
South Korean presidential candidates debate various issues in televised address
From left: South Korea's presidential candidates, Lee Jae-myung of the Democratic Party, Kwon Young-guk of the Democratic Labor Party, Kim Moon Soo of the People Power Party and Lee Jun-seok of the New Reform Party pose for photograph ahead of a 3rd televised presidential debate for the forthcoming June 3 presidential election at MBC studio on May 27, 2025 in Seoul, South Korea. - Pool via AP
SEOUL: The liberal Democratic Party of Korea's presidential candidate Representative Lee Jae-myung pledged to start a dialogue and map out cooperation between the two Koreas and achieve peace on the Korean Peninsula, reiterating his bid to deescalate border tensions if elected president.
During a four-way televised debate aired on May 27, Lee said peace and stability on the Korean Peninsula are 'very important', adding that dialogue, cooperation and peace are necessary on the Korean Peninsula, on the foundation of galvanised military strength, as well as the alliance between Seoul and Washington.
Lee also blamed the former conservative Yoon Suk Yeol administration's hardline stance against North Korea for heightening border tensions between the two Koreas, saying the Yoon administration failed to take action to stop anti-North propaganda leaflet campaigns from the South.
Lee added that he would 'resolve (border tensions) one by one'.
Meanwhile, Lee's conservative rival, the People Power Party's candidate Kim Moon-soo, said he would work to strengthen South Korea's nuclear deterrence on the foundation of the Seoul-Washington alliance to counter North Korea's nuclear threats and missile provocations.
'We will create a South Korea that will not be shaken by any threat by achieving a balance of power,' said Kim.
During the debate, Kim said there is a realistic plan to devise a unique nuclear sharing model with the United States, which his rival Lee said 'will make it impossible to achieve denuclearisation on the Korean Peninsula'.
Kim also said he would foster transparent inter-Korean relations and deal with North Korea confidently, while blasting his liberal rival for alleged involvement in an aide's unauthorised money transfer to North Korea while Lee was serving as governor of Gyeonggi Province.
Lee of the Democratic Party was nine percentage points ahead in the race against Kim, according to a poll by Next Research on May 27.
The debate on May 27 was the last of the three legally required to be hosted by the election authorities, with just one week remaining until the election to replace ousted former President Yoon.
Alongside foreign policy, the televised debate also focused on political polarisation and ways to heal the political divide.
Debating how they would overcome South Korea's deepening political polarisation, the three leading candidates each pointed to different root causes — offering divergent views on what fractured the country's democracy and how to repair it.
The Democratic Party's Lee pointed to former president Yoon Suk Yeol's controversial martial law declaration on Dec 3 as the origin of the political breakdown, describing it as an attempt to erase the opposition.
'The essence of that martial law attempt was to annihilate the opposition and permanently monopolise power,' he said.
Lee argued that the lingering presence of those who supported the emergency decree continues to polarise the country.
During Tuesday's debate, Lee again proposed a broad constitutional amendment to limit presidential authority and reinforce checks and balances, including a two-term presidency and run-off elections.
However, the People Power Party's Kim accused Lee of failing to acknowledge criminal wrongdoing, which he said threatens democracy, as well as allegations that his Democratic Party abused its legislative power to protect its leader.
'How can someone facing five serious charges run for president?' Kim said. 'He should stand trial and accept the outcome.'
In response, Lee dismissed criticism of his legal troubles as political retaliation, claiming 'these indictments are fabricated by a prosecutorial regime'.
Yoon served as prosecutor general of South Korea before he won the presidential election in 2022.
Kim also rejected Lee's characterisation of the Dec 3 event as an insurrection, citing an ongoing criminal trial against the suspects involved in the failed martial law attempt.
Meanwhile, New Reform Party candidate Representative Lee Jun-seok pointed to what he called 'false narratives and fan-driven politics' as the primary sources of polarisation, directly naming both Lee Jae-myung and Kim as figures associated with such narratives.
He accused them of distorting facts and undermining public trust in the democratic process.
Positioning himself as a political outsider, Lee said Korea's political norms had collapsed as major parties abandoned long-standing rules of bipartisan consensus.
He pledged to restore procedural fairness in lawmaking and constitutional reform.
