
Portugal's election seeks to end cycle of instability
Half a century after its transition from dictatorship to democracy,
Portugal
is in danger of losing the mantle of southern Europe's most stable democracy.
Its general election on Sunday will be the third since 2022, as the country has struggled with corruption scandals, a fragmented parliament and weak government.
'We know you are tired of elections and worried about political stability, which we need along with the social, economic and financial stability of the country,' said the conservative acting prime minister, Luís Montenegro, as he campaigned in northern Portugal this week.
This marks a dramatic change for a country that had become known for its sober politics. Last year it celebrated the 50th anniversary of the Carnation Revolution, which peacefully removed the four-decades-long dictatorship. Despite several years of turmoil following the transition to democracy, in recent decades Portugal's politics have been marked by their relative stability, as conservatives and social democrats have alternated in power, a characteristic that was particularly notable in the wake of the euro-zone crisis.
READ MORE
'The principal existing parties of centre-left and centre-right held up much better in Portugal than in the rest of southern Europe in the wake of the 'Great Recession' that began in 2008 and its austerity-oriented aftermath,' said Robert M Fishman, a professor of political science at Madrid's Carlos III University.
Outgoing prime minister Luis Montenegro greets supporters in Sintra, west of Lisbon. Photograph: Patricia De Melo Moreira/Getty
This contrasted with Italy's fragmented parliament and Spain's polarisation and territorial tensions. In 2019, Portugal's Socialist then-prime minister, António Costa, looked disdainfully across the border as he appealed to voters.
'What we don't want is a repeat of what is happening in Spain,' he said. 'We've had four years of stability and Spain has had four elections in four years.'
However, the tables have now been turned. Spain's Socialist prime minister, Pedro Sánchez, has been in office since 2018 while in 2023 Costa stepped down after being named as a suspect in a corruption investigation, although the inquiry found no evidence of wrongdoing by him. Montenegro won last year's election, but his centre-right Democratic Alliance (AD) coalition formed a fragile minority government which collapsed after he lost a confidence vote in March.
That development was triggered by allegations of a conflict of interest on the part of the prime minister. In 2021, when he was outside politics, Montenegro created a company, Spinumviva, whose ownership he transferred to his wife. But, since taking office, the company, and therefore his family, have benefited from contracts awarded by the government. Montenegro's failure to move swiftly to clarify or sever his links to Spinumviva allowed the scandal to snowball.
Montenegro said the election will 'end the atmosphere of constant insinuations and intrigue'.
'We have elections due to a personal problem of the prime minister,' said António Costa Pinto, of the University of Lisbon's Institute of Social Sciences, who sees the ballot as an opportunity for Montenegro to 're-legitimise himself' in the wake of the affair.
'The alternative would be to have a parliamentary commission [to investigate] and finish his political career,' he said.
Attempts by the Socialist Party candidate, Pedro Nuno Santos, to exploit the case on the campaign trail appear to have failed and he is trailing the conservative in polls.
'The Portuguese are too worried by more immediate problems,' said political commentator António Capinha. 'They want to see solutions to the enormous structural problems in Portuguese society which have not been tackled for years.'
The cost of housing is one such issue, with rentals soaring in recent years, pricing many Portuguese out the market. A survey by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) found that, of 30 countries studied, Portugal had seen the worst deterioration in housing access over the last decade.
Low pensions and wages are further causes of discontent, triggering recent street protests, while an increase in migrant arrivals has created another challenge, with the far-right Chega's tough stance on the issue heavily influencing public debate.
[
Far right 'breaks political culture' of tolerance in Portugal
Opens in new window
]
But although the result of Sunday's election looks relatively easy to predict, with Montenegro's AD coalition apparently heading for victory, the make-up of the next government is less clear. While many other European conservative parties have accepted working with the far right to remain in power, so far Portugal has not followed suit, with Montenegro ruling out Chega as a partner.
However, as the third force in parliament and polling strongly, Chega's potential role as kingmaker is undeniable. Pedro Passos Coelho, a former prime minister and leader of Montenegro's centre-right Social Democrat Party (PSD), has underlined that possibility by highlighting his own ideological affinity with the far-right party.
