musk and two groups he funds violated prohibitions on vote bribery and unauthorized lotteries and says his actions were an unlawful conspiracy and public nuisance. The lawsuit asks the court to order that Musk never offer similar payments to voters again. A spokesperson for Musk's America PAC did not immediately return a text message Wednesday seeking comment. There is another Wisconsin Supreme Court election in April. In November 2026, control of the Legislature and the governor's office, as well as the state's eight congressional districts, will be decided. The latest lawsuit was filed on behalf of the Wisconsin Democracy Campaign and a pair of voters by the liberal Wisconsin-based Law Forward and the Washington-based Democracy Defenders Fund. It was filed against Musk, his group America PAC that announced the petition and the Musk-funded group United States of America Inc. that made the payments. The court that Crawford joins in August could ultimately hear the new lawsuit. Crawford would almost certainly be asked to recuse from the case, and if she did, the court would be left with a 3-3 split between conservative and liberal justices. The current court, also controlled 4-3 by liberals, declined to hear a similar hastily filed lawsuit brought by Wisconsin's Democratic attorney general seeking to block Musk's handing out of two $1 million checks to voters two days before the election. Two lower courts rejected that lawsuit before the Supreme Court declined to hear it on procedural grounds. Musk's attorneys argued in that case that Musk was exercising his free speech rights with the giveaways and any attempt to restrict that would violate both the Wisconsin and U.S. constitutions. Musk's political action committee used a nearly identical tactic before the presidential election last year, offering to pay $1 million a day to voters in Wisconsin and six other battleground states who signed a petition supporting the First and Second amendments. A judge in Pennsylvania said prosecutors failed to show the effort was an illegal lottery and allowed it to continue through Election Day. A federal lawsuit filed in Pennsylvania in April alleges that Musk and his political action committee failed to pay more than $20,000 for getting people to sign that petition in 2024. America PAC on Monday filed a motion to dismiss. That case is pending.