Citing French President Emmanuel Macron, he added, 'we may only have three seats, but we can trigger structural change'. - The Korea Herald/ANN
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Sun
4 hours ago
- The Sun
Italians vote on easing citizenship requirements, reversing labour reform
ROME: Italians will start voting on Sunday in a two-day referendum on whether to ease citizenship laws and reverse a decade-old liberalisation of the labour market, but the vote may fail to generate sufficient turnout to be deemed valid. Opposition leftist and centrist parties, civil society groups and a leading trade union have latched onto the issues of labour rights and Italy's demographic woes as a way of challenging Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni's right-wing coalition government. They gathered over 4.5 million signatures, according to the CGIL labour union, far more than needed to trigger the referendum, which will comprise five questions - four on the labour market and one on citizenship. However, opinion polls suggest they will struggle to persuade the required 50% plus one of the electorate to turn out to make the outcome of the vote binding. Meloni and senior government ministers have indicated they will not vote. 'Meloni is afraid of participation and has understood that many Italians, even those who voted for her, will go to vote,' said Elly Schlein, leader of the main opposition Democratic Party (PD), who is spearheading the campaign along with Maurizio Landini, the CGIL labour union chief. A Demopolis institute poll last month estimated turnout would be in the range of 31-39% among Italy's roughly 50 million electors - well short of the required threshold. 'Securing a quorum will be hard. The opposition's minimum aim is to show strength and bring to vote more people than the 12.3 million who backed the centre-right at the 2022 general election,' said Lorenzo Pregliasco, from YouTrend pollsters. CITIZENSHIP The citizenship issue has garnered most public attention in a nation where concerns over the scale of immigration helped propel Meloni's anti-migration coalition to power in late 2022. The question on the ballot paper asks Italians if they back reducing the period of residence required to apply for Italian citizenship by naturalisation to five years from 10. This could affect about 2.5 million foreign nationals, organisers say. With Italy's birthrate in sharp decline, economists say the country needs to attract more foreigners to boost its anaemic economy, and migrant workers feel a lot is at stake. 'If you just look at the time frame, five years are a huge gain for us migrants, if compared to 10,' said Mohammed Kamara, a 27-year-old from Sierra Leone who works in a building construction company in Rome. Francesco Galietti, from political risk firm Policy Sonar, said keeping such rules tight was 'an identity issue' for Meloni, but she was also being pushed by business to open up the borders of an ageing country to foreign workers. 'On the one hand there is the cultural identity rhetoric, but on the other there are potential problems paying pensions and an economy that relies on manufacturing, which needs workers,' he said. The questions regarding the labour market aim to make it harder to fire some workers and increase compensation for workers laid off by small businesses, among other things, reversing a law passed by a PD government a decade ago. The leaders of two of the governing coalition parties, Antonio Tajani of Forza Italia and Matteo Salvini of the League, have said they will not vote on Sunday, while Meloni, who heads Brothers of Italy, will show up at the polling station but will not vote. 'She will thereby honour her institutional duty but avoid contributing to the quorum,' said pollster Pregliasco.


The Sun
4 hours ago
- The Sun
Italy faces key vote on citizenship, labour market reforms
ROME: Italians will start voting on Sunday in a two-day referendum on whether to ease citizenship laws and reverse a decade-old liberalisation of the labour market, but the vote may fail to generate sufficient turnout to be deemed valid. Opposition leftist and centrist parties, civil society groups and a leading trade union have latched onto the issues of labour rights and Italy's demographic woes as a way of challenging Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni's right-wing coalition government. They gathered over 4.5 million signatures, according to the CGIL labour union, far more than needed to trigger the referendum, which will comprise five questions - four on the labour market and one on citizenship. However, opinion polls suggest they will struggle to persuade the required 50% plus one of the electorate to turn out to make the outcome of the vote binding. Meloni and senior government ministers have indicated they will not vote. 'Meloni is afraid of participation and has understood that many Italians, even those who voted for her, will go to vote,' said Elly Schlein, leader of the main opposition Democratic Party (PD), who is spearheading the campaign along with Maurizio Landini, the CGIL labour union chief. A Demopolis institute poll last month estimated turnout would be in the range of 31-39% among Italy's roughly 50 million electors - well short of the required threshold. 'Securing a quorum will be hard. The opposition's minimum aim is to show strength and bring to vote more people than the 12.3 million who backed the centre-right at the 2022 general election,' said Lorenzo Pregliasco, from YouTrend pollsters. CITIZENSHIP The citizenship issue has garnered most public attention in a nation where concerns over the scale of immigration helped propel Meloni's anti-migration coalition to power in late 2022. The question on the ballot paper asks Italians if they back reducing the period of residence required to apply for Italian citizenship by naturalisation to five years from 10. This could affect about 2.5 million foreign nationals, organisers say. With Italy's birthrate in sharp decline, economists say the country needs to attract more foreigners to boost its anaemic economy, and migrant workers feel a lot is at stake. 'If you just look at the time frame, five years are a huge gain for us migrants, if compared to 10,' said Mohammed Kamara, a 27-year-old from Sierra Leone who works in a building construction company in Rome. Francesco Galietti, from political risk firm Policy Sonar, said keeping such rules tight was 'an identity issue' for Meloni, but she was also being pushed by business to open up the borders of an ageing country to foreign workers. 'On the one hand there is the cultural identity rhetoric, but on the other there are potential problems paying pensions and an economy that relies on manufacturing, which needs workers,' he said. The questions regarding the labour market aim to make it harder to fire some workers and increase compensation for workers laid off by small businesses, among other things, reversing a law passed by a PD government a decade ago. The leaders of two of the governing coalition parties, Antonio Tajani of Forza Italia and Matteo Salvini of the League, have said they will not vote on Sunday, while Meloni, who heads Brothers of Italy, will show up at the polling station but will not vote. 'She will thereby honour her institutional duty but avoid contributing to the quorum,' said pollster Pregliasco.