A strong showing by Montenegro on Sunday would not only help him banish the cloud of scandal but could also allay pressure to work with Chega. Another, less controversial, possible partner for the conservatives would be the Liberal Initiative, which has been polling in fourth place.
In 2015, the Socialist Party managed to form a government, despite losing the election, with the support of a broad left-wing alliance which came to be known as the Geringonça, or 'contraption'. However, with the overall vote for left-wing parties having dropped, such an outcome looks unlikely this time.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Times
3 days ago
- Irish Times
Netanyahu under pressure as ultra-Orthodox parties threaten to dissolve parliament
Israel's parliament is set to hold a preliminary vote on Wednesday to dissolve itself following a dispute over conscription, a first step that could lead to an early election, which polls show prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu would lose. The vote could still be pulled at the last minute, and even if it goes against Mr Netanyahu, it would be the first of four needed to bring forward elections. This would give Mr Netanyahu's ruling coalition further time to resolve its worst political crisis yet and avoid a ballot, which would be Israel's first since the eruption of the war with Hamas in Gaza. Dissolving the Knesset would be a victory for Israel's enemies, said Boaz Bismuth, an MP with Mr Netanyahu's Likud party. 'During war this is the last thing Israel needs,' he said. READ MORE Mr Netanyahu has been pushing hard to resolve a deadlock in his coalition over a new military conscription bill, which has led to the present crisis. Some religious parties in Mr Netanyahu's coalition are seeking exemptions for ultra-Orthodox Jewish seminary students from military service that is mandatory in Israel, while others want to scrap any such exemptions altogether. The exemptions have been a hot issue in Israel for years but have become particularly contentious during the war in Gaza, as Israel has suffered its highest battlefield casualties in decades and its stretched military is in need of more troops. Growing increasingly impatient with the political deadlock, ultra-Orthodox coalition factions have said they will vote with opposition parties in favour of dissolving the Knesset and bringing forward an election that is not due until late 2026. 'It's more than ever urgent to replace Netanyahu's government and specifically this toxic and harmful government,' said Merav Michaeli, from the opposition Labour party. 'It's urgent to end the war in Gaza and to bring back all the hostages. It's urgent to start rebuilding and healing the state of Israel.' Opposition parties are likely to withdraw the dissolution bill if Mr Netanyahu's coalition resolves the crisis before the vote is held much later on Wednesday. But even if it passes, the bill's final approval requires three more votes, giving Mr Netanyahu's coalition more time to come to agreements over conscription. If passed, the dissolution bill will next go to parliament committee discussions in between readings, a legislation process which could take days, weeks or months. In this time, Mr Netanyahu could still reach agreements with the ultra-Orthodox parties, his key political allies, and shoot the bill down. To pass the final reading, the bill would need an absolute majority of at least 61 votes in the 120-seat parliament, called the Knesset in Hebrew, and an election will have to be held within five months. Successive polls have predicted that Mr Netanyahu's coalition would lose in an election, with Israelis still reeling over the security failure of Palestinian militant group Hamas' October 7th, 2023 attack and hostages still held in Gaza. Hamas' surprise attack led to Israel's deadliest single day and shattered Netanyahu's security credentials, with 1,200 people killed and 251 hostages taken into Gaza. Israel's offensive against Hamas in Gaza has since killed almost 55,000 Palestinians, according to health officials in the Hamas-run enclave, left much of the territory in ruins, and its more than two million population largely displaced and gripped by a humanitarian crisis. Twenty months into the fighting, public support for the Gaza war has waned. More than 400 Israeli soldiers have been killed in combat, adding to anger many Israelis feel over the ultra-Orthodox exemption demands even as the war drags on. Ultra-Orthodox religious leaders, however, see full-time devotion to religious studies as sacrosanct and military service as a threat to the students' strict religious lifestyle. – Reuters (c) Copyright Thomson Reuters 2025


Irish Times
3 days ago
- Irish Times
LA protests: Gavin Newsom says ‘democracy is under assault' from Donald Trump
California governor Gavin Newsom made the case in a televised address on Tuesday evening that US president Donald Trump 's decisions to send military forces to immigration protests in Los Angeles have put the nation at the precipice of authoritarianism. Mr Newsom urged Americans to stand up to Mr Trump, calling it a 'perilous moment' for democracy and the country's long-held legal norms. 'California may be first, but it clearly won't end here,' Newsom said, speaking to cameras from a studio in Los Angeles. 'Other states are next. Democracy is next.' 'Democracy is under assault right before our eyes – the moment we've feared has arrived,' he added. READ MORE Mr Newsom spoke on the fifth day of protests in Los Angeles against federal immigration raids that have sent fear and anger through many communities in southern California. He said Mr Trump had 'inflamed a combustible situation' by taking over California's National Guard, and by calling up 4,000 troops and 700 Marines. 'Authoritarian regimes begin by targeting people who are least able to defend themselves,' Mr Newsom said in his speech. 'But they do not stop there. Trump and his loyalists thrive on division because it allows them to take more power and exert even more control.' 'I ask everyone to take the time to reflect on this perilous moment,' he said, 'a president who wants to be bound by no law or constitution, perpetrating a unified assault on American traditions.' Los Angeles mayor Karen Bass announced at a news conference Tuesday evening that the city would begin imposing a curfew in downtown Los Angeles as part of its strategy to quell the protests. The curfew began at 8pm local time, running until 6am on Wednesday. The Los Angeles Police Department said it had made 'mass arrests' in the hours after the curfew came into effect. The curfew is expected to last for several days. This article originally appeared in The New York Times , additional reporting by the Guardian


Irish Times
04-06-2025
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on the South Korean election: a vote for stability
Lee Jae-myung's emphatic victory in South Korea's presidential election offers Asia's fourth biggest economy the chance of political stability following six months of turmoil since last December's brief imposition of martial law. But the 61 year-old former human rights lawyer inherits formidable challenges, starting with Donald Trump's threat to impose a 25 per cent tariff on all goods from one of the United States' closest allies. Lee's 49.42 per cent of the vote put him eight points ahead of conservative Kim Moon-soo but it fell a few points short of the landslide predicted by the polls. And his failure to win more than half the votes cast reflects the deep polarisation in South Korea's politics following the impeachment of conservative president Yoon Suk Yeol, which triggered the snap election. Yoon imposed martial law, banning political activity and putting the media under state control, for just six hours before revoking the order in the face of a vote to overturn it in the national assembly. He claimed that he acted out of frustration because Lee's Democratic Party was using its majority in the legislature to obstruct his government. In his inaugural address on Wednesday, Lee promised to 'build bridges of coexistence, reconciliation and solidarity' in an effort to unite the country as he strengthened its democratic institutions. But the public's verdict on him will depend on his success in addressing the country's economic problems which have seen slowing growth in an economy where exports account for 40 per cent of output. READ MORE Negotiating a reduction in Trump's threatened tariffs, which include sectoral tariffs on steel, aluminium and cars, will be Lee's priority. He says that he will do whatever is necessary to secure a good deal. The new president will also face pressure from Washington to increase South Korea's contribution to the cost of maintaining the US military presence there amid reports that Trump is considering a cut in troop numbers. Lee has promised what he describes as a pragmatic foreign policy rooted in his country's interests and promised to restore lines of communication with North Korea. Pyongyang has abandoned its aspiration to uniting the two Koreas and declared Seoul its main enemy but Lee is hoping his move towards engagement will prevent Trump from agreeing a nuclear security deal with North Korea's leader Kim Jong-un over his head. Lee has also promised a reset in Seoul's relations with Beijing and Moscow, a move that reflects the shifting geopolitical landscape following Trump's return to the White House. The European Union is anxious about this foreign policy tilt but South Korea remains a key ally and economic partner and Lee's election carries more opportunities than risks.