New Straits Times
7 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Bersatu's RM195 million bank account freeze stays, court rules
KUALA LUMPUR: Parti Pribumi Bersatu Malaysia's (Bersatu) bank account containing RM195 million will continue to be frozen pending the outcome of two judicial review applications and related criminal proceedings, the High Court ruled recently. Judicial Commissioner Gan Techiong made the ruling in CIMB Bank's application seeking a court declaration on whether it should maintain the freeze on the account or release the funds following conflicting instructions from the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) and Bersatu's executive secretary, Datuk Muhammad Suhaimi Yahya. The bank filed the interpleader application after receiving a letter of demand from Suhaimi seeking the release of the funds, which were deposited into the party's account by Bukhary Equity Sdn Bhd. CIMB, as the sole plaintiff, named the MACC, the public prosecutor and Suhaimi as defendants. Gan said the dispute could not be resolved summarily, as the issues raised were already the subject of pending judicial review proceedings and a criminal trial involving former prime minister and Bersatu president Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin. "The disputes between the defendants are not suitable to be determined summarily by this court in hearing the bank's interpleader. "They are questions of law and disputed facts forming the subject matters of the judicial review applications at the Special Powers Division of this court and the aforesaid criminal prosecution at the Sessions Court – all of which are still pending hearing and trial, respectively. "If this court is to delve deeper, the effect would be to usurp the domain of other courts that ought to be making the final determination on a wider range of issues," he said in his ground of judgment dated April 9 this year. He said Muhyiddin had been charged in March 2023 in his capacity as Bersatu's president over funds allegedly received by the party, which fulfilled the requirement under Section 52A of the Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Terrorism Financing and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities Act 2001 (AMLA) to sustain the seizure order on the account. Gan said a society like Bersatu does not have a separate legal personality, as the law allows charges to be brought against its office bearers. The court said in this case, the president (Muhyiddin) was charged in relation to the very funds in question. The court also rejected a late 376-page affidavit filed by Suhaimi's lawyers, saying it was inadmissible as it was filed without leave of court and at a very late stage of proceedings. "The fact that such a lengthy affidavit was filed at the eleventh hour reinforces my view that the matter is not suitable to be summarily determined in this interpleader." Gan then ordered CIMB to continue holding the funds until the High Court's Special Powers Division disposes of the judicial review applications filed by Muhyiddin and Suhaimi, which are still pending. The first judicial review challenges the legality of the freezing order issued by MACC in January 2023, while the second seeks to quash the seizure order issued by the public prosecutor in April of the same year. Leave to proceed with both reviews was granted last year, but the substantive hearings have yet to take place. Muhyiddin is facing four charges under the MACC Act and two under AMLA involving a total of RM200 million, including RM195 million allegedly transferred into the Bersatu account held with CIMB Islamic Bank. Lawyers Sathya Kumardas and Daud Sulaiman appeared for the bank while senior federal counsel Nurhafizza Azizan and federal counsel Mohammad Salehuddin Md Ali represented the MACC and the public prosecutor. Bersatu was represented by lawyers Chethan Jethwani and Tang Jia Yearn.